Trans community in 'limbo' from Supreme Court judgment
The Scottish Government has accepted the unanimous ruling, adding a review of policies would now commence, with specific consideration being given to updated guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).
That guidance is not due until this summer.
Gender critical feminists For Women Scotland celebrated the ruling, stating it offered clarity on the law.
However, Iris Duane, a transwoman, told The Herald on Sunday: 'It basically leaves hundreds – thousands – of us in limbo and that is quite disappointing.'
Read more:
Scotland's trans community in 'anxious' wait ahead of ruling
Time for NHS Fife to admit defeat in Sandie Peggie row?
Swinney told to act after court rules sex means biology in law
Ministers won't tell NHS Fife to settle tribunal over trans row
Chapman faces removal from Holyrood role over court attack
She added: 'The Supreme Court ruling is making things considerably worse.
'Transgender individuals, both men and women, already feel uncomfortable using facilities for their identified sex and have done for many years. We need to remember that trans people just want to live our lives in peace.
'We're not going into bathrooms or changing rooms to be pointed at. We just want to live.'
Scotland's Census from 2022 found that 19,970 people were trans or had a trans history – 0.44% of people aged 16 and over.
During the same year, statistics revealed that hate crimes against transgender people rose 87% in the previous 12 months.
A report from the Crown Office said there were 84 charges aggravated by transphobia in 2021-22, compared with 45 the previous year.
Ms Duane said the uncertainty around the ruling could exacerbate attacks against the trans community.
'It is really disappointing, especially when we know our politicians know this an absolute risk.
'The fear is spreading across the community. We have had to wake up for many years now with headlines about how we're bad or evil so we've had to build resilience.'
She added: 'We don't know what the implications will be but they are not going to be nice. It hasn't been nice for the last few years. Quite frankly, we're used to it and we will continue to persevere day in and day out.'
Ellie Gomersall. (Image: Ellie Gomersall) Ellie Gomersall said trans people like her had been 'weaponised' as political pawns in recent years.
'I now feel significantly less safe going out and about in public as a trans person than when I first moved to Glasgow and I first came out seven years ago.
'Most of my days is the same as everyone else and then all of a sudden I'm in public and I need to use the loo. I need to weigh it up. Is it going to be safe for me?
'This is something that most people would never even have to think about – would never have to consider in their day to day life. They don't have to wonder 'if I use the loo and I going to get attacked'.
'It's not just confined to things like toilets, it's in public if someone recognises you as being trans are they going to be violent towards you?
'Hate crimes against us have risen rapidly in recent years and I myself have been physically assaulted in public and sexually harassed specifically because I'm trans and that is really scary.
"It is so dehumanising.'
Dr Rebecca Don Kennedy, chief executive of the Equality Network described the Supreme Court ruling as a 'grim leap back in time'.
She also rejected claims it was a 'win for feminism'.
'Feminism is not exclusionary, it does not require proof of womanhood, it does not require women to look any certain way,' she wrote.
The women behind For Women Scotland recently announced they will snub Holyrood's equalities and human rights committee until Scottish Green MSP Maggie Chapman is removed.
Ms Chapman faces calls to be dismissed as deputy convener after she said the Supreme Court ruling showed 'bigotry, prejudice and hatred'.
The group has said they represent the women who have advocated for access to single-sex spaces, with some losing their jobs over criticism of self-ID policies.
Susan Smith, co-director of For Women Scotland said: "We cannot see why this ruling would make anyone more inclined towards violence. These individuals have been very open about their trans status and they are no more conspicuous now than in the past."
She said Equality Network "lied to the public", stating they were never allowed to use women's facilities.
Ms Smith said transwomen were "unlawfully trespassing" on women's spaces.
"We didn't pick this fight but we refuse to be bullied out of standing our ground and protecting what women won over many years and at some cost," Ms Smith added.
"The bottom line is that this ruling has come as a blessed relief to women who have been forced to self-exclude from services for fear of meeting very obvious male individuals.
"The rights of vulnerable women matter, and they have been overlooked and dismissed code too long."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
2 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
How many asylum seekers are in UK hotels and why are they being housed there?
On Tuesday, Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in the Essex town. Here, the PA news agency takes a look at the latest overall data. – How many asylum seekers are in hotels across the UK? The most recent Home Office data showed there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079. New figures – published among the usual quarterly immigration data release – are expected on Thursday, showing numbers in hotels at the end of June. Figures for hotels published by the Home Office date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023 when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. – How many hotels are in use for asylum seekers? It is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210. – Why are asylum seekers being housed in hotels? Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. The Home Office provides accommodation to asylum seekers who have no other way of supporting themselves on a 'no choice' basis, so they cannot choose where they live. When there is not enough housing, the Home Office can move people to accommodation such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases. In May, the National Audit Office said those temporarily living in hotels accounted for 35% of all people in asylum accommodation. – Is this likely to be a permanent arrangement? Labour has pledged to end the 'costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament' – which would be 2029, if not earlier. Campaigners and charities have long argued that hotels are not suitable environments to house asylum seekers. The Refugee Council said they 'cost the taxpayer billions, trap people in limbo and are flashpoints in communities' and urged the Government to 'partner with local councils to provide safe, cost-effective accommodation within communities'. – What is the Government saying since the legal ruling? Ministers are 'looking at a range of different contingency options' following Tuesday's ruling, according to security minister Dan Jarvis In the immediate aftermath of the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle repeated criticism of the previous Conservative government, saying Labour had 'inherited a broken asylum system'. She said the Government would 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns' around asylum hotels. – What options does the Home Office have now? Last month, amid protests outside the Bell Hotel and more migrants crossing the Channel, an extra 400 spaces were being prepared to house male asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield in Essex. The former military site, which has a usual capacity of 800 beds, is expected to house more adult men on a short-term basis. The Labour Government scrapped the large site of the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, earlier this year, while Napier Barracks in Folkestone, Kent, is also due to end housing asylum seekers and be returned to the Ministry of Defence in September. – Why were there protests outside the Bell Hotel? The hotel in Epping has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl – something he has denied and he is due to stand trial later in August. After the High Court's ruling, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage wrote in the Telegraph calling for Epping protests to inspire further action wherever there are concerns about the 'threat posed by young undocumented males' living in hotels. But on Tuesday more than 100 women's organisations wrote to ministers warning that vital conversations about violence against women and girls are being 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' that fuels divisions and harms survivors. The joint statement, including from Rape Crisis England & Wales and Refuge, said: 'We have been alarmed in recent weeks by an increase in unfounded claims made by people in power, and repeated in the media, that hold particular groups as primarily responsible for sexual violence. 'This not only undermines genuine concerns about women's safety, but also reinforces the damaging myth that the greatest risk of gender-based violence comes from strangers.'
Edinburgh Reporter
2 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
New Wallyford homes get go ahead
A housing developer has been given the go ahead to build more than 90 new homes as part of a growing estate at Wallyford, in East Lothian. Taylor Wimpey said the latest phase of its house building will be its first East Lothian location using its new 'national house types' which include a mix of terraced, semi-detached, detached and two bedroom apartments to give a broader appeal to buyers. Confusion surrounded the location of the housing at the council's planning committee after a report by officers into the site's background referred to a neighbouring site where plans to build 150 homes on a site earmarked as park land had been approved earlier this year. That development was refused permission by councillors but was overturned on appeal by Scottish Ministers. However council officers said the reference to the neighbouring site in the report was intended to give councillors background on the 'wider site history' rather than referring to the application by Taylor Wimpey for neighbouring land. Councillor Cher Cassini raised concerns about which site was involved and was told by officers: 'Just to avoid any confusion this application isn't on the site which was previously marked out as open space, it is to the north of that.' Councillor Cassini said that now the new Taylor Wimpey housing development was going to be next to another 150 homes instead of open space, it sparked concern about a lack of green places for new residents. Concerns were also raised about the impact of the additional housing on road junctions serving the site. A spokesperson for Taylor Wimpey reiterated the land approved for the new housing they planned was not the area initially set aside for a public park and had, in fact, always been in the masterplan for the area as housing. They said: 'Our application aligns fully with the approved masterplan and Planning Permission in Principle (PPP). The area granted consent under appeal is entirely separate from the scope of the current application.' Speaking after councillors unanimously approved the new housing on the site, which is being named Dolphingstone Grange, Pauline Mills, technical director at Taylor Wimpey East Scotland, commented: 'We are pleased to have secured detailed planning consent for 93 homes from East Lothian Council, signalling progress for our Dolphingstone Grange development and another part of the Dolphingstone masterplan. 'This development also gives us the opportunity to introduce our new national house types to customers in East Lothian when they are launched for sale early next year, adding to the overall choice we can offer customers.' The approval came as the company announced pre-construction work for its Ravensheugh Heights development in Wallyford has started with the project bringing approximately 700 new homes to the wider site. The first homes at Ravensheugh Heights are expected to go on the market in the next few months from the existing sales information centre just off St Clements Wells in Wallyford. The Dolphingstone master plan includes plans for new foot and cycle connections, fostering an active travel corridor to Wallyford and the local train station. Financial contributions of over £6.4 million will be made to fund education capacity and transport improvements, as well as a contribution of £186,000 to Network Rail for enhancements towards the rail link to Wallyford. By Marie Sharp Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related
STV News
2 minutes ago
- STV News
Glasgow facing £80m financial black hole even with 10% council tax rise
Glasgow City Council is facing a significant £110m budget gap by 2028. Even if the local authority increases council tax by 5% for the next two years, it would still face an £80m black hole. More than £65m of the shortfall is from pressure associated with homelessness, the council's latest financial outlook report said. It comes amid weak economic growth and a downturn in business across the UK and 'significant challenges' in public funding for the Scottish Government. Glasgow's finance director, Robert Emmott, said housing and homelessness remains one of the council's biggest expenses. It was previously reported that Glasgow houses around 4,000 asylum seekers, which the council warned in April is putting too much pressure on the city's services. It was also reported that a decision by the previous UK Government to speed up the processing of asylum claims had led to more people presenting as homeless in Glasgow. Nevertheless, councillors agreed in March to cover the cost of a UK Government decision to speed up the processing of asylum claims for another year. Unless policy changes, the costs of that decision will rise to £43m in 2025/26 and £66m in 2026/27. Mr Emmott's latest report said a 'pause' in both asylum dispersal to Glasgow and the requirement to house asylum applicants from outwith Scotland would reduce estimated costs to £36m in 2025/26 and then to £13m in 2026/27, if implemented from October 2025. Glasgow's city administration committee report will recommend seeking more money and further help from the UK and Scottish Government's on the impact of homelessness within the city. Glasgow City Council has been asked for comment. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
