Trump sues Wall Street Journal and Murdoch over reporting on Epstein ties
The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Miami. It seeks at least 10 billion dollars (£7.4 billion) in damages.
Mr Trump promised a lawsuit after the newspaper described a sexually suggestive letter that the newspaper says bore Mr Trump's name and was included in a 2003 album for Epstein's 50th birthday.
The president denied writing the letter, calling the story 'false, malicious, and defamatory'.
The letter was reportedly collected by disgraced British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell as part of a birthday album for Epstein years before he was first arrested in 2006 and subsequently had a falling-out with Mr Trump.
The letter bearing Mr Trump's name includes text framed by the outline of what appears to be a hand-drawn naked woman and ends with, 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret,' according to the newspaper.
The outlet described the contents of the letter but did not publish a photo showing it entirely or provide details on how it came to learn about it.
It comes after the US Justice Department asked a federal court to unseal grand jury transcripts in Epstein's case at the direction of Mr Trump amid a firestorm over the administration's handling of records related to the case.
Deputy attorney general Todd Blanche filed motions urging the court to unseal the Epstein transcripts as well as those in the case against Maxwell, who was convicted of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein.
Epstein killed himself in 2019 shortly after his arrest while awaiting trial.
The Justice Department's announcement that it would not be making public any more Epstein files enraged parts of Mr Trump's base, in part because members of his own administration had hyped the expected release and stoked conspiracies around the well-connected financier.
The Justice Department said in the court filings that it will work with prosecutors in New York to make appropriate redactions of victim-related information and other personally identifying information before transcripts are released.
'Transparency in this process will not be at the expense of our obligation under the law to protect victims,' Mr Blanche wrote.
But despite the new push to release the grand jury transcripts, the administration has not announced plans to reverse course and release other evidence in its possession.
Attorney general Pam Bondi had hyped the release of additional materials after the initial Epstein files disclosure in February sparked outrage because it contained no new revelations.
A judge would have to approve the release of the grand jury transcripts, and it is likely to be a lengthy process to decide what can become public and to make redactions to protect sensitive witness and victim information.
The records would show testimony from witnesses and other evidence presented by the prosecution during the secret grand jury proceedings, when a panel decides whether there is enough evidence to bring an indictment, or a formal criminal charge.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
9 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump fired America's economic data collector. History shows the perils.
There is the case of China, where earlier this century local authorities manipulated data to hit growth targets mandated by Beijing, forcing analysts and policymakers to turn to alternative measures to gauge the state of the country's economy. Advertisement Perhaps most famously, there is the case of Argentina, which in the 2000s and 2010s systematically understated inflation figures to such a degree that the international community eventually stopped relying on the government's data. That loss of faith drove up the country's borrowing costs, worsening a debt crisis that ultimately led to it defaulting on its international obligations. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It is too soon to know whether the United States is on a similar path. But economists and other experts said that Trump's decision Friday to fire Erika McEntarfer, the Senate-confirmed head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, was a troubling step in that direction. Janet Yellen, the former Treasury secretary and chair of the Federal Reserve, said the firing was not what is expected from the most advanced economy in the world. Advertisement 'This is the kind of thing you would only expect to see in a banana republic,' Yellen said. Essential data The Bureau of Labor Statistics is officially part of the Labor Department, whose secretary is a member of the president's Cabinet. But the agency operates independently, producing detailed, nonpartisan data on employment, prices, wages and other topics. Economists say that reliable, independently produced statistics are critical to good decision making in both the public and private sector. Officials at the Federal Reserve rely on government-collected data on inflation and unemployment to decide how to set interest rates, which affect how much Americans must pay to get a mortgage or a car loan. 'Good data helps not just the Fed, it helps the government, but it also helps the private sector,' Jerome Powell, the Fed chair, said at a recent news conference. 'The United States has been a leader in that for 100 years,' he added, 'and we really need to continue that in my view.' Experts on government statistics say data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and other agencies is unlikely to deteriorate dramatically overnight. The acting commissioner named to replace McEntarfer on a temporary basis, William J. Wiatrowski, is a longtime employee of the agency who is widely respected by experts inside and outside government. The career employees who collect and analyze the data remain in place, using the same methods and procedures they used before McEntarfer was pushed out. But experts who just days ago were defending the integrity of the statistical agencies now find themselves asking uncomfortable questions about the trajectory of economic data in the United States. Advertisement 'If the poverty numbers come in and look great, is the director of the Census going to get a raise?' said Amy O'Hara, a former Census Bureau official who is now a professor at Georgetown University. 'If the household income numbers don't look great what happens then? What about GDP? What about CPI?' Andreas Georgiou knows the challenges of standing up to such political pressure. After he took over Greece's statistical agency in 2010, he found that the country has been severely understating its budget deficits. Those findings ran afoul of Greek authorities, who spent years trying to prosecute him on a variety of charges related to his work, despite independent reviews that supported his conclusions. (He fared better, though, than Olimpiy Kvitkin, a Soviet census official who was arrested and executed when his population count came in lower than Josef Stalin had announced.) Georgiou refused to bend. Reliable statistics are important for policymaking, he said. But they are also essential to democracy. 'Official statistics, government statistics are a mirror that society holds up to itself,' he said. If that mirror is distorted, or broken entirely, then the accountability that is central to a democratic system cannot work. 'If society cannot see itself clearly, then it cannot identify its problems,' he said. 'If it cannot identify its problems, then it cannot find the right solutions. It cannot find the right persons to solve these problems.' Data integrity at risk Trump said he fired McEntarfer because the numbers produced by her agency were 'rigged' to hurt him politically. Experts on the government statistics, including former commissioners in both Democratic and Republican administrations, have called foul on that accusation. The commissioner, who is the bureau's sole political appointee, does not control the numbers that the agency publishes, or even see them until they have been finalized by a staff of career technocrats whose careers typically span multiple presidential administrations. Advertisement Erica Groshen, who led the bureau under President Barack Obama, recalled getting resistance from the agency's staff when she tried to liven up the language of the monthly jobs reports. The bureau's staff insisted that the agency's job wasn't to say whether the glass was half-full or half-empty, only to report that, 'It is an eight-ounce container with four ounces of liquid.' Groshen relented. That is not to say political interference would be impossible. Government statistics rely on hundreds of methodological decisions, many of them judgment calls with no obviously correct answer. A sufficiently sophisticated agency head might, over time, be able to nudge the data in a politically advantageous direction, without any single decision being so egregious that it led to a mass resignation of career employees. 'I could imagine a new commissioner coming in and trying to make changes to those methods and procedures that try to move those numbers one way or the other,' said Katharine G. Abraham, who led the bureau during the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. 'They would have to know a lot in terms of where to put the finger on the scale.' Private alternatives There are also blunter approaches. In Argentina in 2007, the government of then-President Néstor Kirchner pushed out the mathematician in charge of the country's consumer price data, then released an inflation figure that was dramatically lower than the one the mathematician had calculated. The public wasn't fooled. Nor were international bond investors, who ultimately turned to alternative sources of inflation data, calculated by researchers outside the government. Advertisement But such alternative sources are inherently limited, said Alberto Cavallo, a Harvard University economist who developed one of the most widely used private inflation indexes in Argentina. 'Private alternatives can complement official statistics, but they are not a substitute,' Cavallo wrote in an email. 'Government agencies have the resources and scale to conduct nationwide surveys -- something no private initiative can fully replicate.' Recently, Cavallo has been publishing data on consumer prices in the United States, which has shown the impact of Trump's tariffs more quickly than the government's data. But while such real-time sources are valuable, they don't carry the 'institutional credibility' of government data. The trouble is that once that credibility is eroded, it is hard to repair -- particularly at a time when partisans on both sides of the political aisle are skeptical of numbers put out by members of the opposing party. Nancy Potok, a former Census official who served as chief statistician of the United States during the first Trump administration, said that in the past there had been strong bipartisan support for the statistical system in Congress and the business community. But partisanship seems to have eroded that support at a moment when a combination of political pressures and long-standing budget challenges are making it most necessary. 'There were some people who really understood the value of the economic data, and now that's not the conversation and those champions aren't there that were there in the past,' she said. 'There's no one leading the charge to make these kind of investments.' This article originally appeared in Advertisement
Boston Globe
9 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Breaking from his father, Josh Kraft criticizes Trump as having ‘stoked hatred and division'
Kraft, son of New England Patriots Owner Robert Kraft, has been tied to his father's connections to Trump during his campaign. Robert Kraft and Trump have a long history. In 2017, Kraft told the Globe that the two have 'been friends for years' and that during 'the worst time in my dad's life, [Trump] was there for him.' Advertisement Scrutiny over Robert Kraft's friendship with Trump increased after the Globe reported the After the meeting, Josh Kraft received campaign donations from four of the top attorneys at the firm, including its chairman, Brad Karp. At the time, a spokesperson for The Kraft Group denied any coordination between parties for the donation to the campaign. Advertisement Kraft said he is ready to deal with the consequences of the Trump presidency if he is elected mayor, amid 'a mountain of federal budget cuts along with a billion dollar tax credit shortfall.' He also spoke about Mayor Michelle Wu's criticism of his family's relationship with Trump. 'Michelle Wu wants to talk about me, I want to talk about all of you,' Kraft said. Wu could not be immediately reached for comment. Kraft also spoke out against Wu's handling of the Boston housing crisis, the White Stadium renovation, and the city's homelessness problem, saying, 'addiction does not discriminate.' Regarding housing, Kraft said his campaign promises to jump-start construction, implement ' 'Boston is going to be a place where families and young people have to leave the city, and only the wealthy can afford to live here,' Kraft said. Kraft also criticized Wu's comments about 'She's desperate to distract the voters from a record of broken and failed campaign promises and the failures of her policy plans, especially making it easier for the middle class to afford to live in the city of Boston,' Kraft said. Kraft said he proposes a plan to place White Stadium, located in Franklin Park, back in the hands of Boston Public Schools students and athletes. He previously criticized Mayor Wu for not disclosing the Advertisement The renovations, which were subject to lawsuits over alleged During the press conference, Kraft dismissed comments about Super PAC tax exemptions. Super PACs are not limited in their campaign contributions, and can donate more than the $1,000 limit. The Your City Your Future Super PAC that supports Kraft has donated more than $3 million to his campaign. He also did not discuss his tax returns, which his campaign promised to release before the preliminary vote on Sept. 9. His campaign revealed last week he earned $6.3 million in 2024 but declined to break down the sources of Kraft's income. Wu and others have criticized Kraft for his lack of income transparency and the possibility of conflicts of interest in his mayoral campaign. Kraft has already personally contributed $2 million to his campaign. Mayoral candidates are not required to release their tax returns, but it has become common practice to do so. Wu said she has disclosed her finances for the last 12 years. If elected, Kraft said he would not be involved with his family business to avoid conflicts of interest. Critics, including Wu, flagged The Kraft Group's proposed soccer stadium in Everett, to which The Kraft Group proposed mitigation payments of $750,000. Kraft served as the head of the family charity, the New England Patriot Charitable Foundation. The nonprofit reported that Kraft was not paid a salary for his role, but a spokesperson from the campaign said Advertisement Kraft was also the head of the Boston Boys and Girls Club for more than a decade, where he earned $350,000 in 2020, the year he stepped down from his leadership role. Maria Probert can be reached at
USA Today
39 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump says nuclear submarines are 'in the region' amid tension with Russia
Russia faces an Aug. 8 deadline from Trump to make peace with Ukraine or face economic consequences such as secondary tariffs and sanctions. WASHINGTON − President Donald Trump says the nuclear submarines he said he was deploying in response to threatening comments from Russia's former president are "in the region." Trump also signaled that he's preparing to hit Moscow with economic sanctions over its war against Ukraine. 'I've already put out a statement, the answer is, they are in the region," Trump told reporters traveling with him in New Jersey before he boarded Air Force One. Trump ordered two nuclear submarines to the "appropriate region" on Aug. 1 after former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev referenced Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities in a social media post that heightened tension with the U.S. leader. The dispute stemmed from Trump's ultimatum to Russia last month: make peace with Ukraine or brace for sanctions and secondary tariffs aimed at choking off the country's oil revenue. He gave Russian President Vladimir Putin a 50 day-deadline, which he later revised to Aug. 8. Trump offers Putin an ultimatum: Senate pressure builds to sanction Russia The president told reporters on Aug. 3 that if the deadline arrives and Russia has not agreed to a ceasefire, "there'll be sanctions." "But they seem to be pretty good at avoiding sanctions," he added. "You know, they're wily characters. ... So we'll see what happens." Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff had been expected to visit Russia before the deadline, but the president signaled to reporters that trip had not yet taken place. He said Witkoff is currently focused on addressing starvation in Gaza, but could go to Russia later in the week. Trump says he ordered 2 nuclear subs: They're heading to 'appropriate regions' after Russia nuclear threats The president stressed the need for a deal in Ukraine in which people stop being killed. "And now we're adding towns, where they're being hit by missiles," Trump said. Medvedev serves as deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council. He said in a July 28 post on X that Trump should remember that "each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country." Trump hit back in a Truth Social post that said: "Tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory!" After Medvedev said Trump should remember "how dangerous the fabled 'Dead Hand' can be," in a post on the messaging app Telegram that referenced the Soviet Union's doomsday nuclear system, the U.S. president said he would reposition the submarines. Calling the comments "highly provocative," Trump said on Truth Social that he was taking action, "just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that."
