logo
The most pointless role in UK politics? The secretary of state for Wales

The most pointless role in UK politics? The secretary of state for Wales

The Guardian20 hours ago

In the space of one week, Labour-run Wales has been short-changed by Labour-run Westminster on projects from rail funding to national insurance contributions. The poorest nation in the UK is being let down. Repeatedly. But what is to be done?
What we need is a hero. Someone whose job is to speak up for Wales in cabinet, to be Cymru's voice in Westminster's corridors of power. Luckily for Wales, there is such a person – the secretary of state for Wales. Unluckily for Wales, this role has long been utterly obsolete. Rather than being the voice of Wales in cabinet, it far more often represents the voice of the cabinet in Wales. It needs to go.
Wales didn't have its own secretary of state until 1964. The Scots, meanwhile, were given that voice more than 250 years before in 1707, though it was subsequently abolished three decades later and then recreated in 1926. When Wales did finally get one, it was a real cause for celebration and the culmination of much campaigning.
The first two people in the post were Jim Griffiths and Cledwyn Hughes, who were highly respected and had great credentials within the Labour movement. The new role paid dividends and within the space of three years the Welsh Language Act was passed, giving Welsh legal status in Wales (amazing what happens when you give people a voice).
But in the following decades there were some absolute stinkers in the job. The next one was George Thomas, who was anti Welsh language and described the setting up of the Welsh Office as the 'greatest mistake'. The low point of his tenure came after the Aberfan disaster, in which a coal tip collapsed on to a school killing 116 children and 28 adults. Subsequent inquiries found that the National Coal Board was squarely responsible for these deaths after refusing to pay for the removal of the tips. After the disaster, 88,000 individual contributions were received for the victim fund but the Labour UK government decided to take money from that fund and use it to clear the remaining tips. Thomas put pressure on the fund to give in.
Over the subsequent decades, many of the people holding the role were not even Welsh or in a Welsh constituency. (Imagine if they had tried to do that to the Scots.) The worst of these was the Conservative John Redwood, who was born in Kent and was MP for Wokingham in Berkshire. (If you want a treat, dig out the video of him failing to mime the Welsh national anthem.) Redwood refused to sign documents that were written in Welsh, and didn't like to stay overnight in Wales, instead driving back to his constituency in England. But perhaps most damning was that, in a country with significant levels of poverty, he took great pride in returning £100m of the Welsh Office's budget to the Treasury unspent. What an effective voice for Wales in cabinet.
More recently, Wales has been blessed with some equally diligent secretaries of state. One was Alun Cairns, who resigned from the post after it emerged that one of his staff was accused by a judge of deliberately sabotaging a rape trial. His best-known contribution was a supreme act of brown nosing when he got the Severn Bridge renamed the 'Prince of Wales Bridge' – a decision that only 17% of people in Wales supported. Another was Simon Hart, who admits in his just-published diaries that, at the official opening of the new Welsh parliament in 2020: 'I skip the Senedd bit – partly in protest, and partly to have lunch with Adam.' He doesn't say what he was protesting about. Another recent office holder was Robert Buckland who was, err, the MP for South Swindon …
While Wales has had some shocking secretaries of state, this isn't why the role should be ditched. It needs to be gone because, however principled, competent and driven the holder of the office, there is no way they can realistically do the job of being Wales's voice. They have no power, barely any staff, are appointed by the prime minister and bound by collective responsibility. The current situation represents the worst of both worlds: it gives the illusion of Wales having a voice when it comes with a pre-installed mute button.
The current holder of the office is Jo Stevens. Speaking to people in other departments as well as the Wales Office, I get the impression that she is at least proactive in making Wales's needs part of the conversation. I am told she has been focused in trying to get the historic injustices on rail funding remedied ahead of next week's spending review. Whether it works remains to be seen – and she sadly failed this week to prevent the new rail project between Oxford and Cambridge being classed as an 'England and Wales' scheme, meaning that Wales will not receive Barnett consequentials from it. But at least she isn't openly contemptuous of Welsh democracy like many of her predecessors.
The fact remains, however, that whether or not Welsh issues are raised in Whitehall is totally dependent on the whims of a cabinet member who is appointed and often living outside Wales. That's a terrible status quo. Wales should appoint its advocates, not the prime minister, who has only once in the history of the UK been Welsh. The role of secretary of state for Wales needs to be replaced by a representative of the Welsh government, which is directly elected by the people of Wales. Better still, we need to properly reform the UK so the UK government doesn't double as the English government.
Devolution gave Wales and Scotland a voice, and that voice should reverberate around the cabinet table. It is long past the time that Whitehall needs to acknowledge that the UK is made up of distinct countries. Giving these nations a real voice doesn't weaken the union, it strengthens it.
Will Hayward is a Guardian columnist. He publishes a regular newsletter on Welsh politics and is the author of Independent Nation: Should Wales Leave the UK?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Danes Moss: Campaigners say peatland plan withdrawal 'step to victory'
Danes Moss: Campaigners say peatland plan withdrawal 'step to victory'

BBC News

time19 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Danes Moss: Campaigners say peatland plan withdrawal 'step to victory'

Campaigners have welcomed a council's decision to scrap its plans for close to 1,000 homes on a peatland site in Cheshire as the "first step to victory".Cheshire East Council has rowed back on the proposal and asked officers to look at alternative uses for Danes Moss in Macclesfield, which could include restoring the Eccles, the chair of the Danes Moss Trust, said he felt pressure from the campaign group had led to the decision and there was "no justification to build there". Cheshire East opposition councillor, Conservative Chris O'Leary, told a meeting of the authority it was right to "reset the council's plan". The original proposals for the site, known as the South Macclesfield Development Area, included 950 homes, a supermarket and a link East Council owns 55% of the site, while Barratt Homes owns approximately 41%.Campaigners had been calling for no building there because of the amount of peatland, although it has been earmarked for development since 1997.A report ahead of the council meeting said the proposals to build on the land "cannot be fully reconciled" with the council's peat and carbon on Cheshire East Council's economy and growth committee voted on Tuesday to withdraw the homes application and approved plans to review include selling the land rethinking the development plans, or allowing for a "nature-led" recovery, an option added after a cross-party amendment. During the debate, O'Leary said: "Anyone who's visited Dane's Moss will know what an incredibly special place it is and it's quite right we reset the council's plans".The withdrawal was needed to "consider all the available options and make the right decisions for the right reasons for the future of this incredible site," he Labour's Anna Burton said that doing nothing was "not an option"."The wetland peat is drying out, so whatever decisions are made long term doing nothing is not an option," she councillors voted in favour of the withdrawing the application, with two Eccles told BBC Politics North West that he hoped councillors had "seen sense that there's no justification on earth to damage or build on peatlands".He said: "It's good news that the original plans are not going to go ahead but we still feel there should be zero development on this site because of the huge global importance of peatlands."James Melling of the Cheshire Wildlife Trust, which has a nature reserve on the border of the site, said he was "delighted" with the said: "I think it's testament to the hard work of all the campaigners involved and Save Danes Moss have been fantastic." See more Cheshire stories from the BBC and follow BBC North West on X. For more local politics coverage, BBC Politics North West is on BBC One on Sunday at 10:00am and on BBC iPlayer.

Leicester woman vows to fight 'political' camping table fine
Leicester woman vows to fight 'political' camping table fine

BBC News

time24 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Leicester woman vows to fight 'political' camping table fine

A woman has vowed to fight a fine she was given for setting up a table in Leicester city centre while campaigning against city council Rawling was given a £100 penalty under new rules to prevent anti-social behaviour on Saturday 31 72-year-old, from Leicester, said she believed the fine had been issued to prevent political campaigning and she would rather go to court than council said its new public spaces protection order (PSPO) introduced in April does not restrict free speech and that Mrs Rawling had been fined for putting an unauthorised structure on the highway. Mrs Rawling, a member of the Socialist Party, said she was not causing a nuisance or blocking the highway. "I accept the PSPO can be needed to deal with people on e-bikes, noisy speakers or street drinkers," she said."But this was a small camping table which we had for leaflets and so people could sign a petition."I don't think we were in anybody's way. There's plenty of space. We weren't being a nuisance."I think this was political - we were asked to take it down because we were campaigning about council cuts."It was all very amicable. The warden asked me to take it down. I said I would not and he issued a fine."I'm not going to pay it on principle, and if I have to go to court, I will."Mrs Rawling said she was opposing cuts to public services at the city council, including potential closures of community centres, and public sector job council said the penalty for breaching a PSPO could rise to £1,000 if the matter goes to court for prosecution. 'Noticeably improved' Campaigners previously wrote to Leicester's mayor Sir Peter Soulsby seeking assurances they are exempt from the PSPO.A number of groups including unions and political parties said they feared the order could "constitute an unjustified limit on their democratic rights" as the ban also includes "unauthorised structures" such as banners, stalls and told the BBC: "There's absolutely nothing in the PSPO that prevents people from going out and trying to persuade people on political matters - if they do it without a table or gazebo or loud speaker."A council spokesperson said: "The PSPO does not restrict freedom of speech, but it does restrict the nuisance of amplifiers, gazebos and other structures that more than 1,100 respondents to our consultation told us negatively impacted their experience of Leicester city centre."Many groups have been respectful of this so far and, as a result, the environment in the city centre is noticeably improved.""This group had put up a table, in breach of the public spaces protection order (PSPO) that covers the city centre. "One of our wardens asked them to take down the table and advised that if they didn't, they would be issued with a fixed penalty notice. "They refused to take it down and so a fine was issued."The council said three fixed penalty notices were issued in May under the new PSPO rules - all relating to unauthorised use of unauthorised structures on the highway.

'Change is really happening', says Portsmouth Pride organiser
'Change is really happening', says Portsmouth Pride organiser

BBC News

time29 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'Change is really happening', says Portsmouth Pride organiser

"My dad is Muslim and he's always championed and supported me. Me being out and a lesbian has never been an issue."Tally Aslam is co-chair of Portsmouth Pride, a volunteer-run local charity hosting UK Pride 2025 this told the BBC how she came out in 2000 at the age of 15, after she was accused of being "disruptive" in school when she asked about gay relationships in a sex education her dad is her biggest supporter, Ms Aslam said "culturally, there is still a lot of homophobia in non-white communities". "It's not all smooth sailing, other members of my family are not as open-minded as my dad – but then my dad married a white woman so, he's not really one for conforming all the time," she the time Ms Aslam was at school in the Hampshire city, a law called Section 28 was in place that affected the LGBT+ in May 1988, Section 28 of the Local Government Act banned places like schools and libraries from "promoting homosexuality". It was repealed in England and Wales in meant that school teachers were effectively banned from talking or educating people about homosexuality."I didn't even know it [Section 28] existed until I was in my 30s, which is shocking," said Ms Aslam."When I was in school and doing sex education, I asked about gay relationships and was sent to the headmistress's office for being disruptive."But Ms Aslam said she felt "lucky", adding: "All I can do is look at how my dad interprets the Quran and his faith and lead from that. "When it comes to religion, I think a lot of it is interpretation and opinion – you can either use that interpretation to embrace and love people for their differences or you can use it alienate and marginalise communities."On both sides of the coin, the Muslim community is seen through one lens when actually there are so many Muslim people who are LGBTQ+ and have supportive families." Growing up in Portsmouth, Ms Aslam said "homophobia was really rife". "You look on Facebook today and the comments are still there," she said. "People are emboldened by things that happen in the world and legislation emboldens people to embrace their bigotry."However, she said in the eight years she has been involved with Portsmouth Pride, she has seen "huge steps forward from local organisations and individuals"."My favourite bit of Pride is those tiny moments that no-one else sees that show that change is really happening," she said."For me, it is about making Portsmouth a more inclusive city and a better place to grow up LGBTQ+ than it was when I grew up here." You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store