You can't demand seats in the Lords and still be an establishment rebel, Mr Farage
In its first 100 days, the document says, a Reform government would start to ' replace the crony-filled House of Lords with a much smaller, more democratic second chamber'.
It is easy to mock, so let us enjoy the contrast between Farage's high-minded manifesto promises and his demand that some of his cronies should join all the other cronies in the upper house.
Let us, in particular, enjoy the next two sentences in Reform's manifesto. Readers wanting to know how this 'more democratic' chamber might be constituted are dismissed briskly: 'Structure to be debated.' The structure of a more democratic second chamber has been debated for more than 100 years; it seems unlikely that anything will be decided in 100 days.
Then there is this gem: 'Immediate end of political appointees.' As St Augustine didn't quite say, Lord make it immediate, but not yet. Before the arrival of a Reform government and the immediate end of political appointees, Farage would like the prime minister to ennoble some political appointees on his behalf.
It is not fair, the Reform leader says in his letter, that 'the Greens, DUP, Plaid Cymru and UUP have 13 peers between them, but Reform UK has none'. The Scottish National Party also has none, but that is because it disagrees with the House of Lords and means it. Reform, on the other hand, disagrees with the House of Lords but thinks it is a 'democratic disparity' – not that Britain has an appointed upper house but that Reform isn't in it.
It is not as if Farage's parties have never had representatives in the Lords. Malcolm Pearson, a former leader of the UK Independence Party, is still a member, sitting as a non-affiliated peer. David Stevens, former chair of United Newspapers when it owned the Daily Express, was also Ukip and is now non-affiliated. Claire Fox, the former Brexit Party MEP, is also a non-affiliated peer.
Pearson and Stevens were originally Conservative peers but switched, whereas Fox was nominated by Boris Johnson as a way of mischievously celebrating Britain's departure from the EU.
But Farage hasn't been able to hold onto any of them and now wants to put some of his current allies in the Lords. The Times lists Ann Widdecombe, Nick Candy and Zia Yusuf as possible candidates.
It is not going to happen. 'This is the same Nigel Farage that called for the abolition of the House of Lords and now wants to fill it with his cronies,' said John Healey, the defence secretary, this morning. 'I'm not sure that parliament is going to be benefiting from more Putin apologists like Nigel Farage.'
The constitutional position is simple: nominations to the Lords are a matter for the Crown, as advised by the prime minister. The monarch is a cypher; Keir Starmer is the sole decision-maker. He may choose to invite other party leaders to make nominations, but that is entirely up to him.
David Cameron and Boris Johnson, when they were going through green phases, even allowed the Green Party of England and Wales to nominate – Jenny Jones in 2013 and Natalie Bennett in 2019. But it is up to the prime minister, who usually allows him or herself to be fettered by the independent House of Lords Appointments Commission – although Johnson overruled it when it advised against making Peter Cruddas, the Tory former treasurer, a peer.
It might be tempting for Starmer to agree to Farage's request. It would make it harder for Farage to present himself as the doughty outsider, locked out of the Establishment. It would mean that Reform had more public representatives and therefore more chances that one or more of them would embarrass the party. And it would be the responsible thing to do, given that there is a real chance that Farage might soon be prime minister: he ought then to have some back-up in the House of Lords.
But it is not going to happen, and Farage knows it is not going to happen. His letter is a classic August news story, designed to get attention and to drive home the point that Reform, the most popular party in the country, is treated as unrespectable by the establishment parties.
At a time when anti-government and anti-establishment feeling is running high, Farage's status as an outsider is a priceless asset to him.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'It's not wrong to love my partner': UK's first-ever lesbian archbishop fires back after critics claimed her appointment will lead to church exodus
The UK's first-ever lesbian archbishop has hit back at critics who claimed her appointment will lead to a church exodus, saying it is 'not wrong' for her to love her partner. Cherry Vann, who is gay and living in a same-sex partnership, was named as the fifteenth Archbishop of Wales last month. However, her appointment sparked controversy among conservatives who said it goes against biblical teaching and will lead directly to people leaving the church. Susie Leafe, director of Anglican Futures, added that the move scuppers 'any chance of the Anglican Communion coming back together'. She explained that anyone who was 'seriously minded' about their faith, would now be 'considering their options'. Meanwhile, the Global Fellowship of Confessing Anglicans, which represents conservative views, said Ms Vann's appointment was 'another painful nail in the coffin of Anglican orthodoxy'. Responding to the criticism, the archbishop said she has never heard God say to her 'who you love is wrong' or that she is 'living in sin'. She added that the Bible is open to interpretation when it comes to social issues, such as same-sex relationships. Ms Vann told Premier Christian News: 'Christians hold different views on all manner of subjects, divorce, remarriage, abortion, assisted dying, to name but a few. 'I mean, we are not all of one mind on most things. And you know, the church changes its position. It learns a broader understanding of God's love.' 'I cannot see how loving somebody as I love my partner could be wrong,' she added. When asked about whether the Church of Wales will conduct same-sex marriages in churches, she said she thought it would happen 'in the not too distant future'. Prior to her appointment as the Archbishop of Wales, Ms Vann, who is originally from Leicester, served as the Bishop of Monmouth for five years. She replaced Andrew John, who retired last month after three-and-a-half years in the role. Mr John's departure followed a safeguarding review at Bangor Cathedral, which identified 'a culture in which sexual boundaries seemed blurred' and 'promiscuity was acceptable'. There has been no suggestion Mr John behaved inappropriately and he commissioned two reports into the cathedral in October last year. Speaking following her appointment, Ms Vann said: 'The first thing I shall need to do is to ensure the issues which have been raised in the last six months are properly addressed and work to bring healing and reconciliation, and build a really good level of trust across the Church and the communities the Church serves.' Ms Vann was ordained as a deacon in 1989 and was among the first women to be ordained as a priest in the Church of England in 1994. She then served as Archdeacon of Rochdale for 11 years.
Times
12 minutes ago
- Times
Why Europe needs this 24-hour TNT factory deep inside a forest
Deep in a Swedish forest, a project that holds vital implications for Europe's future security is ready to begin. Work is expected to start this year on a factory to produce the chemical compound trinitrotoluene, better known as TNT. The site, concealed from view by several hundred metres of densely packed pine trees, would be the continent's first new TNT factory in 30 years. It is due to open in 2027 and will operate 24 hours a day, using 'continuous nitration' to produce 4,500 tonnes of Nato's high explosive — MIL-DTL-248D standard TNT — each year. At the moment Europe produces only 12,000 tonnes a year, all of which comes from one factory in Poland, and half of which is already pledged to the United States. Russia, by contrast, can produce 50,000 tonnes of TNT annually. • Nato chief: Ukrainians are short on ammunition, not courage The rest of Europe's explosives needs — for defence, demolition or construction — have to be shipped from Asia. These supply lines are subject to delays and would be highly vulnerable to interception in the event of war. For that reason all material and machinery for the new Swedish facility will come from within 600km of the site. This imbalance has a direct battlefield impact. Partly because of its much greater TNT production capacity, and partly because Moscow has access to six explosives factories in North Korea, Russia generates about five million artillery shells a year. The rest of Europe combined is unable to produce even one million shells. On the front line, this means Russia can fire 12,000 rounds a day, versus only 7,000 fired by the Ukrainians, according to Ukrainian data. The missing ingredient isn't necessarily new technology, it's old-fashioned bang. In artillery shells, TNT is the explosive material that generates the destructive force, but only on detonation. TNT is the main compound in the shell, but in the tip is a detonator — such as lead azide — which breaks on impact, triggering a rapid chemical reaction with the TNT, creating the explosive blast. Added to the Polish output, this new Swedish stream of explosives will bring Europe's TNT capacity up to one fifth of the material at Moscow's disposal. More production is expected to follow. Sir Keir Starmer announced plans earlier this year for a £1.5 billion investment in six British munitions factories, creating more than 1,000 jobs. As part of this, BAE Systems said in May that the UK would begin its own mobile explosives department, with six ad hoc shipping containers at various secret sites in the UK. Each container will produce only 100 tonnes of RDX explosives per year — a tiny fraction of the capacity of the proposed Swedish plant. • Britain to ramp up explosives production to end reliance on US arms RDX is roughly 1.5 times more powerful than TNT in weight and twice as powerful in volume, but more sensitive to shock. This UK amount is useful but small, says Joakim Sjoblom, co-founder and chief executive of Sweden Ballistics (SWEBAL), the company behind the proposed Swedish facility. 'When you consider every 155mm artillery shell requires 11.3kg of explosive — that's only 9,000 shells worth produced from each shipping container — not enough to match one day in Russia. But there are big advantages to having your explosives made in mobile shipping containers. In Ukraine they use them to make explosives on the move near the front line and the factories are small and agile enough to move away from enemy fire.' RDX and TNT are chemically similar and work often in tandem — both were blended together during the Second World War to form Composition B, an explosive that is almost equal parts RDX and TNT mixed with wax. One of the main considerations for potential producers though is forestry, says Nick Reynolds, research fellow for land warfare at Royal United Services Institute. He said: 'The base element for TNT is cellulose. Countries like Sweden and places like Canada have a huge source of pine, which is a big factor, something that UK and other countries are lacking.' A second European TNT factory is planned for Finland, says Sjoblom. 'We need to increase our production rate. Even if you just put the Finnish, Swedish, Polish and the new British initiatives together we are still a long way from matching Russian capacity.' His factory will be built just outside the Swedish town of Nora — about 140 miles west of Stockholm. Residents will be only dimly aware of it, he says. As a potential target for enemy states, the factory needs to have as limited a footprint as possible. Local people may notice, snaking out of the forest, a small increase in heavy goods happens to be one of Europe's best preserved wooden towns — described by its visitors' site as 'Bergslagen's little fairytale town'. A TNT production site near a town made out of wood sounds like a recipe for catastrophe — but Sjoblom, who consulted the authorities in 38 towns before choosing this one, says TNT is described as the 'mother of all explosives' because it is so stable you can bash it with a hammer and it won't ignite. That's why it needs a detonator in a shell. 'Underwater mining teams take it to the bottom of the sea via days on stormy waves. In Ukraine they're taking it on bumpy roads; qualified and unqualified people might handle it.'Many European countries have found it hard to find locations to build munitions factories. Potential sites are either too close to densely populated areas or are subject to restrictions on environmental impact. 'I know that the Baltic states were also considering building a plan for explosives, but they found it really hard to find a suitable area because you need space,' says Sjoblom. He said that like the UK, Sweden had a complex web of roads, schools and electrical grids, 'so you cannot just place explosives factories anywhere. Therefore, when you find a suitable location, you'd better produce a lot of volume … because it's not easy.' Russia is not standing still either. President Putin, less troubled by red tape, has announced an RDX factory capable of producing around 6,000 tonnes of explosives a year in Biysk, Siberia, a city nearly 2,000 miles from Moscow with a history of munitions Swedish site is in a region that has been a defence hub before. In 1915 the company Gyttorp Sprangamnes AB — named after an area of Nora — merged with Nitroglycerin AB, the company of Alfred Nobel, the Swedish inventor of dynamite. The new company quickly moved all its production to Gyttorp, and by the 1950s the explosives factory employed more than 800 people. However, the site now almost exclusively makes detonators and shotgun cartridges, rather than explosives. The new site is less than 30 minutes from Karlskoga and Bjorkborn's industrial area, which hosts the defence companies Saab, Nammo, Eurenco and BAE. While the project has cross-party support in the Swedish government, there is local opposition. Sjoblom says: 'It doesn't matter if you are building a clothing factory or an explosive plant, there will always be those who don't want it. That's not just safety, many have been raised in the proximity and have many memories there. Opposition also comes from hunters who use the area. It is part of a democratic process to gain the necessary permits, but any concerns about noise, safety, smell or lights, we control that and are equally keen to prevent that for our own privacy interests.' Sjoblom was previously the chief executive of Minna Technologies, a fintech company that was sold to Mastercard last year, when Sweden joined Nato in response to the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia in 2022. The confluence of the two events shaped his perception of what to do next. 'Suddenly, I had a two-year-old son and another baby on the way,' he says. 'That is part of the philanthropic reason of why I am spending my time doing this — if I can spend my time helping Europe and stopping a conflict I am very proud to do so.'
Rhyl Journal
24 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
U-turn as Trump administration agrees to keep Washington police chief in place
Meanwhile, attorney general Pam Bondi, in a new memo, directed the district's police to co-operate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. The order came after officials in the nation's capital sued on Friday to block President Donald Trump's takeover of the capital's police. The night before, his administration had escalated its intervention into the city's law enforcement by naming a federal official as the new emergency head of the department, essentially placing the police force under full control of the federal government. The attorney general's new order represents a partial retreat for the Trump administration in the face of intense scepticism from a judge over the legality of Ms Bondi's earlier directive, but she also signalled the administration would continue to pressure DC leaders to help federal authorities aggressively pursue immigrants in the country illegally, despite city laws that limit co-operation between police and immigration authorities. In a social media post on Friday evening, Ms Bondi criticised DC attorney general Brian Schwalb, saying he 'continues to oppose our efforts to improve public safety', but she added: 'We remain committed to working closely with Mayor Bowser.' Mayor Muriel Bowser's office said late on Friday that it was still evaluating how it can comply with the new Bondi order on immigration enforcement operations. The police department had already eased some restrictions on co-operating with federal officials facilitating Mr Trump's mass deportation campaign but reaffirmed that it would follow the district's sanctuary city laws. In a letter sent on Friday night to DC citizens, Ms Bowser wrote: 'It has been an unsettling and unprecedented week in our city. Over the course of a week, the surge in federal law enforcement across DC has created waves of anxiety.' She added that 'our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now', but added that if Washingtonians stick together, 'we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy – even when we don't have full access to it'. The legal battle was the latest evidence of the escalating tensions in a mostly Democratic city that now has its police department largely under the control of the Republican president's administration. Mr Trump's takeover is historic, yet it had played out with a slow ramp-up in federal law enforcement officials and National Guard troops to start the week. As the weekend approached, signs across the city — from the streets to the legal system — suggested a deepening crisis over who controls the city's immigration and policing policies, the district's right to govern itself and daily life for the millions of people who live and work in the metro area. The two sides sparred in court for hours Friday before US District Judge Ana Reyes, who is overseeing the district's lawsuit. She indicated the law is not likely to grant the Trump administration power to fully take over city police, but it probably gives the president more power than the city might like. 'The way I read the statute, the president can ask, the mayor must provide, but the president can't control,' said Judge Reyes, who was nominated to the bench by Joe Biden. The judge pushed the two sides to make a compromise. A lawyer for the Trump administration, Yaakov Roth, said the move to sideline Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith came after an immigration order that still held back some aid to federal authorities. He argued that the president has broad authority to determine what kind of help police in Washington must provide. The police takeover is the latest move by Trump to test the limits of his legal authorities to carry out his agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to bolster his tough-on-crime message and his plans to speed up the mass deportation of people in the United States illegally. It also marks one of the most sweeping assertions of federal authority over a local government in modern times. While Washington has grappled with spikes in violence and visible homelessness, the city's homicide rate ranks below those of several other major US cities, and the capital is not in the throes of the public safety collapse the Trump administration has portrayed. The president has more power over the nation's capital than other cities, but DC has elected its own mayor and city council since the Home Rule Act was signed in 1973. Mr Trump is the first president to exert control over the city's police force since it was passed. The law limits that control to 30 days without congressional approval, though Mr Trump has suggested he would seek to extend it. Ms Bondi's Thursday night directive to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Terry Cole, in charge of the police department came after Ms Smith had told officers to share information with immigration agencies regarding people not in custody, such as someone involved in a traffic stop. The Justice Department said Ms Bondi disagreed with the police chief's instructions because they allowed for continued practice of 'sanctuary policies', which generally limit co-operation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers.
