logo
Why Europe needs this 24-hour TNT factory deep inside a forest

Why Europe needs this 24-hour TNT factory deep inside a forest

Times13 hours ago
Deep in a Swedish forest, a project that holds vital implications for Europe's future security is ready to begin. Work is expected to start this year on a factory to produce the chemical compound trinitrotoluene, better known as TNT.
The site, concealed from view by several hundred metres of densely packed pine trees, would be the continent's first new TNT factory in 30 years. It is due to open in 2027 and will operate 24 hours a day, using 'continuous nitration' to produce 4,500 tonnes of Nato's high explosive — MIL-DTL-248D standard TNT — each year.
At the moment Europe produces only 12,000 tonnes a year, all of which comes from one factory in Poland, and half of which is already pledged to the United States. Russia, by contrast, can produce 50,000 tonnes of TNT annually.
• Nato chief: Ukrainians are short on ammunition, not courage
The rest of Europe's explosives needs — for defence, demolition or construction — have to be shipped from Asia. These supply lines are subject to delays and would be highly vulnerable to interception in the event of war. For that reason all material and machinery for the new Swedish facility will come from within 600km of the site.
This imbalance has a direct battlefield impact.
Partly because of its much greater TNT production capacity, and partly because Moscow has access to six explosives factories in North Korea, Russia generates about five million artillery shells a year. The rest of Europe combined is unable to produce even one million shells.
On the front line, this means Russia can fire 12,000 rounds a day, versus only 7,000 fired by the Ukrainians, according to Ukrainian data.
The missing ingredient isn't necessarily new technology, it's old-fashioned bang. In artillery shells, TNT is the explosive material that generates the destructive force, but only on detonation. TNT is the main compound in the shell, but in the tip is a detonator — such as lead azide — which breaks on impact, triggering a rapid chemical reaction with the TNT, creating the explosive blast.
Added to the Polish output, this new Swedish stream of explosives will bring Europe's TNT capacity up to one fifth of the material at Moscow's disposal.
More production is expected to follow. Sir Keir Starmer announced plans earlier this year for a £1.5 billion investment in six British munitions factories, creating more than 1,000 jobs.
As part of this, BAE Systems said in May that the UK would begin its own mobile explosives department, with six ad hoc shipping containers at various secret sites in the UK. Each container will produce only 100 tonnes of RDX explosives per year — a tiny fraction of the capacity of the proposed Swedish plant.
• Britain to ramp up explosives production to end reliance on US arms
RDX is roughly 1.5 times more powerful than TNT in weight and twice as powerful in volume, but more sensitive to shock.
This UK amount is useful but small, says Joakim Sjoblom, co-founder and chief executive of Sweden Ballistics (SWEBAL), the company behind the proposed Swedish facility.
'When you consider every 155mm artillery shell requires 11.3kg of explosive — that's only 9,000 shells worth produced from each shipping container — not enough to match one day in Russia. But there are big advantages to having your explosives made in mobile shipping containers. In Ukraine they use them to make explosives on the move near the front line and the factories are small and agile enough to move away from enemy fire.'
RDX and TNT are chemically similar and work often in tandem — both were blended together during the Second World War to form Composition B, an explosive that is almost equal parts RDX and TNT mixed with wax. One of the main considerations for potential producers though is forestry, says Nick Reynolds, research fellow for land warfare at Royal United Services Institute. He said: 'The base element for TNT is cellulose. Countries like Sweden and places like Canada have a huge source of pine, which is a big factor, something that UK and other countries are lacking.'
A second European TNT factory is planned for Finland, says Sjoblom. 'We need to increase our production rate. Even if you just put the Finnish, Swedish, Polish and the new British initiatives together we are still a long way from matching Russian capacity.'
His factory will be built just outside the Swedish town of Nora — about 140 miles west of Stockholm.
Residents will be only dimly aware of it, he says. As a potential target for enemy states, the factory needs to have as limited a footprint as possible. Local people may notice, snaking out of the forest, a small increase in heavy goods lorries.Nora happens to be one of Europe's best preserved wooden towns — described by its visitors' site as 'Bergslagen's little fairytale town'.
A TNT production site near a town made out of wood sounds like a recipe for catastrophe — but Sjoblom, who consulted the authorities in 38 towns before choosing this one, says TNT is described as the 'mother of all explosives' because it is so stable you can bash it with a hammer and it won't ignite. That's why it needs a detonator in a shell.
'Underwater mining teams take it to the bottom of the sea via days on stormy waves. In Ukraine they're taking it on bumpy roads; qualified and unqualified people might handle it.'Many European countries have found it hard to find locations to build munitions factories. Potential sites are either too close to densely populated areas or are subject to restrictions on environmental impact. 'I know that the Baltic states were also considering building a plan for explosives, but they found it really hard to find a suitable area because you need space,' says Sjoblom.
He said that like the UK, Sweden had a complex web of roads, schools and electrical grids, 'so you cannot just place explosives factories anywhere. Therefore, when you find a suitable location, you'd better produce a lot of volume … because it's not easy.'
Russia is not standing still either. President Putin, less troubled by red tape, has announced an RDX factory capable of producing around 6,000 tonnes of explosives a year in Biysk, Siberia, a city nearly 2,000 miles from Moscow with a history of munitions production.The Swedish site is in a region that has been a defence hub before. In 1915 the company Gyttorp Sprangamnes AB — named after an area of Nora — merged with Nitroglycerin AB, the company of Alfred Nobel, the Swedish inventor of dynamite.
The new company quickly moved all its production to Gyttorp, and by the 1950s the explosives factory employed more than 800 people. However, the site now almost exclusively makes detonators and shotgun cartridges, rather than explosives.
The new site is less than 30 minutes from Karlskoga and Bjorkborn's industrial area, which hosts the defence companies Saab, Nammo, Eurenco and BAE.
While the project has cross-party support in the Swedish government, there is local opposition. Sjoblom says: 'It doesn't matter if you are building a clothing factory or an explosive plant, there will always be those who don't want it. That's not just safety, many have been raised in the proximity and have many memories there. Opposition also comes from hunters who use the area. It is part of a democratic process to gain the necessary permits, but any concerns about noise, safety, smell or lights, we control that and are equally keen to prevent that for our own privacy interests.'
Sjoblom was previously the chief executive of Minna Technologies, a fintech company that was sold to Mastercard last year, when Sweden joined Nato in response to the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia in 2022.
The confluence of the two events shaped his perception of what to do next. 'Suddenly, I had a two-year-old son and another baby on the way,' he says. 'That is part of the philanthropic reason of why I am spending my time doing this — if I can spend my time helping Europe and stopping a conflict I am very proud to do so.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump considering Putin's demands for full control of parts of Ukraine to end war, reports suggest
Trump considering Putin's demands for full control of parts of Ukraine to end war, reports suggest

ITV News

time11 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Trump considering Putin's demands for full control of parts of Ukraine to end war, reports suggest

US President Donald Trump is reportedly considering Putin's demands for full control of parts of Ukrainian territory as a means of ending the war. Trump and Putin met on Friday at a military base in Anchorage, Alaska, for a summit to broker an end to the war in Ukraine - but no deal was reached. Reports claim Putin pushed for a land grab of occupied Ukrainian regions Donetsk and Luhansk during the negotiations, as a condition for stopping the conflict. In exchange, he would give up other Ukrainian territories held by Russian troops. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has previously rejected giving up the territory in the Donbas. Other outlets reported that Trump will support the plan, and will discuss it with Zelensky when they meet in the Oval Office on Monday. It comes as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer will meet European allies on Sunday. Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will host the meeting on Sunday afternoon. Starmer commended Trump's 'pursuit of an end to the killing' following a phone call with the US President, Zelensky and Nato allies on Saturday morning. But the PM insisted Ukraine's leader must not be excluded from future talks to broker a peace in Ukraine. The video conference of allies comes ahead of Volodymyr Zelensky's White House meeting with Donald Trump on Monday. The one-on-one in the Oval Office could pave the way for a three-way meeting alongside Russian leader Vladimir Putin, the US President has said. In a post on X, Zelenskyy accused Russia of "complicating" the process of stopping the war. "We see that Russia rebuffs numerous calls for a ceasefire and has not yet determined when it will stop the killing," he wrote. Trump also appeared to have a change of heart following Friday's summit, indicating that he wants a permanent peace settlement rather than a ceasefire, echoing the sentiment of Putin. The Russian leader has long said Moscow is not interested in a temporary truce and is seeking a long-term settlement. The Prime Minister and European leaders appeared increasingly confident that Trump will offer a 'security guarantee' of air support to back up allied troops on the ground in Ukraine, should they be deployed to keep the peace. Experts have warned Friday's face-to-face summit has risked legitimising the Russian leader, who has been made a pariah by the international community for invading Ukraine. Meanwhile, US First Lady Melania Trump has taken the unusual step in writing a letter to Putin calling for peace, which Trump hand-delivered to the Russian president. The letter did not specifically mention Ukraine, but pleaded with Putin to think of the children impacted by conflict. She wrote: 'In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone — you serve humanity itself.'

Starmer to meet European leaders for 'coalition of the willing' talks on Ukraine
Starmer to meet European leaders for 'coalition of the willing' talks on Ukraine

Sky News

time38 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Starmer to meet European leaders for 'coalition of the willing' talks on Ukraine

European leaders who make up the 'coalition of the willing' are set to hold a conference call on Sunday - ahead of crunch talks between Donald Trump and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy next week. The coalition - co-chaired by Sir Keir Starmer, France's President Emmanuel Macron and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz - has the aim of bringing countries together to protect a peace deal in Ukraine. Top of the agenda at Sunday's meeting will be securing a concrete commitment from Mr Trump on a security guarantee that would act as a powerful backstop in any Russia-Ukraine peacekeeping arrangement. European leaders seemed buoyed by the US president's most recent hints on the subject, in the knowledge that US military might is likely to deter Vladimir Putin from advancing in the future. They will also discuss how to bring Mr Zelenskyy into talks after Mr Trump and Mr Putin's Alaska meeting saw him left out in the cold. In coordinated statements, European leaders said Mr Zelenskyy must play a greater role in future talks, and that peace cannot be achieved without him. The hard bit will be to persuade the unpredictable US administration to change its approach, something that has proved almost impossible in the past. 5:55 When Mr Trump re-entered the White House and made it clear the US would no longer provide a blank cheque to protect peace in Europe, others decided they had to step up, and the 'coalition of the willing' was thrown together in March. Since then, information about the allied peacekeeping effort has been patchy, but we know it includes over 30 countries, which have been asked to pledge whatever military support they can, including troops. 2:21 What has been forthcoming from the group though, has been consistent attempts to use their limited leverage to put pressure on the US. That will continue ahead of crunch talks between Mr Trump and Mr Zelenskyy, which are set to take place in Washington on Monday.

A UK headline wealth tax? It may be simpler to put up existing taxes
A UK headline wealth tax? It may be simpler to put up existing taxes

The Guardian

time41 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

A UK headline wealth tax? It may be simpler to put up existing taxes

Pressure to go further on wealth taxes – by creating new modes of clawing at hoards of hard-to-reach cash – is mounting. For starters, the fiscal picture is looking fairly bleak, with economists estimating that Rachel Reeves must raise £20bn – or even as much as £50bn – to meet her goal of balancing day-to-day spending against the revenue raised from taxation. On the government backbenches, meanwhile, MPs want the chancellor to squeeze the richest in society harder. They even put forward an early day motion last month calling for a 2% annual tax on individual assets over £10m. Yet introducing these kinds of taxes is often not straightforward, with the behaviour of the wealthy being hard to monitor and harder still to predict. The first significant problem is working out where the assets are and who holds them. That has always been difficult and has become even more challenging after one of the most important economic surveys, the household wealth data series, was suspended by the Office for National Statistics because of its low quality. The upshot is that HMRC simply does not know how many millionaires or billionaires there are in the UK. Without reliable figures, it is extremely hard to write policies, cost them and administer them. There is also a battle to be had with an 'old guard with set views' in Whitehall. Whitehall sources paint a picture of a Treasury led by figures influenced by economists whose thinking was prominent at Oxford University in the 1980s and 90s – such as James Mirrlees, Christophe Chamley and Tony Atkinson – leading to something of an orthodox view. In a nutshell, that position is that if you tax capital too much, it will stop investment and hamper growth. Or, in Chamley's words: 'Tax rate on capital income tends to zero in the long run.'. Since this era, the debate within economics has become more nuanced. A growing body of research suggests that some taxation on capital, even at relatively high rates, could lead to greater investment. As it becomes less attractive to hoard wealth because of taxation, risk appetites would then increase in pursuit of higher returns. You might be less tempted to keep your money in a vanilla savings account that can be taxed hard and easily if you can get a much better rate of return – even with a bit more risk – elsewhere. Treasury insiders argue that Reeves has followed the more modern logic, having already taken steps to widen the scope of inheritance and capital gains tax (IHT and CGT). They posit that her reluctance to pursue a headline wealth tax does not mean she has pulled her punches when it comes to taxing wealth. Hostile backbenchers, on the other hand, suggest she follows the old orthodoxy too closely. They often cite her decision to go for relatively small changes in the amounts of tax paid via CGT, rather than bring it more closely in line with income tax at the last budget, which also upset more senior political colleagues. What the debate about how to handle changes to IHT (which have been fiercely opposed by farmers) or CGT illustrates is that if the government really wants to tax wealth more effectively then it has all kinds of ways to do so before opting for a politically – and potentially economically – sensitive route with a headline wealth tax. Yet even changing existing mechanisms might not be easy, when the UK already has one of the highest rates of tax on property and wealth among developed economies, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Political pressure may make it harder to maintain a more gradualist approach, however. Figures on the left of the Labour parliamentary party are attracted to totemic wealth taxes of the kind introduced in Spain – its so-called solidarity tax – and Switzerland. They see it as part of showing a commitment to rebalancing the economy. Reeves is critical of international examples, saying that Switzerland does not have IHT, and that Spain's wealth tax is so riddled with exemptions that it raises too little money. Some developed economies that had comparable wealth taxes have dropped them, too. 'We have inheritance tax. We have capital gains. We've just got rid of the non-dom tax status that doesn't exist anymore in our tax system. So we do have taxes that tax the wealthy,' Reeves said in a recent interview with LBC. Other measures that go further are not yet proven to work, she claims, saying that those who 'come up with simple solutions' must do more to 'explain exactly how it would work, whether it's an ongoing tax, what it would do to tax avoidance, what it would do about people moving or changing the way that their wealth is stored'. Economists argue that the government should focus its energies on raising existing taxes, such as equalising CGT with income tax, for example, or changing gifting rules around IHT first, rather than introduce a novel wealth tax. The Treasury is already examining gifting rules among other possible IHT changes. Yet while Reeves might agree with some of these arguments, it's less clear whether her cabinet colleagues will tolerate a slow and steady approach, particularly if the fiscal picture sours.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store