NYT Connections hints and answers for today (June 9, 2025)
NYT Connections
continues to challenge players worldwide with its clever puzzles. Released every midnight, the game tasks players with finding four groups of related words from a grid of sixteen. Today's puzzle, like always, demands sharp thinking and attention to detail. Whether you're a seasoned Connector or a newcomer, these hints and answers will help you solve the June 9, 2025 puzzle with ease. Keep reading for an overview of the game, step-by-step instructions, useful hints, and the full solution with explanations.
What is NYT Connections?
Connections is a free
word puzzle
by the
New York Times
that encourages players to spot connections between words. Each day, you get a fresh set of sixteen words and your task is to divide them into four groups of four words each, based on a common theme or link. The challenge lies in identifying sometimes subtle or tricky relationships between words, making it a fun and engaging brain exercise.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
เทรดทองCFDs ด้วยค่าสเปรดที่ต่ำที่สุด
IC Markets
สมัคร
Undo
How to play NYT Connections
You start with a 4x4 grid of words. Your goal is to find four groups of four words that share a meaningful connection. Click or tap words to select them and form a group. If correct, that group will be highlighted in a color. If wrong, you lose a life, and four wrong guesses means game over. Words may fit into multiple potential groups, so careful thinking and trial-and-error are key. The groups vary in difficulty, often with the last group requiring wordplay or deeper thought.
Today's Connections hints for June 9, 2025
Yellow group: quick access to important functions
Green group: get it sorted beforehand
Blue group: where you might find soldiers, kumiin, chapitos, and mountain lords
Purple group: take something away to prove your skills with seven characters
Today's Connections answers
Yellow group: keyboard shortcut commands (PASTE, PRINT, QUIT, SAVE)
Green group: secure in advance (BOOK, ORDER, REQUEST, RESERVE)
Blue group: crime organization (CREW, FAMILY, RING, SYNDICATE)
Purple group: Spelling Bee ranks minus a letter (GENUS, GOO, MAZING, SLID)
Explanation of today's answers
The yellow group features common keyboard commands that allow quick actions, such as printing or saving documents.
The green group centers on words related to securing something ahead of time, like booking or ordering.
The blue group refers to crime organizations, including terms like syndicate and family.
The purple group was the trickiest, involving Spelling Bee ranks with one letter removed: 'mazing' is 'amazing' without the 'a,' 'genus' hints at 'genius,' and so forth
. This puzzle tests both word knowledge and lateral thinking, making it a satisfying challenge for word enthusiasts. Happy puzzling!
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
NYT Mini Crossword answers June 10: crack today's puzzle fast with Jaws, James and more pop-culture clues
What are the NYT Mini Crossword across clues and answers for June 10? 1A: Displays at a trailhead Answer: MAPS This one's a straightforward clue. If you've ever hiked, you know trailheads often feature large maps to guide hikers. Answer: MAPS This one's a straightforward clue. If you've ever hiked, you know trailheads often feature large maps to guide hikers. 5A: Pulitzer-winning 2024 novel that reimagined 'Adventures of Huckleberry Finn' from Jim's perspective Answer: JAMES This refers to the celebrated 2024 novel 'James' by Percival Everett. The book won the Pulitzer Prize and retells Twain's classic story through the eyes of the enslaved character Jim. Answer: JAMES This refers to the celebrated 2024 novel 'James' by Percival Everett. The book won the Pulitzer Prize and retells Twain's classic story through the eyes of the enslaved character Jim. 6A: Invader in a sci-fi movie Answer: ALIEN Classic sci-fi clue, and a nod to Ridley Scott's 1979 film Alien, among others. Answer: ALIEN Classic sci-fi clue, and a nod to Ridley Scott's 1979 film Alien, among others. 7A: Thin strands Answer: WISPS A common term for fine strands, often used in reference to hair, smoke, or clouds. Answer: WISPS A common term for fine strands, often used in reference to hair, smoke, or clouds. 8A: 'Tude Answer: SASS Slang for attitude — a common crossword clue/answer combo. What are the NYT Mini Crossword down clues and answers for June 10? 1D: One of Michelle Obama's daughters Answer: MALIA Malia Obama, the eldest daughter of former President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama. Answer: MALIA Malia Obama, the eldest daughter of former President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama. 2D: A little out of whack Answer: AMISS A synonym often used when something feels slightly off. Answer: AMISS A synonym often used when something feels slightly off. 3D: Marshmallow treats in Easter baskets Answer: PEEPS These brightly colored marshmallow candies are a springtime staple. Answer: PEEPS These brightly colored marshmallow candies are a springtime staple. 4D: I.R.S. IDs Answer: SSNS Short for Social Security Numbers, commonly used for tax identification in the U.S. Answer: SSNS Short for Social Security Numbers, commonly used for tax identification in the U.S. 5D: 1975 film with a 25-foot animatronic shark Answer: JAWS Steven Spielberg's blockbuster Jaws is turning 50 next year. The mechanical shark became legendary — both for the movie's suspense and the production nightmares it caused. Why is today's NYT Mini Crossword answer 'Jaws' important? What are other trending NYT puzzles today? Live Events NYT Connections Answer for June 10 NYT Strands Puzzle Answer for June 10 NYT Wordle Answer for June 10 Connections: Sports Edition for June 10 How can I get better at solving the NYT Mini Crossword? Start with the shorter clues — they're often more direct. Look for wordplay or puns in trickier clues. Play every day — patterns and frequent answers will start to stick. Check clue types — for instance, clues with abbreviations usually signal abbreviated answers. FAQs: (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Looking for today's NYT Mini Crossword answers for Tuesday, June 10? You're in the right place. If today's clues had you scratching your head — especially 5-Down, which nods to a famous summer movie turning 50 this year — we've broken it all down for you with simple, clear answers. Here's everything you need to know about the puzzle, along with clues and correct NYT Mini Crossword for June 10, 2025, featured five across clues that tested players on literature, sci-fi, and vocabulary. Here's a complete breakdown:The down clues today offered a mix of pop culture, history, and a touch of clue for 5D celebrates the upcoming 50th anniversary of Jaws, which hit theaters in 1975. This film is widely credited with inventing the summer blockbuster and set a new standard for suspense thrillers. Its inclusion in the crossword is both timely and a fun way to honor movie you've already solved the Mini Crossword, check out these trending puzzles from Tuesday, June 10, 2025:If you're just getting into daily puzzles or want to improve your skills, here are a few tips:You can also explore guides and strategy articles like 'Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword', available on major puzzle and gaming sites.A1: It's JAWS, the 1975 shark movie.A2: It reimagines Huckleberry Finn.
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gujarat court denies maintenance to woman who willingly resigned from job
Ahmedabad: A court turned down a woman's application seeking maintenance from her husband on the grounds that she had willingly resigned from her regular job. The JMFC court in Rajkot had first rejected the woman's request for maintenance in March 2023 because she was gainfully employed. Four months after this order, she resigned from her job and filed another application seeking maintenance, but the court dismissed the second application as well. The couple engaged in the legal battle got married in 2017. While the woman is from Rajkot, the husband lives in Gandhinagar. The woman, who is a PhD holder, got a job as an assistant professor in a Gandhinagar college. The couple lived together for eight months, and marital discord began, resulting in the woman filing multiple litigations against her husband and an FIR against him and the in-laws. O by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo ne of the applications filed in the court in 2019 was under Section 125 of CrPC seeking maintenance. She sought interim maintenance from her husband, claiming that he was earning Rs 1.50 lakh per month. The husband established that his salary was Rs 66,000, while the wife was earning Rs 31,000 per month. He also claimed that his wife was a careerist, and she did not want a child, and therefore left her matrimonial home. Moreover, the woman had several FDs in her name, and she admitted that she had no other liability. Four months after the court rejected the woman's application for interim maintenance, she voluntarily resigned from her job and filed another application on the grounds that she was unemployed and did not have any regular income. After perusing the resignation letter and relieving order, the court said, "The applicant left her job willingly. She holds a high degree and was getting a good salary of Rs 31,000 in this job… Considering all the circumstances, it does not appear proper to grant the applicant's application at this stage. A final decision on her application will be taken after the final hearing by considering all the evidence."
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's troops, Soros's bricks: Lies flood socials - What's behind LA protests?
As thousands march across Los Angeles to oppose sweeping immigration raids, another battle is raging online - one of doctored photos, misleading videos, and conspiracy theories that blur fact and fiction, stoking division and chaos, a New York Times report said. The protests began Friday following the arrest of more than 40 immigrants at workplaces across the city. What started with chants and peaceful rallies has escalated into clashes, military deployments, and a digital storm of disinformation that, according to experts, is not only distorting the reality on the ground but accelerating the unrest. Protests spark over raids, Federal troop deployment Crowds have gathered in downtown LA and beyond since Friday, outraged by the federal immigration sweeps and the arrest of labor leader David Huerta, who has since been released on bond. Protesters have blocked streets, linked arms outside detention centers, and waved Latin American flags in defiance of Trump's policies and rhetoric. By Monday, the protests entered a volatile fourth day. Despite mostly peaceful rallies, law enforcement used tear gas and rubber bullets to break up groups in downtown LA where violence flared - including burning self-driving Waymo cars and assaults on police. The federal response was swift and controversial: 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines have now been deployed to LA, without the consent of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who called the move "reckless" and sued the Trump administration to block it. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo 'This isn't about public safety,' Newsom posted on X. 'It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego.' Online disinformation campaigns stoke the fire As tensions rose on the streets, misinformation exploded across social media - often faster than journalists and officials could respond, the NYT report said. Darren L Linvill, a researcher at Clemson University, described how right-wing influencers were 'building up the riots in a performative way' to validate Trump's framing of Los Angeles as a war zone. 'As they direct attention to it,' he noted, 'more protesters will show up.' One viral post falsely claimed that pallets of bricks had been left near ICE buildings for 'Democrat militants' to launch attacks. The photo was traced to a Malaysian construction supplier - a recycled hoax from past protest cycles. Still, it reached over 800,000 views before being tagged with a Community Note. Actor James Woods reposted a fabricated Obama quote and 2020 riot footage, presenting them as proof of a left-wing plot. Other users shared out-of-context stills from films like Blue Thunder to claim Marines were 'engaging in combat downtown.' According to the Social Media Lab at Toronto Metropolitan University, these narratives aren't new - but their reappearance signals coordinated attempts to discredit protests and depict them as orchestrated insurgencies. 'It's catnip for right-wing agitators and grifters,' the Lab posted. Conspiracies target leaders and amplify division The conspiracy theories didn't stop at bricks or movie clips. Influencers on X and Truth Social claimed - without evidence - that LA Mayor Karen Bass had CIA ties and helped spark the unrest. The claim relied solely on her role on the board of the National Endowment for Democracy. Even more far-fetched accusations targeted financier George Soros, long a bogeyman in far-right narratives. Soros was baselessly blamed for funding the protests, a theory bolstered by anonymous and foreign-linked accounts. Some of the loudest voices, including Trump himself, labeled protesters as 'Paid Insurrectionists.' Russian nationalist Aleksandr Dugin echoed the theme, claiming, 'It is nationwide conspiracy of liberals against not only Trump but against American people in general.' Nora Benavidez, of the media watchdog Free Press, said the disinformation was no accident: 'Information warfare is always a symptom of conflict, stoked often by those in power to fuel their own illiberal goals.' A test case for Trump's power play? Critics argue that the chaos in LA is being used to justify sweeping federal power. President Trump has suggested that similar troop deployments could happen 'everywhere,' fueling concerns that he may invoke the Insurrection Act to clamp down on civil dissent. President Trump's decision to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles - without the consent of California's governor - marks one of the most aggressive assertions of federal power over a state in recent history. Critics say it's not just about immigration enforcement - it's about setting a precedent. 'This is exactly what Donald Trump wanted,' Governor Gavin Newsom said in a viral post. 'He flamed the fires and illegally acted to federalize the National Guard.' The legal mechanism Trump invoked - a rarely used clause allowing deployment in the face of 'rebellion' - has only been triggered once in modern US history without a governor's request, during the 1965 Selma marches. Trump's move is even more provocative given that Los Angeles officials, including Police Chief Jim McDonnell, say local law enforcement has the situation under control. California has filed a lawsuit challenging the deployment. Attorney General Rob Bonta called it 'a trampling of state sovereignty,' arguing that no actual rebellion or invasion exists - conditions required for Trump's order to be lawful. Behind the scenes, legal scholars warn that Trump may be laying the groundwork to invoke the Insurrection Act - a far more extreme measure that would allow the military to directly enforce civilian law. Trump hasn't formally done so, but he and his allies have repeatedly labeled the protests 'insurrections,' echoing language he's used before to justify force. The framing is no accident. Stephen Miller, Trump's top immigration advisor, called the protests 'a battle for the survival of Western civilization.' Trump has claimed Los Angeles would have been 'obliterated' without his intervention. He's also floated the arrest of Newsom, fueling accusations of authoritarian overreach. 'These moves aren't just about LA - they're about testing the boundaries,' Todd Belt, political science professor at George Washington University, told AFP. 'If Trump can override a state on immigration protests, what stops him from doing the same in another city over gun laws, abortion rights, or education policy?' Critics argue that Trump is staging a made-for-TV crackdown to energize his base. His deployment order came just hours before attending a UFC fight - an arena he has used to project toughness. And with his 79th birthday military parade in Washington looming, the timing appears more symbolic than strategic. 'Trump knows the optics,' said Hina Shamsi of the ACLU. 'Deploying troops, calling governors criminals, labeling protesters 'paid insurrectionists' - it's all designed to project dominance and distract from the actual issues.' The fear among civil liberties groups, legal experts, and Democratic leaders is that what's happening in Los Angeles could become a template - not an anomaly.
