TNPSC Group 4 Results 2025 Date: How to download scorecard when released
This recruitment drive aims to fill 3,935 vacancies across various roles including village administrative officer, junior assistant (non-security), junior revenue inspector, typist, steno-typist (grade III) and forest guard.
Step 1: Go to the official TNPSC website: tnpsc.gov.in
Step 2: Navigate to the 'Exam Dashboard' section on the homepage, then select 'Group IV Services'.
Step 3: Click on the result link provided.
Step 4: Log in using your application number and date of birth.
Step 5: Your result will appear on the screen.
Step 6: Download and print a copy of the TNPSC scorecard
The commission has already released the TNPSC Group 4 tentative answer key on July 21. Candidates were given time till July 28 to challenge the provisional answer key online through tnpsc.gov.in. The TNPSC group 4 final answer keys will be published only after the completion of the entire selection process.
The duration of the exam was three hours. The written paper comprised of 200 objective-type questions for a total of 300 marks divided into three parts. Part A was set entirely in Tamil, candidates could choose between English and Tamil for the other two sections.
While part A included 100 questions focused on Tamil Eligibility-cum-Scoring test, part B had 75 questions covering General Studies, part C contained 25 questions on aptitude and mental ability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
6 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Robert Clive: Why the founder of British Indian empire slit his own throat
iStock Robert Clive the first British Governor of the Bengal Presidency 18th Century On a grey November morning in 1774, London was buzzing with a shocking story. Robert Clive, Baron Clive of Plassey, called by some the founder of Britain's Indian Empire and by others its 'most shameless plunderer', was Walpole, the witty politician, told friends Clive had 'cut his own throat.' Lady Mary Coke, an English noblewoman, wrote in her diary that he had 'killed himself.' Some said a razor was found by his side, others whispered about opium. The coroner's report gave no clear cause, but many believed Britain's most famous 'nabob' had ended his own life. It was, some thought, a fitting end for a man whose rise had been as ruthless as his fall. Also Read: After Jhansi ki Rani, another queen fought the BritishRobert Clive was born in 1725 in the small Shropshire village of Styche. As a boy, he was described in books as restless, quick-tempered, and full of ambition. Local tales say he once climbed a church tower and sat on the edge, legs dangling high above the ground, showing early that he was not easily scared. At around 19, with little to keep him in England, Clive sailed to Madras as a junior clerk for the East India Company. It was 1744, and the Company was still a trading business, not yet an empire. But India at that time was divided between rival princes and competing European powers. In this chaos, Clive's boldness, cunning, and skill for planning found their place. By 1751, the French-backed Chanda Sahib threatened British influence in southern India. Clive, still only a junior officer, proposed seizing Arcot, a bold strike deep in enemy territory. Marching 200 British troops and 300 sepoys through monsoon rains, he took the town without resistance. For 50 days, his force held against an army ten times its Thomas Babington Macaulay romanticised this siege, '…the commander who had to conduct the defence… had been bred as a book-keeper… After three desperate onsets, the besiegers retired… the garrison lost only five or six men.'William Pitt the Elder, Prime Minister, called him a 'heaven-born general,' a title Clive wore proudly, though he had never had formal military Read: When Bengali gym bros flexed muscles against the BritishSix years later came the event that made Clive's name, and his fortune. In 1756, Siraj-ud-Daulah, the new Nawab of Bengal, took control of Calcutta. After the 'Black Hole' incident, where many British captives died, Clive set out to retake the 23 June 1757, at Plassey, Clive faced 50,000 men with only 3,000. But the real battle had been fought in secret, key Nawabi commanders, including Mir Jafar, had already been promised British gold and power. The Nawab's army broke apart before any large in Britain called it military genius. Others saw it as plain bribery and betrayal. Either way, Bengal, the richest province in India, passed into Company control. Historians agree this was a turning point in the creation of British rule in returned to England in 1760 with a fortune that made him one of the wealthiest men in the country, £234,000 in cash from Bengal's new ruler, plus a jagir worth £30,000 a year. He bought estates, secured a seat in Parliament, and in 1762 was made Baron Clive of Plassey. Pitt repeated his 'heaven-born general' the public mood was shifting. To many, Clive and his fellow 'nabobs' were symbols of greed. In Parliament, he was accused of plunder and corruption. His infamous defence, that he was 'astonished at my own moderation' given how much more he might have taken, only deepened his villainous image. Also Read: Narco-colonialism: How Britain exploited Indians for its drug trade with China By 1765, Bengal's finances were collapsing under Company misrule. Clive returned, this time to consolidate rather than conquer. At the Treaty of Allahabad, he secured from the Mughal Emperor the diwani, the right to collect taxes in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. This single stroke made the Company the true ruler of restructured the army, raised salaries to curb petty graft, and banned officials from accepting private gifts, not out of altruism, but to ensure the Company's monopoly on wealth. When he left in 1767, he had built the fiscal skeleton of the British Raj, a system designed to feed London's coffers at Bengal's in England, famine in Bengal (1769–1773) stirred outrage. Critics linked it to the Company's revenue demands, and Clive was twice called before Parliament. Though exonerated in 1773, the inquiries dragged on his health and reputation. Edmund Burke and other MPs painted him as the embodiment of imperial body failed him, too. He suffered from gallstones, dulled the pain with opium, and sank into depression. On 22 November 1774, he was found dead at his home in Berkeley Square. Horace Walpole told the story of the razor. Historic UK later wrote bluntly that he 'committed suicide by cutting his own throat.'Some still call Clive the 'Founder of the British Empire in India.' Others, like historian William Dalrymple, have called him 'a vicious asset-stripper.' The National Army Museum calls him 'a greedy speculator.' Perhaps, as noted in many modern reports, he was both: a man who built the foundations of Britain's Indian empire while filling his own pockets. His life's story is one of conquest without mercy, wealth without pity, and an end as dark as the means by which he rose.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
TN TET recruitment 2025: Notification released, registration underway at trb.tn.gov.in, check direct link to apply here
The Tamil Nadu Teachers Recruitment Board (TN TRB) has started the application process for the Tamil Nadu Teacher Eligibility Test (TNTET) 2025. This exam is needed for those who want to become teachers in government and private schools in Tamil Nadu for classes 1 to 8. The application started on August 11, 2025, and will end on September 8, 2025. There are two papers in this test: Paper 1 for teaching classes 1 to 5, and Paper 2 for teaching classes 6 to 8. The test checks your knowledge of child growth, teaching methods, languages, and school subjects. TN TET 2025 eligibility criteria Age Limit: You must be at least 18 years old on July 1, 2025. There is no maximum age limit, so candidates of all ages can apply if they meet the educational qualifications. Educational Qualifications: For Paper 1 (Classes 1 to 5): Candidates should have completed a Diploma in Elementary Education ( which is usually a 2-year course after 12th standard, or a Bachelor of Elementary Education ( which is a 4-year degree course. These qualifications focus on teaching young children and basic education. For Paper 2 (Classes 6 to 8): Candidates should hold a Bachelor's degree in the subject they want to teach, such as Maths, Science, Social Studies, or Languages, along with a Bachelor of Education ( degree. The course prepares candidates for teaching older students with deeper subject knowledge. Candidates should carefully check that their educational qualifications match these requirements before applying. Exam pattern for TN TET 2025 The TNTET exam is designed to check both your teaching ability and subject knowledge. The test consists of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and is divided into two papers depending on the class level you want to teach. Paper 1 (For Teaching Classes 1 to 5) Total Questions: 150 MCQs Total Marks: 150 marks (1 mark per question) Duration: 3 hours Subjects Covered: Child Development and Pedagogy (30 questions) — understanding how children grow and learn, teaching techniques Language I (30 questions) — Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Kannada, or Urdu (choose one regional language) Language II (30 questions) — English language skills Mathematics (30 questions) — basic arithmetic and problem-solving Environmental Studies (30 questions) — basic science and social environment knowledge Paper 2 (For Teaching Classes 6 to 8) Total Questions: 150 MCQs Total Marks: 150 marks Duration: 3 hours Subjects Covered: Child Development and Pedagogy (30 questions) Language I (30 questions) — regional language options same as Paper 1 Language II (30 questions) — English Mathematics and Science (60 questions) — deeper knowledge of math and science subjects Social Studies (60 questions) — history, geography, civics, and related topics Candidates must answer all questions within the allotted time. Practicing past papers and focusing on both teaching methodology and subject knowledge will help improve scores. How to apply online Here is how interested and eligible candidates will be able to register for TN TET exam: Go to to find the TNTET 2025 application link. Use a valid email address and mobile number to create your account on the portal. Enter your personal details, educational qualifications, and other required information carefully. Upload scanned copies of your passport-sized photograph and signature as per the specifications mentioned in the notification. Complete the payment of the application fee online using the available payment options. Review all details and submit your form. Download and print the application confirmation page or receipt for future reference. Direct link to apply here . Candidates should keep their login details safe to check application status and exam updates. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Scroll.in
6 hours ago
- Scroll.in
How to be Indian in India: In his new book, Manu Joseph tries to make sense of the ‘amateur Indian'
What happens when we stop thinking in our mother tongue? Meander a little with me before we come to 'the point'. This is, after all, about language. I used to think in Malayalam and Tamil, though I always hoped only in English. I was born in Kerala and raised in Chennai, a cuckoo among the crows. Like many people, I could speak only one dominant tongue at a time. As a boy I spoke fluent Tamil, and a type of Malayalam that Malayalis said was not Malayalam, and a heavily accented English. However, I read English the best, and as I began reading books, which were almost entirely works from the West, I changed. By the age of 17, I was moving away from Tamil and Malayalam, and I was beginning to think entirely in English. There were hundreds of thousands like me across India, going through the same phase. It was obvious to us then that a bright future was a time and place that thought in English. Are there serious consequences when this happens, or is the specialness of language overrated? When I was around ten, during a monthly test in school, I was asked to write 'the opposite gender of ram'. I was baffled when I realised that most of the class had got the alleged answer 'ewe'. My answer was Sita. I still maintain that I was right. No one in Chennai had ever seen a ram, while Ram, or Rama as we used to call him, was everywhere. Everything else about English was like this – it was venerable at a distance but all wrong when it passed through me. It was a medium of study and intellect but to use it in a casual conversation seemed comically arrogant. The act of speaking in English, in fact, was defamed as 'Putting Peter' in my circle. I was among the boys who carried out the defamation. My teachers were not fluent in English. When my parents spoke English, they, like all Malayalis, spoke English in Malayalam. The effect of not being fluent in English was that I was an insider in my home town. I belonged to my city and the place belonged to me. Not for a moment was I an amateur Indian. I could talk to thugs and policemen and slum dwellers and eunuchs. Also, come to think of it, even stray dogs didn't faze me. I never even noticed them, even though as a kid I began to run at dawn. Being Tamil, or being Malayali, is a distinct behavioural system and only those who thought in either of those languages could play a part in it. Maybe it had nothing to do with Tamil or Malayalam but with the absence of a world framed in English. For instance, when a Tamil Brahmin wanted to convey an insult, he would hedge the risk by putting it across as an ambiguous joke. Also, Tamils of my childhood had the propensity to use glee to show contempt. They would laugh hard, in an exaggerated way, at the jokes of the people they despised, especially their teachers or bosses. This is nothing remarkable or even unique. But it's not an entirely insignificant thing either. All this I did not observe as a boy, when I used to think in Tamil. Observation is not the act of seeing; it is the act of remembering what has already been seen. Only when I stopped thinking in Tamil did I begin to actually see Chennai. The Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges once wrote that the one word we will not find in the Quran is 'camel'. His implication was that ancient Arabs had no reason to mention what was very common in almost every frame of their existence, but an outsider sees what is too ordinary for the insider. (Borges was wrong; the Quran does mention 'camel'. But I accept what he implies.) As a child, I made no special effort to learn to read and write in Tamil or Malayalam. I used them only to think and speak. I could write only in English and Hindi, both foreign to me, Hindi more than English. Then, in 1987, a film called Nayakan by Mani Ratnam was released. I was thirteen and I thought it was the greatest film on Earth. I still believe it is one of the greatest. I decided that apart from being a journalist, I would also become a Tamil filmmaker. I began to write scripts for many Tamil films that I hoped would find takers, but all of them in English. When I was 16, I thought the best way to enter the movie business was as a low-level actor. So when I heard that a film audition was underway for some extras, I went. The queue was long and the men looked impoverished and depressing, and the line had not moved after two hours, so I left, abandoning the idea of acting. I wrote more stories. I co-wrote one with the milkman. Nothing ever came out of them. The Tamil sphere of creativity offered me no prospects. So I let myself be colonised by the English language, by which I also mean a strange condition. Compared to Indian languages, English has names for so many abstract things, labels, even lies, that they can be misunderstood as truths, like hypnosis, secularism, sexism, liberty, human rights, and plain nonsense like 'quality time' and 'multitasking'. All these ideas might seem innocuous, even sensible. Some people might think these words capture innate human nature. They don't. They are a way of thinking. And not long ago in India, people who thought like this were not merely artists and writers. They were the people who ran the country – they were prime ministers, ministers, judges, bureaucrats, editors, all of them shaping the nation at a time when a few influential people could run the country. Yes, most of them liked their samosas and some of them sang in their mother tongue, but the West was inside their heads. The West gave them their aesthetic, intellectual, and moral direction. They had this perception that the West was the pinnacle of the human race. This class and this way of thinking has been properly killed in India. I think the West is being killed even in the West. The death of this class has resulted in the unification of classes. The richest Indian, Mukesh Ambani, in how he perceives wealth, marriage, and family values, his religious piety, his surrender to the mystical, is very similar to a poor or lower-middle-class Indian in the way a Tata was not. The poor can pretty much identify with all their major public figures. The depth of this belonging is best understood from the orphanhood of the other Indian, the amateur Indian. To ruin the chances of sleeping with them, rasp, 'Is the science of climate change beyond dispute?' They say things like 'asparagus' and 'edamame' and eat them, too. They used to love Aung San Suu Kyi, but not any more. They read very long articles in English that are called longform. They despise the word 'infrastructure' when uttered by a provincial man. But anything they hate they will consider forgiving if it is 'sustainable'. They know what an 'open' relationship means. Many of them, especially in Mumbai, have 'friends' among street urchins. They hated giving their biometrics to their government but routinely do that for an American or European visa. They wish for diversity in plants and animals even though they themselves are a monoculture of identical ethical organisms spread across the informed world whose president was Barack Obama. At times, they hold candles and go somewhere. They were, for long, awkward in India, but they had their islands where they could escape the nation. Now there is nowhere to hide, not even in literature festivals. This is a government that is everywhere. So they feel uncertain in universities, think tanks, cultural bodies, journalism, theatre, art and mainstream cinema, activism, and in charitable works. They have lost beef too. The worst truth of this new order is that they, who received the finest education and other opportunities, and who consider themselves the most intelligent and informed among Indians, have been shown as inaccurate, unreliable, and incompetent political analysts of their own nation. It appears that there is only one way left to use them as political forecasters. Listen carefully to what they have to say, for the outcome will be the very opposite. They are the amateur Indians. They always were, since birth. The times when they strayed outside their safe houses, they did not know how to negotiate their own nation. What should they do when a government official asks for a bribe, what should they do when their car hits the bumper of another vehicle, how should they speak to a cop, what are the meanings of many words in their own mother tongues? But never before have state and society encroached into their islands so forcefully and decisively. They are not alone anywhere any more. Nowhere in the malls, theatres, and restaurants can they be guaranteed a degree of refinement. In the theatres they must rise for the national anthem. And what should they do if a man is on the phone throughout the movie? They have heard stories of friends being punched just for objecting to the use of the phone in movie halls. Never before has the uncouth Indian been so empowered, and so affluent. There is no place he cannot afford, or be refused admittance to any more. In any case, some of the richest residential real estate in the country has for long been taken over by fanatic vegetarians. Now there are affluent residential colonies in all major cities where residents demand the construction of temples. What should the lofty people do? Where should the amateur Indian go? They do consider themselves 'global', and everyone knows 'global' does not include Sudan or Mongolia. They will be able to obtain visas of the most advanced economies. But despite everything, all things considered, it is in India that life is the easiest; it is here that they are assured of good spots on the social mountain. What must they do? How can they become as confident as the son of the soil, who has friends in the police commissioner's office and in other government places, who knows when to stand firm during a traffic dispute and when to flee, and how to game the system. How to be Indian in India? Excerpted with permission from Why the Poor Don't Kill Us: The Psychology of Indians, Manu Joseph, Aleph Book Company.
