Trump's Cuts to N.I.H. Grants Are Illegal, Federal Judge Rules
A federal judge on Monday declared the Trump administration's move to cut hundreds of grants issued by the National Institutes of Health illegal, accusing the government of discrimination against minorities and L.G.B.T.Q. individuals.
Ruling from the bench, Judge William G. Young of the Federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts ordered the government to restore much of the funding.
Judge Young, a Reagan appointee with 40 years of experience as a federal judge, said the Trump administration's rationale for canceling the grants, which support research into topics such as gender identity and equity in health care, appeared to be rooted in prejudice. He noted the administration's efforts to eliminate any trace of diversity and equity initiatives from the federal government, as well as its attacks on transgender people.
He said that throughout his career he had 'never seen government racial discrimination like this,' and that he felt duty bound to state his conclusion about the government's intent.
'I would be blind not to call it out,' he said.
Judge Young's ruling echoed arguments during a brief trial earlier in the day in which lawyers from an array of groups said the grants had become a political target.
Kenneth Parreno, a lawyer representing the American Public Health Association, called the government's actions part of a campaign to ban 'forbidden topics' in science by canceling grants related to race or transgender health.
'What this is, is a slapdash, harried effort to rubber stamp an ideological purge,' he said.
The Trump administration in March began terminating a number of public health grants supporting research on topics such as health equity, racial disparities, vaccine hesitancy, and maternal health in minority communities, sometimes by mechanically scanning for certain terms.
In May, Mr. Trump signed an order called 'Restoring Gold Standard Science' that cited a 'reproducibility crisis' and resurrected policy disputes from the Covid-19 pandemic, among other things, as justification for deep changes to the government's role in research and development.
In two separate cases that were heard together, a coalition of Democratic-led states and a coalition of unions, researchers and public health organizations each sued to stop a raft of cuts at the N.I.H., which they said jeopardized scientific progress.
In hearings leading up to the ruling on Monday, Judge Young repeatedly pressed for details about the government's decision making, expressing deep skepticism that it had followed normal, dispassionate processes in terminating the grants.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
22 minutes ago
- New York Times
Supreme Court Justices Disclose International Travel, Book Deals
Trips to lecture in Europe, Latin America and Hawaii. Millions of dollars in book deals. Income from teaching at prestigious law schools. Supreme Court justices offered a window into some of the perks of being part of the nation's highest court in their annual financial disclosures, which were released on Tuesday and covered the justices' activities last year. Under a federal law passed after the Watergate scandal in the 1970s, the justices must disclose gifts, travel and outside income. There has been increased scrutiny of the disclosures in recent years, particularly after revelations that Justice Clarence Thomas had failed to disclose years of lavish gifts and travel from wealthy friends, including the Texas billionaire Harlan Crow. Justice Thomas has said he did not believe that he was required to disclose the gifts. In his latest report, Justice Thomas listed no gifts or private jet travel. In an addendum, however, he wrote that he had 'inadvertently omitted' a life insurance policy from prior reports. The policy, he noted, was purchased in July 2001 and terminated last month. Justice Thomas indicated that the policy covered someone other than himself, and added that 'confusion arose on whether the policy needed to be disclosed.' He did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The forms are only a few pages and provide limited details. But they often give colorful examples of the justices' lives off the bench. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Fast Company
26 minutes ago
- Fast Company
How government can advance innovation
Innovation is a cornerstone of a vibrant economy. Entrepreneurs often get a lot of the credit for big tech breakthroughs and disruptive ideas. But they're not the only ones driving innovation: government can also have a big part to play, according to Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey. Since taking office in 2023, Healey has enacted several policies aimed at boosting the economy, from tax cuts to the largest housing investment in state history. Just a few months ago, she announced an economic development project: the Massachusetts AI Hub, which is described as offering the infrastructure, business development resources, and ethical guidance needed to strengthen the state's position as a center of AI innovation. At the recent Think Conference hosted by IBM, Healey spoke with Stephanie Mehta, CEO and chief content officer of Mansueto Ventures (parent company of Fast Company), about the steps her state has taken to advance collaboration with industry, academia, and entrepreneurs to support advances in AI. Here are four takeaways from the discussion. (Some quotes were edited for clarity and length.) 1. Government support helps big ideas take off. Bringing innovative ideas to life takes teamwork, and the public and private sectors can be a powerful pair. 'The only way to address the challenges of today, to solve the world's problems, is for government to work directly in partnership with private industry,' Healey said. Take AI. Healey explained how the technology requires massive computing power and uses enormous amounts of energy. In Massachusetts, Healey saw an opportunity to help make it easier for energy supply to keep pace with the increasing demand from the state's AI industry. She championed legislation to simplify permitting and siting of energy infrastructure, speeding up the process for bringing more energy online. Healey also believes government can play a pivotal role in helping to support AI entrepreneurs at their earliest stages. To that end, she recently announced a $31 million grant to expand the supply of compute and data capacity for those in the AI sector. In addition, the state's AI Hub is exploring partnerships to create an accelerator program for entrepreneurs developing AI technologies. 2. Progress must be sustainable—and inclusive. Businesses often consider a range of internal and external stakeholders when making major decisions. But it's up to governments to take the broadest view, crafting policies and making investments that address issues such as climate change and foster greater economic participation, Healey said. In the case of AI, that involves addressing the technology's environmental impact. The Massachusetts Green High Performance Computing Center, a collaboration between several of the state's public and private universities, provides infrastructure for computationally intensive research. Much of that power comes via renewable energy from solar arrays and a hydroelectric dam, helping to reduce the carbon footprint associated with scaling AI. Meanwhile, Healey has looked for opportunities to ensure that the benefits of AI are enjoyed by all Massachusetts residents, not just some businesses. She recently assembled a taskforce, including labor officials, who considered what AI adoption will mean through a workforce lens and to offer strategies to manage the potential impacts on the labor market. 'We looked at what we need to do to upskill those who are going to have to participate in what will be an AI economy,' Healey said. 3. Innovative thinking will let organizations maximize their AI investment. To show how generative AI can make organizations more efficient without leaving workers behind, the Massachusetts government decided to start using the technology itself. To prepare to take the AI plunge, leaders did their research. As part of the InnovateMA program, Healey invited students from Northeastern University to research productive AI use cases in state agencies. For instance, students created generative AI prompts that helped Department of Transportation employees wade through hundreds of pages of rules and regulations to advance transportation infrastructure projects. Tasks that used to take several days could now be completed in minutes, and workers felt more empowered to tackle other projects. 'Our employees loved it,' Healey said. 4. Crisis can be a catalyst for innovation. When it comes to disruption, Healey said that she draws inspiration from the business world, embracing solutions-oriented strategies that helped her turn crisis into opportunity. Healey looked to leverage assets in Massachusetts to strengthen the state's own investment in innovation when federal government spending was being cut. She immediately reached out to Massachusetts's teaching hospitals, colleges and universities, and private equity investors to determine what the state needed to do to stay competitive globally. Healey expects that by continuing to fund science and research at the state level amid federal cuts, Massachusetts will emerge from the crisis even stronger in these areas. At the same time, government needs to be a model for thinking beyond the bottom line, she said. 'For the purposes of the creation of a better world, a world where there is an abundance of energy, of housing, of healthcare, of transportation, of economic opportunity and prosperity for every child, it's got to come with a little bit of a broader lens.'
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
‘Abolishing FEMA' Memo Outlines Ways for Trump to Scrap Agency
By , Jason Leopold, and Lauren Rosenthal Save Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem directed the Federal Emergency Management Agency to prepare a memo on how to abolish itself and create a re-branded, radically smaller disaster response organization, according to a copy of the document reviewed by Bloomberg News. As recently as last week, President Donald Trump and Noem said they wanted to wind down FEMA but offered few details publicly. The March 25 memo offers insight into how the administration has weighed which of its current functions to cut. Technically, only Congress can eliminate the agency.
