
Japan invests big in LNG despite climate-friendly promises – DW – 05/21/2025
Japan is a world leader in funding natural gas projects, while at the same time leading a forum in Asia calling for a fossil fuel phase-out.
Japan is one of the world's biggest public financiers of gas and oil production, despite a pledge to halt all such funding for fossil fuel at the G7 summit in 2022.
From 2013 to 2024, Japanese public financial institutions provided $93 billion (€82 billion) worth of investments for oil and gas projects, according to a report from the South Korea-based Solutions for Our Climate (SFOC). Overseas liquefied natural gas (LNG) development projects amounted to $56 billion worth of this financing.
In the same period, the report estimates $24.5 billion in funding was provided for clean energy projects.
"Japan's international influence in energy financing, and specifically fossil fuel financing, is enormous," Walter James, a private consultant focusing on Japan's climate and energy policies, told DW.
"It's really across the fossil fuel supply chain … all the way from exploration, production, transportation to actual use and power plants."
In what the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), a US-based research center, calls the "Japanese model" of LNG investment, decades of policy development by Japan to "encourage direct overseas investment in LNG export projects," has turned Japan into the main driver of LNG development in the Asia Pacific.
A report by the IEEFA says that Japan benefits in two ways: By having more access to LNG supply for its domestic energy needs, and improved access to "demand centers where Japan can resell surplus LNG."
"Japan's LNG resales to overseas markets have reached record highs, indicating a shift in its role within the global LNG market," from a consumer to an exporter, the IEEFA report says, with Australian LNG currently the top source of supply.
At the same time, Japan depends on energy imports to fuel its economy, with little domestic access to fossil fuels. Oil, coal and LNG make up more than 83% of Japan's primary energy mix, according to data cited by the Asia Natural Gas and Energy Association.
Japanese 'greenwashing' with LNG?
After Japan's fossil fuel pledge at the 2022 G7 summit to halt financing fossil fuel projects, it launched the Asia Zero Emission Community (AZEC) with partner countries in Asia to provide a platform for cooperation on "net zero emissions in the Asia region."
In August 2024, a total of 70 Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) were signed with 11 nations, including Australia, Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.
However, many of the projects focus on developing natural gas, ammonia and carbon capture storage (CCS) technology.
LNG is deemed a "transitional fuel" for Japan's partner countries in AZEC.
A 2024 study from Cornell University, however, found that LNG involves 33% more emissions than coal, when processing and shipping are considered.
Loopholes in Japan's G7 pledge allow for investment in LNG projects, even though it contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, according to Hiroki Osaka, development finance and environment campaigner at Friends of the Earth Japan, an NGO.
Osada said Tokyo's pledge was based on "unabated fossil projects," so if countries decide the projects are "abated" like the ones with use of CCS, they can go ahead.
"Unabated" refers to using fossil fuels without taking any measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, such as CCS. Abated fossil fuels, on the other hand, use measures to reduce emissions.
"It's a form of greenwashing," Osada told DW. "Another loophole is that even if the projects are regarded as 'unabated,' if they say they align with the 1.5-degree energy plan [Paris Agreement] or are necessary for energy security and diplomacy, they are justified."
LNG is natural gas cooled into a liquid form for transport Image: Koji Nakayama/AP Photo/picture alliance
Indonesia as an example
Indonesia signed a deal in November 2022 to mobilize $20 billion in public and private finance for energy transition at the G20 summit, led by the US and Japan.
According to Osada, Japan "helped write" Indonesia's long-term energy plan "so there would be a demand for gas."
"There's a lot of renewable potential available and it's actually cheaper and more beneficial for the whole of Southeast Asia, while LNG is too costly and they can't import if there's a blackout," she said.
Natural gas in Indonesia costs more than renewables, according to the calculations from the Institute for Essential Services Reform, an Indonesian energy and environment policy research center.
Indonesia is also the world's largest coal exporter, and coal comprises over 40% of its energy consumption. To phase out coal and oil, Indonesia in March rolled out a $1.5 billion LNG distribution project to feed power plants.
However, Wicaksono Gitawon, policy strategist at Indonesian NGO CERAH, told DW that more overseas investment in LNG will hamper Indonesia's future transition to renewable energy.
"I genuinely think Japan should skip investment in gas [in Indonesia] and push for renewables," Gitawon said.
"We already have a coal infrastructure locked in. They are now pushing for gas, and gas is a big investment, so it would be another lock-in. If we have a gas infrastructure in Indonesia, I don't think we would be able to achieve energy transition."
Energy policy consultant James said that Japan is also meeting demand for technology and investment from countries like Indonesia.
"Indonesia came up with their own energy transition strategies and include things like natural gas and LNG, coal firing with ammonia and hydrogen — all the things Japan would love to sell and invest," he said.
The third AZEC meeting is slated to be held in Malaysia this September.
Climate change - Averting catastrophe, Part 1
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Edited by: Wesley Rahn
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
16 hours ago
- DW
US shifts Africa security strategy amid global pivot – DW – 06/10/2025
The US military is urging African countries to be more responsible for their own security as the Trump administration focuses on domestic policies. Could the move fuel militant groups and undo counterterrorism progress? Africa should take greater ownership of its own security challenges. That was the message recently communicated by General Michael Langley, head of US Africa Command (USAFRICOM). The unit is part of the US Department of Defense and is responsible for all defense operations and security cooperation on the African continent. The announcement comes as the United States rethinks its military strategy in Africa, signaling a significant shift in its approach to security on the continent. This adjustment aligns with a broader strategic pivot under the Trump administration, which is prioritizing homeland security and a leaner, more lethal military force, while reducing the US military footprint overseas, including in Africa. But what could it mean for the continent? Africa's global relevance With its growing population and vast natural resources, Africa is strategically important to Europe and the United States. "Africa is a strategic partner with a large and growing youth population — projected to double by 2045 according to the African Economic Outlook," Adib Saani, a foreign policy and security analyst, told DW. "The continent is rich, holding vast mineral resources and strategic reserves like uranium that both Western and Eastern countries heavily rely on." The continent was also home to 11 of the world's 20 fastest-growing economies in 2024. "The US and others engage with Africa not just out of goodwill but because these resources are vital for running industries worldwide," Saani said. "This makes the relationship mutually beneficial — a win-win for Africa and the rest of the world." However, the Trump administration's defense strategy has shifted focus away from protecting the US from threats emanating from abroad, including countering terrorist organizations such as the so-called "Islamic State" (IS) militant group and al-Qaeda, which have expanded their presence and capabilities in Africa. How USAID cuts are fueling Africa's humanitarian crises To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'Sharing the burden' of US-Africa security operations Previously, US military efforts in Africa combined defense, diplomacy and development. "America has been a close partner in countering violent extremism, especially in Eastern and West Africa," Saani explained. "We have relied heavily on US logistics, training and intelligence sharing to address these threats. In terms of human security, the US has also contributed through USAID and other programs that have helped lift many out of poverty." USAFRICOM head Langley said the military's priorities now focus on homeland protection, encouraging instead "burden sharing" with African partners. He said the goal is to build local military capacity to enable independent operations and reduce reliance on US forces. This shift was evident during the latest African Lion joint military exercise. The annual event is the largest military exercise on the continent and emphasizes combined air, land and sea operations with more than 40 participating nations. The latest edition, in May, lacked the US-led efforts usually apparent and instead focused on collaboration and cooperation. Historically, the US has played in a major role in security operations on the continent, including in Somalia Image: Senior Airman Kristin Savage/Combined Joint Task Force - Horn of Africa/AP Photo/picture alliance What could reduced US involvement mean? Yet foreign policy analyst Adib Saani warned that a diminished US presence could create a power vacuum, emboldening militant networks and undermining years of counterterrorism efforts. "If the US withdraws its support, it would hit us hard. It could embolden terrorists to carry out more lethal and audacious attacks, knowing there is no major power backing our fight. This would also dampen the morale of our soldiers who face these threats daily, and place significant economic pressure on affected countries," he said. USAFRICOM currently deploys roughly 6,500 personnel across Africa and has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in security assistance. Without that, Saani worries that Africa will not be able to be fully independent in terms of security. "It will be difficult in terms of logistics and technology — we are simply not there yet. Security is a shared responsibility and works best when it involves multiple actors. In my opinion, Africa cannot do it alone." Exploiting Africa in the hunt for raw materials To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Russia, China step in to fill security vacuum African countries will need to look for other allies — both new and old, say experts. China has already launched extensive military training programs for African forces, replicating aspects of the US military model, while Russian mercenaries have established themselves as key security partners in North, West and Central Africa. "China's approach in the past has mainly been economic," Saani explained. The US, he pointed out, has primarily focused on military support, in addition to providing economic help. "The Russians have strong presence with both economic and military involvement. It feels like everyone is competing for attention. The clear message is that there's a need to diversify partnerships. We can't rely solely on the US; we may also need to engage more with the Russians and others." Niger: US military operations across the Sahel are at risk To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Can Africa succeed alone? Some voices say the lack of US support could be a wake-up call for African countries, forcing them to consider their own resources and rise to the challenge. African nations must now take the opportunity to review their security resources, Saani said, and collaborate more closely. "Building up our defense industry is also critical. This means developing industrial capacity and enhancing the capabilities of our armed forces," he added. "We also need to tackle corruption to ensure that funds are not getting lost in people's pockets but are instead used to improve people's lives." Editor: Sarah Hucal


Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
The New York Office Renaissance: Edward L. Shugrue III on Real Estate's Diverging Future
Signs of revival are emerging, although unevenly, across key urban markets after years of uncertainty and dire predictions about the office sector's future following COVID. A recent billion-dollar transaction in New York City, the heart of one of the world's most scrutinized commercial real estate hubs, attests to this, injecting confidence into a sector many had prematurely written off. Edward L. Shugrue III, Managing Director at RiverPark Funds, believes that a resurgence in top-tier leasing activity and high-profile property sales suggests that a more nuanced and perhaps opportunistic landscape is taking shape. He offers expert insights, drawing from decades of experience navigating commercial real estate. Shugrue is a seasoned voice in the field, with over 30 years of experience in the commercial real estate investing, lending, and restructuring sectors. As the Portfolio Manager of a fund comprised of floating rate commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), a $1.8 trillion market, his view into market behavior is granular and strategic. His tenure includes leading roles in the restructuring of distressed assets, pioneering commercial mezzanine finance platforms, and overseeing investment strategies. Known for his analytical rigor and operational expertise, Shugrue has also extended his impact to academic settings, where he has contributed case studies and lectured at leading universities. His foundation in public and private market investment allows him to assess cycles and capital flows with clarity. That clarity is critical, especially in today's commercial real estate environment. The office market, particularly in dense urban centers like New York City, is undergoing a bifurcation. Shugrue has witnessed how the decline in office occupancy during the pandemic led many to believe the sector was in secular decline. He argues that such generalizations fail to capture the real story. "New York is far from dead," Shugrue says. "It's simply a tale of two cities, the top-tier assets that are thriving, and the others that are struggling." Recent news backs this up. The Manhattan commercial office market received a welcome boost with the announced sale of 590 Madison Avenue to Scott Rechler's New York-based RXR. After fierce bidding from an array of well-heeled institutional investors including Tishman Speyer (the owner of Rockefeller Center), one of Manhattan's largest office landlords, SL Green Realty (NYSE: SLG), and global private equity giant Blackstone (NYSE: BX), RXR emerged on top with a price of nearly $1.1 billion. The interest and activity in the property is consistent with increased leasing activity in Manhattan (nearly 12 million square feet of signed leases in the first quarter of 2025) since reaching pandemic lows. Formally known as the IBM Building, this one million square foot gleaming office tower sits prominently at 57th and Madison Avenue, sharing the same block as Tiffany & Co's flagship on Fifth Avenue. It boasts a roster of leading finance and investment firms, including Apollo Global Management (NYSE: APO), which recently signed a 100,000 square foot lease. Asking rents at the property are $190 per square foot. The pending sale is noteworthy for multiple reasons. First, it's the largest sale in Manhattan since Google's acquisition of 550 Washington Street in 2022 for nearly $2 billion. Second, with only $5 billion of Manhattan office sales in 2024, this sale will be a significant contributor to 2025 sales levels. Third, the price translates to over $1,000 per square foot, which, while common pre-pandemic, hasn't been seen here for quite some time. This transaction is on the heels of two large and noteworthy office transactions in 2024. First was the sale of an 11% stake in one of Manhattan's newest skyscrapers, One Vanderbilt, to the Mori Building Company of Japan at an implied valuation of $4.7 billion. Second was Tishman Speyer's $3.5 billion refinancing of their historic Rockefeller Center. Additionally, the Paramount Group, Inc. (NYSE: PGRE) recently announced that it is seeking strategic alternatives to maximize shareholder value for its $8 billion portfolio of Class A office buildings in New York and San Francisco. With 11 Class A towers within New York City, many of which are in midtown on Sixth Avenue, interest is expected to be keen. However, Shugrue notes that while the outlook and tone have been strong, the demand is sharply skewed. Class A properties, those offering premium amenities, prime locations, and modern infrastructure, are experiencing strong interest and competitive bidding. Meanwhile, Class B and C assets, those situated away from central business corridors, are languishing in foreclosure or trading at distressed values. This divergence has become a defining characteristic of the market. "Some assets attract global capital and command prices exceeding $1,000 per square foot. Others, although they're just mere blocks away, are nearly abandoned." The industry expert states that this isn't only a matter of location but of a broader realignment in tenant expectations and investment strategy. Shugrue has observed that the appetite remains strong for Class-A towers offering the right mix of quality, location, and technology. However, buildings that fail to meet these changing standards are being repositioned for alternative uses, most notably residential conversions. These projects signify a shift in how underperforming office assets can be reintegrated into urban spaces. As the 590 Madison Avenue sale and recent robust New York City leasing activity demonstrate, big transactions are back in the Big Apple. However, unlike the pre-pandemic world, the tide is no longer lifting all boats equally. Edward Shugrue's insights are a reminder that discernment is the differentiator in a fractured market. The next wave of opportunity won't emerge from sweeping generalizations about the office market but from a disciplined understanding of where capital, tenants, and cities are headed.


Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Silent Success: Private Listings and Luxury Big Island's Model Now Validated by NAR's New Marketing Flexibility Rules
The National Association of REALTORS® (NAR) has announced a significant policy change that formally introduces "delayed marketing exempt listings" to the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) framework. Sellers will now have the option to withhold their property from public marketing—such as through Internet Data Exchange (IDX) and third-party syndication—for a specified period, while still making the property visible to fellow MLS participants. Effective March 25, 2025, and with full implementation required by September 30, the policy is being introduced as part of a broader initiative titled "Multiple Listing Options for Sellers." It is designed to provide homeowners with greater flexibility and privacy when listing properties. NAR emphasized that this update emerged from months of consultations with MLS leaders, agents, brokerages, legal experts, and fair housing stakeholders. This pivot formalizes what certain niche players in the real estate sector—such as Hawaii-based Private Listings and Luxury Big Island—have already been doing for years. The move implicitly acknowledges that some sellers value privacy, while some buyers prefer discretion. According to Harold X. Clarke, founder of both Private Listings and Luxury Big Island, "It's validation that the industry is recognizing what we've known for a long time: not every sale belongs on a billboard." Quiet Sales Have Long Had a Clientele—Now They Have Recognition Off-market transactions, also known as "silent sales" or "pocket listings," have historically served clients whose priorities differ from those of traditional real estate consumers. These include ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWI), public figures, and multi-generational family estate holders who prioritize discretion and exclusivity over broad visibility. Private Listings, which operates as an invitation-only platform, deals with transactions often exceeding $40 million. The properties are not searchable online, and access is restricted to vetted parties. Clarke and his team have described their role less as listing agents and more as real estate matchmakers, connecting opportunities with the right people quietly and efficiently. Luxury Big Island, while publicly accessible, also offers a tailored service to high-net-worth clients. The platform features trophy properties across Hawaii, including gated estates and oceanfront holdings. Both entities are under the corporate umbrella of MegaCapital Hawaii Corp. Clarke says the approach stems from decades of working with individuals "who don't want their homes—or their intentions—on display." Market Forces Are Moving Toward Customization The announcement from NAR comes amid growing consumer frustration with a one-size-fits-all model for property transactions. According to Redfin, more than 15% of luxury home sales in major U.S. cities in 2024 were conducted off-market. In Hawaii specifically, internal data from brokerages suggests that nearly one in five residential sales over $10 million occur outside of the MLS system. This market trend is not exclusive to luxury buyers. Some sellers have cited safety, timing constraints, or the desire to test pricing as reasons for avoiding immediate syndication. Clarke believes the shift reflects deeper changes in how people think about real estate: "For a while, technology dictated the rules—list it, blast it, sell it fast. But people are realizing that speed doesn't always align with value." NAR's policy stops short of explicitly endorsing full off-market deals, but it carves out a sanctioned path for delaying public exposure. It also clarifies that one-to-one broker communications will not be considered public marketing under the Clear Cooperation Policy—a point that may benefit firms already operating in this gray zone. Brokerage Identity Is Being Rewritten NAR's revised guidelines bring fresh attention to the question of what role brokerages should play. Traditionally, listing agents have functioned as conduits between sellers and the MLS. But Clarke suggests that the future points toward a more consultative, problem-solving model. "We're deal sourcers. Our job is to understand the layers behind a transaction—not just find a buyer, but find the right buyer at the right moment." By offering multiple paths to market—from public listings to ultra-private introductions—firms like MegaCapital Hawaii are challenging the idea that MLS participation alone equates to client service. While the new NAR policy still requires listing within one business day of public marketing, the option to delay that exposure now creates more maneuvering room. Whether other brokerages will follow suit remains to be seen. But Clarke is not expecting Private Listings or Luxury Big Island to become mainstream. "Our model isn't for everyone," he says. "But for the people who need what we offer, nothing else works." Local Rollouts, National Implications As individual MLS systems now begin setting their own timelines for delayed marketing periods, brokerages and clients alike will be watching closely. The policy allows for local discretion, which could mean varied experiences across the country depending on how each market interprets and applies the new rules. For those already working with high-discretion clients, the changes may not shift operations drastically. But the regulatory cover now offers legal and professional legitimacy to what had long been viewed as an unconventional approach. What remains consistent, regardless of policy, is the growing demand for customized sales strategies—especially at the top end of the market. Whether done quietly or loudly, the goal is the same: achieving the best outcome for clients in a way that respects their circumstances.