
New guidance published for North Sea oil and gas projects
Climate campaigners say new developments will make "barely a dent" in the UK's reliance on imported fossil fuels.The new guidance was drawn up in response to a landmark Supreme Court ruling last year, that Surrey County Council should have considered the full climate impact of burning oil from new wells.Previously, those assessments took into account emissions generated by the process of extracting oil and gas. However, they did not count the greenhouse gases which would be released when those fossil fuels were eventually burned - known as "downstream" or "Scope 3" emissions.In January, the Court of Session in Edinburgh ruled that the decision in that case should apply retrospectively to Rosebank and Jackdaw.Shell's Jackdaw gas field in the North Sea was originally approved by the previous UK Conservative government, and the industry regulator, in summer 2022.Permission for the Rosebank oil development, 80 miles west of Shetland in the North Atlantic, was granted in autumn 2023.Lord Ericht said work on both fields could continue while the new information was gathered but no oil and gas could be extracted unless fresh approval was granted.
The climate watchdog - Offshore Petroleum Regulator for Environment and Decommissioning - and regulator the North Sea Transition Authority had paused decisions on licenses for new drilling projects and the granting of existing licenses until the government clarified its position.Publication of the new guidance means offshore developers can submit their applications for consent to extract oil and gas in already-licensed fields.Energy Secretary Ed Miliband and the regulator will then reconsider whether or not to grant consent, taking downstream emissions into account.The UK government said it would consider the significance of a project's environmental impact, "while taking into account and balancing relevant factors on a case-by-case basis such as the potential economic impact and other implications of the project".No decisions are expected until the end of the summer.Michael Shanks said: "This new guidance... marks a step forward in ensuring the full implications of oil and gas extraction are considered for potential projects and that we ensure a managed, prosperous, and orderly transition to the North Sea's clean energy future, in line with the science."We are working with industry, trade unions, local communities and environmental groups to ensure the North Sea and its workers are at the heart of Britain's clean energy future for decades to come – supporting well-paid, skilled jobs, driving growth and boosting our energy security."
'Incompatible' with climate commitments
Tessa Khan, executive director of the climate campaign group Uplift, said the new guidance means that oil and gas companies will be "finally be forced to come clean over the enormous harm they are causing to the climate".She said: "In the case of the Rosebank oil field, which Equinor can now seek reapproval for, it is overwhelmingly obvious that the project is incompatible with the UK's climate commitments. "Whether or not this government then follows the science and rejects Rosebank will be a real test of its climate credibility."Ms Khan added that Rosebank is a "bad deal" for the UK, would not help lower fuel bills or boost energy independence.The update comes shortly after the UK government's Spending Review last week, which included about £200m for the Acorn Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) scheme in Aberdeenshire.Shanks also told the BBC he expects plans to be announced "soon" for the future of Grangemouth.
This is a significant moment for the future of the North Sea but it effectively tells us nothing.What it does, though, is it takes the brakes off future development within existing licence areas.Operators seeking consent to produce oil and gas will now be allowed to resume their applications, which have been on hold since the Supreme Court ruling.They'll now have to produce an environmental impact assessment which sets out at all the planet warming greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production and consumption of the product.Beyond that, they have to set out what impact those emissions will have on the warming of the planet.To receive consent, they must set a compelling case for why those emissions must be offset against the benefits of giving the project the go ahead.Then the minister will use a matrix to decide whether to approve or reject any proposal.We won't really know what impact all of this will have on those decisions until the first of them are made.So, there's a summer of uncertainty ahead. But we could start to gather a picture of whether the North Sea has a viable future from August onwards.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
Drive-through plan for former Brighouse ballroom
A former ballroom could be demolished and replaced with a drive-through coffee want to knock down the Venue 73 nightclub in Bradford Road, Brighouse, in order to build a new opened in 1937 the building has been used as a cinema, bingo hall and was home to The Ritz Ballroom from 1981 to to an application from EG on the Move Ltd the site has been empty for five years, suffers from damp and is in need of a complete change. Supporting statements on behalf of the applicants claim the premises has been subjected to anti-social behaviour and the police "regularly" had to attend as a agent said some public consultation had been held and overall well supported, though some people had raised concerns over road safety. According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, a report showed a number of letters of support had welcomed the applicant said, if approved, the new building would include some art deco stylings as a nod to the building's past, with limited hours vehicle charging included on building previously hit the headlines in 2017 when lawyers from the Ritz Hotel ordered its owner to change its name or face legal building closed as a ballroom later that same year and as a live music space in February 2020. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.


BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
Grade II-listed ex-GP building in Wolverhampton set for new flats
A 180-year-old Grade II-listed building that used to be a GP surgery will be converted into offices and consultancy rooms at the site in Wolverhampton have been empty since last year when private healthcare company Summerfield Heath went into administration.A new two-storey rear extension and a single-storey side extension would be added to the building as part of the work on Summerfield Road, Chapel one and two-bed flats feature in the plans approved by City of Wolverhampton Council. The building, which dates back to the 1840s, lies on the edge of West Park.A council planner report said the principle of residential development was "considered acceptable in this predominantly residential area". The development would contribute "to the vitality and mix of uses and much needed regeneration of this part of the city", it offices on the opposite side of Summerfield Road, last used by Marston's brewery, will also be converted into flats, after plans were approved by the council last former Marston's training centre will be turned into 18 one and two-bed pub giant announced last summer it was selling its 40% stake in Carlsberg Marston's Brewing Company to Carlsberg for £206m. This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
Oxford controversial bridge scheme cost rises by £3.7m
A controversial bridge will cost an extra £3.7m to build because of delays caused by a recent judicial review, a local authority has Oxpens River Bridge, which would link Oxpens Meadow to Grandpont Nature Park in Oxford, was approved last year and was supposed to have been built by against the bridge launched a judicial review into the decision earlier this year, which was dismissed by the High Court on all five counts in bridge was initially expected to cost £10.3m, but the city council now estimates it will cost £14m. Oxford City Council said the increase in cost was due to the inflation of construction costs, caused by the delay from the judicial a report prepared ahead of a scrutiny committee meeting on Tuesday, the council said it was working with potential benefactors, including Homes England and the University of Oxford, to bridge the funding gaps. Construction work on the bridge is set to begin in early 2026, with a view to be completed by February Friends of Grandpont Nature Park, who brought the judicial review, said it "hopes to save [the taxpayer] millions by scrapping the project altogether".The group has submitted an appeal against the high court decision, and is waiting to hear whether it can city council previously said the bridge would provide a walking route between Osney Mead and Oxpens - with both areas set for regeneration with new homes and for the bridge currently consists of £8.8m from the Oxfordshire Housing and Growth Deal, and £1.5m from the Housing and Infrastructure Fund from Homes opposed to the development argue locals would lose a cherished nature park, emphasising that there is already a bridge a short distance away that could be fixed instead. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.