Countries failing to act on UN climate pledge to triple renewables, thinktank finds
The failure to act means that on current forecasts the world will fall far short of its clean energy goals, leading to a continued reliance on fossil fuels that is incompatible with the target of limiting global heating to below 1.5C.
A report by the climate thinktank Ember found that only 22 countries, most within the EU, have increased their renewable energy ambitions since more than 130 signed up to the renewables pact at the UN's Cop28 climate talks in Dubai almost two years ago.
This means that the global sum of national renewables targets is now just 2% higher than at Cop28. While this could be enough to double the world's renewable energy capacity from 2022, to reach 7.4 terawatts (TW) by 2030, governments would fall well below the 11TW needed to meet the UN goal of tripling renewables, according to the analysts.
'Tripling global renewables capacity by 2030 is the single biggest action this decade to stay on track for the 1.5C climate pathway,' the report said. 'Yet, despite the landmark Cop28 agreement to reach 11,000GW of renewables by 2030, national targets remain largely unchanged and fall short of what is needed.'
The report found that beyond the EU only seven countries have updated their renewable energy goals since the pact was signed, including Mexico and Indonesia, which have watered down their targets.
Countries that have failed to act include the US, China and Russia, which are some of the world's largest energy users and together are responsible for almost half of the world's annual carbon emissions.
The fate of the world's renewable energy deal may depend on the actions of Beijing, which is expected to finalise its 15th five-year plan for energy later this year, covering the period 2026-30. Washington and Moscow do not have renewable energy targets for 2030, and according to Ember their political leaders are not expected to set any.
In India, clean energy targets have also remained unchanged, but the country's ambition to build 500GW of renewables by 2030 is already aligned with the global goal to triple renewable energy capacity, the thinktank added.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
The country that has showed the greatest renewables ambition since Cop28 is Vietnam, which this year pledged to increase its capacity by 86GW by the end of the decade. Australia and Brazil have promised to increase their homegrown renewables by 18GW and 15GW.
The UK upgraded its renewable energy plans last year with a pledge to build an extra 7GW of renewable energy by 2030 to reach the Labour government's target to create a virtually carbon-free electricity system. In Korea, renewables are expected to grow by 9GW by 2030.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Renewables and fossil fuels not ‘either-or', says Reeves after Trump comments
Renewable and non-renewable energy sources are not an 'either-or', Rachel Reeves has said after Donald Trump described North Sea oil as a 'treasure chest'. On a visit to Lossiemouth on the North Sea coast in Moray, the Chancellor described oil and gas as 'incredibly important for the UK and our energy security'. Her appearance in Scotland followed a five-day visit from the US president, who called on the UK Government to 'incentivise the drillers, fast'. Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social: 'North Sea oil is a treasure chest for the United Kingdom. 'The taxes are so high, however, that it makes no sense.' Asked whether she would 'unlock' the 'treasure chest', Ms Reeves told the PA news agency: 'Oil and gas are incredibly important for the UK and our energy security. 'And oil and gas is going to play an important role in our energy mix for decades to come. 'It's why, alongside the private sector, we're investing in carbon capture and storage, which is absolutely essential for supporting energy intensive industries. 'But it's not either-or. 'At the same time, we're investing in clean homegrown energy, including at Berwick Bank in Scotland, which will create thousands of new jobs and power millions of homes. 'And that's what we need to do to make sure that our economy has this energy security that we need, that we bring down bills and bring more good jobs to Scotland.' Berwick Bank in the North Sea has this week received a green light from the Scottish Government. The proposed wind farm, off the coast of East Lothian, could add more than 4.1 gigawatts of capacity, which according to developer SSE Renewables is enough electricity to power more than six million homes annually. But Mr Trump criticised existing wind farms during his visit, when he said: 'When we go to Aberdeen, you'll see some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen, the height of a 50-storey building.' Gesturing with his hands, he added: 'You can take 1,000 times more energy out of a hole in the ground this big.' Conservative shadow Scottish secretary Andrew Bowie has written to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, calling for a review of policies affecting the oil and gas industry. 'As President Trump has said, the UK's 'very high' tax on oil and gas companies is a deterrent to investment,' he wrote. 'The extension of the energy profits levy (EPL), coupled with uncertainty around future licensing and investment signals, has created a climate of instability that threatens jobs, innovation and the region's economic resilience. 'President Donald Trump's remarks during your visit – calling Aberdeen the 'oil capital of Europe' and urging the UK to 'bring it back' – reflect a sentiment shared by many in the region. 'May I urge you to consider the president's call to 'incentivise' domestic production of hydrocarbons? 'Oil and gas still have a vital role to play in our energy mix and economic future; British people would rather see the UK benefit from domestic exploration and drilling than import more from Norway and Qatar.' The West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine MP added: 'Will you urgently call a meeting in Downing Street to conduct the review in partnership with industry leaders, our world-leading supply chain business, and the local workforce to ensure a coherent and sustainable path forward?'
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The furious Green Blob will try to destroy these Heathrow plans
Just expand the damn airport already. Somewhere in Prime Minister Keir Starmer's 2026 diary an entry has been written marked 'bottle Heathrow decision'. At least that is a reasonable assumption based the current administration's record with hard choices, and a history of similar cave-ins by governments of all stripes since the 2003 Air Transport White Paper first proposed Heathrow expansion. I will not remake the case for encouraging people to visit the UK. It should be self-evident to anyone professing to care about growth that making it easier to move people and things is as essential as having secure abundant energy. To do that we need more planes, and planes need more runways and airports. I will not remake the case for this scheme. There are other proposals, including a second Heathrow option, other airports, and a filing cabinet full of wilder ideas like Boris Island. A serious country would be thinking about doing most or all of them. But Britain is not a serious country, it's a climate cult living in a heritage theme park governed by anxiety-riddled children nannied by lawyers. Gaze if you will for example on the specimens running the capital. Top beetle on the dung-heap of wilfully managed decline is the Mayor of London Sadiq Khan. He helped successfully delay expansion back in 2020, using a legal challenge on the grounds of non-compliance with the Paris Agreement on climate change. He was aided by his predecessor and then-prime minister Boris Johnson who, in the midst of his Glasgow COP-inspired climate mania, bottled the government response. It was left to the airport, who had the mad decision overturned by the Supreme Court at vast cost. Khan however was backed by most of the MPs and councils in London, all of whom were responding to the political incentives provided by British planning rules and net zero. Not that airport expansion is unpopular – more are in favour than against, according to polling. But where there is opposition, it is concentrated and vocal. When you throw in climate laws and environmental permitting, infrastructure decisions can be cynically delayed by activists for years. This is getting worse since international courts like the ECJ and ICJ ruled, some would say reasonably, that governments foolish enough to sign these treaties should abide by them. Khan can now argue that any activity that increases emissions, which more flying certainly will (if we ignore fantasy plans for negative emissions technology), is illegal. We have then a cynical stand-off between the Cabinet, including a disingenuously neutral Ed Miliband, who know the country desperately needs growth, versus local politicians, Nimbys and activists who like growth in theory, just not near them. Unless something radically changes, this proposal will spend years in dismal process and courtrooms before vanishing back into the 'too difficult' box, as those responsible wring their hands and cry 'what could we do?'. It is, however, relatively simple. The Climate Change Act and related targets need to be scrapped, or at the very least reduced from a legally binding commitment to a statement of ambition. The UK either needs to withdraw from the Paris Agreement or make it clear that its contribution to saving the planet from eternal summer will be a dividend of growth through innovation, not a curtailment by banning activities. This approach has the side benefit of encouraging investment in quieter, lower-carbon flight, rather than driving such animal spirits and wealth offshore, where they have airports and fewer taxes. The planning Acts and related nature laws need to be reined in, reduced, and be subject to an absolute veto for the building of major infrastructure. Those are all things this or any future UK government could do if it wished to be serious again. In the interim you would be unwise to book a flight. The UK's ongoing capacity problems are increasing, airport congestion is growing, and as an aside so are global emissions. Our friends and rivals are simply far better at saying no to the climate children and their legal guardians. Change the laws, ignore the moaners, expand the airport.
Western Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Fact check: Recognising a Palestinian state, misleading tsunami video and deportations vs returns
Is the Government on track with its pledge to recognise a Palestinian state? On July 29, the Prime Minister announced that the UK would recognise Palestine as a state in September, ahead of the United Nations (UN) General Assembly, unless Israel meets certain conditions. Labour's manifesto committed to formally recognising a Palestinian state 'as a contribution to a renewed peace process which results in a two-state solution'. A 'two-state solution' refers to a proposed framework to resolve the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict, in which a sovereign Palestinian state is established alongside Israel. Previous efforts at a peace process did not result in a sovereign Palestinian state. UK governments have long been in favour of a two-state solution, as well as recognising a Palestinian state as part of a process towards that goal. All members of the G7 group of countries have pledged support for a two-state solution, as has the EU and China. Palestine is currently designated by the UN as a 'permanent observer state', a form of non-member state, meaning it cannot vote on decisions made by the UN's main organs and bodies, such as the General Assembly. However, the majority of UN member states have formally recognised Palestine. According to media reports, as of July 2025, some 147 UN member states formally recognised Palestinian statehood, not including France, which in the same month committed to recognising Palestine at the General Assembly in September. The UK is not included in this figure, although it does have a Consulate General in Jerusalem to assist British nationals in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. It has been reported that a number of UK peers have questioned the legal basis for any recognition of a Palestinian state. Full Fact has contacted the Government for comment on this. How fact checkers helped set the record straight on PM's viral video When 31-year-old Abby Raworth first realised her photo and name were being shared online – falsely linked to a viral video involving the Prime Minister – she assumed it was a mix-up. Posts on social media claimed that the woman in the video was not mum-of-three Nicola but was really a 'paid actress' or 'actress and agent' named Abby Raworth. Full Fact's investigation brought to light how much was being written about her online 'without any regard for if it was correct or not.' Abby has spoken to Full Fact about her experience, telling us: 'What shocks me is how little people bothered to do regarding checks before they used someone's name and accused them of something. There is a lack of accountability for what comes out of peoples' mouths and if it had happened to any of those people they would have a different opinion on it.' We're grateful to Abby for sharing her story to help show exactly why Full Fact exists to counter the harm caused by misinformation. Old tsunami video circulates amid Pacific evacuations A video circulating online amid major evacuations across the Pacific is claimed to show a tsunami which has taken 'thousands of lives'. But this is misleading. The footage shows three people, including the person filming, narrowly escape huge waves that crash into some small boats on a shore. It was shared online following news of an 8.8 magnitude earthquake off the coast of Russia, which triggered the evacuation of almost two million people across Japan. Warnings were also put in place in other locations including Hawaii, Ecuador, Indonesia, Peru and China. A caption shared with the video said: 'Massive Earthquake triggers Tsunami taking thousands of lives in seconds with little to no warning.' But this footage is not current, or related to the earthquake in Russia or the subsequent tsunami warnings. It actually showed a tsunami which occurred on the west coast of Greenland in 2017, triggered by a landslide. That tsunami did not kill 'thousands', as stated in the social media posts. Four people were killed, and nine others were injured. The same footage has been wrongly shared in the wake of other earthquakes before. Has Labour carried out 'record deportations'? Labour MP Mike Tapp recently claimed that the Government has carried out 'record deportations'. We've frequently seen MPs and ministers using the word 'deportations' when referring to all immigration returns. Not all immigration returns are 'deportations'. We don't actually know how many meet the official definition of a deportation, which the Home Office defines as 'a specific subset of returns which are enforced either following a criminal conviction or when it is judged that a person's removal from the UK is conducive to the public good'. We do know, however, that enforced returns – the category of returns which includes deportations – account for a minority (26%) of all returns carried out under Labour during its first year in office. According to ad-hoc figures published by the Home Office, during Labour's first year in office a total of 35,052 returns were recorded. We don't have the data to compare this exact period to the same period in previous years, but official immigration statistics show that this figure is not a record for the number of immigration returns over a 12-month period, going back to 2004 when this data series began. These figures show that immigration returns over a 12-month period were consistently above 40,000 between 2010 and 2016, for example. It does appear, however, that the 35,052 returns in the first year of this Labour government represents the highest 12-month figure since 2017. While we don't know how many of these returns were official 'deportations', the figures show that the 9,115 enforced returns carried out between 5 July 2024 and 4 July 2025 also do not represent a record. While this figure is the highest number of enforced returns carried out over a 12-month period since 2018, prior to 2018 enforced returns were consistently above 10,000 over a 12-month period. MPs should use statistics transparently and with all relevant context and caveats, and quickly rectify oversights when they occur.
