logo
Scientists pinpoint the link between alcohol and pancreatic cancer

Scientists pinpoint the link between alcohol and pancreatic cancer

Daily Mail​6 hours ago
A new study has revealed how a heavy drinking habit can increase your risk of deadly pancreatic cancer, and found a promising solution.
The researchers from Miami in the US explained high alcohol consumption damages cells that produce enzymes vital for digestion.
This causes inflammation of the tissue, which damages the pancreas, an organ which releases enzymes and hormones vital for digestion and regulating blood sugar levels.
Over time, they explained, pre-cancerous lesions can develop, increasing the risk of full blown pancreatic cancer.
This is one of the deadliest forms of cancer which kills more than 9,000 Britons and 50,000 Americans each year.
But for it to progress into cancer there needs to be a mutation in a pre-cancerous gene responsible for cell growth called Ras.
The study found exposure to alcohol and a pro-inflammatory molecule caused symptoms similar to alcohol-introduced pancreatitis, an inflammatory condition.
They discovered this inflammation triggered the development of the precancerous lesions and later cancer.
The researchers also found that they could prevent the development of precancerous and cancerous lesions, even in the presence of alcohol.
This included by knocking out a special type of gene called CREB which plays an pro-inflammatory role.
On their findings, lead author, Dr Nagaraj Nagathihalli, Ph.D, a professor at the University of Miami said: 'We found that CREB is not just a mediator of inflammation.
'It is a molecular orchestrator that permanently converts acinar cells into precancerous cells.'
The study's co-author, Nipun Merchant, M.D. a surgeon in Miami added they believe their findings 'lays the groundwork' for future pancreatic cancer prevention.
The findings come amid a concerning rise in pancreatic cancer in young people—but there hasn't been a spike in deaths.
However, the deadly cancer has a survival rate of roughly 10 per cent in the first year after the diagnosis.
However, three years or more after the diagnosis chance of survival lowers to one per cent.
Less than one in 20 pancreatic cancer patients live to see the decade after their diagnosis, according to UK figures.
So, it is incredibly important to catch the illness in its early stages by recognising the easy to dismiss symptoms.
These include weight loss, fatigue, abdominal pain and changes in bowl habits and jaundice—the yellowing of the skin or eyes.
Pancreatic cancer is an umbrella term for various tumours found on the 25cm tadpole shaped organ that helps with digestion and hormone regulation.
The most common type which is called adenocarcinoma accounts for roughly 90 per cent of cases.
This variant has little-to-no symptoms until patients start suddenly losing weight and turn yellow and at which point for the vast majority, it is too late.
It is for this reason the heartbreaking disease has been dubbed a 'silent killer'.
However, the surge in cases has come from another type of pancreatic cancer, called endocrine cancers.
These are slow growing tumours which take decades to emerge, and while they may turn cancerous, are mostly benign.
Some experts suspect that cancer isn't appearing more often in young people, but there are better tools today to diagnosis it.
They put the surge down to an increased use of high-tech medical scans like CT and MRIs which have grown more sensitive.
According to the National Health Service (NHS) those more likely to get cancer are over 65s and those who have chronic pancreatitis or a family history of the cancer.
Other risk factors include smoking, being overweight or obese, diabetes, eating red and processed meat as well as blood group.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The future of cancer treatment is ‘personalized' mRNA vaccines. Experts fear RFK research cuts will jeopardize that
The future of cancer treatment is ‘personalized' mRNA vaccines. Experts fear RFK research cuts will jeopardize that

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

The future of cancer treatment is ‘personalized' mRNA vaccines. Experts fear RFK research cuts will jeopardize that

Scientists have discovered the ability to 'personalize' cancer treatments using cutting-edge genetic technology - but experts fear that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s, recent funding cuts will have 'a profound chilling effect' on U.S. progress in this area of medicine. The new mRNA vaccines are specifically engineered to address the genetic differences of each patient with stomach cancer, according to Japanese researchers in a study published Tuesday, which makes them more effective than standard treatments. But, vaccine experts told The Independent that $500 million cuts to mRNA development at Emory University, Pfizer, and other institutions in flu, Covid and infectious disease vaccines could be devastating to progress in the U.S. 'Secretary Kennedy's decision to cancel $500 million in contracts and spread lies about the safety and protection offered by mRNA vaccines will have a profound chilling effect on innovative medical research,' Dr. Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at the Brown University School of Public Health, told The Independent in an email. 'mRNA vaccines hold tremendous promise to not only protect us from some of the worst infections, but also from devastating diseases like cancer,' she added. 'Rather than look forward at the promise of life-saving cures, the secretary would prefer that we look backwards towards the dark ages when these diseases ravaged us.' mRNA vaccines work differently from traditional vaccines, which inject a weakened virus into the body to trigger an immune response. Instead, mRNA vaccines teach the body's cells to make small and harmless pieces of virus that trigger the same response. The only mRNA vaccines currently available are Covid vaccines, but cancer vaccines work by getting the body to attack the disease. The new vaccines, described in the Japanese study, harness this technology and advance it by targeting unique spots on tumors. Last week, Kennedy said he would wind down some mRNA vaccine development, saying that the Department of Health and Human Services was 'shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate.' Kennedy, a longtime vaccine skeptic, has spread misinformation that mRNA Covid vaccines are deadly and that vaccines 'poisoned' American children, despite decades of public research and countless government assessments that have deemed them safe. HHS's mRNA cuts have not impacted cancer vaccine research, which is underway at the Texas-based Baylor College of Medicine and other medical institutions, Dr. Peter Hotez, a vaccine scientist and pediatrician at the school, said. Baylor had announced it was testing the effectiveness of personalized mRNA vaccines in 2023. But, funding cuts and denouncements of the tech can affect the field more broadly. 'Therefore it's important that the federal government and the Department of Health and Human Services reverse their position on mRNA vaccines and throw their support behind this technology,' Hotez said. Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine expert at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, told The Independent that mRNA research in the fight against cancer is 'critical.' 'It's tragic that we have wrapped this up into politics, which will only hurt our ability to move forward,' he said. HHS told The Independent said that recent $500m cuts to Covid, flu and infectious disease mRNA vaccines would not impact other medical research in the area. 'Technologies that were funded during the emergency phase but failed to meet current scientific standards will be phased out in favor of evidence-based, ethically grounded solutions – like whole-virus vaccines and novel platforms. Other uses of mRNA technology within the department are not impacted by this announcement,' Press Secretary Emily Hilliard said in an email. The new study, from Kindai University in Osaka, explains that the vaccine targets the unique biological signatures of each patient's tumor cells. 'NeoAgs, derived from individual genetic alterations in each cancer patient, serve as unique immunological targets on tumor cells and represent the key to personalized immunotherapy,' Kindai University's Professor Kazuhiro Kakimi said in a statement. The mRNA vaccine helps the body create more cancer-attacking white blood cells and resulted in tumors shrinking or disappearing. When used with an unnamed cancer drug, it had a heightened effect on tackling the tumor, the study found. The Japanese researchers said the vaccine was particularly effective on peritoneal metastasis, the condition when stomach cancer spreads to the lining of the abdomen. It is one of the most common forms of reoccurring cancer following surgery for stomach cancer. Stomach cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths in the world. The U.S. is estimated to see 30,300 new cases of stomach cancer and 10,780 deaths this year, according to the American Cancer Society. It disproportionally affects men, with more than 2,000 more deaths than women.

Vaccine on RFK Jr's chopping block could protect against one of the deadliest cancers
Vaccine on RFK Jr's chopping block could protect against one of the deadliest cancers

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Vaccine on RFK Jr's chopping block could protect against one of the deadliest cancers

Experimental mRNA vaccines shrouded in controversy may protect against one of America's deadliest cancers, a new study suggests. Researchers across the country tested a personalized mRNA vaccine on people with pancreatic cancer who had already had surgery and still had traces of the disease remaining. Pancreatic cancer is one of the hardest forms of the disease to treat, with a five-year survival rate of just 12 percent. And most cases are diagnosed after the disease has ravaged other organs, as it symptoms are usually mistaken for more benign issues. The vaccine uses mRNA technology, which uses RNA to tell cells how to make proteins and induce an immune reaction, to targets mutations of the KRAS gene. KRAS mutations are thought to be responsible for nine in 10 pancreatic cancers and nearly half of colon cancers. The researchers, from major institutions like Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), found about 85 percent of participants had an immune response to the vaccine. And two-thirds had enough of a response to stave off lingering cancer cells. Participants also lived more than twice as long after getting the vaccine than pancreatic cancer patients on average. Dr Zev Wainberg, trial leader and co-director of the UCLA gastrointestinal oncology program, told NBC News: 'That far exceeds the rates with resectable cancers.' Resectable cancers are those than can be removed with surgery. mRNA technology, which is also used in Covid vaccines, has been hailed a 'game-changer' in the cancer space, leading to a mountain of new trials testing if it can be used in vaccines. In one research paper out of Penn State College of Medicine, the scientists note: 'mRNA vaccines are an attractive and powerful immunotherapeutic platform against cancer because of their high potency, specificity, versatility, rapid and large-scale development capability, low-cost manufacturing potential, and safety.' Despite expert consensus and scientific evidence, however, Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, a longtime vaccine skeptic, has repeatedly cast doubt on the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines. Earlier this month he announced the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) would cancel nearly $500million in contracts for new vaccine development, including those for mRNA shots. Pancreatic cancer affects roughly 67,000 Americans every year and kills about 52,000. Along with colon cancer, it is also increasingly affecting young people. More than half the time, the disease is first spotted after it has already reached stage three or four due to its vague symptoms. These include abdominal pain, weight loss, back pain, jaundice and floating or clay-colored stools. This leads patients to assume their symptoms are from more benign causes like irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). By the time it reaches stage four, the five-year survival rate is just three percent, making it virtually incurable. It's unclear exactly what causes pancreatic cancer, but smoking, obesity and diabetes are thought to increase the risk by inducing harmful inflammation that causes cells to divide and become mutated more easily. In the new phase I trial, published Monday in the journal Nature Medicine, doctors recruited 20 people with pancreatic cancer and five with colorectal cancer. All participants had a KRAS mutation and had undergone standard treatment, which usually includes chemotherapy and surgery, to shrink and remove most of their tumors. Blood tests revealed the patients had traces of cells left behind, known as microscopic residual disease, which can travel elsewhere in the body and grow into tumors. After surgery, each participant received up to six doses of the vaccine, called ELI-002 2P, and 13 also received booster shots. The team found 85 percent, or 21 out of 25 participants, showed an immune response to the vaccine, and about 66 percent had enough of an immune response to stave off lingering cancer cells. And in nearly 70 percent of participants, the vaccine triggered an immune response not just to KRAS mutations but to other tumor cell targets not in the vaccine. The phase 1 trial also showed people with pancreatic cancer survived for an average of 29 months and lived recurrence-free for 15 months. The average survival length for patients with stage four pancreatic cancer, which is when most are diagnosed, is usually just six months to a year. The team is now running a phase 2 trial to test the vaccine's durability and compare if it is more effective than the current standard of care, which involves monitoring for disease recurrence.

Parents who advised daughter (23) against chemotherapy warned over behaviour in court
Parents who advised daughter (23) against chemotherapy warned over behaviour in court

BreakingNews.ie

timean hour ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Parents who advised daughter (23) against chemotherapy warned over behaviour in court

The parents of a young woman who refused chemotherapy after being diagnosed with cancer have both been warned about their behaviour in an English court during an inquest into her death. Paloma Shemirani (23) collapsed on July 19th last year and was taken to Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton, England, where she died five days later. She had earlier declined treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Advertisement Her mother, Kay 'Kate' Shemirani, a prominent online conspiracy theorist and her father, Dr Faramarz Shemirani, who is 'sympathetic' to his ex-wife's views, believe medical professionals are to blame for their daughter's death. Coroner Catherine Wood, presiding over the inquest at Kent and Medway Coroner's Court in Maidstone, left the court due to the behaviour of Miss Shemirani's parents on Tuesday afternoon. Faramarz Shemirani outside the inquest. Photo: PA The inquest, which was originally scheduled to conclude on Wednesday, had been extended as the evidence and questioning of witnesses had taken longer than anticipated. On Tuesday, Mrs Shemirani, who was struck off as a nurse in 2021 after spreading harmful misinformation about Covid-19, was cross-examined by Dr Shemirani. Advertisement Questioning broke down when Dr Shemirani, who is understood to have a PhD in computational fluid dynamics, tried to ask his ex-wife's opinion of medical evidence which she would then try to answer, despite warnings from the coroner. 'Mrs Shemirani, I've told you not to speak, I'll find you in contempt if you keep on speaking now,' the coroner said. 'Confine [yourself] to asking questions of this witness as a witness of fact,' she told Dr Shemirani. As Dr Shemirani argued back through his video-link, the coroner said: 'Dr Shemirani, challenge me by judicial review later' before trying to move on. Advertisement 'Of course I will, of course I will,' he replied. Later, Dr Shemirani once again tried to ask questions which had already been ruled irrelevant by the coroner. 'I'm going to rise for a few minutes because I'm finding it incredibly difficult to keep you on track,' said Ms Wood. Dr Shemirani continued to speak until the coroner shouted 'Dr Shemirani, listen'. Advertisement 'Your behaviour has been bordering on contemptuous to the court – when I make a ruling on something you cannot come back,' she added. Mrs Shemirani also accused osteopath Nick Gosset of lying under oath earlier in the inquest. Mr Gosset treated Miss Shemirani the day she collapsed and said she had appeared to be in the 'last stages of a very difficult disease'. He told the court that when he inspected her, he could feel lumps in her right shoulder going all the way up into her neck, which he identified as lymphoid mass and that he 'had never seen anything like it' in 43 years of practice. Advertisement Mr Gosset told the court: 'It was obvious to me that I was not the right person to be helping her, normally you see a patient like that, you would refer her [to a GP]. 'Any referral was refused – when I suggested that the proper avenue of approach was through a normal, medical channel she dismissed it. On Tuesday, Paloma's mother said 'his statement under oath is completely opposed with the truth' and has argued her daughter was healthy the day she collapsed. The inquest continues on Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store