Plastic Surgeons Reveal Procedures They'd Never Get
Although I grew up with quite a few doctors in the family, I've always been scared of surgery — and that includes plastic surgery. Maybe it's that the two surgeries I've had in my life were too much for me to handle...or more likely, perhaps I've seen one too many botched surgery videos on the internet.
And I guess that isn't gonna change. Because recently, Reddit user Topgunner85 asked, "Plastic surgeons of Reddit, what body-altering surgery would you never get and why?" and the answers have low-key transformed my reluctance into an absolute "no." That, and they're just really freakin' interesting. So here's what people said:
"Brazilian Butt Lifts (BBLs) carry a surprisingly high mortality rate and the recovery is brutal."
"I would never get a 'nonsurgical' or 'liquid' rhinoplasty. Most of the time that's just filler injected into the nose. There is a risk of filler in this location causing you to go blind."
"My sister is an opthalmic surgeon, and her take on LASIK is terrifying."
"I would never have an operation to change height — for example, leg lengthening. This is one of the most traumatic and painful operations, with long recovery, risks of complications, and all for the sake of aesthetic or social conformity. The operation involves bone fracture, their stretching with the help of devices and months — or even years — of pain and rehabilitation. At the same time, the result may be unstable, and expectations may be inflated. For me, it would be too high a price for trying to meet external standards. I'd rather work on accepting myself and finding an environment where growth doesn't matter."
"Iris depigmentation laser surgery. The risks of blindness or complications are quite high. And it looks shit."
"Beverly Hills plastic surgeon, awake and present. I would say fox eye lift, threads lifts, and rib removal."
"As an injector, I hate consulting for thread lifts, and was so glad when our medical director said we weren't offering them anymore. Most of the clients wanting threads just need to get a facelift."
"I'm just a nurse, but I'll say liposuction is a popular answer. It's horrible on the body, with a high risk of infection and bleeding and embolism. And better results with diet and exercise."
"360 lifts and abdominoplasty (tummy tuck). Basically anything that involves removing large amounts of skin and tissue. It's even worse if they combine it with liposuction. Because I think the complications are serious enough to warrant very careful consideration from people that do need it. Just because a surgery can improve a person's quality of life doesn't mean we should ignore the potential risks."
"My quick answer is rib removal and buccal fat removal. But also: there is a space for discussing procedures as being awful, but what's more important is WHO is doing the surgery. The aesthetics community is riddled with non-plastic surgeons doing procedures beyond their scope of practice. Oral surgeon doing BBLs? Dermatologists doing breast implants? Uncertified people doing invasive facial injection procedures? That's just skimming the top of what is going on in my city."
"I'd stay away from anything that involves going to another country to get something discount. One of the issues with surgery, any surgery, is that they often have complications. You could either find yourself paying insanity-level money for correction, or simply live as whatever monster a shady butcher left you as."
"My cousin is a surgeon, and he said, 'Don't ever get a nose job unless you've got at least $30,000 ready in case you need a revision.'"
"Med tech here. I'd say Botox in any form, unless medically necessary. You are injecting a paralytic toxin from bacteria which along of the desired effects of smoothing out wrinkles can also lead to a host of neurological issues that far outweigh the perceived benefit."
"Honestly? Rib removal surgery — just to get a smaller waist or 'Barbie' silhouette. As someone who's been around medical tourism and seen both great and terrible results, I've noticed that anything messing with internal structure like that is playing with fire. It's not just about aesthetics — your ribs protect your organs. Removing them is risky, painful, and recovery can be brutal. I've seen people fly across the world for cheap procedures like this, only to end up with nerve damage or breathing problems."
"I'd never get tongue splitting — it's permanent, can mess with speech, and just isn't worth the risk. I'd rather not gamble with how I talk or eat."
"A DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. It's a much bigger surgery than they expect, and it's got such a difficult recovery that takes so long. My patients who opt for the tissue expander to implant instead have a much easier recovery."
"Hair implants. The implants are definitely visible, the donor area always gets rare, and if you don't take finasteride (a drug that has impotence as a possible side effect), the hair between the plugs WILL fall. It may be a good procedure for some, and I know many people who are happy with the results, but I'd rather keep my penis functioning than my hair. And yes, I know, not everyone gets those side effects. But many do, and in some cases, they are permanent."
"I work in surgery, and TBH, I would basically not get anything done unless it's medically necessary or going to significantly improve my quality of life after exhausting all other options (like to relieve pain, make breathing easier, etc)."
If you're a medical professional, tell us which procedures you'd never get done! Submit your response in this form, or write it in the comments below. Either way, we wanna hear it!
And make sure to check out BuzzFeed Canada on Instagram and TikTok for more!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Best Wellness Advice Has Always Been Free
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. This is an edition of Time-Travel Thursdays, a journey through The Atlantic's archives to contextualize the present. Sign up here. Allow me to make myself sound very dainty and attractive: Last year, I was diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease. This was an unfortunate development, I decided, and so not in line with 'brat summer.' I handled the news like any journalist might—with compulsive research and fact-checking. My fear directed me to Reddit threads and scientific studies, to new diet plans and workout regimens and supplement orders, until my unremitting quest for answers landed me in the Zoom office of a functional-medicine doctor, a woman who charged me a couple of hundred bucks to tell me that I should eat more boiled plantains. My search for wellness had gone too far. I was spending money I didn't have to try to fix an illness with origins I'd never understand, much less control. Yet I trust that I'm far from alone in this desire to feel good. Every year, the average American spends more than $6,000 on 'wellness,' an imprecise category that includes both fads and legitimate endeavors, with offerings as varied as diagnostic technologies and protein popcorn. Across the world, wellness is a $6.3 trillion business—outpacing even the pharmaceutical industry—and Americans are by far the biggest spenders. Although some health issues require interventions or specialists (which can be exorbitantly expensive), the wellness industry tells Americans that no matter their condition—or lack thereof—there's always some treatment they should be buying. There's always more Googling and optimizing to be done. Take the journalist Amy Larocca's book, How to Be Well, which details her wellness-industry misadventures, including 'gravity' colonic cleanses, $200-a-month prescription herbs, and $1,000 Goop events. In a recent Atlantic review of the book, the writer Sheila McClear observed how widespread the 'wellness craze' has become, noting that 'in a nation known for its relatively poor health, nearly everybody seems to be thinking about how to be healthy.' Yet, like the human body's frailty, America's obsession with wellness is far from new. In our archives, I found a letter addressed to someone else facing an unsexy stomach ailment: 'A Letter to a Dyspeptic,' published in 1859, includes some remarkably sassy advice from an anonymous writer to a 19th-century gentleman with indigestion. This writer is all tough love, unafraid to call the gentleman an 'unfortunate individual,' a man of 'ripe old age, possibly a little over-ripe, at thirty-five,' and, due to the fellow's unique bathing habits, an 'insane merman.' The dyspeptic man had spent the past years suffering, quitting his business and doling out cash to questionable doctors and therapies, to little avail. 'You are haunting water-cures, experimenting on life-pills, holding private conferences with medical electricians, and thinking of a trip to the Bermudas,' the author writes. But this search for a cure came at a high cost: 'O mistaken economist! can you afford the cessation of labor and the ceaseless drugging and douching of your last few years?' Any hyperfixation on wellness can be draining and futile; an endless search for answers to one's ailments might be alluring, but 'to seek health as you are now seeking it, regarding every new physician as if he were Pandora,' the writer warns, 'is really rather unpromising.' In lieu of expensive treatments, the writer advises that the dyspeptic man do three things: bathe, breathe, and exercise. (Another suggestion is to purchase 'a year's subscription to the 'Atlantic Monthly,'' one of the 'necessaries of life' for happiness—it seems we writers have never been above the shameless plug.) Notably, all of these (except the Atlantic subscription, starting at $79.99) are more or less free. Written almost two centuries later, Larocca's book ends on a similar note, championing the kind of health advice that doesn't hurt your wallet. After her tiresome and expensive foray into the world of wellness, she 'doesn't recommend a single product, practice, or service, although she does name one tip that helped her,' McClear notes. 'It's a simple breathing exercise. And it's free.' America's wellness methods have changed over time—sometimes evolving for the better. (The 1859 letter, for instance, details how some philosophers believed in being as sedentary as possible because 'trees lived longer than men because they never stirred from their places.') Even so, as skyrocketing costs and medical mistrust plague American health care, the wellness industry churns out a carousel of treatments, touting sweeping benefits that are often dubious at best. Compared with the many big promises that 'gravity' colonics and supplement companies might make, most health tips that have stood the test of time are far more quotidian: sleep, exercise, breathe. Their simplicity can be both healing and accessible. The body has 'power and beauty,' the anonymous writer noted more than a century ago, 'when we consent to give it a fair chance.' When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic. Article originally published at The Atlantic
Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
The Best Wellness Advice Has Always Been Free
This is an edition of Time-Travel Thursdays, a journey through The Atlantic 's archives to contextualize the present. Sign up here. Allow me to make myself sound very dainty and attractive: Last year, I was diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease. This was an unfortunate development, I decided, and so not in line with ' brat summer.' I handled the news like any journalist might—with compulsive research and fact-checking. My fear directed me to Reddit threads and scientific studies, to new diet plans and workout regimens and supplement orders, until my unremitting quest for answers landed me in the Zoom office of a functional-medicine doctor, a woman who charged me a couple of hundred bucks to tell me that I should eat more boiled plantains. My search for wellness had gone too far. I was spending money I didn't have to try to fix an illness with origins I'd never understand, much less control. Yet I trust that I'm far from alone in this desire to feel good. Every year, the average American spends more than $6,000 on 'wellness,' an imprecise category that includes both fads and legitimate endeavors, with offerings as varied as diagnostic technologies and protein popcorn. Across the world, wellness is a $6.3 trillion business—outpacing even the pharmaceutical industry—and Americans are by far the biggest spenders. Although some health issues require interventions or specialists (which can be exorbitantly expensive), the wellness industry tells Americans that no matter their condition—or lack thereof—there's always some treatment they should be buying. There's always more Googling and optimizing to be done. Take the journalist Amy Larocca's book, How to Be Well, which details her wellness-industry misadventures, including 'gravity' colonic cleanses, $200-a-month prescription herbs, and $1,000 Goop events. In a recent Atlantic review of the book, the writer Sheila McClear observed how widespread the 'wellness craze' has become, noting that 'in a nation known for its relatively poor health, nearly everybody seems to be thinking about how to be healthy.' Yet, like the human body's frailty, America's obsession with wellness is far from new. In our archives, I found a letter addressed to someone else facing an unsexy stomach ailment: ' A Letter to a Dyspeptic,' published in 1859, includes some remarkably sassy advice from an anonymous writer to a 19th-century gentleman with indigestion. This writer is all tough love, unafraid to call the gentleman an 'unfortunate individual,' a man of 'ripe old age, possibly a little over-ripe, at thirty-five,' and, due to the fellow's unique bathing habits, an 'insane merman.' The dyspeptic man had spent the past years suffering, quitting his business and doling out cash to questionable doctors and therapies, to little avail. 'You are haunting water-cures, experimenting on life-pills, holding private conferences with medical electricians, and thinking of a trip to the Bermudas,' the author writes. But this search for a cure came at a high cost: 'O mistaken economist! can you afford the cessation of labor and the ceaseless drugging and douching of your last few years?' Any hyperfixation on wellness can be draining and futile; an endless search for answers to one's ailments might be alluring, but 'to seek health as you are now seeking it, regarding every new physician as if he were Pandora,' the writer warns, 'is really rather unpromising.' In lieu of expensive treatments, the writer advises that the dyspeptic man do three things: bathe, breathe, and exercise. (Another suggestion is to purchase 'a year's subscription to the 'Atlantic Monthly,'' one of the 'necessaries of life' for happiness—it seems we writers have never been above the shameless plug.) Notably, all of these (except the Atlantic subscription, starting at $79.99) are more or less free. Written almost two centuries later, Larocca's book ends on a similar note, championing the kind of health advice that doesn't hurt your wallet. After her tiresome and expensive foray into the world of wellness, she 'doesn't recommend a single product, practice, or service, although she does name one tip that helped her,' McClear notes. 'It's a simple breathing exercise. And it's free.' America's wellness methods have changed over time—sometimes evolving for the better. (The 1859 letter, for instance, details how some philosophers believed in being as sedentary as possible because 'trees lived longer than men because they never stirred from their places.') Even so, as skyrocketing costs and medical mistrust plague American health care, the wellness industry churns out a carousel of treatments, touting sweeping benefits that are often dubious at best. Compared with the many big promises that 'gravity' colonics and supplement companies might make, most health tips that have stood the test of time are far more quotidian: sleep, exercise, breathe. Their simplicity can be both healing and accessible. The body has 'power and beauty,' the anonymous writer noted more than a century ago, 'when we consent to give it a fair chance.'
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
Internet Stunned As Before and After X-Rays of Back Surgery Go Viral
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A man has gone viral after posting dramatic before-and-after X-rays of his spine following surgery to correct severe scoliosis. The Reddit user, who goes by u/Sure_Pangolin_9421, titled his post: "After a 6-hour surgery on March 11, I'm cured of scoliosis!" The powerful transformation struck a chord online, amassing over 21,000 upvotes. The Redditor underwent what is known as spinal fusion—a technique used to permanently join two or more vertebrae in the spine. To understand more about the condition, Newsweek spoke with Dr. Nikita Kanani, a U.K.-based general practitioner. She said: "Scoliosis is a condition where the spine curves sideways, often forming an 'S' or 'C' shape. "In most cases, the cause is unknown—this is called idiopathic scoliosis. But it can also result from congenital conditions, neurological or muscular disorders like cerebral palsy, or injury. Hormonal changes, growth spurts, and genetics may also contribute, especially during adolescence." Who Is Affected by Scoliosis? Nearly 7 million people in the U.S. are living with scoliosis, making it the most common spinal condition among school-aged children, according to the National Scoliosis Foundation. The Reddit user recalled the impact of the condition on his younger years, commenting: "I got called the sideways hunchback of Notre Dame in high school. It was very painful." Kanani, the chief strategy and innovation officer at Aneira Health, a digital healthcare provider focused on women's health noted that scoliosis can affect anyone. But it typically emerges during puberty and is more frequently diagnosed in girls. "Girls are also more likely to require treatment, even though most cases are mild. Adults may develop scoliosis too—usually due to age-related degeneration in the spine," she said. How Does Scoliosis Affect Daily Life? "For some people, scoliosis causes little disruption," said Kanani. "But for others, it can result in pain, reduced mobility, fatigue, and lower self-esteem—especially during adolescence. In more severe cases, it can even impair heart or lung function. The emotional toll is significant, and that's why care should be holistic—not just focused on the curvature, but on the whole person." Post-surgery, the man reported a remarkable recovery. "I feel great," he told fellow Redditors. "I'm in no pain at all aside from the occasional shoulder ache. It's amazing how fast the body heals from something so drastic." He added: "I have very good mobility, for which I'm very grateful." Reddit Reacts Three x-rays showing a scoliosis without (left) and with implant (right). Three x-rays showing a scoliosis without (left) and with implant (right). oceandigital/iStock / Getty Images Plus Support and admiration poured in from fellow users. One wrote: "So happy for you, I've dealt with this for years—biggest advice is always stretch, it really helps." Another commented: "Awesome. Very brave to go through. Glad you're doing well." A third added: "Congrats, very happy for you. I've seen the surgery on YouTube—it looks painful. But I bet it's a thousand times better than the alternative." Newsweek reached out to u/Sure_Pangolin_9421 for comment. We could not verify the details of the case.
