Daryl Hannah Shouts Out Ukraine While Presenting at the Oscars
Before the 'Kill Bill' actress presented the Best Editing award to 'Anora' writer/director Sean Baker, she simply said the phrase, 'Slava Ukraine.'
It is the battle cry of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which have been at war for three years since the Russia invasion in 2022.
The phrase has been used frequently on social media to show empathy with the Eastern European country since the tense meeting in the Oval Office between Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and U.S. president Donald Trump.
During the meeting, Vice President JD Vance chastised Zelenskyy for not thanking America for its financial and military aid over the last three years, calling the wartime leader 'disrespectful.'
Prior to the contentious meet-up of the heads of state, Trump called Zelensky a 'dictator,' a term he later told reporters he did not remember using.
Trump and his newly installed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have recently refused to admit that Russia started the war by invading Ukraine.
During an interview on Fox News Sunday last week, Hegseth dodged the question of who began the ongoing hostilities: 'It's fair to say it's a very complicated situation.'
Hegseth told host Shannon Bream, 'Standing here and saying, 'You're good, you're bad; you're a dictator, you're not a dictator; you invaded, you didn't.' It's not useful. It's not productive.'
A few other acceptance speeches early in the evening could be construed as making a statement on the current tense political situation as well. Gints Zilbalodis, who won Best Animated Feature Film for 'Flow,' said, 'We have to get along, we're all in the same boat,' echoing the film's premise of a group of animals somehow working together to survive a catastrophic flood.
In her speech, Best Supporting Actress winner Zoe Saldaña thanked her parents, who are immigrants, and said she was grateful she was able to speak Spanish in 'Emilia Pérez.'The post Daryl Hannah Shouts Out Ukraine While Presenting at the Oscars appeared first on TheWrap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Trump Now Supports Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan -- What It Means for Investors
Key Points Trump initially wanted Tan to resign as CEO before changing his view after the two met at the White House. It is too early to tell whether Tan's turnaround plan would lead to a comeback for Intel. Intel's valuation may imply little downside. 10 stocks we like better than Intel › U.S. President Donald Trump, who just last week demanded the resignation of Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) CEO Lip-Bu Tan, reversed course on Monday. In social media posts on Aug. 8, the president initially labeled Tan as "highly conflicted" over alleged ties to the Chinese Communist Party, citing illegal actions by Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ: CDNS) while Tan was its CEO as the proof. After the two met on Monday, Trump now calls Tan a "success," and supports his leadership of the chip giant. The conflicting attention on Tan brought additional scrutiny on the semiconductor stock as it struggles to regain its competitiveness in an industry it once dominated. It also means investors would be well advised to make sense of the news and the implications it might have for Intel shareholders before buying the stock. Lip-Bu Tan and China The initial issue arose after Cadence pleaded guilty on July 28 to unlawfully exporting its semiconductor design tools to a Chinese chip manufacturer and a university with ties to the Chinese military. Tan was Cadence's CEO when these transfers occurred. On Aug. 6, Arkansas's Republican Senator, Tom Cotton, sent a letter to Intel's Chairman of the Board Frank Yeary, asking questions about Tan's China ties. President Trump learned of Cotton's letter soon after, and on Trump Media's Truth Social platform, he called on Tan to resign "immediately." He stated that there was "no other solution to this problem" but did not provide any additional details. Tan countered Cotton's accusations, releasing a letter to Intel employees on Thursday, Aug. 7, stating that there had been "misinformation" circulating about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems. He also affirmed his dedication to U.S. security interests and mentioned Intel's discussions with the Trump administration regarding the issues raised. Intel's board of directors also released a statement supporting Tan and emphasizing the board's commitment to U.S. security and economic interests, noting that Intel's investments, including domestic manufacturing, align with President Trump's stated agenda. Tan then visited Trump at the White House to make this case. An Intel spokesperson described the meeting as a "candid and constructive discussion," outlining the commitment Intel has made to bolstering U.S. leadership in manufacturing and technology. Trump responded by hailing Tan's success and rise as an "amazing story," adding that Tan will spend time with members of Trump's administrative cabinet and bring suggestions to him over the next week. Shareholder implications Intel's stock price recovered after releasing the news. Nonetheless, the challenges that Tan faces in getting Intel back on track remain considerable. Intel's board hired Tan back in March 2025 specifically to turn the company around. After decades of industry leadership, it has fallen behind its top competitors in recent years. Efforts by past CEOs to resolve Intel's issues have so far proven unsuccessful. In 2021, former CEO Pat Gelsinger put forth a plan to regain the technical lead by 2025 and turn its foundries into a third-party chip manufacturing business. The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) accelerators thwarted the company's plans to catch up technically, and its efforts to upgrade foundries were beset with setbacks, prompting Gelsinger to leave the company last year. When Intel's board appointed Tan, it likely hoped that Tan could replicate his previous success at Cadence. Since taking the job, he has streamlined the management team, and now the client group and the data center and AI group report directly to him. Additionally, he elevated Intel's technical leadership and began the process of reducing the workforce to approximately 75,000 employees by the end of the year (a one-year staff reduction of over 30%). Tan has made it clear that a comeback will take years. It's still far too early if his initiatives will succeed. So far, its financials suggest little has changed. Revenue for the second quarter of 2025 was $12.9 billion, amounting to flat growth from year-ago levels. There has also been a considerable increase in costs and expenses, and Intel's Q2 net loss widened to $2.9 billion. Still, the fact that Tan persuaded Trump to reverse course is undoubtedly a victory for the CEO. Additionally, its price-to-book ratio is just over 0.9. Since that means Intel stock is worth less than its assets minus its liabilities, one has to assume its troubles are more than priced into the stock. Should investors buy the pullback in Intel stock? Intel was arguably a speculative buy before this recent news and likely remains so. Indeed, the company faced considerable uncertainty before Trump initially turned on Tan. Although Tan has averted a crisis by winning over Trump, Intel still faces an uphill battle in making the venerable tech giant competitive. However, with its price-to-book ratio under 1, Intel is unlikely to have further downside without conditions worsening further. Thus, the news probably just gives investors more time and reason to initiate a speculative Intel position. Should you buy stock in Intel right now? Before you buy stock in Intel, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Intel wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 11, 2025 Will Healy has positions in Intel. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Cadence Design Systems and Intel. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. President Trump Now Supports Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan -- What It Means for Investors was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
USA Today
8 minutes ago
- USA Today
Is inflation eating your savings? How the 'Big Beautiful Bill' offers some relief
President Donald Trump's tax and spending package introduces annual inflation adjustments on many new items that will give Americans much needed help to better keep up with rising prices, even if it may reduce government revenue for programs. The mega tax law, dubbed Trump's Big Beautiful Bill,has made more items 'indexed to inflation,' or set to receive an automatic cost-of-living adjustment each year. Americans already see these annual inflation adjustments in Social Security benefits, for example. The adjustments help preserve purchasing power or stave off an increase in tax burdens because of inflation. Without indexing, the value of benefits would decrease over time, analysts said. How Child Tax Credit lost value Th popular Child Tax Credit (CTC) is a prime example of how an unindexed tax provision gets eroded over time, analysts said. From 2018 to 2024, the CTC's $2,000 maximum value and its income eligibility thresholds have remained the same. "The bout of unexpectedly high pandemic-era inflation means that the CTC's real value has been eroded in recent years," wrote John Ricco, associate director of policy analysis at The Budget Lab at Yale, in April. If it had been indexed to inflation, the CTC's value would have been $2,600 by 2026, he said. Additionally, fewer parents in 2026 (87%) would have benefitted than in 2018 (91%), he estimated. "But the per-child average benefit, expressed in 2026 dollars, would fall from $520 in 2018 to $400 in 2026 − a decline of one-quarter," Ricco said. What new items will the new tax and spending act adjust for inflation? Items that will begin being indexed for inflation in 2026 include: Beginning in 2028, the $5,000 so-called "Trump account" and $2,500 employer contribution to such accounts will become inflation adjusted. 'This is something we've needed for some time,' said Rob Burnette, investment adviser representative and professional tax preparer at Outlook Financial Center. Americans are hurt without inflation adjustments, he said. Why isn't everything indexed to inflation? But even though inflation adjustments are positive for taxpayers, the Treasury loses necessary revenue to fund programs when they're in place, some financial experts say. 'Indexed for inflation is always good for a taxpayer,' said Richard Pon, a certified public accountant in San Francisco. 'Unfortunately, not all amounts are indexed for inflation as that would increase tax benefits and decrease Treasury revenue.' For instance, those lawmakers who drew up the legislation in 1983 to tax Social Security chose not to adjust the thresholds to inflation so that eventually everyone would pay income tax on benefits, Senate records show. More revenue collected from taxing Social Security help keep the fund solvent. In 2023, 3.8% of the Social Security trust fund's income came from taxing those benefits, according to the 2024 Social Security Trustee Report. That's forecast to rise to 6.6% in 2033 as more people pay taxes on their benefits. Income thresholds to determine who must pay taxes on Social Security benefits have not been adjusted for inflation since taxes on the benefits were introduced in 1984. That means with each passing year, an increasing proportion of seniors have been reaching those low thresholds and paying taxes on their benefits. In 2021, about half of beneficiaries paid income tax on their Social Security benefits, according to the Congressional Budget Office. By 2050, that's expected to rise to more than 56%, a Social Security analysis said in 2015. 'To be responsible about it, there would be a need to find revenues to replace what would be lost,' said Jordan Gilberti, senior lead planner and certified financial planner at financial advisory Facet. Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday.
Los Angeles Times
8 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: UCLA needs to fight back against Trump's ‘attempted extortion'
To the editor: Inasmuch as the state of California is the largest net tax donor among the 50 states, a fine against one of our major universities is both economically and morally questionable (''Uncharted territory': Newsom and UC go to battle against Trump's UCLA sanctions,' Aug. 11). This is part of the attack on diversity, equity and inclusion. It seems that, if these things must be eradicated, what is sought is a return to segregation. In view of California being a net donor, Californians are to be required to subsidize this shabby attempt at re-segregation. I want to see the state fight this and, to the extent practicable, to seek not only a dismissal of this dubious fine but also reparation for the expenses of fighting it. It is unfortunate that punitive damages cannot be assessed against the obvious instigator of this attempt at financial penalization for attempting to live up to the statement of equality at the very beginning of the Declaration of Independence. Bill Seckler, Riverside .. To the editor: It really is time to fight back. As a UCLA undergrad and law school alum, I am personally affronted and shocked, but not surprised, by President Trump's attempted extortion of $1 billion from UCLA. I challenge the UCLA Alumni Assn. (of which I was once a board member), the faculty, the Associated Students (of which I was once president) and the university's administration to stand up and fight against this blatant attempt by Trump to diminish the power and prestige of leading universities across the country. Whatever may have occurred during the campus protests over the war in Gaza, UCLA is not antisemitic as a whole and to use this claim as a false basis for the university to come to its knees is sophistry. All Bruins should stand up and fight. James Stiven, Cardiff .. To the editor: The Oxford dictionary defines extortion as 'the practice of obtaining something, especially money, through force or threats.' I'd say this describes what our president is doing to a tee. His efforts to extract huge sums of money from UCLA and other prominent universities is disgusting. I'm sure Trump is thrilled with all the money he is bringing in from tariffs, program cuts, settlements from other universities and law firms and firing staff. Then, he spends federal funds on a new ballroom for the White House and more Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. We, the people, are paying the price with all the cuts to programs that were actually helping us — not to mention the climate of fear and uncertainty that he cultivates on a daily basis. Joanna Ryder, Hermosa Beach
