logo
Gerry Adams' ‘putting manners on BBC' remark ‘chilling', NUJ man says

Gerry Adams' ‘putting manners on BBC' remark ‘chilling', NUJ man says

Seamus Dooley, the Irish secretary of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ), also said the high profile case showed the need for reform of Ireland's defamation laws, saying the public would never know why the jury made its decision.
Former Sinn Fein leader Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement.
A jury at the High Court in Dublin awarded him 100,000 euro (£84,000) when it found in his favour on Friday, after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article.
It also found the BBC's actions were not in good faith and the corporation had not acted in a fair and reasonable way.
Mr Adams' legal team said the verdict of the jury was a 'full vindication' for their client while the BBC said it was 'disappointed' with the outcome.
Mr Donaldson was shot dead in Co Donegal in 2006, months after admitting his role as a police and MI5 agent over 20 years.
Mr Dooley told RTE's This Week programme that it was a verdict which would make journalists 'pause for reflection'.
He said: 'The first thing we should say is Gerry Adams was entitled to take his case.
'But it does have profound implications for the practise of journalism and I think it has implications both in terms of defamation law but also for me in terms of journalism in Northern Ireland and the relationship between Sinn Fein and journalists in Northern Ireland.'
Speaking outside court on Friday, Mr Adams said taking the case was 'about putting manners on the British Broadcasting Corporation'.
He added: 'The British Broadcasting Corporation upholds the ethos of the British state in Ireland, and in my view it's out of sync in many, many fronts with the Good Friday Agreement.'
Mr Dooley said: 'I found that a chilling comment actually. He referred to putting manners on the BBC, to me that means putting them back in their box.
'The reality is that Spotlight has, for over 40 years, done some of the most amazing investigative journalism.
'Margaret Thatcher tried to ban Spotlight because of their coverage of Gibraltar Three, they exposed Kincora at the heart of the British establishment, recently they did work on Stakeknife, and in fact the Sinn Fein mayor of Derry led the campaign to save BBC Radio Foyle news service.
'I found the attitude quite chilling but also unfair and unreasonable in the circumstances.'
Mr Dooley said that Mr Adams was a figure of 'huge significance' to journalists, historians and academics and had 'influenced the shape of history of Northern Ireland'.
He added: 'On that basis, any journalist has a right, any academic, to question and probe.'
He said the case underpinned the need for a review of defamation laws in Ireland.
He said: 'First of all we need to look at the defence of honest opinion and how you square that circle in the context of journalists' right to protect sources, it is a real difficulty.
'For many years the NUJ was in favour of retaining juries. I have now reached the conclusion in defamation cases that juries are not appropriate.
'One of the reasons is we will never know why the jury reached this decision.
'If, as in Northern Ireland, had Mr Adams taken his case in Northern Ireland, the case is heard before judges, you have the benefit of a written judgment, you have the benefit of a detailed explanation of the reason why a verdict is given.
'That provides an insight and a guide.
'Here we don't know.'
Mr Dooley also pointed out that proceedings in the case had been running since 2016.
Former Sinn Fein member Mr Donaldson was shot dead in Co Donegal in 2006, months after admitting his role as a police and MI5 agent over 20 years.
In the Spotlight programme broadcast in September 2016, an anonymous source given the pseudonym Martin claimed the shooting was sanctioned by the political and military leadership of the IRA and that Mr Adams gave 'the final say'.
In 2009, the dissident republican group the Real IRA claimed responsibility for the killing and a Garda investigation into the matter remains ongoing.
Mr Adams had described the allegation as a 'grievous smear'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I'm only human! Celtic striker Idah hits back at critics who question his off-field conduct
I'm only human! Celtic striker Idah hits back at critics who question his off-field conduct

Daily Mail​

time24 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

I'm only human! Celtic striker Idah hits back at critics who question his off-field conduct

CELTIC striker Adam Idah has fired back at critics who questioned his off-field conduct towards the end of last season. A video was circulated on social media back in April which appeared to show Idah looking worse for wear and vomiting in the back of a taxi. Idah, who was on a day off at the time, immediately sought to explain himself to Celtic boss Brendan Rodgers in the aftermath. Rodgers was quick to defend the Republic of Ireland striker, who was signed for £9million from Norwich City last summer. Speaking to Irish media ahead of his country's friendlies against Senegal and Luxembourg, Idah insisted he will continue to live his life as normal. 'It didn't impact me,' said the 24-year-old in response to the social media storm around the video. 'I was out on a day off, that was that. The manager understood. I was off, I went out with the boys, and that was that. 'There was no problem with the manager - he spoke about it really well. 'I will be video-taped, but at the end of the day, I am a human being. I go out. I'm not a robot where I have to stay inside all the time. 'It's hard when people are videoing you. It can be quite upsetting, especially when the story is made out to be what it is not. 'It can be tough, but like I said, I am human and I'm going to carry on with my life.' All in all, Idah had a testing season. He wasn't first-choice for a lot of the campaign, with Daizen Maeda shining in a central role. But the Irishman still scored 20 goals in 53 appearances, which was the highest total of his career thus far. Learning to deal with the pressure and demands at a club like Celtic is something which he feels will stand him in good stead moving forward. 'The pressure is a lot and you are expected to deliver,' he said. 'I think with my experience now, you have to put that behind you. You know what you are good at. 'If you don't score for a couple of games, it is not helpful to listen to an ex-player. I am not really concerned with what he thinks - I am there to do my bit. 'I had a good run in the last few games, but I know it can turn quick. That is football. 'There have been plenty of games when I have gone without scoring, you have to stay focused and help the team. 'There is a lot of pressure at the club to be successful. It is good, I think. Every player wants to play at a big club, but what comes with a big club is the pressure. 'It was a disappointing end to the season for us [losing the Scottish Cup Final], but an overall fantastic season. 'I came away with two trophies, scored 20 goals and got the winning goal in the last camp for Ireland. I feel really good. 'Most strikers will say the same thing: that you get that feeling from scoring goals, and you're hungry for more. It's great to have. 'I got into a nice little rhythm towards the end of the season, and hopefully I can come into this camp and score more.' Meanwhile, Kieran Tierney has said his farewell to Arsenal fans ahead of his impending move back to Celtic in the summer. Tierney will return to Parkhead on a free transfer once his contract with the Gunners expires. Tierney told the Arsenal website: 'Just thank you for everything from day one. The fans supported us through the good times and the bad, and they supported me through some hard times as well. 'I think that's what I'm most grateful for, the times where it wasn't so good or so easy for me is when they probably supported me most, so I'm just very grateful and I feel very lucky to have the support from them. 'I feel so lucky that I've played for this club and the love that the supporters have given me has been amazing. I've loved every day here and I've learned so much, I've improved so much and I just feel very lucky.'

Jodie Comer exudes sophistication in draped black dress as she joins stylish co-star Aaron Taylor-Johnson at photocall for 28 Years Later in Paris
Jodie Comer exudes sophistication in draped black dress as she joins stylish co-star Aaron Taylor-Johnson at photocall for 28 Years Later in Paris

Daily Mail​

time24 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Jodie Comer exudes sophistication in draped black dress as she joins stylish co-star Aaron Taylor-Johnson at photocall for 28 Years Later in Paris

Jodie Comer and Aaron Taylor-Johnson displayed their impeccable fashion tastes on Wednesday, as they attended the photocall for their new zombie movie 28 Years Later at Publicis Champs Elysees in Paris. Jodie, 32, oozed effortless glamour in a black draped dress with gold detailing and an asymmetric neckline that showcased her svelte waist. The actress boosted her height with a coordinating pair of strappy heels and accessorised with silver earrings and a pair of cateye sunglasses. While Aaron, 34, looked typically handsome in a bright red V-neck jumper, which allowed a glimpse of his hairy chest underneath. The British star added a trendy white barn jacket over the top, paired with black tailored trousers and shiny dress shoes. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. He completed the look with flashy Omega watch, after signing a deal with the brand which provide timepieces to the James Bond franchise - in what fans believes was a hint he would soon be announced as the new 007. Sporting a bushy beard, Aaron hid his eyes behind a pair of tinted shades and was seen breaking into laughter with Jodie as they posed together. The stars were joined by their film director Danny Boyle, who opted for a more casual look of jeans and a blue zip-up jumper. The much-anticipated release of 28 Years Later is just weeks away, with fans left waiting two decades to discover the next instalment in the film series. And with the nation devastated by the Rage virus nearly three decades ago, this new film - released June 19 - will show insight into the vastly different ways humanity has adapted to survive. For one such community, this means complete isolation from the outside world, and in a new clip ahead of the film's premiere, Aaron shares insight into this new addition to the 28 Days Later universe for the first time. In this new land, known as The Holy Island, humans are entirely self-sufficient, and only leave the community to hunt on the mainland, when the tide is low. Aaron plays Jamie a scavenger who is tasked with training his Spike to survive in the wilderness, before they embark on a deadly mission to the mainland. In an exclusive featurette, the actor offered a glimpse at this new Holy Island, explaining: 'My character is part of this community that survived 20-odd years because they live on the Holy Island, disconnected from the mainland. 'They don't have doctors or medicine, can only eat what they can grow, they can go hunt, but they have to go hunt on the mainland.' 'And we have rules, if you leave the island and you don't return, there's no one going out to look for you, they're going to assume you've been infected and you're dead.' Aaron then explained that for his character's son, it's a 'rite of passage' to learn his father's hunting skills, in the hope that they can survive when they leave the island. Meanwhile, Jodie plays Jamie's wife Isla, while Ralph Fiennes also stars in the film as Dr. Kelson, a survivor of the outbreak. The film is set on the real-life island of Lindisfarne, which is only accessible through a causeway during low tide. The original film 28 Days Later starred Cillian Murphy as a bicycle courier who wakes up from a coma to discover the accidental release of a highly contagious, aggression-inducing virus has caused the breakdown of society. But despite frenzied speculation that he would be reprising his role in this sequel, when the trailer came out in December, with one character appearing to resemble a zombified form of Cillian's character Jim from the first film. In the movie Aaron (pictured) plays Jamie a scavenger who is tasked with training his son Spike to survive in the wilderness However, this theory was quickly shut down when a London art dealer and model revealed he was the one playing the zombie character. Danny has since teased that viewers may get to see Cillian, 48, return after all, in one of the later films in the trilogy. Speaking during Sony's presentation at 2025 CinemaCon, the filmmaker hinted: 'Like all good things in life, you may have to wait a little while for [Cillian] to make his appearance'. 28 Years Later was filmed back-to-back with the second film, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, by director Nia DaCosta, which is being released in January 2026. Producer Andrew Macdonald previously confirmed that Cillian would not be appearing in 28 Years Later, but also suggested he could return for a future film. He told Empire: '[On] this, we wanted him to be involved and he wanted to be involved. He is not in the first film, but I'm hoping there will be some Jim somewhere along the line.' He added: 'He's involved at the moment as an executive producer, and I would hope we can work with him in some way in the future in the trilogy.' With a budget of $75million, 28 Years Later is the biggest film to be created with an iPhone and follows in the footsteps of a new Apple TV show. 28 Years Later hits UK cinemas on June 19, 2025.

Harry and Meghan considered changing surname to Spencer
Harry and Meghan considered changing surname to Spencer

North Wales Chronicle

time38 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Harry and Meghan considered changing surname to Spencer

However, this plan was apparently shelved after the UK passports for Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet were issued almost six months after the initial applications. The passport application was apparantly delayed (Image: Dominic Lipinski/PA) A source claimed that the duke and duchess feared that UK officials were delaying the process because of the applications included HRH titles (His/Her Royal Highness) for both children. According to The Guardian, a source close to the Sussexes said: 'There was clear reluctance to issue passports for the kids." However, after three months without receiving the documents because of "technical issues," it is understood that Harry and Meghan reapplied using the 24-hour passport service, only for their meeting to be cancelled because of a "systems failure". The source claimed: 'The king hadn't wanted Archie and Lili to carry the titles, most of all the HRH, and the British passports, once created, would be the first and perhaps the only legal proof of their names'. They added: "Harry was at a point where British passports for his children with their updated Sussex surnames (since the death of Queen Elizabeth II) were being blocked with a string of excuses over the course of five months. 'Out of sheer exasperation he went to his uncle to effectively say: 'My family are supposed to have the same name and they're stopping that from happening because the kids are legally HRH, so if push comes to shove, if this blows up and they won't let the kids be called Sussex, then can we use Spencer as a surname?'' It is understood that Prince Harry wants his children to have the HRH titles so that they can decide for themselves in the future if they want to be working royals. The standard wait time for a UK passport is within three weeks (Image: Phil Harris/Daily Mirror/PA Wire) Prince Harry says he doesn't know 'how much longer my father has' Prince Harry loses appeal on keeping level of police protection when in the UK According to the UK Government website, the standard wait time for a British Passport is within three weeks. However, this could take longer if more information is required or if applicants need to be interviewed. The turnaround time may also differ for those applying from another country. The application time starts when the Passport Office receives an applicant's documents.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store