Georgia freshman Erik Parker makes surprise move after Super Regionals loss
Georgia freshman Erik Parker makes surprise move after Super Regionals loss (Getty Images)
Freshman outfielder Erik Parker is officially moving on from the University of Georgia. Just days after the Bulldogs' baseball season ended, Parker entered the NCAA transfer portal.
The Georgia native came in as a highly-rated prospect, and now he's seeking a new opportunity to continue his college baseball journey. His decision comes as the Bulldogs regroup after a tough postseason loss.
Erik Parker enters transfer portal after Georgia's season ends
On Sunday, June 2, 2025, Georgia's baseball season came to an emotional close when the team lost 8–6 to Oklahoma State in the NCAA Super Regionals. The game was played in Stillwater, Oklahoma, and ended with a walk-off home run in the bottom of the ninth inning.
The Bulldogs, coached by Wes Johnson, had been hopeful of reaching the College World Series in Omaha for the first time since 2008.
Just a day later, on Monday, June 3, Erik Parker's name appeared in the NCAA transfer portal, according to 247Sports. Parker is a true freshman who played in 16 games during the 2025 season. While his playing time was limited, he made contributions in other areas—scoring 10 runs and stealing a base.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Beyond Text Generation: An AI Tool That Helps You Write Better
Grammarly
Install Now
Undo
He had just four at-bats, recording one hit.
Erik Parker played high school baseball at North Gwinnett High School in Suwanee, Georgia. In July 2024, he was selected by the Los Angeles Dodgers in the 15th round of the MLB Draft but chose to play college ball instead. Now, less than a year later, he's exploring new options through the transfer portal.
Also Read:
Is Chandler Simpson the fastest man in baseball? Tampa Bay's secret weapon is shocking everyone
Coach Wes Johnson's program faces more offseason changes
Head coach Wes Johnson, who joined Georgia before the 2024 season, has used the transfer portal to rebuild the program quickly.
In his first year, the Bulldogs reached the Super Regionals but lost to LSU. This year, they fell short again, despite a strong regular season.
Speaking with local reporters after the team's elimination, Johnson said, 'This group gave everything. We just came up short this time.'
Now that the offseason has started, roster changes are expected. Like many programs, Georgia will both gain and lose players through the portal. Parker's transfer is part of that cycle. Though he was not a regular starter, his potential is clear.
More updates on Parker's next destination are expected soon. For now, he remains one of the more notable young players in the portal. You can track portal entries at On3.com for live updates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Simone Biles vs Riley Gaines: Trans debate sparks heated clash on social media
The Musk vs Trump row waves haven't died down yet, and X (formerly, Twitter) has platformed yet another, what netizens are now calling, 'cat-fight'. This time, the participants are Simone Biles and Riley Gaines. What's happening? Olympic gold medalist Simone Biles and former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines have found themselves embroiled in a public dispute over the inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports. The controversy ignited after Gaines criticized a Minnesota high school softball team's state championship victory, led by transgender pitcher Marissa Rothenberger. Gaines referred to Rothenberger as 'a boy,' sparking backlash from Biles and others. — Simone_Biles (@Simone_Biles) What triggered the fight? Champlin Park High School's softball team won the Minnesota state title with Rothenberger, a transgender athlete, leading them to victory. Gaines, quite well-known for her opposition to transgender women competing in women's sports, took to social media to express her disapproval, labeling Rothenberger's participation as unfair. She also disabled comments on her post, which led to further criticism. What followed? Simone Biles, the most decorated gymnast in Olympic history and a vocal advocate for inclusivity in sports, used her platform to confront Riley Gaines, a former collegiate swimmer known for campaigning against transgender athletes in women's sports, responded to Gaines' comments calling her 'truly sick' and accusing her of being a 'sore loser,' who bullies transgender athletes rather than seeking inclusion. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Biles suggested that instead of attacking transgender athletes, Gaines should work towards creating inclusive spaces or separate categories for them in sports. She also labeled Gaines as a 'bully' for her stance. Simone's X post read, 'You're truly sick, all of this campaigning because you lost a race. Straight up sore loser. You should be uplifting the trans community and perhaps finding a way to make sports inclusive OR creating a new avenue where trans feel safe in sports. Maybe a transgender category IN ALL SPORTS!! But instead … You bully them … One thing's for sure is no one in sports is safe with you around!!!!!' Biles concluded with a final jab, 'Bully someone your own size, which would ironically be a male.' Gaines, of course, fired back at Biles, saying, 'This is actually so disappointing. It's not my job or the job of any woman to figure out how to include men in our spaces. You can uplift men stealing championships in women's sports with YOUR platform. Men don't belong in women's sports and I say that with my full chest.' She also hit back against Biles' suggestion of a transgender category and rejected accusations of body-shaming. The bigger debate: The heated sparring between Biles and Gaines highlights the ongoing debate in sports regarding fairness and inclusion. Gaines argues that allowing transgender women to compete in women's sports undermines fairness due to perceived physical advantages. She has been vocal in advocating for policies that restrict transgender athletes' participation in women's categories. On the other hand, Biles and other advocates for transgender rights emphasize the importance of inclusivity and the need to create environments where all athletes, regardless of gender identity, feel welcome and supported. Studies show that nearly 80% of people support keeping biological males out of girls' and women's sports, but Biles challenges the sports community to find solutions that balance fairness and inclusion with suggesting the possibility of establishing separate categories for transgender athletes to balance fairness and inclusion. Namie sake is making a miracle comeback in Japan's Fukushima
The Hindu
8 hours ago
- The Hindu
Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for U.S. colleges to pay athletes millions
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday (June 6, 2025), clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. The road to a settlement: Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as 'March Madness' or 'Roll Tide.' It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte.
Hindustan Times
9 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
153 NCAA rules had to be eliminated to clear the way for the House settlement. Numbers to know
The groundbreaking case leading to the transformation of college sports in the United States comes nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House and Oregon basketball player Sedona Prince filed a complaint against the NCAA and the five most powerful conferences alleging they were unfairly being denied of pay for use of their name, image and likeness. The settlement approved by U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken resolved three antitrust cases — House vs. NCAA, Carter vs. NCAA and Hubbard vs. NCAA — that became known collectively as the 'House case.' The class-action lawsuits contended the NCAA, ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC violated antitrust law by not providing benefits and compensation to athletes and restraining athletes' ability to make money for endorsements and sponsorships. Incremental gains won by athletes in previous lawsuits against the NCAA set the stage for the House settlement and the all-out professionalization of college sports. A look at key numbers associated with the case: Athletes who played an NCAA sport between 2016-24 and could be eligible for back payments Class members who submitted a claim form or updated their payment information, which represents approximately 26.2% of the 389,700. Athletes who opted out of the settlement and could pursue their own remedies. Back damages to be paid to current and former college athletes who were denied the opportunity to profit from the use of their NIL rights. The amount will be paid in $280 million installments over 10 years. The NCAA will use reserves and insurance to cover about 40% of the payments. The rest will be covered by the NCAA reducing its annual distributions to Division I schools. Estimated amount of the $2.8 billion that will be paid in back damages to football and men's and women's basketball players in the power conferences. The 2025-26 pool of money each Division I school can distribute in direct payments to athletes beginning July 1. The amount represents 22% of the average revenue generated by each school from the five defendant conferences and Notre Dame. NCAA rules that had to be eliminated to allow schools to provide additional benefits to athletes under the settlement. All Division I athletes will be required to report to their schools and the Deloitte clearinghouse any and all third-party NIL contracts with a total value of $600 or more, if payment occurs after July 1, 2025. The clearinghouse will determine whether the amount is commensurate with the athlete's fair market value. The widely accepted estimate by University of San Francisco sports economist Daniel Rascher of additional direct compensation athletes will receive over the next 10 years. The estimated amount of damages faced by the NCAA and the five conferences if they avoided a settlement and lost at trial. Plaintiffs attorneys' request for legal fees. The figure is based on attorneys receiving 20% of the NIL settlement fund and 10% of the additional compensation settlement fund as well as an injunction relief award of $20 million paid by the defendants. That does not included about $9 million in expenses attorneys are claiming. college sports: /hub/college-sports
