logo
‘General acceptance': A year of banning cellphones in Canadian classrooms

‘General acceptance': A year of banning cellphones in Canadian classrooms

EDMONTON - Sixteen-year-old Roha Akram was skeptical when teachers in Calgary announced a cellphone ban during the first assembly of the school year.
'I was like, 'No one's going to follow this,'' the Grade 11 student recalled of the change in September.
'It's just the nature of teenagers. We don't like rules.'
Teachers didn't want to see phones on desks or in pockets, Akram added. 'They wanted it in the backpack, in the locker, in the car.'
She said the ban has been good for some students, who just need a reminder to focus in class, particularly when teachers are speaking. But some have struggled.
One teacher took a phone away from a boy who was really attached to his device, she said. 'He started acting crazy. He went around asking everyone, 'Can I use your phone? Can I use your phone? I need to go on Instagram.'
'I saw phones are kind of becoming an addiction.'
As the school year wraps up this month, education ministries across Canada say there have been overall positive results from banning cellphones.
They say it has taught students not to develop unhealthy attachments to their phones and to focus on lessons in the classroom.
Last fall, most provinces introduced policies to limit cellphone use in schools, similar to jurisdictions in other countries.
Before the ban in Manitoba, Education Minister Tracy Schmidt said a school librarian complained to her that students were too quiet sitting around the stacks of books.
'The students would come in groups, sit down at a table together, pull out their cellphones and they would all sit there. You could hear a pin drop,' said Schmidt.
The cellphone ban has returned the chatter and socialization among students, she said.
'They still come with their groups of friends, but now they're sitting, they're talking, they're laughing. They might pick up a board game. (The librarian) was really, really grateful to the province for taking this step.'
Ontario's education ministry said parents and teachers find the ban has created a better learning environment.
'As we close out the first full year of implementation, we will continue gathering input to understand how the policy has worked in practice, where it has been effective, and where further support may be needed,' said spokesperson Emma Testani.
In Nova Scotia, school staff were surprised by how smoothly it was to implement the new directive, said education spokesperson Alex Burke.
'While not all students like leaving their devices out of the classroom, there is a general acceptance of the benefit of limiting cellphone use and appreciation of the opportunity to ignore their phones,' said Burke.
The Edmonton Public School Board, Alberta's largest school division, said it didn't notice any significant issues.
'Schools had the flexibility to determine how best to implement the ban, whether it meant introducing new practices or adjusting current ones,' said spokesperson Kim Smith.
A year of the ban doesn't mean students aren't still using phones in class, admitted Akram. Some have just become more sneaky.
One fellow student used a textbook to hide his phone while teachers were talking, she said.
'He just watches YouTube Shorts the whole class.'
Akram said she also occasionally uses her phone during work time in class — her AirPods in her ears, under her hijab — so she can listen to music.
When teachers do confiscate phones, they're typically returned at the end of class or the school day, she added.
Akram said she can see why the ban might be necessary for generation Z and students with unhealthy attachments to their phones.
'We were born when people were inventing iPads and iPhones ... so we grew up with screens.'
She said she thinks teachers will be stricter with the ban next year.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Drag Performers Crash Trump's Date Night at the Kennedy Center to Protest His Anti-'Woke' Agenda
Drag Performers Crash Trump's Date Night at the Kennedy Center to Protest His Anti-'Woke' Agenda

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Drag Performers Crash Trump's Date Night at the Kennedy Center to Protest His Anti-'Woke' Agenda

A group of drag queens and one drag king attended the same Kennedy Center performance of Les Misérables as Donald and Melania Trump on June 11. While the president, first lady and other MAGA A-listers received a mixed reception, drag performers Tara Hoot, Mari Con Carne, Ricky Rosé and Vagenesis entered to applause and cheers from the crowd. The subtle protest came after Trump seized control of the Kennedy Center's board and named himself chairman in February, insisting that he would specifically ban drag shows from the Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump received a mixed reception of cheers and boos when they attended the Kennedy Center's opening night performance of Les Misérables on Wednesday, June 11. However, a group of drag performers who arrived ahead of the first couple received applause and admiration from the crowd. Videos captured by fellow attendees showed Tara Hoot, Mari Con Carne, Ricky Rosé and Vagenesis — all in full drag — smiling and waving as they took their seats ahead of the performance. An Instagram post by Qommittee, a "national network of drag performers fighting hate and censorship," confirmed that the performers' attendance was a "protest of Trump's presence at the show, following his ban of drag at the center." "FREE EXPRESSION MEANS EVERYONE. NO EXCEPTIONS," the post added. Tara Hoot reflected on the experience in a video following the show, saying, "The staff at the Kennedy Center, they were just delighted to see us walk in." "Kudos to all of you bringing art to the world," the self-proclaimed "campy and kind" queen continued. "Unfortunately, there were some other people there, but I think we brought the audience as much as we possibly could." The subtle demonstration comes after Trump seized control of the Kennedy Center board — naming himself chairman and installing special envoy Richard Grenell as the president and interim director — in February, shortly after taking office for his second term. 'I want to make sure it runs properly,' Trump said of his motives at the time. 'We don't need woke at the Kennedy Center, and we don't need — some of the shows were terrible. They were a disgrace that they were even put on.' When a reporter asked a follow-up question about whether he had 'seen any shows there,' the president admitted, 'No.' 'I get reports they were so bad… I didn't want to go,' he explained. 'There was nothing I wanted to see.' On Monday, Feb. 10, Trump announced Grenell's appointment on Truth Social, specifically calling out his belief that the Kennedy Center had featured drag performances. "NO MORE DRAG SHOWS, OR OTHER ANTI-AMERICAN PROPAGANDA — ONLY THE BEST. RIC, WELCOME TO SHOW BUSINESS!" Trump wrote. In another post, Trump again claimed that the performing arts theater had put on 'Drag Shows specifically targeting our youth." "THIS WILL STOP," he continued. "The Kennedy Center is an American Jewel, and must reflect the brightest STARS on its stage from all across our Nation. For the Kennedy Center, THE BEST IS YET TO COME!' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer. Wednesday's Les Mis performance — which was also attended by Vice President J.D. Vance and his wife, Usha Chilukuri Vance — was always expected to feature a slightly different cast than most Kennedy Center attendees will see during the show's month-long run. On May 7, CNN reported that at least 10 of the 12 actors in the musical were not planning to perform on the night the Trumps attended. According to sources who spoke to the outlet, the cast was given the option to not perform, and several ensemble members and starring cast members opted out. Somewhat ironically, Les Mis is a personal favorite of President Trump. In February, the U.S. Army Chorus performed the musical's protest anthem, "Do You Hear the People Sing?," at the 2025 White House Governors Ball. He also incorporated the song into his 2016 and 2024 presidential campaigns, with The Guardian reporting in 2022 that the politician "bizarrely" blasted the song ahead of announcing his 2024 candidacy. Many see the president's admiration for the song as an odd choice, given that the lyrics are sung from the point of view of French revolutionaries standing up against a powerful and corrupt ruling class. The lyrics include, "Do you hear the people sing? / Singing the song of angry men?/ It is the music of the people / Who will not be slaves again!" Read the original article on People

Corporate America remains silent amid ICE raids and protests
Corporate America remains silent amid ICE raids and protests

Axios

time4 hours ago

  • Axios

Corporate America remains silent amid ICE raids and protests

Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Los Angeles County have led to public unrest, with Home Depot and Waymos as the backdrop. Why it matters: Corporate America's muted reaction is in stark contrast with the way it responded to protests during the first Trump administration. Catch up quick: Protests broke out on Friday near a Home Depot in the LA County city of Paramount, after ICE agents carried out a deportation operation targeting day laborers. The Trump administration ordered National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines to quell protests over the objections of local and state officials. Mayor Karen Bass imposed a curfew on downtown LA to curb vandalism and looting, which in the previous days led to Waymos being set on fire. Anti-deportation protests took place nationwide in cities including San Diego, San Francisco, Dallas, Chicago and New York. What they're saying: Home Depot directed inquiries to ICE and wouldn't expand when asked how the retail giant was supporting stores, employees and customers. Waymo suspended service in Los Angeles. A spokesperson told Axios that "safety is our highest priority ... both for people who choose to ride with us and with whom we share the streets. We are in touch with law enforcement and will retrieve our vehicles at the appropriate time." Zoom in: Small businesses raided by ICE have issued statements in support of detained employees and members of their communities. ICE agents raided a local San Diego restaurant Buona Forchetta on May 30, and three employees were taken away when they couldn't show identification, Axios San Diego's Andrew Keatts reports. In response, the local restaurant issued a public statement on its Instagram account. "The way [the raid] unfolded was nothing short of traumatic," the statement read. "We are devastated and heartbroken. At this moment, our priority is not public perception or headlines. Our priority is our people. We are working closely with our attorneys to locate and support our detained employees and their families. ... We are also deeply moved by the outpouring of support from our community." Nearby businesses have shown their support through statements and donations, and the community has led ICE protests in response. Between the lines: Trump's 2017 immigration policies and travel bans prompted many CEOs taking a political stance. Now, however, corporate America has recalibrated to strategic silence. Yes, but: Moments arise when companies should be prepared to comment, and they must have a plan in place, says Paul Argenti, professor of corporate communications at Dartmouth's Tuck School of Business. "If you think about it conceptually, what is in it for a company to go up against Donald Trump? Zero, nothing ... unless it's an issue connected to you directly or there is a strategic need to comment." "So as it relates to Home Depot [executives], the raids and protests happened right in front" of their store, Argenti said. "How did they not comment on it? Customers, employees and community members will expect to hear from them. There's just no way [they] can get away without saying anything." It's an example of why all corporate communications teams need to anticipate being dragged into societal or political matters, he added. The big picture: Even given the penchant for silence, stakeholders expect business leaders to engage on matters that affect employees, customers or the business. A recent Axios Communicators Pro-Gravity Research survey found business leaders feel the most pressure from employees (69%) as it relates to engaging on immigration policies. 31% say they feel pressure from policymakers, while 15% say shareholders and customers demand engagement on the issue. What we're watching: The reaction in the coming days or weeks to ongoing " deportation wars" could signal corporate America's current appetite for wading into political crosshairs. It's either the moment corporate America begins to engage or continues to retreat.

Fact Check: Anti-ICE protester wearing Army fatigues in video isn't active duty
Fact Check: Anti-ICE protester wearing Army fatigues in video isn't active duty

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Fact Check: Anti-ICE protester wearing Army fatigues in video isn't active duty

Claim: A video clip authentically shows an active duty U.S. military member defying deployment orders by participating in anti-immigration enforcement protests in Dallas, Texas, in June 2025. Rating: Context: The Department of Defense Rapid Response X account said the woman seen in the Dallas video served in the U.S. Army from November 2010 to August 2014 and in the Army Reserves from August 2014 to June 2020. In other words, she wasn't on active duty in June 2025. On June 11, 2025, BreakThrough News, an independent news website based in New York City, posted a video (archived) showing a woman wearing Army fatigues at an anti-immigration enforcement protest in Dallas, Texas, on June 9, 2025. (X user @BTnewsroom) BreakThrough News said the video showed a "military member" speaking out against U.S. President Donald Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles. The woman in the video said: We are not pawns for Donald Trump's agenda. Why now? It's because the military was called upon innocent protesters. We, in our oath to serve, we serve the people of the United States, the Constitution. These constitutional rights are being stripped and just denied, and the military will not be pawns to that. So I'm calling upon the conscience of military members who served previously and now. We have a conscience, we have a mind, and we have a duty and moral obligation to say no and resist evil. The video had more than 5 million views at the time of this writing. Claims started circulating online on X (archived), Facebook (archived), Threads (archived) and Instagram (archived) that the woman in the video was an active duty U.S. soldier or Marine and had defied orders by participating in the anti-immigration enforcement protest in Dallas. However, according (archived) to the Department of Defense (DOD) Rapid Response X account, the woman in the video was not an active duty soldier. Carmen Colado served in the U.S. Army from November 2010 to August 2014 and in the Army Reserves from August 2014 to June 2020, according to the DoD. Colado described herself as a "U.S. Army veteran" and a "Former military intelligence analyst" on her Instagram page. The DOD Rapid Response account said of Colado that: "She does not speak for nor reflect the U.S. Army." Therefore, we rate this video claim as miscaptioned. We reached out to the U.S. Army Public Affairs to ask whether it had or would contact Colado about her appearance in the video while wearing an Army uniform and whether the appearance broke any army rules that might apply to retired service members and await a reply. Colado, who said her mother immigrated to the U.S. from Honduras in the 1990s, became a filmmaker, director and writer after leaving the Army. Social media users speculated that Colado had broken military rules by appearing and speaking at the protest while wearing an Army uniform (archived) (archived) (archived). According to "DOD Instruction 1334.01 Wearing of the uniform," former service members may wear their uniform during specified activities or occasions. The directive did not list protests as a specified activity. The directive also said that retired service members must not wear their uniform "during or in connection with furthering political activities, private employment, or commercial interests, when an inference of official sponsorship by DoD or the Military Service concerned for the activity or interest may be drawn." Likewise, "Directive 1344.10 on Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces" says that members not on active duty "should avoid inferences that their political activities imply or appear to imply official sponsorship, approval, or endorsement." @BTnewsroom. "BREAKING: After Trump Deployed Marines to LA, This Military Member Joined an Anti-ICE Protest in Dallas, Declaring, 'We Won't Be Pawns in Stripping Away Constitutional Rights.'." X, 11 June 2025, "Carmen Colado." Instagram, "Carmen Colado | Art Department, Director, Writer." IMDb, Accessed 12 June 2025. @DODResponse. "Correction: This Individual Served in the U.S. Army from November 2010 to August 2014 and Was Then in the Army Reserves from August 2014 to June 2020." X, 11 June 2025, Penrod, Virginia S. DOD INSTRUCTION 1334.01 WEARING OF THE UNIFORM. U.S. Department of Defense, 13 July 2021, Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces . U.S. Department of Defense, 19 Feb. 2008, Quezada, Chelsea. "Empowering Dreams: A Year Later with Mitú x Walmart's Filmmaker Mentorship Program Alumni Carmen Colado and Ernest Govea." Mitú, 26 Feb. 2024,

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store