US second quarter GDP growth to reflect tariff turbulence
The world's biggest economy is anticipated to expand at an annual rate of 2.5 percent in the April to June period, according to a consensus forecast by Briefing.com.
This marks a reversal of a 0.5 percent decline, annualized, seen in the first three months of the year.
But cost pressures from tariffs, among other factors, could later bog down investment and consumption -– a key driver of the US economy.
"It's very much distorted by the trade flows and inventory," said Nationwide chief economist Kathy Bostjancic, referring to second quarter growth.
At the start of the year, businesses rushed to stock up on products in an effort to avoid Trump's threatened tariff hikes -- but this build-up is now unwinding.
The imports surge ahead of tariff hikes in the first quarter led to the largest drag on GDP growth from net exports on record, analysts at Goldman Sachs said in a recent note.
This means a bounce back is expected once imports cool.
But the acceleration is not sustainable, Bostjancic told AFP.
Trump had raised the idea of across-the-board tariffs targeting trading partners during election campaigning last year, and since returning to the US presidency in January he has rolled out wave after wave of fresh duties.
These included a 10 percent levy on almost all US partners, higher duties on steel, aluminum and auto imports, as well as separate actions against Canada and Mexico over illegal immigration and illicit fentanyl flows.
In April, the Trump administration separately took aim at the world's number two economy, China, as Beijing pushed back on US tariffs.
Both countries ended up imposing tit-for-tat tariffs on each other's products, reaching triple-digit levels and bringing many trade flows to a halt before Washington and Beijing reached a temporary agreement to lower duties.
After two days of talks in the Swedish capital of Stockholm this week, negotiators from both countries signaled there could be an extension of the truce -- although the final call depends on Trump.
- 'Clear deceleration' -
Bostjancic expects that underlying activity driving US gross domestic product will be moderating, although not collapsing.
"The US economy continues to navigate a complex set of crosscurrents, obscuring a clear reading of its underlying momentum," said EY chief economist Gregory Daco in a note.
But he added that one trend is evident, which is that "economic activity is decelerating even as inflationary pressures are reemerging."
"Tariff-induced cost pressures, persistent policy uncertainty, severely curtailed immigration, and elevated interest rates are collectively dampening employment, business investment and household consumption," Daco said.
Analysts are closely eyeing the impact of Trump's tariffs on inflation, with economists warning that the duties could fuel price increases. They expect to learn more from data in the summer months.
All of this could impact consumer spending -- a key economic driver.
"The trend in GDP growth is best analyzed by considering the first and second quarters together," said Samuel Tombs, chief US economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics.
"The likely average growth rate of about 1.5 percent over these two quarters represents a clear deceleration from the 3 percent rates in the previous two years," he added.
He said in a note that the US economy would probably "lose more momentum" in the third quarter, when consumer prices for imported goods likely will rise sharply.
And "adverse consequences" of economic policy uncertainty will also start to materialize when it comes to business investment, Tombs said.
Analysts have noted that companies tend to hold off major decisions during times of uncertainty, given the risk of sudden policy shifts.
"We continue to expect GDP growth to average just 1 percent in the second half of this year," Tombs said.
bys/sla/dw
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Indian Rupee Weakens Amid 25% Tariff Warning
Indian rupee(INR) slides to a fresh low of ?87.79 after Trump threatens 25% tariffs. The rupee gave up more ground from Monday's ?87.65 close as traders brace for penalties over India's discounted Russian oil imports, echoing a wider emerging-market stumble this week. Trump took to Truth Social to accuse New Delhi of scooping up cheap Russian crude and flipping it for big profits, vowing a substantial tariff hike and even dubbing India a dead economy. India shot back, calling the threats unjustified and unreasonable. India imported 1.7 M bbl/day of crude in Q1, with roughly 40% coming from Russia. If the U.S. follows through, refiners may scramble to buy more Middle Eastern and Atlantic Basin barrels, driving up import bills and domestic fuel prices. A weaker rupee could swell India's $100 billion import bill, pinch corporate margins and stoke will eye the RBI's Aug 8 policy review and any fresh U.S. tariff updates for clues on the next move. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's firing of the labor statistics chief could lead to a financial crisis
Donald Trump's firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer for releasing truthful employment figures showing a faltering U.S. economy is clearly not good news. But the consequences might be even worse than you think. Trump's actions weren't based on a methodological disagreement. He fired McEntarfer because he doesn't like the U.S. government releasing accurate numbers about the state of our economy — at least not when they make him look bad. In the short run, with luck, the impacts could be relatively modest. In the long run, without reforms to ensure quality data, this will lead to significantly slower economic growth than in other countries, and perhaps even a financial crisis. After McEntarfer's firing, government economic data can no longer be trusted or relied upon under this administration. Trump will not be able to appoint anyone with credibility to take over as BLS commissioner when it's already clear that person could be fired for releasing accurate data. The same goes for other statistical agencies, too. This doesn't mean all government data will be fraudulent going forward, but it does mean it will be less trustworthy. Government data analysts will do their best to produce credible reports, and much of what they publish will be accurate, but these workers will be increasingly subject to political pressures, or outright meddling. Reputational damage has already been done — and the decline in trust carries real consequences. The free availability of high-quality economic data from the government is an important part of how our economy operates. Businesses, entrepreneurs and families can't make good plans based on untrustworthy information. In practice, politicized data means the economic advantages Americans have long enjoyed — such as lower borrowing costs than the rest of the world — will begin to erode. Indeed, some experts and investors are already questioning whether higher interest rates will be necessary to compensate for the increased risks in the American economy brought about by Trump's firing of the BLS commissioner. This could lead to higher costs for both the U.S. government's debt payments and Americans' mortgages. Data reliability problems also create an uneven playing field for data, subtly undermining economic competition and growth. There will still be plenty of economic information available—it's just that the best data available won't be as good, and it won't be available to as many people. Private data companies will produce their own reports, but they simply aren't capable of the same scale as the government's current data collection efforts, and some of their reports will only be available to those who can pay. Established corporations that can afford alternative data sources will have a greater economic edge. Entrepreneurs won't have the same level of information to help them challenge more established players, so they'll do so less frequently and with less success. Worse, only Trump and his cronies will know whether, and how, government data has been juiced. This will give their companies a competitive economic advantage, further stifling competition. It also creates an additional incentive for corruption — and there is overwhelming evidence that corruption hinders growth in the long-run. Most troublingly, bad data can lead to financial crises because it allows political leaders to steer their countries into worse economic trouble than they would otherwise be able to. It's harder for investors, political opponents and anyone else outside the executive branch to warn about an inflationary or debt crisis if they don't know about it. Bad data can also exacerbate crises, as people are more likely to panic based solely on rumor. More and more, the United States looks like the countries we don't want to emulate. Firing the BLS commissioner echoes early warning signs from Argentina and China where gutting independent economic institutions paved the way for major economic collapse. Reliable data is but one of the many reasons democracies are generally rich and autocracies often are not. Autocrats try to erase facts that don't fit their preferred narrative. They get rid of people who tell the truth, including government experts, and use fear to stop dissent. Unsurprisingly, then, autocracies also frequently suffer deep economic crises. Firing the BLS commissioner may seem like a modest change in all the chaos the Trump administration has created, but it is not. Real damage has already been done. Still, most of the harmful economic consequences will be felt in the long term. This means there's still time for Americans to push back, and ensure the next administration can't cook the books. This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword
San Francisco Chronicle
14 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's pursuit of meeting with Chinese leader reveals the complex web of US-China relations
WASHINGTON (AP) — China, the adversary. China, the friend? These days, maybe a bit of both. From easing export controls to reportedly blocking the Taiwanese president's plans to travel through the United States, President Donald Trump is raising eyebrows in Washington that he might offer concessions that could hurt U.S. interests in his quest to meet, and reach a deal with, the Chinese leader. There is no firm plan for Trump to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping. But it's widely believed that the men must meet in person, likely in the fall, for the two governments to ink a trade deal, and some are worried that Xi is leveraging Trump's desire for more giveaways. "The summit mismatch is real. There's a clear gap between Trump's eagerness for a face-to-face with Xi and Beijing's reluctance to engage," said Craig Singleton, senior director of the China program at the Washington-based think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies. There are concerns that Trump may throttle back on export controls or investment curbs to preserve summit prospects, Singleton said, warning the risk 'isn't just in giving away too much' but also "in letting Beijing set the tempo.' China-U.S. relations have pinballed often since Washington established relations with communist-led Beijing in 1979. They've hit highs and lows — the latter in the aftermath of the 1989 massacre of pro-democracy protesters in Tiananmen Square, after a 2001 incident involving a U.S. spy plane, during the COVID pandemic and right now. Both countries have struggled to understand each other, which has sometimes gotten in the way of deeper partnerships. And this time around, there's a wild card: the anything-might-happen second presidency of Trump. Efforts by a U.S. president to meet the head of the authoritarian Chinese government have often met with partisan outcries — which happened when former President Joe Biden hosted Xi in California in 2023. But Trump's case is peculiar, partly because he is willing to break with conventional political restraints to make deals and partly because his own party has grown hawkish towards China over national security. 'With President Trump, everything seems to be open for negotiation, and there are few if any red lines,' said Gabriel Wildau, managing director of the global consultancy Teneo. 'The hawks worry that if Trump gets into a room with Xi, he will agree to extraordinary concessions, especially if he believes that a big, beautiful deal is within reach.' While most Republican lawmakers have not voiced their concerns openly, Democrats are vocal in their opposition. "President Trump is giving away the farm to Xi just so he can save face and reach a nonsensical trade deal with Beijing that will hurt American families economically," said Rep. Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. On Tuesday, Kush Desai, a White House spokesman, said the Trump administration 'has not wavered — and will never waver — in safeguarding our national and economic security to put America first.' 'The administration continues to have productive conversations with China to address longstanding unfair trade practices,' Desai said, adding that export controls on cutting-edge technology and many tariffs remain in place. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, after his latest round of trade negotiations with the Chinese in July, told CNBC that the team was 'very careful to keep trade and national security separate.' And Secretary of State Marco Rubio, appearing on Fox News Radio, said the U.S. remains 'as committed as ever to our partners ... in places like Taiwan' but also spoke of the strategic need to keep trade ties with China steady. 'In the end, we have two big, the two largest economies in the world,' Rubio said. 'An all-out trade conflict between the U.S. and China, I think the U.S. would benefit from it in some ways, but the world would be hurt by it." There's worry over Taiwan Taiwan is concerned that the self-governing island could be 'trade-able' when Trump seeks a deal with Beijing, said Jason Hsu, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a former legislator in Taiwan. 'Our concern is that, will any of the trade deals lead to concession on political support for Taiwan?" Hsu said, citing the case last month where the White House allegedly blocked a request for Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te to transit through the United States. The U.S. maintains unofficial ties with Taiwan and has always allowed such transits in the past. Experts are worried that the Trump administration is setting a bad precedent, and Democrats have seized on it to criticize Trump. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on China, called the move 'both a sharp break from precedent and another example of the Trump administration caving to China in hopes of reaching a trade deal." He said the policy decision 'sends a dangerous signal' that Taiwan's democracy is negotiable. Hsu said Taiwan fears that Trump could be coerced or compelled to support the one-China principle, as espoused by Beijing, that acknowledges Beijing's sovereignty claim over the island. There are also concerns that Trump might utter anything in support of 'unification." That was a request Beijing raised with the Biden administration, though it failed to get a positive response. Now, it's upon Taiwan to persuade Trump to think of the island as 'an economic partner rather than something that he can trade when he negotiates with China,' Hsu said, suggesting that Taiwan step up defense commitments, increase energy procurement, open its market to U.S. companies and invest more in the U.S. But Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Stimson Center, said Trump is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act, a domestic law that obligates the U.S. to maintain an unofficial relationship with the island and provides it with sufficient hardware to deter any invasion by China. 'He can dial the (U.S.-Taiwan) relationship up and down," Sun said, "but he can't remove the relationship.' Export controls have been instituted, to mixed results In April, the White House, citing national security, announced it would restrict sales of Nvidia's H20 computer chips to China. The ban was lifted about three months later, when the two governments had climbed down from sky-high tariffs and harsh trade restrictions. The decision upset both Republican and Democratic lawmakers. Rep. John Moolenaar, a Michigan Republican who chairs the House Select Committee on China, wrote to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to stress that the U.S. cannot let the Chinese Communist Party 'use American chips to train AI models that will power its military, censor its people, and undercut American innovation.' In Stockholm, Bessent pushed back at the concern that national security might be compromised. 'We are very diligent,' Bessent said, adding there's an interagency process that involves the National Security Council and the Defense Department for decisions. 'There's nothing that's being exchanged for anything,' Bessent said. Addressing H20 chips specifically, Bessent said they 'are well down" Nvidia's "technology chips stack.' U.S. companies are banned from selling their most advanced chips to China. That might not be persuasive enough. Teneo's Wildau said China hawks are most worried that the H20 decision could be the beginning of a series of moves to roll back export controls from the Biden era, which were once considered 'permanent and non-negotiable.'
