Stocks offer restrained response to US-China trade framework
Live Events
AUCTION ANGST
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
Share markets and the dollar on Wednesday offered a guarded welcome to the latest signs of progress in U.S.-China trade talks, while awaiting more detail of what was decided and whether it would stick for long. Bond investors were also hunkered down for a reading in U.S. inflation that could show the early impact of tariffs on prices, and a Treasury auction that will test demand for the debt.Over in London, negotiators from Washington and Beijing said they had "agreed a framework on trade" that would be taken back to their leaders.U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick added the implementation plan should result in restrictions on rare earths and magnets being resolved, but again offered no specifics."Even though details are scant, as long as the two sides are talking, I think markets will be happy," said Carol Kong, a currency strategist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia."It will still be very hard and it will take a long time for both sides to reach a comprehensive trade agreement," she added. "That sort of comprehensive deal usually takes years to be reached, so I'm sceptical that a framework reached at the meeting in London will be comprehensive."The law was another hurdle as a federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them.Investors, who have been badly burned by trade turmoil before, offered a cautious response and MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan rose 0.2%.Japan's Nikkei added 0.4% and Australian stocks firmed 0.4%.EUROSTOXX 50 futures, FTSE futures and DAX futures were all down 0.2%, while S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq futures both lost 0.1%.The reaction in currency markets was equally restrained, with the dollar dipping 0.1% on the Japanese yen to 144.73. The euro edged up to $1.1433 and the dollar index held steady at 98.971.Bond investors had other things to worry about and yields on 10-year Treasuries were little changed at 4.467%. An auction of $39 billion in 10-year notes is due later in the day and the market is anxious to see if foreign buyers turn up.Concerns about huge U.S. budget deficits and debt have combined with unease over the White House's erratic trade policies to see investors demand a higher term premium for holding Treasuries.Data on U.S. consumer prices for May might also show some initial upward pressure from tariffs, though analysts assume it will take a few months to fully show in the series.Median forecasts are for the headline CPI to rise 0.2% and the core 0.3%, which would nudge the annual rates up to 2.5% and 2.9% respectively.Anything higher would be a setback to hopes for another rate cuts from the Federal Reserve and could see bonds sell off. Markets imply little chance the Fed will ease at its meeting next week or in July, but have priced around a 60% chance of a move in September.In commodity markets, gold edged up 0.3% to $3,333 an ounce. [GOL/]Oil prices eased back from near seven-week highs ahead of U.s. inventory data. [O/R]Brent dropped 31 cents to $66.56 a barrel, while U.S. crude eased 28 cents to $64.71 per barrel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
Oil jumps 7%, US stocks fall on fears of wider Iran-Israel war
NEW YORK (AP) — Oil prices leaped, and stocks slumped Friday on worries that escalating violence following Israel's attack on Iranian nuclear and military targets could damage the flow of crude around the world, along with the global S&P 500 sank 1.1% and wiped out what had been a modest gain for the week. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 769 points, or 1.8%, and the Nasdaq composite lost 1.3%.advertisementThe strongest action was in the oil market, where the price of a barrel of benchmark US crude jumped 7.3% to $72.98. Brent crude, the international standard, rose 7% to $74.23 for a barrel. Iran is one of the world's major producers of oil, though sanctions by Western countries have limited its sales. If a wider war erupts, it could slow the flow of Iran's oil to its customers and keep the price of crude and gasoline higher for everyone the oil coming from Iran, analysts also pointed to the potential for disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, a relatively narrow waterway off Iran's coast. Much of the world's oil that's been pulled from the ground moves through it on attacks involving Iran and Israel have seen prices for oil spike initially, only to fall later 'once it became clear that the situation was not escalating and there was no impact on oil supply,' according to Richard Joswick, head of near-term oil at S&P Global Commodity has Wall Street waiting to see what will come next. US stock prices dropped to their lowest points for the day after Iran launched ballistic missiles toward now, the price of oil has jumped, but it's still lower than it was earlier this year. 'This is an economic shock that nobody really needs, but it is one that seems more like a shock to sentiment than to the fundamentals of the economy,' said Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Annex Wealth in turn sent US stocks to a loss that was notable in size but outside their top 15 for the year so that use a lot of fuel as part of their business and need their customers feeling confident enough to travel fell to some of the sharpest losses. Cruise operator Carnival dropped 4.9%. United Airlines sank 4.4%, and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings fell 5%.They helped overshadow gains for US oil producers and other companies that could benefit from increased fighting between Israel and Mobil rose 2.2%, and ConocoPhillips gained 2.4% because the leaping price of crude portends bigger profits for that make weapons and defense equipment also rallied. Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and RTX all rose more than 3%.advertisementThe price of gold climbed as investors searched for safer places to park their cash. An ounce of gold added 1.4%.Often, prices for Treasury bonds will likewise rise when investors are feeling nervous. That's because U.S. government bonds have historically been seen as some of the safest options around. But Treasury prices fell Friday, which in turn pushed up their yields, in part because of worries that a spike in oil prices could drive inflation has remained relatively tame recently, and it's near the Federal Reserve's target of 2%, but worries are high that it could be set to accelerate because of President Donald Trump's sent the yield on the 10-year Treasury up to 4.41% from 4.36% late Thursday. Higher yields can tug down on prices for stocks and other investments, while making it more expensive for US companies and households to borrow money.A better-than-expected report Friday on sentiment among U.S. consumers also helped drive yields higher. The preliminary report from the University of Michigan said sentiment improved for the first time in six months after Trump put many of his tariffs on pause, while U.S. consumers' expectations for coming inflation Wall Street, Adobe fell 5.3% even though the company behind Photoshop reported a stronger profit for the latest quarter than Wall Street expected. Analysts called it a solid performance but said investors may have been looking for some bigger revenue forecasts for the upcoming of Brazilian meat giant JBS fell 3.9% as they made their debut on the New York Stock Exchange. The company wants to increase access to its shares among global investors, despite criticism from environmental groups, U.S. lawmakers and others who noted JBS' record of corruption, monopolistic behavior and environmental told, the S&P 500 fell 68.29 points to 5,976.97. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 769.83 to 42,197.79, and the Nasdaq composite sank 255.66 to 19, stock markets abroad, indexes slumped across Europe and Asia. France's CAC 40 lost 1%, and Germany's DAX dropped 1.1% for two of the larger Watch
Economic Times
6 hours ago
- Economic Times
ET Market Watch: Friday the 13th Crash: Sensex Sinks, Crude Spikes, Gold Nears Record
Transcript Welcome to ET Market Watch, your quick fix on the day's biggest market movers. I am Neha Vashisht Mahajan - your host of the evening. It's Friday, June 13. Today was a turbulent day for investors, both emotionally and financially. Let's start with the numbers. The Sensex fell 573 points to close at 81,118, while the Nifty50 ended 169 points lower, settling at 24,718. Earlier in the day, markets were in freefall — with the Sensex down over 1,300 points and Nifty hitting an intraday low of 24,473. So, what triggered the sell-off? Reason #1: Israel strikes Iran In a dramatic escalation of Middle East tensions, Israel launched a preemptive military strike on Iran's capital, Tehran. The airstrikes reportedly targeted nuclear sites, missile factories, and top Iranian commanders, including Revolutionary Guards chief Hossein Salami, whose death has been confirmed by Iranian state media. A state of emergency has been declared in Israel, and markets fear retaliatory attacks. Washington has distanced itself from the strike, calling it a 'unilateral action.' This geopolitical flashpoint shook global markets — and India wasn't spared. Reason #2: Crude oil prices spiked Brent crude surged over 6.6% to $74.15, after hitting $78.50 — the highest since January. WTI crude wasn't far behind, rising 7.3% to $72.91. Markets are worried that if Iran retaliates by blocking the Strait of Hormuz, oil supply could be severely restricted. And we've seen this story before — back in 2022, similar fears sent energy prices soaring. Reason #3: Global sell-off The ripple effect extended beyond oil. Asian markets tumbled — Japan's Nikkei, South Korea's KOSPI, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng all lost over 1%. In Europe, the DAX, CAC 40, and Euro Stoxx followed suit. The mood? Risk-off. Safe-haven rally As panic set in, investors fled to safety. Gold shot up to $3,416 per ounce, approaching its all-time high. The Swiss franc and Japanese yen gained. US 10-year Treasury yields dropped to a one-month low of 4.31%. And the Dollar Index climbed 0.5% — classic flight-to-safety. Closing Thought: The BSE's market capitalisation dropped by ₹2.17 lakh crore, wiping out a chunk of investor wealth in just a few hours. It's a reminder that in today's connected world, geopolitics and markets move hand in hand. That's all for today on ET Market Watch. We'll keep watching the numbers — and the world behind them.
NDTV
8 hours ago
- NDTV
Trump May Try To Alter AUKUS Deal, But Here's Why He Won't Sink It
The Pentagon has announced it will review the massive AUKUS agreement between the United States, United Kingdom and Australia to ensure it's aligned with US President Donald Trump's 'America first' agenda. The US undersecretary of defence for policy, Elbridge Colby, is reportedly going to oversee the review. The announcement has raised concern in Australia, but every government is entitled to review policies that their predecessors have made to consider whether or not there's a particular purpose. The UK has launched a parliamentary inquiry into AUKUS too, so it's not actually unreasonable for the US to do the same. There's a degree of nervousness in Australia as to what the implications are because Australia understandably has the biggest stake in this. But we need to consider what Colby has articulated in the past. In his book, The Strategy of Denial: American Defence in the Nature of Great Power Conflict, he made the case the US could 'prepare to win a war with China it cannot afford to lose – in order to deter it from happening'. So, with a deterrent mindset, he sees the need for the US to muscle up militarily. He's spoken about the alliance with Australia in very positive terms on a couple of occasions. And he has called himself an ' AUKUS agnostic ', though he has expressed deep concern about the ability of the submarine industrial base in the US to manufacture the ships quickly enough. And that leads to the fear the US Navy would not have enough submarines for itself if Washington is also sending them to Australia. As part of the deal, Australia would eventually be able to contribute to accelerating the production line. That involves Australian companies contributing to the manufacture of certain widgets and components that are needed to build the subs. Australia has already made a nearly A$800 million (US$500 million) down payment on expanding the US industrial capacity as part of the deal to ensure we get some subs in a reasonable time frame. There's also been significant legislative and industrial reforms in the US, Australia and UK to help facilitate Australian defence-related industries unplug the bottleneck of submarine production. There's no question there's a need to speed up production. But we are already seeing significant signs of an uptick in the production rate, thanks in part to the Australian down payment. And it's anticipated the rate will significantly increase in the next 12–18 months. Even still, projects like this often slide in terms of timelines. Why The US Won't Spike The Deal I'm reasonably optimistic that, on balance, the Trump administration will come down on the side of proceeding with the deal. There are a few key reasons for this: 1) We're several years down the track already. 2) We have more than 100 Australian sailors already operating in the US system. 3) Industrially, we're on the cusp of making a significant additional contribution to the US submarine production line. And finally, most people don't fully appreciate that the submarine base just outside Perth is an incredibly consequential piece of real estate for US security calculations. Colby has made very clear the US needs to muscle up to push back and deter China's potential aggression in the region. In that equation, submarines are crucial, as is a substantial submarine base in the Indian Ocean. China is acutely mindful of what we call the ' Malacca dilemma '. Overwhelmingly, China's trade of goods and fossil fuels comes through the Malacca Strait between Malaysia and Indonesia's island of Sumatra. The Chinese know this supply line could be disrupted in a war. And the submarines operating out of Perth contribute to this fear. This is a crucial deterrent effect the US and its allies have been seeking to maintain. And it has largely endured. Given nobody can predict the future, we all want to prevent a war over Taiwan and we all want to maintain the status quo. As such, the considered view has been that Australia will continue to support the US to bolster its deterrent effect to prevent such a scenario. Could Trump Be Angling For A Deal? As part of the US review of the deal, we could see talk of a potential slowdown in the delivery rate of the submarines. The Trump administration could also put additional pressure on Australia to deliver more for the US. This includes the amount Australia spends on defence, a subject of considerable debate in Canberra. Taking Australia's overall interests into account, the Albanese government may well decide increasing defence spending is an appropriate thing to do. There's a delicate dance to be had here between the Trump administration, the Australian government, and in particular, their respective defence departments, about how to achieve the most effective outcome. It's highly likely whatever decision the US government makes will be portrayed as the Trump administration 'doing a deal'. In the grand scheme of things, that's not a bad thing. This is what countries do. We talk a lot about the Trump administration's transactional approach to international relations. But it's actually not that different to previous US administrations with which Canberra has had to deal. So I'm reasonably sanguine about the AUKUS review and any possible negotiations over it. I believe the Trump administration will come to the conclusion it does not want to spike the Australia relationship. Australia has been on the US side since federation. Given this, the US government will likely make sure this deal goes ahead. The Trump administration may try to squeeze more concessions out of Australia as part of 'the art of the deal', but it won't sink the pact. However, many people will undoubtedly say this is the moment Australia should break with AUKUS. But then what? What would Australia do instead to ensure its security in this world of heightened great power competition in which Australia's interests are increasingly challenged? Walking away now would leave Australia more vulnerable than ever. I think that would be a great mistake. (Author: , Professor, Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, Australian National University) (Disclosure Statement: From 2015 to 2017 John Blaxland received funding from the US Department of Defense Minerva Research Initiative (subsequently disbanded by the Trump administration). This was used to write a book (with Greg Raymond) entitled "The US Thai Alliance and Asian International Relations" (Routledge, 2021). John currently is a fulltime employee of the ANU.)
