logo
Ex-NRL, AFL Kiwi rookie Shem Tatupu charged with attempted murder

Ex-NRL, AFL Kiwi rookie Shem Tatupu charged with attempted murder

RNZ News05-06-2025
Shem Tatupu walks out before a Hawthorn Hawks AFL pre-season training session at Waverley Park on January 13, 2016 in Melbourne, Australia.
Photo:
Getty Images/Darrian Traynor
Kiwi Shem Tatupu has reportedly been arrested and charged with attempted murder.
The former Hawthorn and Melbourne Storm's player was arrested by Victoria Police last month,
7 News reported
.
It also reported the charge being linked to a family incident and that "the matter had already been in court".
The 29-year-old is due to appear in in Melbourne Magistrates' Court for a committal mention hearing in August, it reported.
Victoria Police did not share any details about the case with RNZ, including when and where the alleged offences took place.
Tatupu spent most of his youth playing rugby. His father is Tony Tatupu, who was a star rugby league player in the Warriors.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kiwi murderer David Ngatokotoru Martin to be deported from Australia under 501 law
Kiwi murderer David Ngatokotoru Martin to be deported from Australia under 501 law

RNZ News

time8 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Kiwi murderer David Ngatokotoru Martin to be deported from Australia under 501 law

By Tara Shaskey, Open Justice reporter of Kiwi man David Ngatokotoru Martin was jailed for murdering Luke Hankey in Australia in 2007. He has now been released from prison on parole and is being held in immigration detention. Photo: 123RF A Kiwi who murdered an aspiring professional surfer in a New South Wales pub carpark almost 20 years ago has been released from prison and is being held in immigration detention across the ditch. David Ngatokotoru Martin, 45, has made a plea to the Australian Government from the detention centre to allow him to remain in the country, where he would be subjected to parole conditions until 2030 if he were released into the community. Lisa Mackett, Martin's partner and co-offender in the violent 2007 incident which led to his murder conviction, has supported his plea, stating she has remained in a committed relationship with him since he was jailed. But the tribunal considering the appeal heard Martin lacked remorse and insight for his crimes, including the murder, had repeatedly breached prison rules by using drugs while inside, and had not engaged in rehabilitation to the extent recommended by the courts or prison psychologists. Martin was found to be a "significant risk" of committing further violent offending if he were released into the community, leading the Administrative Review Tribunal of Australia to rule in favour of his deportation to New Zealand, where he has not resided since 1988, when he was 8. According to the decision, released this month, Martin and Mackett went to the Bateau Bay Hotel in New South Wales on October 20, 2007. They spent the evening in the hotel's beer garden with friends before leaving around midnight. They decided to drive home rather than leave their car parked at the venue, where groups of people were milling about, yelling and shouting. As Mackett drove through the carpark, the car's path became blocked by pedestrians, including Luke Hankey, who was directly in front of the vehicle when it stopped. "He apparently turned his back on the vehicle, putting plant material down his trousers and, as described by his sister, 'wiggled his bum'," the decision detailed. "Lisa Mackett was heard to yell out, perhaps with expletives: 'Get out of the way; you'll get yourself killed.' The path of the car, however, remained blocked. Members of the crowd yelled at the occupants of the car." Martin, who had been in the passenger seat, and Mackett got out of the car and Martin picked up a "blunt instrument" believed to be a screwdriver. He swiftly approached the group and struck one man twice in the neck with the weapon, leaving superficial wounds, before moving towards Hankey. "With a thrusting motion, requiring moderate to severe force, he struck Luke Hankey twice in the chest. The blunt implement, on one of these occasions, penetrated eight centimetres through to the heart and aorta." As Hankey collapsed, Martin confronted a third man, who backed away while holding up his hands. Martin did not harm the third man and returned to the car while Mackett assaulted two women before rejoining Martin. "The whole episode took seconds rather than minutes. The vehicle then left at some speed, driven by David Martin. As it drove away, it was attacked by the crowd." Meanwhile, Hankey was taken to hospital where he was declared dead, according to Australian media. The 24-year-old was described in reports as an aspiring professional surfer who had been celebrating his niece's birthday with family and friends on the night he was killed. Martin went on to plead guilty to the common assault of one victim but denied murder and reckless wounding relating to his other victims. Following a lengthy trial, he was found guilty and sentenced in October 2011 to 20 years' imprisonment with a minimum parole period of 15 years for the murder, and two years and six months on the other charges. Mackett was convicted of being an accessory after the fact to murder and two counts of assault. According to the tribunal's decision, Martin, whose visa was cancelled as a result of his serious offending, was released on parole in May this year and taken into immigration detention. That same month, he applied to the tribunal to appeal his visa cancellation. Martin has resided in Australia continuously for more than 36 years and has never returned to NZ, according to the decision. He began using drugs and alcohol from an early age, did not complete school and ran away from home at 15, initially sleeping in abandoned trains. Martin only occasionally worked and has an extensive criminal history, beginning in 1995. While multiple reports stated Martin was not remorseful for his offending, he told the tribunal he was ashamed of his behaviour and that he regretted the damage he had caused. However, the tribunal said he still sought to minimise his culpability, and denied the murder was unprovoked. It said he has taken some steps to address his drug and alcohol use and his need for anger management but more work was required, and he has limited support in the community. The tribunal was not convinced that Mackett, who is currently prevented by Martin's parole conditions from contacting him, and others who offered to support Martin, would be a positive influence. Martin said he has no family, housing, or support network in NZ but, in ruling in favour of his deportation, the tribunal said he would likely receive support as a returning prisoner under NZ's Returning Offenders (Management and Information) Act 2015. The Act enables the Department of Corrections to manage and monitor certain offenders, such as 501 deportees, returning from overseas. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .

Inquiry clears SkyCity Entertainment to hold South Australia's only casino licence
Inquiry clears SkyCity Entertainment to hold South Australia's only casino licence

RNZ News

timea day ago

  • RNZ News

Inquiry clears SkyCity Entertainment to hold South Australia's only casino licence

SkyCity Entertainment has been cleared by an independent review as fit to hold South Australia's only casino licence. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi SkyCity Entertainment has been cleared by an independent review as fit to hold South Australia's only casino licence, despite identified shortcomings in its implementation of anti-money laundering rules, but might yet face further penalties. The review, led by retired Supreme Court judge Brian Martin, also found that SkyCity Entertainment was 'suitable' to be a close associate of it subsidiary SkyCity Adelaide. "If I had been asked to determine the suitability of the licensee and SCEG (SkyCity Entertainment Group) at the end of October 2021, the inevitable answer would have been that neither were suitable," Martin said in his report. "Since then, the situation has changed." He credited the company's "genuine" efforts to meet its obligations. "I am satisfied that as at the date of this Report, the licensee is a suitable person to hold the license to operate the Adelaide Casino." The inquiry was initiated in mid-2022 by the South Australian liquor and gambling commissioner, amid concerns the Adelaide establishment had been lax in policing anti-money laundering rules, leading to the laundering of billions of dollars over several years. It was interrupted between February 2023 and June 2024, while the Australian financial regulator AUSTRAC took civil action against SkyCity Adelaide for breaching national AML/CFT laws, resulting in a A$67m (NZ$74m) penalty for the breaches. "We fully accept and acknowledge the findings of the report that we did not measure up to the standards required, and we apologise for those failings," said SkyCity's chief executive Jason Walbridge. He said the company was working with authorities to improve systems and standards, having already committed up to $60m up to 2027. However, SkyCity still faces possible further action as the state Liquor and Gambling Commissioner, Brett Humphrey, considers the Martin report and other study by authorities. "This is by no means a clean bill of health for SkyCity Adelaide ... [given] deficiencies and breaches uncovered [which] are deeply concerning," Humphrey said in a statement. Forsyth Barr investment analyst Paul Koraua said the talk of further enforcement suggested the risk of another penalty. "We assume a A$50m penalty payable in FY26, with some credit given for the NZ$60m three-year programme of works for the Adelaide casino which has been approved by the Commissioner, and the A$67m AUSTRAC fine already paid." The Adelaide Casino has been mixed performer for SkyCity costing it close to NZ$120m in tax and AML/CFT penalties, as well as a $94m write down in its value last year, on top of a $330m rebuild completed in 2021. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Kathleen Folbigg speaks out against 'insulting' $2 million compensation payment
Kathleen Folbigg speaks out against 'insulting' $2 million compensation payment

RNZ News

time2 days ago

  • RNZ News

Kathleen Folbigg speaks out against 'insulting' $2 million compensation payment

By Courtney Barrett Peters, ABC Kathleen Folbigg was "shocked" with the NSW government's $2 million compensation offer over her wrongful imprisonment. Photo: Handout / courtesy of Kathleen Folbigg / AFP Australian woman Kathleen Folbigg has vowed to keep on fighting, describing a $2 million ex gratia payment as a "lowball" and "insulting" attempt to compensate her wrongful imprisonment. Once labelled Australia's worst female serial killer, Ms Folbigg was found guilty in 2003 of killing her four young children and spent 20 years behind bars . In 2023, her convictions were quashed when new medical evidence emerged to suggest her children died of natural causes. Last week, the NSW Attorney-General Michael Daley granted her the compensation payout , which has since attracted widespread criticism from legal and scientific experts for being "totally inadequate". Speaking out for the first time, Ms Folbigg said the lack of transparency as to how the state government came to that sum has left her feeling "confused" and "shocked". "Is it set-up money? Or is it just an, 'Okay, we need to get this off our books?'," she said. "It feels like it was a tick the box, let's get this done sort of situation without too much feeling, empathy or understanding going on in the process. "It's pretty much a slap in the face." Ex gratia payments are made at the discretion of the government. Ms Folbigg applied for one in 2024. Ms Folbigg thought her "fighting days" would be over when she received reparations, but instead she felt like it was "go away" money. "We're all exhausted and tired, but it looks like there's one more fight just yet," she said. Having missed what, she called "the best years of her life" in jail, Ms Folbigg had hoped the compensation would help her to be "comfortable for the rest of [her] life," and provide her with some financial security. "Realistically, I've got no option really to be getting [superannuation]. "I'm honest enough to say mental health care is going to be needed for the rest of my life after this, and that is not free." Kathleen Folbigg says she's missed the best years of her life while in jail. Photo: ABC News She addedhow her life-long dream to own a home has been crushed, as well as her wish to repay her pro bono legal team . When asked how much the state government should instead have compensated her, she said she was unable to put a number on it. "How do you put a figure on your life?" she replied. Over two years on from her release, Ms Folbigg feels failed. She claims NSW Premier Chris Minns has refused to sit down with her and her legal team to discuss compensation, and has not offered her an apology. "I've never had a 'Terribly sorry you've gone through this Ms Folbigg and that's a little bit concerning'," she said. On Monday, Mr Minns rejected suggestions the Attorney-General decided on that figure because he "isn't convinced of her innocence ," instead doubling down on his previous comments that $2 million was all the state could afford. "Obviously the Attorney-General would never have pardoned Kathleen Folbigg if there was any question about her innocence in the eyes of the law and that shouldn't be forgotten as part of the government's decisions here," Mr Minns said. The NSW premier doubled down on comments that $2 million was all the state could afford. Photo: ABC News "We don't have $20 million, $30 million, $15 million just lying around - it necessarily has to come from other programs." Despite conceding the sum does not reflect the length of time Ms Folbigg unjustly spent behind bars, Mr Minns reiterated the 58-year-old and her lawyers were free to sue his government if they wished to seek further compensation. "When you've seen large-scale payments from the government … it's usually, in fact as far as I know, only on the back of a settlement reached between the state and the individual as a result of civil litigation. "This wasn't a settlement, it's an ex gratia payment. "I understand there are people who contributed to Kathleen Folbigg's release who were pro bono for her over that period of time, but I need to make a decision on whether the state government has to pay those lawyers, and I can't justify it," he said. Folbigg says she has struggled moving on from the death of her youngest daughter, Laura. Photo: Supplied / ABC Ms Folbigg has always maintained her innocence over the deaths of her children Caleb, Patrick, Sarah and Laura Folbigg. They all died when they were babies or toddlers between 1989 and 1999, in the state's Hunter region. While she managed to grieve their deaths "in a very different manner", Ms Folbigg said she has particularly struggled to move on from her youngest, Laura's passing. "I think enough time has gone past … I don't baulk at talking about them," she said. "They deserve the respect [of] being spoken about. They existed, they lived, they died." Two decades after she was wrongfully convicted, new genetic testing helped cast reasonable doubt over her guilt. Ms Folbigg said that if she's awarded further compensation in the future, she wants to help people with cases like hers, and bring genetic testing to the forefront of evidence. She also wishes to support women who have experienced losing children. - ABC Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store