
Solar panels that fit on your balcony or deck are gaining traction in the US
'We thought absolutely, let's do this right away,' said Dwyer, who lives in Oakland, California.
These small-scale solar systems could become attractive to more homeowners now that President Donald Trump's sweeping budget-and-policy package will scrap residential rooftop solar tax credits and may shift interest to cheaper alternatives. Even before the GOP bill passed, manufacturers of the smaller systems known as plug-in or balcony solar were seeing increased demand and other positive signs such as a new Utah law streamlining regulations for homeowners to buy and install them. The systems about the size of a door haven't been as widely adopted in the U.S. as in Europe because of lack of awareness, patchwork utility rules and limited availability.
The $2,000 plug-in solar system installed on Dwyer's backyard deck in March consists of two 400 watt panels, an inverter, a smart meter and a circuit breaker. It saves him around $35 per month on his power bill because he is consuming less energy from the grid, but he said reducing his carbon footprint was his primary motivation.
'We like the environmental benefits of solar and wanted to engage with solar in some fashion,' Dwyer said.
Had Dwyer opted for rooftop solar, he would have paid $20,000 for the system and $30,000 to upgrade his roof to support the panels.
Installing a plug-in solar system requires some homework. What power companies let customers do with energy-generating equipment varies, which is why prospective purchasers should check their utility's policies first. Building permits might be required depending on the municipality. Some systems can be self-installed, while others may require an electrician. For example, some kits have meters that must be wired into a home's circuit breaker.
Removing hurdles for plug-in solar
Dwyer bought his system from Bright Saver, a nonprofit company in California that advocates for plug-in solar. In addition to the type Dwyer bought, the company also offers a smaller model costing $399 that recently sold out in six days.
'The interest and demand have been overwhelming,' said Cora Stryker, a founder of Bright Saver. 'It is clear that we are hitting a nerve — many Americans have wanted solar for a long time but have not had an option that is feasible and affordable for them until now.'
Kevin Chou, another founder of Bright Saver, said wider adoption of the systems in the U.S. has been hindered by utility policies that create uncertainty about whether they're allowed and a lack of state and local policies to make clear what rules apply.
Some utilities contacted by The Associated Press say plug-in solar systems require the same interconnection applications as rooftop panels that send electricity back to the wider network. But Steven Hegedus, an electrical engineering professor at University of Delaware, said he doesn't understand why a utility would need to require an interconnection agreement for plug-in solar because, unlike rooftop systems, they are designed to prevent energy from flowing to the grid.
Still, if in doubt, a customer should follow their utility's policy.
During the early days of plug-in solar's growth, some opposition from utilities is likely since customers are buying less energy, said Robert Cudd, a research analyst at the California Center for Sustainable Communities at the University of California, Los Angeles.
'Utilities really prefer everyone being a predictable and generous consumer of the electricity they sell,' Cudd said.
This year, Utah enacted a novel law supporting plug-in solar by exempting certain small-scale systems from interconnection agreements and establishing safety requirements such as being certified by a nationally recognized testing organization such as Underwriters Laboratories. It appears to be the only state that's passed legislation supporting plug-in solar, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Republican state Rep. Raymond Ward, who sponsored the legislation, said the smaller systems allow people to better manage where their energy comes from and what they pay.
'Europe has these things. You can go buy them and they work and people want them. There is no reason why we shouldn't have them here in the United States,' Ward said.
Bright Saver says they are lobbying other states for similar legislation.
Alexis Abramson, dean of the University of Columbia Climate School, also applauded Utah's move.
'We actually need more localities, more states putting in allowances for this type of equipment,' she said.
Plug-in solar availability and savings potential
Some questions remain about how much customers could save. Severin Borenstein, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley's Haas School of Business, said the cost of some portable solar systems in the U.S. would make it hard for customers to come out ahead on their utility bills over the time they own them. He estimates the price of a $2,000 system in the U.S. works out to paying about $0.20 a kilowatt-hour over a 25-year period, which only saves people money if they have high utility costs. By comparison, Borenstein said the cost of systems sold in Europe, typically around $600, is equivalent to paying about $0.05 or $0.06 per kilowatt-hour over 25 years.
Baltimore resident Craig Keenan said saving money was only part of why he installed one of the smaller Bright Saver models on his balcony in July.
'I'm interested in renewable energy because the amount of carbon emissions that we produce as a species is very, very unsustainable for our world,' he said.
He said he expects the system will save him about $40 per year on utility bills, so it would take him about 10 years to recoup the cost of the kit.
Keenan, a mechanical engineer, said installation took him 10 to 15 minutes.
'I think anyone can install this,' he said. 'It's not complicated. It doesn't require a technical degree.'
Other companies selling plug-in solar kits include Texas-based Craftstrom. It has sold about 2,000 systems in the U.S. since 2021, mostly in California, Texas and Florida. The company's basic kits contain a solar panel that can fit in a backyard or other sunny space, along with equipment to maintain and regulate the flow of energy including an inverter and smart meter.
Kenneth Hutchings, Craftstrom's chief revenue officer, said their U.S. sales rose this year even before the passage of the GOP tax bill, and he expects demand for plug-in solar to increase further as federal rooftop solar credits expire.
The company advises customers to notify their power company before installation, but it has 'never had any pushback from any utility,' said Michael Scherer, one of the founders of Craftstrom.
China-based EcoFlow plans to begin selling plug-in solar systems in Utah and expand to other states if supportive legislation is passed, said Ryan Oliver, a company spokesperson.
'This is an example of where technology is sort of ahead of the regulators,' Oliver said, adding: 'As this rolls out to more of a nationwide product, we expect it will become more mainstream as people understand it better.'
___
Associated Press video journalist Mingson Lau in Baltimore contributed to this report.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Starbucks rival continues its US expansion
Whether you're a coffee lover or not, Starbucks is nearly impossible to ignore. With over 40,000 locations in 80 countries, it has become the most recognizable name in coffee worldwide; chances are, almost everyone has tried something from its menu at least once. However, Starbucks has experienced a noticeable decline in recent years. Sales are down, store traffic has slowed, and concerns about the company's long-term growth have prompted a major turnaround strategy to revive its business. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter While Starbucks still dominates the market, smaller chains like Dutch Bros (BROS) , Scooter's Coffee, and 7 Brew Coffee have been gaining traction, steadily growing their customer bases. Now, Starbucks faces perhaps its most significant challenge yet. A powerful international rival has entered the U.S. market, threatening its position as a coffee leader. Related: Starbucks faces huge new rival Founded in 2017 in Beijing, Luckin Coffee (LKNCY) entered the coffee scene 46 years after Starbucks (SBUX) launched, and has already surpassed expectations. With over 22,000 stores, it's now the largest coffee chain in China, overshadowing Starbucks in that market. Although relatively unknown to Americans, Luckin Coffee immediately caught people's attention when it opened its first stores in New York City on June 30. It debuted two locations, one at 55 Broadway and another at 800 6th Ave., introducing its blue-and-white deer logo to the U.S. Image source:Luckin Coffee is known for its high-quality coffee and wide range of menu options at affordable prices. However, due to economic and currency differences, prices at its U.S. locations are understandably higher than in Asia. Starbucks has faced backlash over the last few months for raising its prices. In response to criticism, it simplified its menu and eliminated extra charges, a timely move that coincides with its rival's arrival in the U.S. Related: Starbucks' huge new rival opens first US stores When comparing their menus, Luckin Coffee clearly acknowledges Starbucks as a competitor. Both chains carry handcrafted coffee beverages, frappes, matcha drinks, and refreshers. Their prices are also very similar, with a 16-ounce drip coffee costing $3.45. And so far, U.S. consumers seem intrigued to give Luckin Coffee a chance. During its opening week, lines were out the door, with many people eager to try the new coffee shop in town. Keeping the momentum, Luckin Coffee has wasted no time expanding into the U.S. In a recent Instagram post, the company teased the grand opening of its third location in New York City, hinting that the new store will be "steps away from Columbus Circle" and asking people to guess the exact location. This sparked a wave of fans quickly flooding the comments section, with many commenting "901 8th Ave." More Food News: After bankruptcy, Starbucks rival plans aggressive expansionPizza Hut menu adds a completely new type of pizzaHershey teams up with Costco to make a dream candy combo The Chinese coffee chain also posted a picture to its Instagram story revealing the outside of the new coffee shop, which appears completed. Although Luckin Coffee has yet to provide an official date for the grand opening of its new location, it claims it will be opening very soon. To promote it, Luckin Coffee launched a scavenger hunt that will end on August 18 and allows participants to win prizes and free drinks. This suggests that the third store could open on Monday Aug. 18. Related: Starbucks plans major change to how it adds new menu items The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Wall Street Journal
7 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Americans Pull Back From an Epic Credit-Card Binge
Americans are starting to pull back from a pandemic-era credit-card binge. After a surge in credit-card spending that pushed Americans' card balances above $1 trillion, growth is now moderating. Credit-card spending has been growing more slowly than debit-card spending since late last year, the first such stretch in nearly four years, according to the latest spending data from Visa and Mastercard.


New York Post
12 hours ago
- New York Post
Want your son to be a CEO? New study reveals the most powerful male name in the US — and you won't guess what it is
It's not Tom, Dick, or Harry. A new study has revealed that Robert is the most powerful male name in America, with a whopping 21 of the Fortune 500 company CEOs bearing the moniker. The analysis was conducted by Profit Engine, with the company interested in examining whether a person's name had an impact on their professional life. 'The patterns we discovered were quite striking,' Jason Morris, CEO of Profit Engline, proclaimed in a press release. 'While correlation doesn't equal causation, these results definitely make you wonder if there's something to the old saying about names shaping destiny.' 'These findings reveal something notable about representation in American corporate leadership,' Morris said. 'The complete dominance of traditional male names isn't a coincidence.' New Africa – Powerful Americans bearing the name include Disney boss Robert 'Bob' Iger and Boeing boss Robert Ortberg. Interestingly, however, no US president has ever been named Robert. 'Robert has been a powerhouse name for decades,' Morris declared. 'It projects authority and tradition, both of which are qualities that boards of directors clearly value when selecting leadership.' Since the year 2000, however, the classic name has fallen far from favor. That year, it was the 29th most popular name for boys born in the US, according to the Social Security Administration. By 2020, it had fallen to number 80. Last year, it slipped further and is now the 90th most popular boys' moniker in America. Profit Engine found that Fortune 500 CEOs were far more likely than the general public to possess traditional names. Dusan Petkovic – If you want your son to be a CEO and you're not a fan of the name Robert, the analysis shows that it's still best to stick to the classics. Profit Engine found that male Fortune 500 CEOs were far more likely than the general public to possess traditional names. After Robert, Michael was revealed to be the second most powerful name, with 19 Fortune 500 CEOs bearing the moniker. James, John, Christopher, William, David, Mark, Timothy, Brian, Andrew, Thomas and Scott followed in that order. 'These findings reveal something notable about representation in American corporate leadership,' Morris said. 'The complete dominance of traditional male names isn't a coincidence. It reflects decades of systemic patterns in who climbs the corporate ladder.' 'What's particularly telling is that we're not seeing the diversity of names that reflects modern America. No Aidens [or] Ethans, despite these being popular baby names in recent decades,' he added. 'This suggests either a generational lag or that certain naming conventions still carry unconscious advantages in professional settings.'