
I Won't Be Getting the New Chase Sapphire Reserve. Here's Why
The Chase Sapphire Reserve®* is well-known among travel enthusiasts and average credit card users as a great travel credit card. However, its accessibility to the former crowd is likely to change.
The Sapphire Reserve was an expensive card before Chase's recent update at $550 annually, but it now costs $795, which is even more than its top competitor, The Platinum Card® from American Express.
Aside from the higher fee, the biggest changes to the card are a greater emphasis on annual credits and a larger welcome offer. Chase is also changing how much your points are worth, but more on that later.
The card issuer is adding several new annual credits, elite memberships and subscriptions to its list of benefits. This sounds great on paper, but personally, it makes the card even less attractive. I don't want my credit cards to require a ton of legwork to get the greatest value from them.
In my mind, a credit card should make it easier to spend and earn rewards, not have several hoops to jump through to get the maximum value. You shouldn't need to redeem dozens of credits, sign up for several complimentary subscriptions, only book flights and hotels when your points are boosted and feel like you have to buy a Peloton to make sure you're getting enough value to justify a card's annual fee.
I have no doubt that some travel experts and credit card aficionados will disagree and could happily squeeze oodles of value from this card, but for credit cardholders like myself who would rather have a more automated, streamlined experience, it just doesn't seem worth the effort.
Anyway, here's what's changing.
What does the new Chase Sapphire Reserve look like?
Chase has changed the card's rewards and how much they're worth when it's time to redeem.
New and old rewards compared New rewards Old rewards 8x points for all travel booked through Chase Travel 10x points for booking hotels and rental cars through Chase Travel 4x points on flights and hotels booked directly 5x points on flights booked through Chase 3x points on dining 3x points for all other travel 1x point for everything else 1x point for everything else
These changes are good. Dining rewards seem like a no-brainer on a travel card, and it's something I was surprised to not see on the card originally. Also, not needing to always book through Chase Travel opens more travel and earning opportunities.
The card also includes a higher welcome offer:
100,000 bonus points and a $500 Chase Travel℠ credit for spending $5,000 in the first three months from account opening.
However, Chase is also changing the value of the rewards you earn with its new Points Boost program.
You used to be able to redeem your points for travel through Chase at a bonus value of 1.5 cents per point. Now, you'll earn 2 cents per point, but only with rotating boosted redemption flights and hotels. And if you redeem your points for any non-boosted flight or hotel, they'll only be worth 1 cent each. You can still transfer your points at a 1:1 ratio to Chase's travel partners.
This is clearly less flexible than the card's previous reward program, and will likely cause cardholders to miss out on value they would've otherwise secured. What if there are no boosted flights or hotels for when and where you're looking to travel?
You'll either need to wait or have less of your trip covered. Or, you could transfer your points where they could be worth more -- but again, that takes more work than simply redeeming through your card issuer's portal for a small bonus, as it was before. The Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card* now uses the Points Boost program as well.
New annual credits
The card is also gaining a handful of new annual credits:
$500 The Edit℠ credit. The Edit is Chase's new collection of over 1,100 hotels. You get $250 from January to June, and the other $250 from July to December.
The Edit is Chase's new collection of over 1,100 hotels. You get $250 from January to June, and the other $250 from July to December. $300 dining credit. Again, split in half -- $150 for January through June, and the other $150 for July to December.
Again, split in half -- $150 for January through June, and the other $150 for July to December. $300 StubHub credit. $150 for January through June, $150 for July to December. Ends 12/31/27.
$150 for January through June, $150 for July to December. Ends 12/31/27. Apple+ and Apple Music membership , worth $250 annually. Ends 6/22/27.
, worth $250 annually. Ends 6/22/27. $120 Peloton credit. You get $10 monthly statement credits for a Peloton membership through 12/31/27 for a maximum of $120 annually. Plus, you'll earn 10x rewards on Peloton equipment purchases.
Those are the new credits; there are a number of others, too. You can see them all on Chase's page. The issuer says the card offers more than $2,700 in value, but you'll really need to work to achieve that.
For those who spend $75,000 in travel on the card in a calendar year, you'll unlock a $500 Southwest travel credit plus A-list status, IHG Diamond Elite Status and $250 in statement credits for The Shop at Chase. That's a high spending threshold that only the most well-off traveller will likely be able to reach, and it doesn't seem like a great return on investment.
And a higher fee
Lastly, the card now costs $245 more than it did a month ago. The annual fee for the Chase Sapphire Reserve now sits at $795, one of the highest on the market. While the credits offered can surpass the price of the card, you'll need to do the work to use everything it has to offer.
That means buying and using a Peloton, checking the Points Boost program, ordering DoorDash, using Lyft and taking advantage of the new dining credit and two travel credits, and on and on. It's a lot of homework. If you don't use enough of the extra perks, you'll likely be on the hook for at least part of its annual fee.
Should you get this card?
In short, I think there are people who will find this card worth it, particularly those with higher-than-average travel budgets (and perhaps some sort of assistant to help them keep track of everything), but for the average traveler or credit cardholder, they are more likely to leave value on the table and be stuck with a high annual fee.
There's just so much offered here, which is great, but the change in how points are valued, how much additional work you, as the cardholder, have to do annually to make the card's $795 fee actually worth the cost, doesn't add up to me. But again, I probably view credit cards a bit differently than most card experts. I like the easy route, the one that guarantees value without any financial corrosion or work beyond my usual routine.
So I'll happily stick with my Sapphire Preferred, which offers way less, but only costs $95 each year.
I use it for my dining and travel expenses, redeem my points for trips home through Chase Travel and take advantage of its annual $50 hotel statement credit.
There may not be countless annual credits, memberships and subscriptions, but I barely need to do any additional work -- and definitely don't need to overspend -- to realize its value versus how much it costs me annually.
*All information about the Chase Sapphire Reserve and Chase Sapphire Preferred has been collected independently by CNET and has not been reviewed by the issuer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elizabeth Warren Says Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Paying Less Tax Than You But Getting 'Billions' From The Government: Trump And GOP 'Rigged' The Tax Code
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has accused Elon Musk's SpaceX of benefiting from billions in U.S. government contracts while paying little to no federal taxes. Warren Accuses Musk Of Dodging Taxes On Monday, Warren took to X, formerly Twitter, and said that "Elon Musk's SpaceX is worth over $350 BILLION – after receiving billions in government contracts – but could be paying LESS in taxes than you." She blamed Donald Trump's tax reforms, saying Republicans "rigged the tax code with loopholes for billionaire corporations" and demanded "no more corporate handouts." Trending: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Her remarks followed a New York Times report that SpaceX has avoided paying federal income tax on about $5 billion in taxable income since its founding in 2002 by using a legal tax strategy known as a net operating loss carryforward. The provision, expanded indefinitely under Trump in 2017, lets companies offset future income with earlier losses. Musk Previously Defended Tesla's Tax Strategy Musk currently has a net worth of $375 billion, according to Bloomberg's Billionaire Index, making him the wealthiest individual on Earth. In February earlier this year, Musk and Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) VP of Finance Sendil Palani denied claims that Tesla evaded taxes, saying that the company legally carried forward past losses under IRS provisions. At the time, Musk acknowledged Tesla didn't pay U.S. federal income tax for several years, including 2024, since most profits come from overseas sales, but highlighted the need for comprehensive tax reform to address excessive Revenue Soars, Taxes Stay Low Documents reviewed by the publication show that more than 75% of SpaceX's revenue in 2020 and 2021 came from federal contracts. Despite that reliance on taxpayers, SpaceX paid only minimal taxes — including $483,000 to foreign governments and $78,000 in state taxes in 2021. SpaceX's business is also booming. Revenue is expected to reach $15.5 billion in 2025, double the $7.4 billion reported in 2023. Starlink, its satellite internet service, now generates more revenue than its rocket division, with 2.5 million users and $8 billion in 2023 sales. Warren Broadens Criticism Of Musk Warren has previously also targeted Musk over what she describes as conflicts of interest and misuse of government influence. In June, her office released a report titled "130 Days of Elon Musk," alleging more than 100 abuses of power during his time as a Trump administration adviser. She has also criticized the Pentagon for awarding Musk's AI startup xAI a $200 million contract just days after its chatbot Grok was caught making antisemitic remarks. Read Next: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. Bezos' Favorite Real Estate Platform Launches A Way To Ride The Ongoing Private Credit Boom Photo Courtesy: Sheila Fitzgerald On UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Elizabeth Warren Says Elon Musk's SpaceX Is Paying Less Tax Than You But Getting 'Billions' From The Government: Trump And GOP 'Rigged' The Tax Code originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum vs. Quantum Computing Inc.
Key Points Quantum computing offer an intriguing opportunity given its potential to revolutionize many industries. D-Wave Quantum and Quantum Computing Inc. are early-stage businesses with promising innovations. However, both companies are seeing volatile sales across quarters, and neither is profitable. 10 stocks we like better than D-Wave Quantum › The quantum computing sector offers an exciting new area to invest in. Quantum machines can perform sophisticated calculations beyond the capabilities of current classical computers. This tech could transform industries such as medicine and artificial intelligence. But among the bevy of businesses in the field, which are worthwhile long-term investments as the nascent industry grows? Two to consider are D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS) and Quantum Computing Inc. (NASDAQ: QUBT), which also refers to itself as QCi. Between D-Wave and QCi, one looks like the better quantum computing stock. Read on for an exploration of both businesses to understand which one and why. Untangling D-Wave Quantum's business performance D-Wave produces income primarily through subscriptions to its quantum systems via the cloud and professional services to support customers in the use of its technology. In 2025, D-Wave's sales have been on a roller coaster. It generated $15 million in the first quarter after selling one of its quantum computers. In Q2, revenue was $3.1 million, a 42% increase from 2024's $2.2 million as the company picked up $1 million to upgrade the device sold in the first quarter. This sales volatility could continue for some time as D-Wave grows its business. An encouraging sign is 92% year-over-year growth in its Q2 bookings to $1.3 million. Bookings represent customer orders received in the quarter that are expected to produce revenue when the orders are fulfilled. However, D-Wave isn't turning a profit. Its Q2 operating loss of $26.5 million was a 42% increase from the previous year. That's a concerning trend given its Q2 revenue of just $3.1 million. Fortunately, D-Wave has stockpiled a record high $819.3 million in cash and equivalents on its balance sheet. It exited Q2 with total assets of $843.6 million versus total liabilities of $149.3 million. This enables the company to maintain operations in the short term on its path to revenue growth. Quantum Computing Inc.'s budding business QCi uses light particles, called photons, to perform calculations in its quantum computer chips. It sells these chips, other hardware, and professional services to generate revenue. The company is in an early stage of its business lifecycle with sales coming primarily from research grants and proof-of-concept projects. As a result, its sales are small, and prone to substantial swings. For example, in 2024, QCi generated revenue of $373,000, a 4% year-over-year increase. But through the first half of 2025, sales plunged 52% to $100,000. QCi's technology has the potential to generate long-term revenue growth. Photons can be used in a wide range of light sensing, imaging, and other optical applications. Nevertheless, until QCi can gain traction with a larger group of customers, sales will continue to struggle. And that does not bode well for its business viability, because the company is not profitable. The company exited Q2 with an operating loss of $10.2 million against revenue of $61,000 as research and development costs more than doubled year over year to $6 million. QCi's saving grace is that, like D-Wave, it amassed a large war chest to fund operations in the short term. Q2 total assets were $426.1 million with cash and equivalents of $348.8 million. Total liabilities in the quarter were $30.1 million. Deciding between D-Wave Quantum and Quantum Computing Inc. In choosing between D-Wave Quantum or QCi, an important consideration is share price valuation. Since both are not profitable, the way to get at this is using the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, which measures how much investors are willing to pay for every dollar of revenue generated over the trailing 12 months. The chart shows QCi's P/S multiple is far above D-Wave's, and the disparity is so great, QCi shares look overpriced. Consequently, D-Wave stock is the better value. This, combined with promising sales and bookings growth, makes D-Wave a more attractive investment than its rival. At QCi's current phase of development, it's a highly speculative stock given the low revenue, high costs, and limited commercial sales. This doesn't mean D-Wave shares are a bargain, since its sales multiple is quite high as well. Another factor to consider is that the quantum computing industry is in its early stages. Quantum computers are prone to calculation errors, because the atomic particles in these machines are sensitive to the slightest environmental disturbances, such as a minor temperature change. So while D-Wave is the better choice versus QCi, any investment in a pure-play quantum computer company is a risk. And it could take years before a scalable quantum device is possible. Some estimates predict that won't happen until 2040. Given these factors, only investors with a high risk tolerance should consider investing in D-Wave. Should you invest $1,000 in D-Wave Quantum right now? Before you buy stock in D-Wave Quantum, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and D-Wave Quantum wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $671,466!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,633!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,077% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 Robert Izquierdo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum vs. Quantum Computing Inc. was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lowe's to buy Foundation Building Materials for $8.8 billion to boost contractor business
(Reuters) -Lowe's Cos said on Wednesday it has agreed to buy interior building products distributor Foundation Building Materials for nearly $8.8 billion, stepping up its expansion into the professional builder market. Shares of the home improvement chain rose 4.3% in premarket trading as the company also beat second-quarter profit estimates. Lowe's and rival Home Depot are leaning on deals to bolster their businesses that serve contractors and builders, a key growth area, amid softness in the do-it-yourself segment. Lowe's acquired Artisan Design for $1.33 billion in April, while Home Depot in late June decided to buy specialty building products distributor GMS for about $4.3 billion. The company raised its total annual sales forecast to a range of $84.5 billion to $85.5 billion, compared to its prior expectation of $83.5 to $84.5 billion. It earned $4.33 per share on an adjusted basis in the quarter, exceeding estimates of $4.24, according to data compiled by LSEG. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data