
Govt proposes ban on in-store payment surcharges
'By May 2026 at the latest, we will ban surcharges for in-store payments," Simpson said.
"Shoppers will no longer be penalised for their choice of payment method, whether that's tapping, swiping or using their phone's digital wallet.'
Transactions made through the Visa and Mastercard networks, and by EFTPOS, were the main method of card payment in New Zealand, and Simpson said surcharges on some purchases were "a hassle and an unwelcome surprise when shoppers get to the till".
"That pesky note or sticker on the payment machine will become a thing of the past," he said. "We're banning surcharges so consumers can shop with confidence knowing how much they will pay for their purchases.
ADVERTISEMENT
Scott Simpson. (Source: Getty)
The Retail Payment System (Ban on Surcharges) Amendment Bill was expected to be introduced by the end of this year.
Kiwis paid an estimated $150 million in surcharges annually, including $45-$65 million in excessive surcharges.
Simpson said this was "money that could be saved or spent elsewhere". However, retail and hospitality groups have cautioned that businesses might raise total prices to pass fees on.
Earlier this month, the Commerce Commission moved to lower interchange fees paid by businesses to accept Visa and Mastercard payments, citing high costs for businesses.
The commission put the overall cost of interchange fees at around $1 billion for businesses, which were often passed on to customers through surcharges and higher product costs.
Visa and Mastercard logos on credit cards (File image). (Source: istock.com)
ADVERTISEMENT
"Surcharges cover the fees businesses pay for accepting contactless payments and credit cards, but we know these are often excessive," Simpson said.
"In some cases, the retailer doesn't even make it clear what the percentage is.
"A ban on surcharges means no more surprises for people who currently feel like they're being charged to use their own hard-earned money. It means they can make a purchase knowing exactly what they'll pay, and how they'll pay it."
The ban would not apply to online payments, foreign-issued cards, prepaid gift or travel cards, or cards issued by other networks like American Express or UnionPay.
Surcharges may be absorbed into total prices — groups
Reacting to the announcement, business groups were positive that it would improve customer experiences at the checkout.
But they noted businesses could pass the costs on through higher prices.
ADVERTISEMENT
BusinessNZ advocacy director Catherine Beard welcomed the change and said it was "the way the rest of the world is regulating".
"We used to pride ourselves on being early-adopters of new technology, but surcharges felt like a step back for New Zealand."
Hospitality NZ chief executive Steve Armitage said consumer savings would depend on how businesses responded and "whether cost recovery mechanisms remain viable."
"It's important to recognise that electronic payments come with real costs to businesses. If surcharges are removed, many operators will have to adjust their pricing to reflect that — particularly for small hospitality operators already under pressure," he said.
(Source: istock.com)
"Margins across the hospitality sector remain very tight. Some operators may be able to absorb the cost, but for many, particularly smaller businesses, that won't be realistic. These businesses may have no option but to reflect those costs in their pricing."
Retailers 'have no choice but to pass the costs on'
ADVERTISEMENT
Dairy and Business Owners Group chairperson Ankit Bansal said the big banks were to blame for high transaction fees for small businesses.
"If these changes go ahead, small retailers will have no choice but to pass these costs on to consumers through higher prices," he said in a statement.
"If the Government wants to eliminate surcharges, then it should start by fixing the root cause — the banking sector's lack of competition and its unfair pricing model."
But Consumer NZ advocacy head Jessica Walker said she was "thrilled" at the change.'
"The ban is a no-brainer. These new rules will bring an end to a very messy situation."
Walker said the cost of products "shouldn't increase by that much" if at all.
"Any increase should be very minimal because interchange is being lowered which will reduce the cost to businesses of accepting payments."
ADVERTISEMENT
A Mastercard spokesperson "welcomed" the changes, at a time when the multinational giant said "payment acceptance costs have never been lower".
Retail NZ chief executive Carolyn Young said work would be needed to ensure terminals had the ability to distinguish between domestic debit and credit cards, and commercial or international credit cards, and charge differential surcharge rates.
Paying for a doctor's appointment (file image) (Source: istock.com)
Young said Retail NZ wanted certainty around the Commerce Commission's ability to monitor and enforce both the new interchange fees and the ban on surcharging.
"The Commerce Commission will need to ensure that the fees being charged to merchants reflect the new legislation, that the savings are passed on to retailers and that other fees are not increased.
"We will be seeking more detail on the surcharge changes, particularly around commercial credit cards which are not mentioned in today's announcement, and possible future changes to online transactions," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
71% Of Generate Members Maximise Final $521 Government Contribution – Ahead Of Policy Changes
Generate members claimed over $62 million in Government Contributions this year — a strong sign of engagement ahead of next year's halving. In total, 71% received the full $521.43 contribution, with another 14% making a partial claim. This result stands out across the industry. Recent reports from some other KiwiSaver schemes have indicated that only 60–65% of their members received the contribution. Generate's total cohort of members receiving the full or partial contribution (85%) is also well above the national average, which sits at around two thirds of members. 'The Government Contribution is one of the most valuable features of KiwiSaver — essentially a 50% return on up to $1,042.86 in annual contributions,' says Generate adviser Hayley Taylor. 'We're proud to see such high engagement from our members. Our commitment to educating our members via our adviser network plays a key role in helping Kiwis make the most of their KiwiSaver investment.' In total, Generate claimed $62,474,541.57 in Government Contributions to pay out to its members through the scheme this year — helping thousands of Kiwis build a stronger retirement foundation. From 1 July 2026, the maximum Government Contribution will be halved to $260.71, making this year's result even more significant. Members who earn more than $180,000 per annum will also no longer be eligible. 'The upcoming change reinforces the importance of being proactive,' says Taylor. 'Small, consistent contributions — and good advice — can make a real difference over time.' As the KiwiSaver landscape evolves, staying informed and making smart decisions will be more important than ever. Generate remains committed to helping New Zealanders get the most out of their KiwiSaver investment through advice, education, and long-term performance. ---------------------------------------------------------


Techday NZ
9 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Kiwis embrace AI in travel but trust & caution remain high
New research from Global AI Sentiment Report shows a mix of excitement and caution among New Zealand consumers regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in travel planning and experiences. The survey, which included responses from over 1,000 people in New Zealand, indicates that 81% of respondents are excited about AI and 68% consider themselves familiar with the technology. At the same time, 92% of those surveyed registered at least one concern about AI, suggesting that despite interest in its potential, apprehension remains widespread. Excitement and caution According to the report, 79% of New Zealand consumers expressed a desire to use AI to plan their future trips. However, only 3% fully trust AI, and just 6% said they were comfortable allowing AI to make decisions independently without human oversight. This reflects a significant boundary in public trust, with the majority preferring human approval in decision-making processes involving AI. Melissa Ellison, Area Manager of New Zealand at provided further perspective on these findings: "The research shows that Kiwis are embracing AI across many aspects of the travel experience - it's shifting how people explore the world and what they expect along the way. As AI technology evolves, we're committed to further understanding and developing our offerings so we can better improve the customer experience. At we've been using AI for years to make travel more experienced and personalised for Kiwi travellers, including the successful launch of our AI Trip Planner last year - and this next chapter is more than just smart tech. It is making sure it's about building trust and keeping everyone safe as we embrace AI together." Patterns of AI usage The report identified five distinct personas among New Zealand travellers, ranging from AI Advocates, who actively support and promote the use of AI, to AI Sceptics, who express reservations or resistance. Approximately 25% of respondents identified as AI Enthusiasts, interested in AI's possibilities, while 5% were AI Advocates. Meanwhile, 20% of respondents described themselves as AI Cautious, and 11% as AI Sceptics, with 39% categorised as AI Detractors, indicating a tendency to resist or reject AI adoption. Despite hesitancy, AI has already become part of day-to-day activities for many. The study found that 98% use AI-powered search, 81% rely on streaming recommendations enabled by AI, and 62% engage with generative AI tools. However, 49% of respondents felt that AI interactions could be impersonal, and 64% regularly double-check AI-provided information, with 45% always fact-checking and 19% doing so sometimes. Uses in travel AI's role in travel is growing, with 63% of New Zealand respondents expecting autonomous trip planning to become the mainstream approach. Nearly half of those surveyed have already used AI during some stage of their travel experience; of these, 96% used it for planning or booking, and 92% relied on AI while already travelling. When planning a trip, New Zealand travellers most commonly use AI to research destinations and timing (39%), discover local experiences or cultural activities (36%), and seek restaurant recommendations (31%). Notably, AI assistants have gained more trust for travel advice (13%) compared to social media influencers (9%). Additionally, 37% utilise AI for translation, 39% for activity suggestions, 37% for finding places to eat, and 40% for navigating around unfamiliar areas while on holiday. After returning, 34% of respondents use AI to edit their holiday photos. Expectations and impact The majority of respondents (53%) believe that AI can make travel easier and more efficient, and 63% value AI-generated recommendations that help them avoid overcrowded destinations or busy travel periods. A significant portion (48%) also want AI to assist in highlighting experiences that positively affect the communities they visit, indicating growing awareness and demand for sustainable travel practices. Trust and verification Despite increased use of AI, trust remains a substantial hurdle. Only 3% of New Zealand consumers fully trust AI, and most are unwilling to let AI make decisions without some degree of human involvement. Instead, AI is seen primarily as a supportive resource, enhancing human choices rather than replacing them. Regional differences The report also highlights notable contrasts in attitudes toward AI by region. Latin America showed the highest levels of excitement and familiarity with AI (98% and 89% respectively), followed by the Asia Pacific, which included high uptake for daily uses such as education and transport. In contrast, North America and Europe & Middle East displayed greater levels of scepticism, with higher percentages expressing distrust towards information generated by AI (32% and 29%, respectively), compared to 16% in Asia Pacific and 15% in Latin America. This report reflects ongoing shifts in how consumers approach technology in travel, suggesting that the relationship between travellers and AI is likely to continue evolving as both adoption and understanding deepen.

1News
9 hours ago
- 1News
Cabinet Ministers defend hiking board fees for Crown bodies
Cabinet ministers are defending a move to hike board fees for Crown bodies by up to 80%, insisting those in the roles are overseeing billions of dollars — not just "beer and skittles." Labour says the decision proves the Government is out of touch with the cost-of-living crisis and has accused it of trying to sneak the news by the public. A Cabinet document, quietly uploaded online on Monday, shows ministers agreed to lift the maximum annual fee for chairs of governance boards from $90,000 to about $162,000. The "Cabinet Fees Framework" is not binding but provides guidance to ministers when deciding compensation for those on a range of bodies, such as royal commissions and ministerial inquiries. Speaking today, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said public sector fees had become completely "out of whack" with private sector rates and needed a reset. ADVERTISEMENT "We need to make that a little bit more competitive, so that we can actually attract good talent," he said. Luxon said paying more to ensure "really good governance teams" could save billions in the long run. New Zealand currency. (Source: Finance Minister Nicola Willis echoed the point, stressing that New Zealanders deserved value for money. "This isn't beer and skittles. This is billions of dollars of public money. We need the very best people making governance decisions about it." Public Service Minister Judith Collins told reporters that the updated fees still fell short of private sector rates — around 80% of the going rate. "A lot of people who are experienced directors don't want to do these jobs in the public sector because they know they're going to lose money," she said. ADVERTISEMENT Judith Collins. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone (Source: Collins said she did not think the public would be worried by the news. "One of the problems is that we've had an underperforming public service that's taken a hell of a lot of taxpayers' money, and so it is very important that we have the right people in charge of that." Hipkins accuses government of 'twisted priorities' Labour leader Chris Hipkins said the decision revealed the Government's "twisted priorities" at a time when households were doing it tough. "They're saying that board members can get up to 80% increases in their pay, whilst nurses and teachers are being told to settle for 1% or less," he said. "They've said everyone needs to tighten their belts — apparently except for the people who they hand-picked to put on public sector boards." ADVERTISEMENT Hipkins rejected the idea that higher fees were necessary to attract quality candidates, calling it "absolute nonsense." Chris Hipkins. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii (Source: He said many public appointees had altruistic motivations and were already sitting on "very well paid directorships" in the private sector as well. "They're not doing it for the money," Hipkins said. Hipkins accused the Government of trying to "slip this [announcement] out quietly" without scrutiny. But Luxon denied any secrecy: "It's normal practice... how it's been communicated." Hipkins does not appear to have issued a media release as Public Service Minister in 2022 when the then-Labour Cabinet agreed to a smaller 10% increase in fees. In November, State Owned Enterprises Minister Paul Goldsmith published a release about a similar but separate move to increase director fees for 22 Crown-owned companies.