logo
Basic principles

Basic principles

Telegraph17-07-2025
We are quality media
Remember at all times that Telegraph.co.uk is a quality website and The Daily Telegraph and The Sunday Telegraph are quality newspapers. The content of all our media is characterised by its accuracy, integrity, literacy and lack of sensationalism. Our readers are educated and intelligent people. Everything we write and publish should be informed by these precepts.
Responsibility
It cannot be emphasised strongly enough that conformity with style, accurate use of the English language and accuracy in use of facts, quotes and other information in an article are the responsibility of the writer. No writer should expect commissioners or publishers to spot mistakes or solecisms or to be there to correct them – although commissioners and especially publishers should be alert to any errors and should query and correct them when spotted.
Also, in respect for the integrity of the writer whose byline will appear on the piece, no changes of fact should be made to copy without the knowledge of the writer. Nomenclature, etc should be changed only when what has been written is in breach of house style.
There is no better maxim than the one most of us were taught in our early days in journalism: 'Who, what, where, when' should form the cornerstones of every story. The 'Why' may well provide the thrust of the story but the first four criteria must never be neglected.
Convey the message as you would speak it
Few people who are worth listening to speak in sentences of more than 30 words. Try to avoid multiple subordinate clauses as they breed confusion. Concision is one of the greatest virtues of expression and, therefore, of journalism.
Never take for granted the reader's understanding of a subject
It is not insulting to set things out simply and logically. Do not, however, patronise by remarks such as 'the author Charles Dickens'. We have an educated readership and there are certain assumptions about their general knowledge that we can make. It is precisely because our readership is generally well educated, though, that they are quick to notice mistakes.
Each story should be self-contained, with an explanation, however brief, of what has gone before. Always presume that the reader has been on a desert island, without the benefit of media.
Aim for common sense and question apparent nonsenses, such as pike in village ponds that swallow small dogs. Use your own yardstick as to what is feasible but do check. Good journalism at all levels is largely about the development of judgment.
Be temperate in language
Keeping a sense of proportion, recognising that 'storms' and 'fury' are often merely disagreements or differences of opinion, shows balance and maturity and is part of the Telegraph's appeal.
Profanities
Only to be used, either in copy or headlines, when absolutely essential. They should always be dashed out. Swear words may add 'Cor, f— me' value, especially if they are contained in a quote by a prominent figure, but we risk looking tawdry if this is overdone. Language of a sexually explicit nature should only be used when essential - such as in certain court reports or features about health or relationships - and never gratuitously or for effect.
Avoid tabloid constructions and agency-speak
'Television addict, Mansfield butcher John Smith' should be John Smith, a butcher from Mansfield who is addicted to television. NOT the famous anything (if it is famous there is no need to say so). Steer clear of words such as 'spotted' and 'dubbed' and use 'saw' and 'called' or 'nick-named'. Further examples of such horrors are to be found in the A to Z.
Unless we are certain something is exclusive to us, avoid the construction 'told The Telegraph'. Even then use extremely sparingly: it is tabloidy and much more easily replaced by the word 'said'.
Attribute everything.
Without care, it is easy when putting a subject's words into reported speech to render his or her claims and opinions into statements of fact. Even if sources are anonymous, it is important to source in its opening paragraph any claim on which a story is constructed: otherwise, why should the reader read on?
Avoid clichés
They cripple news stories with their tiredness and the laziness with which they are used. They are also often glib and inaccurate and are never an acceptable substitute for proper descriptions of events. A cliché or pun in a headline may be new to you, but it quite possibly isn't to the readers: avoid tired old jokes of the 'Life's a beach' variety.
Puns
In digital headlines these are best avoided. In print, they are to be used in strict moderation. Avoid those entirely that rely on one word sounding vaguely like another, unless they work at first sight. All funny headlines should work both ways: they should be capable of being read as the joke and still say what the story is about.
Direct quotes
They should add value to the article and should only be the best line. Do not put bland single words in quotes, especially in intros ('The England manager said he was 'disappointed' with his side's performance'). If you do hang an intro on a single-word quote, make sure you give the quote in full lower down. Do not give partial quotes in copy then repeat in full a par lower down. Leave out anything superfluous.
Avoid gratuitous references
To a person's ethnicity or sexual orientation for example. It is grossly outdated to describe someone as being 'openly gay'. Avoid the use of 'woman' as in 'a woman doctor/a woman Army officer/a woman scientist'.
Companies, groups and organisations etc
These are inanimate. They take 'that' or 'which', depending on the syntax, and not 'who'. They take a singular verb. (But Sport uses plural verbs for teams).
Quotes must be accurate
While it is permissible to clear up illiteracies it is not permissible to alter words or sense. Inevitably, some quotes will include words disapproved of by this style guide. That they are within quotation marks makes it clear, however, that the words are not ours. Remember to break up long quotes when several sentences run together.
Yesterday/today
We stopped using such words as 'yesterday' and 'today' in digital copy at The Telegraph some time ago. Instead say Monday, Tuesday etc and give the date if there is risk of confusion. In the paper, continue to say yesterday, today, tomorrow. Make sure they are put in the right place.
Many intros and captions are spoilt by the misplacement of these words, which makes the sentence sound like a translation from German. English is a flexible language but adverbs of time sound very odd placed directly before a verb 'he yesterday said he was going to do it'.
Corr
Add a subbing note when something is correct but looks as though it may not be. Reporters can save commissioners and publishers (and themselves) much tedious secondary research by noting unusual spellings or apparent contradictions in text.
Adherence to these and all the other rules set out in this guide will not in itself create a first-class journalist or indeed a first-class website or newspaper, but it will be the start of such a process.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Top secret' D-Day landing maps to go to auction
'Top secret' D-Day landing maps to go to auction

BBC News

time10 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'Top secret' D-Day landing maps to go to auction

"Top secret" maps used by Allied troops in the D-Day landings are expected to fetch up to £15,000 when they go up for UK, the US, Canada and France attacked German forces on the coast of northern France on 6 June was the largest military seaborne operation in history and involved the simultaneous landing of tens of thousands of troops on five beaches in maps, found in a box of documents originally bought for £10, provide restricted-access details of the Utah, Omaha, Gold, Juno and Sword beaches, and will go under the hammer in Etwall, Derbyshire, on Wednesday. The maps outline details of the German defences, including enemy strong points, barbed wire and aircraft were used throughout the conflict to create an accurate record of the French coast, and because it was not known where D-Day would take place, maps were developed for a wide area of to Hansons Auctioneers, about 2,500 anti-tank obstacles acted as shoreline defence, while hundreds of submerged mines proved fatal to troops wading behind the beaches, coupled with barbed wire and anti-tank ditches, made advancement even more many as 4,400 troops died from the combined allied forces on D-Day while some 9,000 were wounded or German casualties on the day are not known, but are estimated as being between 4,000 and 9,000 men. The maps were found in a box of various other documents bought at auction for £ had previously been in the possession of Royal Naval Sub Lt Walter Page, who served on Landing Craft Tank 2138 - one of 900 such vehicles which played a vital role in transporting men and supplies across the Crowson, from Hansons, said: "Imagine landing on a strange shore under enemy fire and not knowing where you were going or what hazards awaited."These maps, which look so old-fashioned today, would have been essential for the D-Day troops."It is amazing to think, had it not been for the eagle-eyed vendor, they would likely never have seen the light of day."

I'm a boomerang kid at 38
I'm a boomerang kid at 38

Times

time23 minutes ago

  • Times

I'm a boomerang kid at 38

The hallway of my mum's new-build maisonette looked like the 'after' pictures of the world's least fun car boot sale. Huge blue and red laundry bags bulging with clothes, battered suitcases, baby toys, coats thrown carelessly and a rogue bag of cables that even the Dalai Lama wouldn't have the patience to untangle. Standing to one side, trying to remain calm, was my 78-year-old mum. 'How long are you staying for?' she joked. 'TBC,' I grimaced back. This was in January when my partner and I, along with our one-year-old son, moved in with my mum while the 'fixer-upper' house we bought as our first family home was, uh, fixed up. It saved us thousands but everyone — apart from the baby — was nervous. I'm definitely not the only one moving back home. A recent survey by the British bank TSB found that 80 per cent of first-time buyers moved back in with their parents to get onto the property ladder. My mum has been living alone for more than 30 years. First in the house I grew up in, then in the pristine new flat she downsized to a few years ago. She's no Hyacinth Bucket but she was used to having everything just so. When she left a room in the morning it would look the same way when she returned at night — and the same could very much not be said once we moved in. For me and my partner, there were other worries. There's only one TV, and our viewing habits, dinner timings and entire routine were different from my mum's. The space was small. Perfect for one, maybe two people, but three adults and chaos monkey? Nope. Too small. There's nowhere to escape. We also had to go back to sharing a bedroom with our son again after finally getting him settled into his own room. And I don't know if you've ever tried to work from home with your boomer parent in the house but I'd compare it to trying to work in a room with an affectionate labrador that happens to have the stealth of a monster truck and the street smarts of an undercover spy. However, in the five months we spent living with her, I learnt some valuable things. The first I knew before we moved in but I really knew it by the time we left: how lucky we were to have the option to do this in the first place. To have family in the city you live and work in isn't a given. To have them in London, the most expensive place to live in the UK, and round the corner from your life, your work and your kid's nursery is like having a winning lottery ticket in your purse. Mum was patient and kind. She kept our son entertained while we made him dinner, put up with him wrecking her curtains and carpet, and coped with my snapping at her that I was 'trying to work' for approximately 12 hours a day. The second was that you really only know someone when you live with them. Like most children, my relationship with my mum was previously frozen in time. We revert to type the minute we're in the same room: I am always the mouthy boundary-pusher and she is always the warrior-like matriarch whose word is final. But the truth, of course, is that we're different now, both made softer and harder by the toll life takes, by age and by motherhood itself. Living with each other forced us to reckon with the people we actually are, rather than the family personas we used to take on. Three years ago my mum was diagnosed with Parkinson's, something we've all been in denial about since. But I needed to see how it affected her life. At present, the answer is not much. However, I now know the ways in which that will change and what I can do to help when it does, because I am under the skin of her day-to-day life in a way you can't be when you check in by phone once a week or see each other for Sunday lunch. In the reverse, she knows what type of mother I am and that I am finally, for the first time in my adult life, in a relationship with a functional, kind man. Some nights, after I'd go to bed, my partner and my mum would sit up and chat. I only found this out afterwards, and how much he enjoyed it. And lastly, that time she had with her young grandson was precious. They imprinted on each other in a way I never could have predicted. His face still lights up when Grandma enters the room. He took his first steps on her velvet-soft rug. He runs into her place and goes straight for the window they'd look out of together, counting the cars on the street below. We all cried when the time came for us to finally move out because we knew that blink-and-you'll-miss-it moment in time meant more than anything. Amy Grier What it's like to live with my parents at 23 by Esme Gordon-Craig When I was younger I enjoyed imagining a 23-year-old-version of myself. She was living in a small but elegant flat in London, maybe with a boyfriend, but I also considered that a couple of best friends would be fun too. I pictured having the perfect office job with the perfect office outfit, along with all the emotional and financial freedoms that would follow. This fantasy, a product of overwatching The Devil Wears Prada, is yet to come true. Instead, having now reached the great age of 23, I find myself living at home with my parents, cushioned among all the emotional and financial security that brings. This is increasingly common for my generation. The cost of living crisis has ensured that those of us in our early twenties who have the opportunity to live at home will happily sacrifice our independence for the sake of saving, or even just affording to live. We see it as a temporary situation, one that might one day lead to the ultimate goal of adulthood: having a home of our own. Having the option to live at home as an adult is both a blessing and curse. It's a blessing for many reasons, an obvious one being no rent. Then there are the added extras: I have my washing done for me, bills are nonexistent and a home-cooked meal is guaranteed every night. • The reality of living with your parents in your twenties However, as much as I love my parents, there are downsides. Number one, if you want the perks of being supported like a child you have to accept being treated like one too. There are no drunken nights out ending in early-morning cereal binges and no hungover lie-ins that blend beautifully into a day-long movie marathon. I can't even guarantee access to the TV. World War Three can kick off with the simple act of not turning off a light switch or forgetting to open the gate for the postman, and remoulding one's life around the routine of one's parents can be exceptionally challenging when everything down to the hot water has a regimented schedule. Then there's the problem of socialising. I had a boyfriend who was living at home after he graduated. I wouldn't say this was the reason we ended it but coming downstairs to be greeted by his parents every morning added an element of awkwardness. The big issue for me is that, unlike my ex, home is nowhere near London. It's nowhere near anything, really, and to make matters worse, I can't drive. Yes, I still get lifts on nights out.

Prince Harry condemns Sentebale charity boss for acting in the 'poorest taste' by referencing Princess Diana after she won control of duke's 'life's work' that royal fears will 'go down in flames'
Prince Harry condemns Sentebale charity boss for acting in the 'poorest taste' by referencing Princess Diana after she won control of duke's 'life's work' that royal fears will 'go down in flames'

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Prince Harry condemns Sentebale charity boss for acting in the 'poorest taste' by referencing Princess Diana after she won control of duke's 'life's work' that royal fears will 'go down in flames'

Prince Harry believes the boss of Sentebale acted in the 'poorest taste' by invoking Princess Diana 's memory after she retained control of the charity he set up to continue his mother's work in Africa, a source close to the royal has claimed. The Duke of Sussex is said to have been left 'devastated' by the boardroom battle that saw him leave the organisation after 19 years, which he fears will now go 'down in flames'. Harry, who co-founded Sentebale in 2006, is said to consider it a 'hostile takeover' of the charity by chairwoman Dr Sophie Chandauka who he claims has destroyed his 'life's work'. 'She's allowing it to go down in flames because of her own pride and hubris… he has for the last 19 years established this charity from nothing', a source close to Harry claimed. A dispute earlier this year prompted Harry to step down as patron in support of trustees who resigned in opposition to Dr Chandauka, who then accused him of 'harassment and bullying at scale' - a claim that is vehemently denied. On Tuesday, the Charity Commission published a report criticising all sides for making the fallout public with interviews and statements, but the war of words continues. Dr Chandauka then vowed to honour the founding mission of Sentebale in memory of the Duke's late mother after the watchdog ruled she could stay in her position. But sources close to Harry, who co-founded Sentebale in 2006, have criticised the chair, saying her 'hostile takeover' of the charity had destroyed his 'life's work'. The Charity Commission yesterday revealed it had found 'no evidence of widespread or systematic bullying or harassment including misogyny or misogynoir' following a bitter boardroom battle at Sentebale. Neither side was satisfied with the final adjudication, which criticised all parties involved, and, although the regulator urged all to be 'mindful to channel their belief in the charity's mission in a constructive and collaborative way', there seems little hope of the row going away. Dr Chandauka said: 'Despite the recent turbulence, we will always be inspired by the vision of our founders, Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso, who established Sentebale in memory of their precious mothers, Princess Diana and Queen Mamohato.' But a source close to Harry said in response: 'For Sophie Chandauka to have invoked Princess Diana's memory in her own defence was in the poorest possible taste. 'She's got what she wants, which is control of the charity, but unfortunately the people who suffer most out of all of this… are the children of Lesotho and Botswana.' Speaking to the Telegraph, the source added: 'The most devastating thing for Prince Harry in all of this is that his life's work and all the money he was able to pump into Lesotho and Botswana through his work has gone down in flames.' Sentebale meanwhile has appeared to suggest allegations made by Dr Chandauka of bullying, harassment and misogyny at the charity - which the commission found no evidence of - may be pursued against individuals through 'avenues more appropriate'. Another source said: 'This has been emotionally absolutely devastating for Prince Harry and (Sentebale co-founder) Prince Seeiso (of Lesotho). What's been perpetrated over the last few months is nothing short of a hostile takeover.' Seeiso also stepped down as patron of the charity which works in Botswana and Lesotho supporting the health and wellbeing of young people, especially those with HIV and Aids. The source added: 'You have to remember Prince Seeiso and Prince Harry started this charity nearly two decades ago to honour the work and continue the legacy of their mothers Queen Mamohato and Princess Diana, and the work that they had done in southern Africa to support those living with HIV and Aids. 'In the 19 years that they have worked with this charity, and a lot of the former board of trustee members, they have raised tens of millions of pounds and distributed tens of millions of pounds.' The commission criticised all parties in the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly and described how all trustees contributed to a 'missed opportunity' to resolve the issues that led to the serious disagreement which risked undermining public trust in charities generally. The regulator, which cannot investigate individual allegations of bullying, found no evidence of systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment' felt by some involved. After conducting its regulatory compliance case the commission issued a Regulatory Action Plan with Sentebale saying it had complied with the steps, from implementing an internal dispute policy to improving the charity's complaints and whistle-blowing procedures. The trustees who resigned said in a statement they were 'gravely concerned for the future of the charity' adding they were 'disheartened' by the way the regulator had 'chosen to ignore key concerns and irrefutable evidence raised with them regarding the leadership and oversight of Sentebale's chair'. Sentebale said in statement: 'The Charity Commission is explicitly clear, including in its public guidance, that it is not the commission's responsibility to adjudicate or mediate internal disputes. This would include individual allegations of bullying, harassment, misogyny, misogynoir etc. 'As a result, the commission has not investigated any individual allegations and therefore has not made any findings in relation to individuals, including Prince Harry. 'The issues not investigated by the commission can and may be dealt with through avenues more appropriate than the commission.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store