ICE officials ‘un-American' for attempts to ‘intimidate' members of Congress, lawmaker says
Three House Democrats accused officials at Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and the broader Trump administration of being 'un-American' on Sunday after the arrest of Newark's mayor at an ICE facility.
Reps. Bonnie Watson Coleman, Rob Menendez, and LaMonica McIver appeared on CNN's State of the Union for a joint interview on Sunday. The trio were threatened with arrest by a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson over the weekend after conducting an oversight visit to an ICE facility on Friday — a visit explicitly allowed by the legislation directing funding for those facilities.
They told CNN's Dana Bash that Trump administration officials were attempting to 'intimidate' members of Congress and the White House's critics with threats of arrest and imprisonment. Ras Baraka, the mayor of Newark, was arrested after attempting to enter the facility on Friday.
'Someone on the phone above the leaders of ICE, who were with us at that facility, instructed them to go out of the facility, go to the private property and lock the mayor of the largest city in the state of New Jersey up. That's absurd. That's un-American,' said Watson Coleman.
She added: 'That's determination to intimidate people in this country.'
Menendez, who tweeted out the clause of legislation defining the legality of congressional oversight visits to ICE detention facilities, told MSNBC on Saturday that 'no one should feel safe' as the second Trump administration seeks to use law enforcement to 'intimidate' critics.
'This is a pattern,' said Menendez on MSNBC's The Weekend Primetime. 'It's judges — federal judges who they disagree with their decision. It's mayors, it's now members of Congress.'
Baraka was interviewed Sunday on MSNBC's The Weekend.
'This is like moving us slowly towards an authoritarian kind of government here, where they are telling people they can't come to a public place, they can't go onto a facility to even get a tour. We weren't protesting. Nobody barged in. We were there peacefully,' said the mayor.
'I was there for over an hour before they decided to escalate it.'
Menendez added on CNN: "They had over 20 armed ICE [Homeland Security Investigations] officers, they were heavily armed, their faces were covered, and they wearing no identification. So this is who they chose to have come engage with the mayor of Newark and three elected members of the House of Representatives."
On Saturday, more than 100 miles away in Albany, New York, Democratic state lawmakers and activists were blocked by police officers as they attempted to confront the White House's deportation czar, Tom Homan, during his visit to the state capitol. Among them was Zohran Mamdani, estimated in most polls to be trailing Andrew Cuomo as the disgraced former governor's main competitor in the New York City mayoral race.
The three lawmakers who visited the ICE facility on Friday were threatened with arrest, with McIver being accused of 'body-slamming' an officer. Video footage released by ICE does not show this, and instead shows McIver being jostled repeatedly, and attempting to push her way through a scrum of officers attempting to block her path. During the scuffle, McIver says she was shoved by an agent before she made contact with other officers. Notably, as McIver said Friday, the scuffle occurred after McIver and the two other lawmakers first entered the facility.
'This scuffle, during which an ICE agent physically shoved me, occurred AFTER we had entered the Delaney Hall premises. We entered the facility, came BACK OUT to speak to the Mayor, and then ICE agents began shoving us.'
Watson Coleman confirmed during her interview Sunday that the clash with ICE officers occurred after the arrest of the mayor was ordered. The lawmakers confirmed that ICE agents proceeded to allow a tour of the facility after the scuffle and arrest of the mayor.
'After Mayor Baraka was arrested yesterday, DHS officials let us conduct our tour as is required by law. So despite the Admin's attempts to spin this, they know we had every right to be there and enter the facility. If you ignore the spin, you'll see there is only one accurate narrative - ours,' said Menendez on Twitter.
On Saturday, a DHS spokeswoman warned: 'There will be more arrests coming.'
The Trump administration has not identified what charges would potentially be brought against McIver or others for the confrontation on Friday and doing so would provoke a confrontation with Democratic leadership the likes of which the White House has not yet seen. The situation played out this weekend as the administration has taken successive defeats in the court system and on Friday saw the ordered release of Rümeysa Öztürk, a Tufts University student, after weeks of legal battles over her detention and possible deportation. A judge in the case admonished the administration's focus on protected First Amendment activities for the revocation of her visa.
White House officials have not yet openly defied the courts but continue to ignore an order requiring them to facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man deported to El Salvador despite a judge ruling that he could not be sent there. U.S. officials maintain that Abrego Garcia is in Salvadoran custody and therefore out of the administration's hands.
Federal agents arrested a federal judge in Wisconsin last month and accused her of refusing to allow agents to detain a man outside of her courtroom; her arrest has been widely condemned by legal experts.
Immigration raids continue across the United States as the Trump administration pushes towards a target of deporting 1 million people this year. Raids were reported in Washington DC, Tennessee, and California over the past week.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
30 minutes ago
- Fox News
Lara Trump: China wants to replace us
All times eastern FOX News Saturday Night with Jimmy Failla FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: President Trump attends UFC event in Newark, New Jersey


USA Today
30 minutes ago
- USA Today
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts Show Caption Hide Caption Biden criticizes Trump administration's handling of Social Security Social Security overhaul sparks criticism from Biden over service disruptions, layoffs and automation as Trump defends changes as efficiency. Straight Arrow News Social Security is an important source of income for millions of Americans, but the program has a serious financial problem. Costs have increased faster than revenues in recent years because the aging population is growing more quickly than the working population. As a result, the trust fund, the financial account that pays benefits, is on track to be depleted within a decade. Specifically, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the trust fund will be exhausted in 2034. That would eliminate one source of revenue (i.e., interest earned on trust fund reserves), and the remaining tax revenues would only cover 77% of scheduled payments. That means a 23% benefit cut would be necessary in 2035. Fortunately, the lawmakers in Washington have several years to find a better solution. Here are four Social Security changes that could prevent deep, across-the-board benefit cuts. 1. Apply the Social Security payroll tax to income above $400,000 Social Security is primarily funded by a dedicated payroll tax, which takes 6.2% of wages from workers and employers. But some income is exempt from the payroll tax. Specifically, the maximum taxable earnings limit is $176,100 in 2025. Income above that threshold is not taxed by Social Security. Importantly, the Social Security program is projected to run a $23 trillion deficit over the next 75 years as it's strained by shifting demographics. But the deficit could be slashed by applying the payroll tax to more income. For instance, including income above $400,000 would eliminate 60% of the 75-year funding shortfall, says the University of Maryland. 2. Gradually increase the Social Security payroll tax rate to 6.5% over six years Under current law, the Social Security payroll tax rate is 6.2% for workers and their employers. But gradually raising that figure would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit. For example, increasing thetax rate by 0.05% annually over a six-year period would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. Now that I've discussed two possible changes, let's step back and look at the big picture. There are basically three ways to resolve Social Security's financial problems: (1) increase revenue, (2) reduce costs or (3) some combination of the first two options. The changes discussed so far would increase revenue, but the next two changes would cut benefits. However, they are more subtle cuts than the 23% across-the-board reduction that would follow trust fund depletion. 3. Gradually increase full retirement age to 68 by 2033 Workers are eligible for retirement benefits at age 62, but they are not entitled to their full benefit — also called the primary insurance amount (PIA) — until full retirement age (FRA). Anyone that claims before full retirement age receives a smaller payout, meaning they get less than 100% of their PIA. FRA is currently defined as 67 years old for workers born in 1960 or later, but raising the figure would reduce the long-term deficit. For instance, increasing FRA to 68 years old by 2033, meaning it would apply to workers born in 1965 or later, would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. 4. Reduce benefits for retired workers with income in the top 20% Social Security benefits are determined as percentages of two bend points. Specifically, income from the 35 highest-paid years of work is adjusted for inflation and converted to a monthly figure called the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) amount. The AIME is then run through a formula that uses two bend points to determine the PIA for each worker. Modifying the second (highest) bend point would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit by reducing benefits for high earners. For instance, the University of Maryland estimates that reducing benefits for individuals with income in the top 20% could reduce the 75-year funding deficit by 11%. Here's the big picture: The four changes I've discussed would eliminate 101% of Social Security's $23 trillion funding shortfall, which would prevent across-the-board benefit cuts in 2035. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »


Fox News
35 minutes ago
- Fox News
CIA chief: We released two Mandarin-speaking videos to the Chinese people to contact us over dark web
All times eastern FOX News Saturday Night with Jimmy Failla FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: President Trump attends UFC event in Newark, New Jersey