
‘Not just Saif': Other Royals too claim share in last nawab's properties
The case concerns assets of the last Nawab of Bhopal, Hamidullah Khan, whose daughter Sajida Sultan —grandmother of film actor Saif Ali Khan— was declared sole heir in 1962.
Descendants of the Nawab's elder brothers and other siblings are now contesting the claim.
What Does The Plea Say?
On Aug 8, the SC bench of Justices P S Narsimha and Atul Chandurkar stayed the MP high court order while issuing notices in an appeal by Omar Faruq Ali and Raashid Ali, descendants of Nawab Obaidullah Khan.
Their counsel Aadil Singh Boparai talking to TOI said, "Madhya Pradesh high court, in its June 30 judgment, reaffirmed the principle from the Talat Fatima (Rampur) case that the Nawab's properties should devolve amongst his legal heirs as per Muslim personal law.
However, despite upholding this principle, it erroneously remanded the case to the Bhopal trial court for fresh consideration. The current petition before the supreme court challenges the HC judgment to the extent to the remand to the trial court for fresh consideration.
"
A History Of Judgments
In 2019, the Supreme Court set a precedent by ruling that Talat Fatima Rampur's royal property should be divided according to personal law.
MP high court had set aside a February 14, 2000, trial court judgment that upheld the exclusive rights of Nawab's daughter Sajida Sultan, her son cricketer late Mansoor Ali Khan and their legal heirs, actor Saif Ali Khan, Soha Ali Khan, Saba Sultan, and veteran actress Sharmila Tagore, over the estate.
The high court said the trial court's ruling was based on a 1997 Allahabad high court verdict which was later overturned by the supreme court in 2019 and remanded the case back to the trial court for reconsideration.
Another Facet Of Dispute
There's another twist in the royal property dispute. In 2015, the government vested properties of Abida Sultan, Hamidullah's eldest daughter, because she moved to Pakistan. Her assets in India have been labeled 'enemy property.' "Abida Sultaan was an ex-party in the original 1972 case, (which involved over 20 claimants to Bhopal royal properties)," explained Jabalpur based, Rajesh Kumar Pancholi, former counsel for the Pataudi family.
The 2019 Rampur case was important because it said all heirs—including women—should get a share. But Pancholi says that case may not fully apply to Bhopal. Since 1972 many of the Nawab's properties—spread across Bhopal, Sehore, and Raisen—have been sold or are in possession by others. The high court has banned any new sales or transfers while the case is still going on.
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Swara Bhaskar says ‘we all are bisexuals,' reveals of having 'a crush' on politician Dimple Yadav
In an interview with Screen, Swara Bhasker said, 'We all are bisexuals. If you leave people to themselves, they are all bisexuals, but heterosexuality is an ideology.' Bollywood actress Swara Bhaskar, known for films like Tanu Weds Manu and Raanjhanaa, has made headlines for her recent remarks. In an interview with Screen, she said, 'We all are bisexuals. If you leave people to themselves, they are all bisexuals, but heterosexuality is an ideology that has been put in us for thousands of years. Because that is how the human race will perpetuate, so it has to be the norm.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Swara Bhasker, who always stays in headlines for her controversial statements rather than her movies, schooled for her tweet comparing the outrage on the 'partly fictionalised filmy torture of Hindus" in Vicky Kaushal starrer 'Chhaava ' than the reaction to the deaths at the Mahakumbh stampede. Taking to X, Bhasker had tweeted, 'A society that is more enraged at the heavily embellished partly fictionalised filmy torture of Hindus from 500 years ago than they are at the horrendous death by stampede & mismanagement + then alleged JCB bulldozer handling of corpses – is a brain & soul-dead society. #IYKYK" The tweet garnered severe criticism from netizens with several suggesting her to 'see a doctor as soon as possible' for her sick mental state. Responding to Swara, a journalist named Swati Chaturvedi wrote, 'Rethink, this tweet Swara, I am a student of history from Delhi university & nothing remotely fictional about the torture inflicted by Aurangzeb on Sambhaji Maharaj before he murdered him. Let's not play games with our history please. One outrage does not preclude the other." 'Fictionalised filmy torture of Hindus"?! How dare you seek to make light of the supreme sacrifice made by Sambhaji Maharaj – who was brutally tortured and murdered by the wicked Mughal coward Aurangzeb! Swara Bhaskar – your deeply offensive and hurtful statement, that too on the birth anniversary of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, is obviously aimed at deliberately insulting the sentiments of millions of Indians and to create strife between religious groups. You, madam, ought to be prosecuted for this criminal offence to the fullest extent permissible under the law," Jai Anant Dehradai, a Supreme Court advocate. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Varanasi court orders FIR against Bhojpuri actor Pawan Singh, 3 others over Rs 1.57 crore 'film investment fraud'; hotelier alleges threat to life
The businessman, Vishal Singh, alleges he was defrauded of over Rs 1.5 crore under the guise of investing in the 2018 film 'Boss,' with promises of profit and producer credit. NEW DELHI: A Varanasi court has directed the police to register a case of fraud against Bhojpuri actor-singer Pawan Singh and three others following a complaint by a local hotelier. The order was passed on August 13 by the court of the additional chief judicial magistrate-II after hearing an application filed by businessman Vishal Singh . The development has now come to light. Vishal Singh's counsel, Ashish Singh, alleged that his client was duped in the name of investing in the 2018 film Boss . According to the lawyer, Vishal Singh met Mumbai-based film director Prem Shankar Rai in 2017, after which he was introduced to several people associated with the project. It was alleged that Vishal Singh was persuaded to invest in the film with a promise of profit, and a meeting with Pawan Singh was even arranged to convince him. The complainant claimed that he deposited about Rs 32.60 lakh from his and his brother's firm into different accounts. In July 2018, he was declared a producer of the film and assured 50 per cent of the profits. Later, he invested another Rs 1.25 crore in the project. However, despite the film's release, Vishal Singh was allegedly not given his share of the profit. The businessman further alleged that when he demanded his dues, actor Pawan Singh threatened to kill him. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play this game for 1 minute and see why everyone is crazy about it Undo The complainant approached the Cantonment police station and the police commissioner with his grievance. After no action was taken, he moved the court, which directed the police to register an FIR against Pawan Singh and three others under fraud charges. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.


Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Not just Saif': Other Royals too claim share in last nawab's properties
Bhopal: The Supreme Court has stayed MP high court order to remand a property dispute involving the Bhopal royal family to the trial court. The case concerns assets of the last Nawab of Bhopal, Hamidullah Khan, whose daughter Sajida Sultan —grandmother of film actor Saif Ali Khan— was declared sole heir in 1962. Descendants of the Nawab's elder brothers and other siblings are now contesting the claim. What Does The Plea Say? On Aug 8, the SC bench of Justices P S Narsimha and Atul Chandurkar stayed the MP high court order while issuing notices in an appeal by Omar Faruq Ali and Raashid Ali, descendants of Nawab Obaidullah Khan. Their counsel Aadil Singh Boparai talking to TOI said, "Madhya Pradesh high court, in its June 30 judgment, reaffirmed the principle from the Talat Fatima (Rampur) case that the Nawab's properties should devolve amongst his legal heirs as per Muslim personal law. However, despite upholding this principle, it erroneously remanded the case to the Bhopal trial court for fresh consideration. The current petition before the supreme court challenges the HC judgment to the extent to the remand to the trial court for fresh consideration. " A History Of Judgments In 2019, the Supreme Court set a precedent by ruling that Talat Fatima Rampur's royal property should be divided according to personal law. MP high court had set aside a February 14, 2000, trial court judgment that upheld the exclusive rights of Nawab's daughter Sajida Sultan, her son cricketer late Mansoor Ali Khan and their legal heirs, actor Saif Ali Khan, Soha Ali Khan, Saba Sultan, and veteran actress Sharmila Tagore, over the estate. The high court said the trial court's ruling was based on a 1997 Allahabad high court verdict which was later overturned by the supreme court in 2019 and remanded the case back to the trial court for reconsideration. Another Facet Of Dispute There's another twist in the royal property dispute. In 2015, the government vested properties of Abida Sultan, Hamidullah's eldest daughter, because she moved to Pakistan. Her assets in India have been labeled 'enemy property.' "Abida Sultaan was an ex-party in the original 1972 case, (which involved over 20 claimants to Bhopal royal properties)," explained Jabalpur based, Rajesh Kumar Pancholi, former counsel for the Pataudi family. The 2019 Rampur case was important because it said all heirs—including women—should get a share. But Pancholi says that case may not fully apply to Bhopal. Since 1972 many of the Nawab's properties—spread across Bhopal, Sehore, and Raisen—have been sold or are in possession by others. The high court has banned any new sales or transfers while the case is still going on. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.