UK's central bank set to keep interest rates on hold amid Middle East uncertainties
LONDON (AP) — The Bank of England is set to keep interest rates on hold Thursday as fears grow that the conflict between Israel and Iran will escalate to involve the United States and send oil prices soaring and push U.K. inflation further above target.
The bank's nine-member Monetary Policy Committee is widely expected to hold its main interest rate at the two-year low of 4.25% as they await to see how the conflict in the Middle East pans out over coming days.
With U.K. inflation at 3.4% above the bank's target rate of 2%, policymakers are likely to be mindful of the impact on oil prices, which have risen sharply in recent days to over $75 a barrel.
The prevailing view at the bank was that inflation would remain elevated over the coming months but start to head back towards next year. The uptick in oil prices has the potential to scupper that expectation.
'The risk to energy prices has clearly intensified and moved up the agenda given developments in the Middle East,' said Sandra Horsfield, an economist for Investec.
Uncertainty over the level of tariffs U.S. President Donald Trump will impose around the world is also clouding the outlook for prices around the world. Though the U.K. looks like it will be spared a raft of tariffs, the backdrop for the global economy remains highly uncertain.
That tariff concern is at the forefront of concerns at the U.S. Federal Reserve, which on Wednesday kept its key rate unchanged, to the chagrin of Trump, who has been urging the central bank to join others, such as the Bank of England and European Central Bank, and cut borrowing costs.
Since its first quarter-point rate cut last August from the 16-year high of 5.25%, the Bank of England has played it steady, reducing interest rates every three months. That would mean the next reduction is in August.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2 defensive shares for investors to consider for passive income in 2025
Generating passive income takes more work than many investors might think. I think the key is to pick high-quality dividend shares that can deliver regular income and weather any economic storms in the long run. That's why I've picked out two reliable dividend payers in the FTSE 100 that I think are worth considering for those investors trying to build a steady second income. Unilever (LSE: ULVR) is known as a reliable defensive dividend payer in the Footsie. The company has a wide portfolio with household brands including Dove and Magnum. This gives it global reach and steady demand even when the economy weakens. With a share price of £46.34 as I write on 18 June, the stock is trading on a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 18.3. That's a touch higher than the Footsie average but I'd expect to pay a slight premium for defensive stocks. The company's 3.2% dividend yield makes it one worth considering. On top of that, I liked the company's full-year results announced in February, showing underlying sales growth of 1.9% and a 12.6% increase in profit. It's not all upside of course. Sluggish demand in emerging markets like Indonesia and China poses a risk to future growth. Of course, competition is fierce and margins remain tight while the company tries to keep up with ever-shifting consumer tastes. Still, for those seeking income with a defensive tilt, Unilever's consistency and dividend history are hard to ignore. Diageo (LSE: DGE) is another name that I think is worth investors considering for income. The company has a large portfolio of alcoholic beverages including Johnnie Walker and Guinness. The stock currently trades at around £19 at the time of writing, with a forward P/E ratio of around 15 and a dividend yield of 4.1%. Diageo's premium spirits segment makes up a significant chunk of its portfolio, which adds resilience in the event of further economic weakness. What about the risks? Recent weakness in Latin America and sluggish performance in the US has spooked some investors and contributed to a 25% decline in the company's share price over the past 12 months. Investors are also concerned by falling alcohol demand as the market for non-alcoholic options continues to grow. While I wouldn't expect enormous future revenue growth, I think Diageo's sheer size and ability to pivot towards trends in the beverage sector could deliver in the long run. The company has a diversified portfolio of top-tier brands, which underpins its ability to weather the economic cycle and deliver a steady long-term passive income stream. There are numerous quality dividend shares for investors to choose from. I believe in long-term investing and looking for opportunities to generate a steady second income. Defensive sectors like consumer staples can help to achieve this by being less susceptible to cyclical changes in consumer demand compared to companies in sectors like construction or leisure. However, that often means they can come at a higher cost with this perceived 'safety premium' reflected in the price. I think both Unilever and Diageo are large, well-established companies that hold strong market positions. I think that makes them worth considering as part of a diversified portfolio for investors seeking to build a long-term passive income. The post 2 defensive shares for investors to consider for passive income in 2025 appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool The Motley Fool UK has recommended Diageo Plc and Unilever. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New environmental guidance published for halted North Sea oil and gas projects
Major North Sea oil and gas projects halted by a Supreme Court ruling will be able to reapply for consent after the Government published new environmental guidance. The Supreme Court ruled last year that emissions created by burning fossil fuels should be considered when granting planning permission for new drilling sites, in a case that focused on an oil well in Surrey but reverberated through the energy sector. A challenge brought by environmental campaigners in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling, over approval for the Rosebank oil field north-west of Shetland and the Jackdaw gas field off Aberdeen, was upheld at the Court of Session in Edinburgh in January. Greenpeace and Uplift had argued the UK Government and North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) had acted unlawfully when granting consent to the projects, as environmental impact assessments did not take into account downstream emissions resulting from the burning of the extracted fuels. The Government has now published new guidance on how the environmental impacts of oil and gas – including their downstream 'scope three' emissions created when the fossil fuels are burned – are included in assessments. Officials said offshore developers will now be able to submit applications for consent to extract fossil fuels in oil and gas fields that are already licensed, which includes Rosebank and Jackdaw. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband will 'consider the significance of a project's environmental impact, while taking into account and balancing relevant factors on a case-by-case basis – such as the potential economic impact and other implications of the project', the Government said. Labour has previously ruled out issuing new oil and gas licences for the North Sea, but Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said the fuels will be needed for decades to come and indicated he would not 'interfere' with existing licences. But the green groups behind the legal challenge to the Rosebank and Jackdaw schemes said they were incompatible with the UK's climate commitments to curb the greenhouse gas emissions driving rising temperatures and dangerous weather extremes. The International Energy Agency has previously said no new fossil fuel projects should be developed beyond existing fields if the world is to stay below 1.5C of global warming, beyond which increasingly dangerous and irreversible impacts of climate change will be felt. Energy minister Michael Shanks said: 'This new guidance offers clarity on the way forward for the North Sea oil and gas industry, following last year's Supreme Court ruling. 'It marks a step forward in ensuring the full implications of oil and gas extraction are considered for potential projects and that we ensure a managed, prosperous, and orderly transition to the North Sea's clean energy future, in line with the science. 'We are working with industry, trade unions, local communities and environmental groups to ensure the North Sea and its workers are at the heart of Britain's clean energy future for decades to come – supporting well-paid, skilled jobs, driving growth and boosting our energy security.' The Government pointed to £200 million in funding for a project to capture and store carbon in Aberdeenshire and a pilot in Aberdeen, along with Cheshire, Lincolnshire and Pembrokeshire, to help workers access jobs in new clean energy industries. Tessa Khan, executive director of Uplift, said: 'The new rules mean that oil and gas companies will finally be forced to come clean over the enormous harm they are causing to the climate.' She argued Rosebank would not lower fuel bills or boost energy independence as most of the oil would be exported, and tax breaks would mean the public would cover most of the costs of development. She also said the extreme weather the UK is experiencing 'must be a wake-up call for this Government to stand up to the oil and gas firms'. Greenpeace UK head of climate Mel Evans said: 'It's only right for the Government to take into account the emissions from burning oil and gas when deciding whether to approve fossil fuel projects currently pending. 'Since Rosebank and other drilling sites will pump out a lot of carbon while providing little benefit to the economy and no help to bill payers, they should fail the criteria ministers have just set out. She said approving the projects would be a 'political sleight of hand' that would benefit oil giants while leaving the UK hooked on fossil fuels. 'Real energy security and future-proofed jobs for energy workers can only come through homegrown, cheap renewable energy, and that's what ministers should focus on,' she urged.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Aurora Cannabis says AI-generated news reports of $215M deal and new partnership are 'entirely false'
Aurora Cannabis ( is denying the validity of multiple news reports published on Wednesday. One claims the Canadian pot company is acquiring a New Zealand-based cannabis producer in a $215 million cash and stock deal. Another announces a partnership to distribute medical cannabis in Europe. 'Neither of these stories are true in any way. This is entirely false information,' Aurora's vice-president of communications and public relations Michelle Lefler stated in an email to Yahoo Finance Canada on Thursday. 'I can confirm we take this situation very seriously and are taking the appropriate actions.' Toronto-listed Aurora shares fell more than 20 per cent on Wednesday, despite the Edmonton-based company reporting strong financial results in its most recent quarter before the opening bell. A story posted on the website says Aurora 'announced today the acquisition of MedLeaf Therapeutics, a specialized medical cannabis producer, for $215 million in a cash and stock transaction.' The article, which says it was generated with the support of artificial intelligence and reviewed by an editor, quotes Aurora CEO Miguel Martin, and cites filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). A separate article appearing on published Wednesday, also quoting Martin and citing SEC filings, references a new strategic partnership between Aurora and European pharmaceutical distributor MediPharm GmbH to expand its medical cannabis presence in Germany and other EU markets. More to follow. Jeff Lagerquist is a senior reporter at Yahoo Finance Canada. Follow him on X @jefflagerquist. Download the Yahoo Finance app, available for Apple and Android. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
