Amazon, the river of burning dreams
— Amazon (River of Dreams), a 1993 song by jazz guitarist Artie Traum emblematic of the iconic river basin's dire straits three decades later
Climate impact on the Amazon rainforest and the issue of fossil fuels brought together the heads of Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Suriname and Venezuela—eight members of Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization (ACTO)—after 14 years in August 2023 at Belem, Brazil. Home to more than 1.5 million indigenous people representing over 385 ethnic groups and a verdantly diverse biome, the enigmatic Amazonia seeks inclusive social support, besides an environmental look.
Holding a fifth of all newly-identified global oil reserves, the region is currently witness to a frenzy as oil majors and nouveau rentiers capitalise on the opportunity. However, the well-documented history of 'experimental exploration' in the Amazon basin reflects failed projects and environmental delinquency. Recurrent mechanical failures, sabotage, corrosion and natural disasters on ageing and 'strategically misplaced' pipelines have resulted in thousands of oil spills over the last 50 years. River pollution and destruction of planet's largest rainforest remains a politically sensitive issue for Latin American oil producers, as they rely on exports to usher social and economic welfare.
With rampant hydrocarbon contamination of numerous waterways and Amazon tributaries, infrastructural compatibility and logistics management is essential for ethical production practices. The catastrophic March 2025 spill in coastal Esmeraldas from a ruptured trans-Ecuadorian pipeline, the worst in 30 years, is such a tragedy. The historic referendum of August 2023 precluded exploration in the country's Yasuní National Park, a Unesco Biosphere Reserve. Ceasing further operations in the area, Petroecuador was directed to 'revive the ecosystems and dismantle any infrastructure within a year'. However, 'stranded assets' and debris continue to besmear the pristine environs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Mexico hands over 26 cartel suspects to US authorities under Trump deal
Mexico has expelled 26 high-ranking cartel figures to the United States in the latest major deal with the Trump administration as American authorities ratchet up pressure on criminal networks sending drugs across the border, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press on cartel leaders and other prominent figures were being flown from Mexico to the US on Tuesday, the person said. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the operation that was still being handed over to US custody include Abigael Gonzlez Valencia, a leader of 'Los Cuinis,' a group closely aligned with notorious cartel Jalisco New Generation or CJNG. Another person, Roberto Salazar, is accused of participating in the 2008 killing of a Los Angeles County sheriff's deputy, the person said. Mexico's Attorney General's Office and Security ministry confirmed the transfers, which were carried out after a promise from the US Justice Department that prosecutors would not seek the death penalty in any of the the second time in months Mexico has expelled cartel figures accused of narcotics smuggling, murder and other crimes amid mounting pressure from the Trump administration to curb the flow of drugs across the border. In February, Mexico handed over to American authorities 29 cartel figures, including drug lord Rafael Caro Quintero, who was behind the killing of a US DEA agent in transfers came days before 25% tariffs on Mexican imports were to take effect. Late last month, President Donald Trump spoke with Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum and agreed to put off threatened 30% tariffs for another 90 days to allow for has shown a willingness to cooperate more on security than her predecessor, specifically being more aggressive in pursuit of Mexico's cartels. But she has drawn a clear line when it comes to Mexico's sovereignty, rejecting suggestions by Trump and others of intervention by the US Trump administration made dismantling dangerous drug cartels a key priority, designating CJNG and seven other Latin American organized crime groups foreign terrorist Gonzlez Valencia is the brother-in-law of CJNG leader Nemesio Rubn 'El Mencho' Oseguera Cervantes, a top target of the the US government. He was arrested in February 2015 in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco and had been fighting extradition to the United States since his two brothers, he led 'Los Cuinis,' which financed the the founding and growth of the CJNG, one of the most powerful and dangerous cartels in Mexico. CJNG traffics hundreds of tons of cocaine, methamphetamine, and fentanyl into the United States and other countries and is known for extreme violence, murders, torture, and of his brothers, Jos Gonzlez Valencia, was sentenced in Washington's federal court in June to 30 years in a US prison after pleading guilty to international cocaine trafficking. Jose Gonzlez Valencia was arrested in 2017 under the first Trump administration at a beach resort in Brazil while vacationing with his family under a fake name. - EndsMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
14 hours ago
- First Post
What Trump-Putin summit could mean for US-EU trans-atlantic alliance
It is understandable that there will be limits to US-Russia détente, but Trump administration may further erode the strategic trust between the US and its European allies read more The European countries have stood with Kyiv since the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine war in early 2022. For more than two years since the war, members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato), led by the US and the European Union, were united in supporting Ukraine in its war efforts against its more powerful neighbour. Billions of dollars of military assistance, including weapons and ammunition, flowed into Ukraine. However, divisions within Nato as well as between the US and the European Union have become more discernible with the return of Donald Trump to the American White House. President Trump, from the days of presidential election campaigns for the second term, has repeatedly opposed his predecessor Joe Biden's Ukraine policy. He also drastically differed with Biden's approach to Nato. During his first presidency, Trump was distrustful of Nato, but his successor, Joe Biden, had restored the trans-Atlantic trust amidst the Ukraine War. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While President Trump in his second administration successfully bulldozed Nato members to agree to his proposal for enhancement of their defence expenditure to make it five per cent of their respective GDP, he has not been able to bully the EU member countries to endorse his policy towards Russia and its war against Ukraine. As President Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin are scheduled to meet in Alaska on Friday for their first summit this year and negotiate a deal to end the Ukraine War, European countries appear nervous. President Trump is not willing to carry the leaders of America's trans-Atlantic allies along with him while negotiating with President Putin. During decades of the Cold War, the US always consulted, partnered and collaborated with the European allies on numerous conflict spots. The US and Nato were together in the longest war of the Cold War era in Vietnam. They were together too in the longest war of the post-Cold War era against the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. The US and the Nato members also fought against Russia by fully backing Ukraine militarily and seeking to cripple the Russian economy through sanctions during the Biden administration. But now, under the Trump 2.0 administration, the trans-Atlantic relations have developed cracks, perhaps beyond complete restoration in the near future. Twenty-three out of 27 members of the European Union are also members of the Nato alliance. President Trump considers the EU a fierce competitor, perhaps an economic rival, and recently launched a tariff war against them, as against numerous countries around the world. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD After several rounds of negotiations, the EU managed to conclude a trade deal by agreeing to a 15 per cent tariff on their exports to the US, which is actually several times more than the tariff rate earlier. The EU as an association signed the deal; the details of the deal, however, are not known. And all individual member countries are not contented over it. While many European leaders stay away from making critical remarks on President Trump's policies, the French prime minister called it 'a dark day' when the deal was announced. Others described it as a 'suboptimal deal'. While the EU energy imports from Russia were difficult amidst the Ukraine war and implementation of anti-Russian sanctions by the combined West, Trump's demands for more defence expenditure added to the economic agonies of the EU. But the European allies of the US felt more firmly sandwiched when Trump dilly-dallied on backing Ukraine militarily, pushed for direct negotiations with Russian President Putin and refused to consult them on an issue that has perceptibly posed the most serious security challenge to the continent since the end of the Second World War. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The decision of President Trump to hold a bilateral summit with President Putin in Alaska has rung an alarm bell in Europe. More outrageous to Ukraine and its European backers is the idea of a 'land swap' as part of the deal that would allow Russia to gain territory and make Ukraine cede part of its sovereign territory. Seven EU members, including France and Germany, issued a joint statement and proclaimed that 'the path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine'. Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelenskyy, on his part, outrightly rejected any 'land swap' that would be decided by the American and Russian leaders on Ukrainian territory. It appears as if in the current situation Ukraine and some European powers are united against the United States and Russia! Its ramifications can be radical transformations in contemporary geopolitics. The trans-Atlantic alliance can develop holes that will be difficult to fill up in the foreseeable future. The divergences on political and security affairs between the United States and Europe appear stark when one considers the French and British position on Palestine, the Spanish and Swiss decision against buying F-35 fighter aircraft from the US and the European resolve to bolster their military capabilities to address security challenges in the absence of American support. France and Britain have proposed the idea of collaboration in developing a European deterrence capability. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is understandable that there will be limits to US-Russia détente. Whether it will survive the Trump 2.0 administration is also a question mark. But the challenges of this détente between erstwhile cold warriors under the Trump administration may further erode the strategic trust between the United States and its European allies. The EU and Britain seem to have embarked upon a journey for achieving strategic independence from the United States, and this journey is unlikely to end even after a change of administration in the US. However, the EU's desire to achieve strategic autonomy is not going to be an easy way. The EU will also face tremendous difficulties from within the association. There are member countries that admire the Trumpian policies, and then there are also members, such as Poland, Hungary and Slovakia, which are Euro-sceptics. The recently elected president of Poland, Karol Nawrocki, for instance, is a right-wing leader who appears to be pro-Trump on certain policy matters. He is dead against Russia but opposes Nato membership for Ukraine. Yet, the efforts towards consolidating the abilities of the EU to confront the challenges emanating from the other side of the Atlantic will remain a work in progress. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author is founding chairperson, Kalinga Institute of Indo-Pacific Studies, and editor, India Quarterly. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Hindustan Times
17 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
After India, Brazil's Lula dials China's Xi, calls for self-reliance amid Trump's tariff pressure
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Chinese President Xi Jinping on Monday discussed the role of the BRICS bloc, bilateral business ties and the importance of self-reliance among Global South nations, in the backdrop of steep tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump. Chinese President Xi Jinping and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva discussed strengthening Global South unity in a phone call, as Lula also spoke with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on responding to steep US tariffs. The conversation between Lula and Xi Jinping came days after the Brazilian president spoke to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi about the fallout from Trump's decision to raise tariffs on both countries to 50% — one of the highest rates imposed by the US president. The development also comes after Lula signalled last week that he intended to hold talks with the leaders of India and China to explore a coordinated response to US trade measures, reported AFP. Meanwhile, Trump postponed the planned tariff hike on Chinese goods on Tuesday for another 90 days. Follow India tariff news LIVE According to China's state news agency Xinhua, Xi said China would 'work with Brazil to set an example of unity and self-reliance among major countries in the Global South' and 'jointly build a more just world and more sustainable planet.' He added that 'all countries should unite and firmly oppose unilateralism and protectionism' — a remark seen as aimed at US tariffs. BRICS and G20 role highlighted The Brazilian presidency said the one-hour conversation covered a range of issues, including the war in Ukraine, climate change, and the importance of multilateral institutions. 'Both agreed on the role of the G20 and BRICS in defending multilateralism,' the statement said. The leaders also 'committed to expanding the scope of cooperation in sectors such as health, oil and gas, digital economy and satellites.' Notably, Beijing has actively sought deeper engagement in the region to counter US influence making it the largest trading partner for Brazil. Two-thirds of Latin American countries have also joined Beijing's Belt and Road infrastructure initiative. Lula and Modi discuss US tariffs Earlier in the week, Lula held an hour-long call with Narendra Modi to discuss the fallout of Trump's 50% tariffs on Brazil and India. Modi said on social media that he had a 'good conversation' with Lula. 'We are committed to deepening our Strategic Partnership, including in trade, energy, tech, defence, health and more. A strong, people-centric partnership between Global South nations benefits everyone,' he wrote. A readout from the Indian side said Lula initiated the call, and Modi recalled their meeting on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro last month. 'Building on these discussions, they reiterated their commitment to take the India-Brazil Strategic Partnership to new heights,' it said. Lula, in a social media post, said the conversation focused on the 'international economic scenario' and the 'imposition of unilateral tariffs'. 'Brazil and India are, so far, the two most affected countries,' he said. The Brazilian president also confirmed plans to make a state visit to India early next year, with Vice-President Geraldo Alckmin scheduled to travel to India in October to prepare for the visit and attend a trade monitoring meeting.
