logo
Tesla Stock: Why These 2 Downgrades Are Actually a Buy Signal

Tesla Stock: Why These 2 Downgrades Are Actually a Buy Signal

Globe and Mail20 hours ago

[content-module:CompanyOverview|NASDAQ:TSLA]
When a stock climbs 14% in just two trading sessions despite getting hit with not one but two analyst downgrades, the market is sending a clear message. Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) has done exactly that this week, shrugging off downgrades from both Baird and Argus Research as if they were minor speed bumps on a highway.
For growth-focused investors, this apparent disconnect between Wall Street caution and actual market action represents something we love to see and write about: a buying opportunity.
The Downgrades That Missed the Mark
Monday brought a double dose of analyst pessimism when Baird cut Tesla from Buy to Hold, followed by Argus Research, who made the same move. Both firms cited the same primary concern: the very recent and very public spat between Elon Musk and President Trump, which they believe introduces significant uncertainty to Tesla's prospects.
Baird's team also expressed particular skepticism about management's optimistic robotaxi timeline and suggested that positive expectations around the upcoming affordable vehicle launch, which we highlighted last week, might already be baked into the current share price.
Meanwhile, Argus focused heavily on how the Musk-Trump dispute could weaken demand, especially as EV tax credits face potential expiration. They warned that Tesla's stock now appears driven more by non-fundamental events than actual business performance.
Market Defiance Tells the Real Story
But here's what makes Tesla so compelling as a stock to own: Tesla shares have actually gained 14% this week already, suggesting investors are treating the analyst caution as temporary noise rather than a very red warning sign.
The stock's ability to climb despite fresh negative coverage indicates that the market sees through the political theater the underlying business momentum and long-term potential.
After all, Tesla had posted what analysts called a fundamentally poor quarter in April, yet shares had already begun recovering before the Trump-Musk tensions erupted. That recovery trajectory appears to be reasserting itself regardless of Wall Street's newfound caution.
The Bullish Chorus Remains Intact
[content-module:Forecast|NASDAQ:TSLA]
While Baird and Argus stepped to the sidelines, the broader analyst community tells a different story and is worth noting. The team at Piper Sandler actually reiterated their Overweight rating on Tuesday, echoing the updates from Morgan Stanley and Wedbush this month, already in maintaining bullish stances. Wedbush has been particularly aggressive, slapping a $500 price target on the stock and standing firm despite the recent volatility.
This split in analyst opinion actually strengthens the contrarian case. When selective downgrades occur against a backdrop of maintained Buy ratings from other respected firms, it often signals that the negative factors are temporary rather than structural.
Case in point: the fact that these downgrades focus primarily on political uncertainty rather than fundamental business deterioration supports this view.
Perfect Storm for Patient Capital
Tesla's current situation creates an almost textbook setup for contrarian investors. The stock has already absorbed a 25% hit from political noise, endured two high-profile downgrades, and still managed to surge 14% in just two sessions. This combination suggests that temporary headwinds are actually creating opportunity rather than risk.
Consider this: if Tesla can gain 14% while dealing with two rare analyst downgrades and political uncertainty, imagine the potential upside once these temporary factors fade. The upcoming affordable vehicle launch and robotaxi development remain on track regardless of Washington drama, and Tesla's core EV market position continues to strengthen globally.
For investors who believe in Tesla's long-term transformation story, the current moment offers something increasingly scarce: the chance to buy into a high-growth stock at a potential discount.
The Window Is Already Narrowing
All that being said, the market's quick dismissal of Monday's downgrades suggests this buying opportunity may be short-lived.
Political tensions have a way of resolving themselves, especially when business interests are at stake. Meanwhile, Tesla's product roadmap and market expansion continue regardless of Twitter feuds or analyst hand-wringing.
For investors willing to look past the headline noise, these rare downgrades may prove to be perfectly timed entry points rather than warning signals.
Where Should You Invest $1,000 Right Now?
Before you make your next trade, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis.
Our team has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and none of the big name stocks were on the list.
They believe these five stocks are the five best companies for investors to buy now...

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AVGO vs CSCO: Which Enterprise Security Software Stock Has an Edge?
AVGO vs CSCO: Which Enterprise Security Software Stock Has an Edge?

Globe and Mail

time25 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

AVGO vs CSCO: Which Enterprise Security Software Stock Has an Edge?

Broadcom AVGO and Cisco Systems CSCO are key providers of security software solutions for enterprises. AVGO offers Endpoint Security (Symantec and Carbon Black), Network Security, Information Security, Application Security (Carbon Black) and Identity Security solutions. Meanwhile, CSCO offers Network Security, Identity and Access Management, Secure Access Service Edge and Threat Intelligence, Detection and Response offerings. According to Gartner's latest data, enterprise spending on cybersecurity software and network security will grow 14% in 2025 to $118.5 billion, driven by strong demand for Generative AI (Gen AI) and cloud adoption. IDC expects global cybersecurity spending to grow 12.2% year over year in 2025, driven by increasing complexity and frequency of cyberattacks due to growing deployment of Gen AI and AI, with spending on security software to grow 14.4% year over year. The bullish projections offer significant growth opportunities for both Broadcom and Cisco. Both companies are benefiting from strong demand for AI infrastructure, data center build-outs and an increasing threat landscape. Shares of Broadcom and Cisco have appreciated 10.3% and 9.8% year to date. AVGO and CSCO Stock's Performance So, Broadcom or Cisco, which is leading the charge? Let's find out. AVGO Rides on Strong Infrastructure Portfolio Broadcom's security offerings are a part of its broader Infrastructure Software solution that accounted for 44% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2025. Infrastructure software revenues jumped 25% year over year to $6.6 billion, bolstered by the successful conversion of enterprise customers to the full VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) software stack subscription. AVGO expects infrastructure software revenues to be approximately $6.7 billion, up 16% year over year, in the third quarter of fiscal 2025. Broadcom's focus on delivering AI-powered, proactive security to stay ahead of evolving cyber threats has been noteworthy. In March, AVGO introduced updates to VMware vDefend, improving security planning, lifecycle management, and scalability for VCF with new tools like the Security Segmentation Assessment and Report, optimized micro-segmentation, and advanced Network Detection and Response, all aimed at improving threat prevention and operational efficiency. In April, Broadcom introduced Incident Prediction, which extends the security feature of Adaptive Protection, a unique capability of Symantec Endpoint Security Complete (SES-C). Apart from Infrastructure solutions, strong demand for Broadcom's application-specific integrated chips (ASICs), designed to support AI and machine learning and make these tasks more efficient, aids top-line growth. Custom AI accelerators (XPUs), which are a type of ASICs, are necessary to train Gen AI models, and they require complex integration of compute, memory, and I/O capabilities to achieve the necessary performance at lower power consumption and cost. CSCO Benefits From Strong Security Demand, AI Push Cisco's aggressive AI push and growing security dominance, as reflected by the third-quarter fiscal 2025 results, are noteworthy. Security revenues jumped 54% year over year, while orders grew in high double digits and included a large multiyear deal with a major financial services company for Splunk's security and observability platforms. Cisco's strategy of infusing AI across Security and Collaboration platforms and developing Agentic capabilities across the portfolio is a key catalyst. Cisco's security business is benefiting from strong demand for both Cisco Secure Access, Hypershield and XDR. On a combined basis, these solutions added more than 370 customers in the fiscal third quarter. The acquisition of Snap Attack enhances Splunk's capability. Moreover, Cisco Secure AI Factory with NVIDIA is founded on the NVIDIA Spectrum-X Ethernet networking platform. Security is at the core of the solution and helps enterprises simplify, deploy, manage and secure AI infrastructure at any scale. Cisco AI Defense and hybrid mesh firewall enable enterprise customers to build and secure data centers to develop and run AI workloads. AVGO's and CSCO's Earnings Estimate Revision Positive The Zacks Consensus Estimate for AVGO's fiscal 2025 earnings is pegged at $6.63 per share, up by a penny over the past 30 days, indicating a 36.14% increase over fiscal 2024's reported figure. The consensus mark for Cisco's fiscal 2025 earnings has increased by 1.6% to $3.79 per share over the past 30 days, suggesting 1.61% growth over fiscal 2024. Both AVGO's and CSCO's earnings beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate in all the trailing four quarters. Cisco's average surprise of 3.94% is slightly better than AVGO's surprise of 3.2%, reflecting a good quality of earnings beat on a consistent basis. Valuation: CSCO is Cheaper Than AVGO Both Cisco and Broadcom are overvalued, as suggested by the Value Score of D. However, in terms of forward 12-month Price/Sales, Broadcom shares are trading at 17.48X, significantly higher than Cisco's 4.38X. CSCO and AVGO Valuation AVGO Leads the Race on Stronger AI Push Broadcom's expanding AI portfolio, along with a rich partner base, including NVIDIA, Arista Networks, Alphabet, Dell Technologies, Meta Platform, Juniper and Supermicro, is a key catalyst. AVGO expects third-quarter fiscal 2025 AI revenues to jump 60% year over year to $5.1 billion on these factors. Cisco is not far off in terms of its AI push. The company is expanding its AI portfolio for data centers with new solutions like the Unified Nexus Dashboard, Cisco Intelligent Packet Flow, configurable AI PODs and 400G bidirectional optics. However, Broadcom is slightly ahead due to strong demand for XPUs by hyperscalers. Cisco also faces a tough competitive environment in its core networking market compared with Broadcom. Both Broadcom and Cisco currently carry a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) each. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days Just released: Experts distill 7 elite stocks from the current list of 220 Zacks Rank #1 Strong Buys. They deem these tickers "Most Likely for Early Price Pops." Since 1988, the full list has beaten the market more than 2X over with an average gain of +23.5% per year. So be sure to give these hand picked 7 your immediate attention. See them now >> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO): Free Stock Analysis Report Broadcom Inc. (AVGO): Free Stock Analysis Report

N.B. legal aid commission to review eligibility criteria in wake of auditor general report
N.B. legal aid commission to review eligibility criteria in wake of auditor general report

CBC

time38 minutes ago

  • CBC

N.B. legal aid commission to review eligibility criteria in wake of auditor general report

The New Brunswick legal aid commission says it is proud of the service it provides, despite the auditor general's recent finding that some people might not be getting the help they need under eight-year-old eligibility criteria. In the last fiscal year, the Legal Aid Services Commission provided services in family and criminal law to more than 31,000 clients — 4,000 more than in the previous year, said Chantal Landry, the commission executive director. But Landry doesn't disagree with concerns raised by Auditor General Paul Martin about eligibility requirements. "We do recognize that, given the economic realities and the inflation observed in the last few years, it would be appropriate for a review of the financial eligibility grids, and we take no exception to the recommendation made by Mr. Martin on this." Martin reviewed the efficiency and effectiveness of the commission in providing legal aid across the province between April 1, 2023, and Dec. 31, 2024. His report was released earlier this week. Martin commended the commission for a number of things, including the timely processing of applications and the consistent application of financial eligibility criteria. But he found the "lack of timely review of the eligibility grid may contribute to the risk that [the commission] may not be fulfilling its mandate to serve low-income individuals as intended." Landry said an "appropriate analysis" is to be done, but if it determines an increased need for legal aid, the commission needs to be "properly resourced" to meet it. Before the current eligibility grid for legal aid was adopted, eligibility was decided based on a means test that looked at the amount of disposable income an applicant had left at the end of each month. "It was a very convoluted and very, honestly, inequitable system, because for clients who were financially responsible, they typically didn't qualify," Landry said. The income grid used now is based on gross household income. For example, according to the grid posted in 2017, a single-person household making more than $2,600 per month is not eligible for legal aid. Landry said the reason the criteria haven't been reviewed in eight years is that there were other priorities and an increase in clients coming through the door. In Martin's report, he also found no formalized financial appeals process, and people who did appeal were not treated consistently. The audit found that of the 140 appeals, 14 applicants were approved with an income of more than 10 per cent above the threshold, while 15 were denied despite their income being within 10 per cent of the threshold. Landry said that in recent years, the commission looked at accepting people who were just above the eligibility cut-off and appealed being denied aid. "We developed kind of a discretionary standard of accepting a client if their income was within 10 per cent over the top of the grid," said Landry. "So to address the recommendation of Mr. Martin, we've already put in place some directives to staff, and we will further develop processes to provide more transparency for clients who will want to appeal under this guideline." Landry said she understands why there needs to be more process in that particular system, and hopes it will be achieved in the near future. Landry said she was pleased with the positive comments that came out of the auditor general's report, but said there's always room for improvement in any program.

Met Opera attendance dropped in spring as tourism fell, coinciding with immigration crackdown
Met Opera attendance dropped in spring as tourism fell, coinciding with immigration crackdown

CTV News

time44 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Met Opera attendance dropped in spring as tourism fell, coinciding with immigration crackdown

People appear in Josie Robertson Plaza in front of The Metropolitan Opera house at Lincoln Center in New York on March 12, 2020. . (AP Photo/Kathy Willens, File) NEW YORK — Metropolitan Opera season attendance dropped slightly following the Trump administration's immigration crackdown that coincided with a decrease in tourists to New York. The Met sold 72% of capacity, matching 2023-24 and down from its 75% projection. 'We were on track to continue to improve,' Met general manager Peter Gelb said Friday. 'We were disappointed by the sales in the last two months of the season — our projections were much higher and I attribute the fact that we didn't achieve our sales goals to a significant drop in tourism." New York City Tourism & Conventions last month reduced its 2025 international visitor projection by 17%, the Met said. International buyers accounted for 11% of sales, down from the Met's projection of 16% and from about 20% before the coronavirus pandemic. 'It's unfortunate, but this is the times in which we live,' Gelb said. The Met said factoring ticket discounts, it realized 60% of potential income, down from 64% in 2023-24 but up from 57% in 2022–23. 'We were able to sell an equal amount of tickets the last year, but there were more discounted tickets,' Gelb said. 'This really was the result of the last two months of the season.' There were 76,000 new ticket buyers, a drop from 85,000 in 2023-24, and the average age of single ticket buyers was 44, the same as in the previous season and a drop from 50 before the pandemic. Subscriptions accounted for just 7% of ticket sales, down from 12-15% before the pandemic, Gelb said economic uncertainty impacted sales for next season. 'The stock market jumping up and down made people feel insecure,' he said. 'In one week we saw an enormous decline in our advance for next season. Then it picked up again.' Met music director Yannick Nézet-Séguin earned $2,045,038 in the year end last July 31, up from $1,307,583, in the previous fiscal year, according to the company's tax return released Friday. Gelb earned $1,395,216, roughly the same as his $1,379,032 in 2022-23,and he also accrued $798,205 listed as retirement or deferred compensation. Assets declined by about $40 million to $467 million, primarily because of an endowment draw following the pandemic. Among individual productions last season, the highest percentage of tickets sold were for the English-language version of Mozart's 'The Magic Flute' and a new staging of Verdi's 'Aida,' both at 82%, followed by the company premiere of Jake Heggie's 'Moby-Dick' at 81% Other new productions included Strauss' 'Salome' (74%), John Adams' 'Antony and Cleopatra' (65%), Osvaldo Golijov's 'Ainadamar' (61%) and Jeanine Tesori's 'Grounded' (50%). The best-selling revivals were Puccini's 'Tosca' (78%), Tchaikovsky's 'Pique Dame (The Queen of Spades)' and Puccini's La Bohème (77% each), Beethoven's 'Fidelio' and Rossini's 'Il Barbiere di Siviglia' (76% each) and Mozart's 'Le Nozze di Figaro' (71%). Lagging were Strauss' 'Die Frau ohne Schatten' (68%0, Verdi's 'Rigoletto' (64%), Offenbach's 'Les Contes d'Hoffmann' and the German-language version of Mozart's 'Die Zauberflöte' (62% each) and Verdi's 'Il Trovatore' (59%). Ronald Blum, The Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store