
What if IUD insertion didn't have to be so painful?
Before the insertion late last year, Ni, a 26-year-old health care consultant, took deep breaths of the nitrous oxide. She started to feel woozy. 'Initially you just feel relaxed,' she says, 'and then suddenly you get a bit of a head high, similar to when you would hit a vape. That kind of feeling, but intensify it more.' During the procedure, she continued to breathe the gas through cramping. Without the laughing gas, she suspects the pain would have been more acute.
'I know it's a short procedure,' Ni says, 'but I honestly cannot imagine it without the laughing gas.'
Vox Culture
Culture reflects society. Get our best explainers on everything from money to entertainment to what everyone is talking about online. Email (required)
Sign Up
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The reality is more complicated. Many patients felt they were lied to by their doctors whose only option for pain management was over-the-counter painkillers. Studies analyzing social media posts about IUD insertion found that almost all of them mentioned pain and discussed how this pain was minimized. Part warning, part public service announcement, these viral videos not only helped bring to light the real suffering patients were experiencing, but also shaped professional guidance regarding what pain management doctors should offer them.
Within the past year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) released updated recommendations for pain management during IUD placement. Both suggest clinicians offer local anesthetics like lidocaine spray, lidocaine-prilocaine cream, and paracervical block — an injection of anesthetic around the cervix. Other providers are going further, offering anti-anxiety medications or general anesthesia.
The most effective way to address pain is perhaps the most straightforward, and the most novel: talking to patients and hearing their concerns.
While the ACOG guidance found insufficient evidence to support nitrous oxide use, Ni remembers her doctor telling her how it helped other patients. She had a similarly positive review; she says she'll request it again when she needs to replace her IUD. 'Unless there's some other medication then,' she says. 'But I feel like the laughing gas will suffice.'
Over 6 million people in the United States currently use IUDs as contraception, and the evolving pain management standards around them show the medical establishment has moved to address women's pain — and how much more work is left to be done. Aside from having a slate of pain management options on offer, the most effective way to address pain is perhaps the most straightforward, and the most novel: talking to patients and hearing their concerns. The shifting standards around IUD procedures point to the ways doctors are only beginning to see patients as experts of their own bodies, and to take women's concerns seriously.
'This fits right into a movement that has really picked up steam, but I doubt is the norm across medical disciplines,' says Eve Espey, a professor and chair of the department of OB-GYN and family planning at the University of New Mexico. 'But if you approach patient care in that way — in thinking about what a patient might experience with a painful outpatient procedure — [it] would dovetail very nicely into that much more patient-centered approach.'
A history of pain in gynecology
Intrauterine devices are a form of long-acting birth control that have grown in popularity over the last 30 years, especially among those between the ages of 25 and 34. There are two categories of IUDs: copper and hormonal, both of which prevent sperm from fertilizing eggs.
Part of the allure of IUDs is that, unlike the pill, which must be taken daily, an IUD is effective for anywhere from three to 10 years, depending on type. No upkeep, no prescription refills. Some users report less cramping and bleeding during periods and less endometrial pain; others stop getting their periods altogether.
'There's also some literature that says if you tell people that something's going to hurt, that it hurts more, which is true.'
Although the insertion itself only takes a few minutes, there are multiple points of pain throughout the procedure. First, the medical professional inserts the speculum, an instrument that opens the vaginal walls, which can be painful for some patients. Then, using a device called the tenaculum, the provider will grasp the cervix to straighten and hold it in place. The depth of the uterus is then measured, which can cause cramping, and finally, the IUD itself is inserted.
Espey has placed countless IUDs during her 37-year career as an OB-GYN. For a while, she'd outline the risks and benefits and answer any patient questions. But she wouldn't necessarily emphasize the potential for pain in order to avoid scaring patients. 'We just assumed that if somebody came in for an IUD, that they wanted it,' Espey says. 'It's not that we wouldn't describe the fact that it was painful — I did — but it's also a little tough, because there's also some literature out there that says if you tell people that something's going to hurt, that it hurts more, which is true.'
The concern was IUDs would be too difficult and painful to place for anyone else. 'On average,' Epsey says, 'women who have had vaginal births, particularly recent vaginal births, have far less pain with IUD placement than women who have not or who have only had C-sections.'
Birth control pills were the go-to contraceptive method for decades, Espey says. But as more evidence emerged about the safety and efficacy of IUDs for people of all ages with uteruses, guidance about who should get an IUD began to change in the 2010s. But even as more people — particularly those who had never given birth — began to get them, the perception that the procedure was only mildly uncomfortable persisted. Indeed, medical providers often rated their patients' pain during IUD placement as significantly lower than what the patients experienced.
Women and gender-nonconforming people's experiences in medical settings have long been dismissed. In a 2018 review of scientific literature about gender biases in health care, men were seen as 'stoic' when it came to pain, while women were perceived as being more sensitive to pain and 'hysterical.' Hysteria was a popular medical diagnosis for centuries, almost exclusively used to refer to women. The diagnosis was used to classify women as having a mental disorder associated with sexual and social repression and weak character.
Women and gender nonconforming people's experiences in medical settings have long been dismissed.
The field of gynecology has similarly nefarious origins. The 'father of modern gynecology,' James Marion Sims, developed gynecological practices by experimenting on enslaved women without anesthesia based on the false stereotype that Black people have higher pain thresholds. Amid the eugenics movement of the 1900s, those with low incomes, people of color, and people with disabilities underwent forced sterilizations.
Even as late as the 1990s, contraceptive implants were marketed toward low-income Black communities as a means of controlling reproduction of those deemed unfit or unworthy of parenthood. 'I'm an OB-GYN,' says Ashley Jeanlus, a board-certified OB-GYN in Washington, DC, 'but I'm also not very naive that historically and to modern times, how we take care of patients isn't always patient-centered.'
The recent CDC and ACOG pain management guidelines are a welcome change, Jeanlus says. 'We're showing that there is improvement, that we're taking important steps to making sure that we are standardizing care, ensuring that patients are receiving these procedures with compassion and dignity, and we're not telling them to just tough it out anymore,' she says.
Better evidence
ACOG's pain recommendations, released in May, were almost two years in the making. Between the uproar on social media and a greater availability of research showing the efficacy of local anesthetic during IUD placement and other in-office procedures, clinicians felt it appropriate to make a statement, says Kristin Riley, an OB-GYN and minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon at Penn State Health and one of the co-authors of the ACOG committee opinion on pain management. 'There's a lot more studies about this overall topic,' she says, 'and we wanted to pull it all together in one place where clinicians and potentially patients could see it all together and really give people options.'
Both the ACOG and CDC guidelines are just that: recommendations for practitioners. They urge doctors to better understand what pain management options are available and supported by research, and to inform their patients of these options, risks, and benefits. CDC guidelines simply mention topical lidocaine 'might be useful for reducing patient pain.' ACOG goes a step further, saying pain management options 'should be discussed with and offered to all patients seeking in-office gynecologic procedures.' But whether doctors follow the guidelines is completely voluntary.
Getting an IUD? Here's how to advocate for yourself. Learn about the different options for pain management. What might be best for you?
Discuss your concerns, fears, and preferences with your doctor ahead of time. Don't wait until the day of your appointment to ask about anesthetics or anti-anxiety medication.
Ask as many questions as you want until you feel comfortable. Make sure your doctor explains all of your options, which may include referring you to another clinic with more resources.
Develop a plan. What medications will you take pre-appointment? What form of anesthetic will your provider use during the procedure?
If your doctor isn't taking your concerns seriously or doesn't offer pain management that you want, find a new one. Ask if your doctor has a referral list. Or you could reach out to a hospital affiliated with a university. There might be a higher chance of finding a provider that offers additional pain management there, Jeanlus notes. You can also try searching for a provider who is fellowship trained in complex family planning , which means they have received additional training in abortion and contraceptive care.
Pain is complex and subjective, which makes studying it difficult. Patients who have a history of sexual abuse and trauma or prior negative gynecological experiences can also experience greater pain during IUD placement. The number of different pain medicines — injected lidocaine, sprays and gel-based lidocaine anesthetics, over-the-counter painkillers — and the various combinations in which researchers use them in studies make it difficult to reach conclusive results, Riley says.
Danielle Tsevat, an OB-GYN at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who studies gynecological pain, says the most conclusive evidence for pain relief during IUD insertion points to a lidocaine paracervical block, especially among patients who have never given birth. During her medical residency a few years ago, Tsevat had a mentor who utilized the anesthetic during IUD placements. She'd seen it used for other procedures, like abortion or miscarriage evacuations, but the shot wasn't commonly used for IUD placements.
Other studies have found topical lidocaine gel or creams to be effective at minimizing pain from the tenaculum (the device that holds the cervix in place during the procedure), Tsevat says. Other methods aren't as definitive. Ibuprofen hasn't been shown to help during the insertion, but can ease cramping afterward. Some clinicians will offer anti-anxiety medications since anxiety can put a patient at higher risk for pain, Tsevat says. 'They report improved outcomes after that too,' she says. 'That one also doesn't really have much evidence behind it yet…but it's something that we've seen offered.' Nitrous oxide, what Ana Ni used during her procedure, has also shown promise in studies, Espey says. Meanwhile, misoprostol, one of the pills used in medical abortions, was found by ACOG to cause more abdominal pain during IUD placement.
No one option provides a panacea because there is no one source of pain during IUD placement, and the pain itself is relatively short-lived, lasting all but a few seconds. Additionally, a shot itself can be uncomfortable. Perhaps the paracervical block — administered after the speculum is inserted — would be more effective if clinicians waited a few minutes after giving the shot. 'But that also prolongs the procedure too,' Tsevat says. 'A lot of patients just say, 'I want to get this over with and done,' and not be in the speculum for that long.'
Related How to get the sexual health care you deserve
During her medical training, Fran Haydanek, a board-certified OB-GYN in Rochester, New York, says she was never taught about pain management during IUD placement. After hearing from her patients, and others' horror stories on social media, she began counseling patients on pain management options and offering paracervical blocks in 2021. She estimates 80 percent of her patients opt for the injection, and her practice eats the cost because insurance won't reimburse for the medication, she says. 'There's clear guidelines from medical organizations that are saying this [medication] should be offered,' Haydanek says. 'Doctors should be reimbursed for that.'
However, across the board, few providers seem to be offering these medications. In a small recent study, only 28 percent of clinics offered lidocaine, including paracervical blocks, for pain management; 85 percent recommended ibuprofen. Another study that looked at pain medications for IUD placement within the Veterans Affairs Health Care System found that lidocaine was used only 0.2 percent of the time, while nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used during 8 percent of IUD placements.
Whose pain matters?
Perhaps the most effective pain management option is IV sedation or general anesthesia, which ACOG notes requires additional research to determine risks, benefits, cost, and accessibility. It's an even more resource-intensive option. 'I would bet a million dollars that if we studied IV sedation and IUD pain that we would find that it significantly reduces pain,' Espey says. But clinics would need a pharmacy, nursing staff, advanced monitoring equipment, a recovery room — all of which could drive up costs for patients.
The many years that passed before women's pain was taken seriously for IUD insertions, as well as the continued lack of research into the cost and accessibility of general anaesthesia, lead to a logical question: Whose pain does the medical establishment take seriously?
Men have long been offered pain medication for below the belt treatments.
Aside from medications, innovations to the devices used during IUD placement could make the procedure more comfortable. The tenaculum, for instance, the tool that grasps the cervix and is a major source of pain, dates back to the 1800s. A Swiss company, Aspivix, has developed an alternative tool, called Carevix, that uses suction to secure the cervix. The device is FDA-cleared in the US and is used in 21 health care centers worldwide, including at the Indiana University School of Medicine and Columbia University, according to the company's chief marketing officer, Ikram Guerd.
Given the absence of a silver-bullet solution, the most consequential change when it comes to addressing pain is far more understated. 'The most important thing that we've done, ironically, is stressed how important it is to talk to your patient,' Espey says. Trauma-informed care — in which doctors take a patient's past into account — puts the patient at the center of treatment. When patients feel safe to discuss prior challenging IUD placements or past sexual assault, the provider can better individualize pain control. Giving survivors of sexual assault control over their medical appointments can help avoid retraumatizing them.
But how much control, how much information, is appropriate to share with patients? Doctors walk the fine line between disclosing how much discomfort to expect from a procedure (and potentially causing increased anxiety) and downplaying their concerns. Research shows that the more people expect pain, the more painful the experience actually is. But to say IUD insertion is entirely pain-free might come across as gaslighting. 'Do you minimize pain to reduce that anticipatory anxiety at the expense of potentially looking like you're lying to your patient about something quite painful?' Espey says.
For Espey, the sweet spot is offering patients plenty of options, from prescribing anti-anxiety medications prior to the procedure or rescheduling them at a clinic with more resources. 'Just giving patients options really helps people feel like they can make a decision,' she says.
In a current study, Tsevat, the UNC OB-GYN, is surveying patients post-IUD placement. The feedback has been interesting, she says. Some patients report low pain, while others have compared the experience to razor blades in their uterus. Some were offered pain management, others were not. One participant, who was getting her IUD replaced after eight years, was delighted when her doctor explained the pain management options available. 'She said it was still painful,' Tsevat says, 'but she was just happy that she had gotten something and [it] helped her experience a little bit.'
Most notably, patients hardly ever discussed their experience with their doctors afterward; it wasn't something they thought was appropriate to mention. When patients don't feel seen or taken seriously, it can have lasting impacts and may result in their avoiding future health care. While one aspect of women's pain in medicine is finally being discussed, others with painful periods or endometriosis may still feel dismissed. There's still room for more conversations, more transparency.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
What still causes the plague in the US?
(NEXSTAR) — Northern Arizona recently recorded its first pneumonic plague-related death since 2007. Early last year, Oregon saw its first case of the bubonic plague since 2015. Person-to-person spread of the plague hasn't been seen in more than 100 years in the U.S., but cases occasionally pop up. So what causes them? The plague cases reported in the U.S. today are not exactly the same as those seen in medieval Europe. Between 1347 and 1352 alone, it's estimated that the plague caused the deaths of at least 25 million Europeans. Rats aboard a ship from the Crimea and Asia that docked in Sicily are blamed for bringing the bubonic plague into Europe. Once fleas ran out of host rodents in Europe – those that lacked resistance to the plague also died – they sought out humans. Fungus labeled 'urgent threat' by CDC is spreading rapidly, hospital study finds Eventually, those who were sick or at risk of carrying the plague were isolated and put into quarantine, much like guidance issued during the COVID pandemic. A vaccine in the late 19th century, improved sanitation, better health practices and modern antibiotics have been credited with helping to stop the spread of the plague when it pops up. The U.S. now sees about seven cases annually, on average, according to estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The World Health Organization says most human cases over the last three decades have been in Africa. When cases do occur in the U.S., they're primarily in the West, with most reported in New Mexico and Arizona. Cases have also appeared within the region of southern Oregon, far western Nevada, and California. U.S. cases are, most often, bubonic. There are three main forms of the plague: bubonic (the most common during Europe's Black Death), septicemic, and pneumonic. Generally speaking, plague is brought on by the Yersinia pestis bacterium, with humans and mammals being affected. 'Quiet cracking' is the newest term for a workplace problem — and it's 'pretty pervasive,' expert says The three types of plague present with different symptoms and are caused by different things. Bubonic plague is caused by the bites of fleas that are mostly found on rodents. Symptoms of bubonic plague, the Cleveland Clinic explains, include a sudden high fever; chills; headaches; pain in the abdomen, arms, and legs; and large, swollen lymph nodes that can leak pus. While the bacteria will multiply in the lymph node where it entered the body, it's capable of spreading to other parts of the body if not treated with antibiotics. Septicemic plague has similar symptoms to bubonic plague, including fever, chills, extreme weakness, pain in the abdomen, shock, and the possibility of bleeding into the skin and other organs, the CDC explains. This form of plague can develop from untreated bubonic plague as well as from the handling of infected animals. Should a person with bubonic or septicemic plague go without treatment, and the bacteria reach their lungs, they can develop pneumonic plague. A person can also get pneumonic plague from breathing in 'droplets coughed out by another person or animal with pneumonic plague,' according to the CDC. Like other forms of plague, a person infected with pneumonic plague may develop a fever, headache, weakness, and pneumonia, with the latter developing 'rapidly.' While bubonic and septicemic plague may take a few days to set in, the incubation period for pneumonic plague may be just over a day, the CDC reports. It's the only form that can be spread person-to-person, and it is considered the most serious form of the disease. Between 2020 and 2023, the CDC reported 15 human plague cases were reported. Of those, three died. As the Cleveland Clinic explains, plague has to be treated with antibiotics as quickly as possible — taking antibiotics within 24 hours of symptoms gives you 'the best chance of getting better.' You could begin feeling better within a week or two, as long as you receive treatment, according to health experts. Regardless of the type of plague, about 90% survive with quick treatment. Untreated, 'plague is nearly always fatal,' the Cleveland Clinic said. Health officials have not said how the Arizona resident who died earlier this year of the pneumonic plague became infected. Oregon's case of bubonic plague last year was believed to be brought on by a pet cat. In recent years, Colorado has reported a cat testing positive for septicemic plague and a cat, two prairie dog colonies, and a squirrel testing positive for bubonic plague. Infected fleas are largely to blame for plague cases that occur in the U.S. today, but the handling of infected animals – like cats, rabbits, rats, mice, and squirrels, according to New York's Department of Health – has also been known to lead to the plague. To avoid getting the plague, it's recommended that you take steps to avoid flea bites. That includes wearing bug spray with DEET and clearing up spaces outside where the wild animals fleas love may live. It's also important to speak with your veterinarian about preventing fleas on your pets. Your pets should also not be allowed to roam outdoors freely if you live in an area prone to the plague.


USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
Dangerous waters: What to know about the flesh-eating bacteria and brain-eating amoebas
For most people, swimming in a lake or river is the best way to cool off on a hot summer's day. But there are more than frogs and fish in those waters – microscopic pathogens that can cause serious illness, and in extreme cases, even death, are lurking below the surface. Two waterborne pathogens have been increasing in freshwater lakes and brackish waters across the U.S. in recent years, due to the warming trends of climate change, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The culprits are the rare "flesh-eating" bacteria (scientific name Vibrio vulnificus) and the "brain-eating" amoeba (scientific name Naegleria fowleri). In early July, a boy died from the brain-eating amoeba, after swimming in a South Carolina lake. Four other people have died after contracting the rare flesh-eating bacteria in Florida this year, state health officials confirmed. How do these pathogens enter the body? The brain-eating amoeba and flesh-eating-bacteria are known to thrive in warm water environments. The brain-eating amoebas are more commonly found in warm freshwater lakes and rivers, while the flesh-eating bacteria are primarily found in warm brackish water, which is a mix of fresh and salt water. How both pathogens can enter the body during water activities: Why is it called a brain-eating amoeba? The amoeba is often referred to as brain-eating because it can cause an deadly infection called Primary Amebic Meningoencephalitis (PAM) that destroys brain tissue. The brain-eating amoeba usually kills fewer than 10 Americans each year. In particular, only four survivors have been identified out of 167 instances that have been recorded in the U.S. between 1962 and 2024, according to the CDC. Why is it called a flesh-eating bacteria? The bacteria is often referred to as fleshing-eating because it can cause necrotizing fasciitis, which destroys muscle tissue, skin tissue and skin. It can enter through a cut, but it cannot penetrate unharmed skin. The bacteria can also enter your body when you eat uncooked or undercooked shellfish. The flesh-eating bacteria is rare, but it can be life-threatening. Without treatment, death can occur in just a few days. An average of 150 to 200 cases are reported each year, with most of them in Gulf Coast states, according to the CDC. Take these precautions during water activities Swimmers, particularly those in southern states and warm coastal waters, should expect a minimal risk of contracting a pathogen in warm freshwater lakes, rivers, brackish waters and hot springs. How to lower your risks: Medical experts always recommend keeping a close eye on children when they play or swim in the water. While it's uncommon for adults to swallow water while swimming, children are far more prone to do so, according to VCU Health. Researchers are unsure why boys appear to be most at risk of being infected. It may be because they are more prone to play in the sediment at the bottom of lakes or jump and dive into the water, according to the CDC. Progression of infection: Know the symptoms Because of the life-threatening results, it is important to be know of symptoms and significance of seeking immediate medical assistance following any exposure. Here is a comparison of symptoms of the flesh-eating bacteria vs. the brain-eating amoeba: CONTRIBUTING Julie Garisto, T. Sudore and C.A. Bridges/USA TODAY NETWORK, Christopher Cann and George Petras/USA TODAY SOURCE Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Health, Cleveland Clinic, WebMD, VCU Health, The Florida Department of Health, and USA TODAY research


San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Got the sniffles? Here's what to know about summer colds, COVID-19 and more
Summer heat, outdoor fun ... and cold and flu symptoms? The three may not go together in many people's minds: partly owing to common myths about germs and partly because many viruses really do have lower activity levels in the summer. But it is possible to get the sniffles — or worse — in the summer. Federal data released Friday, for example, shows COVID-19 is trending up in many parts of the country, with emergency department visits up among people of all ages. Here's what to know about summer viruses. How much are colds and flu circulating right now? The number of people seeking medical care for three key illnesses — COVID-19, flu and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV — is currently low, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Flu is trending down and RSV was steady this week. But COVID-19 is trending up in many mid-Atlantic, southeast, Southern and West Coast states. The expectation is that COVID-19 will eventually settle into a winter seasonal pattern like other coronaviruses, but the past few years have brought a late summer surge, said Dr. Dean Blumberg, chief of pediatric infectious diseases at University of California Davis Children's Hospital. Other viruses circulating this time of year include the one that causes 'hand, foot and mouth' disease — which has symptoms similar to a cold, plus sores and rashes — and norovirus, sometimes called the stomach flu. Do viruses spread less in the summer? Many viruses circulate seasonally, picking up as the weather cools in the fall and winter. So it's true that fewer people get stuffy noses and coughs in the summer — but cold weather itself does not cause colds. It's not just about seasonality. The other factor is our behavior, experts say. Nice weather means people are opening windows and gathering outside where it's harder for germs to spread. But respiratory viruses are still around. When the weather gets too hot and everyone heads inside for the air conditioning, doctors say they start seeing more sickness. In places where it gets really hot for a long time, summer can be cold season in its own right. 'I grew up on the East Coast and everybody gets sick in the winter,' said Dr. Frank LoVecchio, an emergency room doctor and Arizona State University researcher. 'A lot of people get sick in the summer here. Why is that? Because you spend more time indoors.' Should you get another COVID-19 booster now? For people who are otherwise healthy, timing is a key consideration to getting any vaccine. You want to get it a few weeks before that big trip or wedding, if that's the reason for getting boosted, doctors say. But, for most people, it may be worth waiting until the fall in anticipation of winter cases of COVID-19 really tick up. 'You want to be fully protected at the time that it's most important for you,' said Dr. Costi Sifri, of the University of Virginia Health System. People at higher risk of complications should always talk with their doctor about what is best for them, Sifri added. Older adults and those with weak immune systems may need more boosters than others, he said. Are more younger kids getting sick with COVID-19? Last week, the CDC noted emergency room visits among children younger than 4 were rising. That makes sense, Blumberg said, because many young kids are getting it for the first time or are unvaccinated. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in May that the shots would no longer be recommended for healthy kids, a decision that health experts have said lacks scientific basis. The American Academy of Pediatrics still endorses COVID-19 shots for children older than 6 months. How else can I lower my risk? The same things that help prevent colds, flu and COVID any other time of the year work in the summer, doctors say. Spend time outside when you can, wash your hands, wear a mask. And if you're sick, stay home. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.