logo
German police criticised for treatment of AfD-supporting teenager

German police criticised for treatment of AfD-supporting teenager

Times03-07-2025
German police have been rebuked by a judge for 'disproportionately' hauling a teenage girl out of a classroom and interrogating her over several right-wing memes and symbols she had posted on the internet.
The 17-year-old is a vocal supporter of the hard-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which has portrayed her as a martyr to the country's restrictions on free speech.
She became a national cause célèbre in February last year after the headmaster of her school in Ribnitz-Damgarten, a town between Rostock and Stralsund on the Baltic coast, received an anonymous email alleging that she was publishing extremist videos on TikTok, the social media platform.
• AfD designated as 'right-wing extremist' by German intelligence
The incident is widely known in Germany as the 'Smurf case' because the girl had written that 'the Smurfs are blue and so is east Germany', a reference to the AfD's party colours and its strong performance in polls ahead of regional elections.
However, it appears that the investigation related to eight other posts, including one where she had used the nativist slogan 'No 'Yallah Yallah' — in Germany we speak German', which derides migrants' use of Arabic in the county.
In another, she posted 'Homeland, liberty, tradition, last stop for multiculturalism', words associated with the right-wing extremist Identitarian movement.
She also released a video of herself surrounded by nationalist symbols such as runes and wearing a jacket that bore the initials 'HH', the logo of the manufacturer Helly Hansen but which could also have been interpreted as an abbreviation of 'Heil Hitler'.
The headmaster informed local police and three armed officers entered the school while the girl, who was 16 at the time, was in the middle of a class. The head took her out of the classroom and the officers questioned her in his office.
The teenager was notified that she was being treated as a potential danger to the German state and might be breaking the law by using banned political symbols or publishing other kinds of extremist content.
Ultimately, the schoolgirl was not charged. Police said there had been insufficient grounds to suspect her of extremism in the first place.
The AfD turned the case into an emblem of the supposed persecution of right-wing views by the authorities. Alice Weidel, the party's co-leader and candidate for the chancellorship, called it an 'intolerable transgression'.
The incident also drew international attention, the tech billionaire Elon Musk among those expressing surprise at her arrest.
The girl's family then sued the police force and the interior ministry of the local Mecklenburg-West Pomerania region. Their lawyer, Ralf Stark, compared the girl's treatment to the socialist police state of the former East Germany.
On Tuesday, the administrative court in Greifswald ruled that the police had broken the law because their approach had been out of proportion to the seriousness of the allegations against the girl. 'There would have been gentler measures than immediately taking the schoolgirl out of class and taking her to the school office alongside police officers in full view of the rest of the school,' the court said.
• What is AfD? The reasons behind rise of the hard right in Germany
A separate lawsuit brought by the family against the head teacher and the education ministry has yet to begin.
The girl's mother told Junge Freiheit, a newspaper aligned with the AfD: 'My daughter should be rehabilitated. It's important that my daughter receives justice here because she committed no crime, and both the interior and education ministries have always defended the behaviour of the police and the head teacher.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

One month until TikTok could be banned (again). What you need to know
One month until TikTok could be banned (again). What you need to know

The Herald Scotland

timea day ago

  • The Herald Scotland

One month until TikTok could be banned (again). What you need to know

In late July, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview that if China did not approve a U.S.-drafted deal to sell the platform's American assets, the app would go dark again, once the next ban extension expires on Sept. 17. "If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark," Lutnick previously said. "And those decisions are coming very soon, so let's see what the Chinese do. They've got to approve it. The deal is over to them right now." The White House did not immediately respond for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on Aug. 15. When could TikTok go dark (again) in the US? The next deadline for TikTok to be sold by ByteDance is Sept. 17. Why is TikTok at risk of getting banned? Some government officials are concerned that TikTok poses a national security threat, believing that ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, is sharing U.S. user data with China. TikTok has repeatedly denied these claims. In January, the platform went dark for less than 24 hours under federal legislation signed into law by former President Joe Biden in 2024. Trump has signed executive orders three times now that push back the deadline for when TikTok must be sold, promising that deals with China are on the horizon. The latest was in early July, when Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was hopeful Chinese President Xi would agree to a deal to see the platform to the U.S. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@

Migrant who filmed ‘how to kill your wife' rant fled to UK after being sacked from fast food job as he was always late
Migrant who filmed ‘how to kill your wife' rant fled to UK after being sacked from fast food job as he was always late

Scottish Sun

time2 days ago

  • Scottish Sun

Migrant who filmed ‘how to kill your wife' rant fled to UK after being sacked from fast food job as he was always late

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MIGRANT who told men online how 'to kill your wife' was sacked from his job flipping burgers because he was always late. Parwiz Hanifyar was dismissed from a Berlin branch of chicken and kebab takeaway shop Munchies last year. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 6 Parwiz Hanifyar was sacked from his job flipping burgers because he was always late Credit: Tiktok 6 He was was axed from a Berlin branch of chicken and kebab takeaway shop Munchies Credit: Munchies Kreuzberg 6 The migrant told men online how 'to kill your wife' in a sick video Credit: TikTok The boat migrant — who lived in Germany for up to three years — came to the UK on a dinghy on Saturday. And we can reveal he was working for cash before coming across the Channel to get bed and board for free. German asylum seekers are able to apply for work permits after three months to earn money in lieu of support. After 15 months, if their claim has not been processed, they can work any role without restrictions. Hanifyar, in his 20s, is believed to have been sacked in mid-December. In a letter seen by The Sun, a manager said: 'We hereby terminate your employment with Munchies during the probationary period.' A source said: 'He was dismissed due to a lack of language skills and repeated unpunctuality. 'He didn't act professionally and was terminated before probation.' We can also reveal he had been living in charity-funded 'refugee accommodation' on the outskirts of Berlin's Märkisch-Oderland. It means he had both a home and access to work in Germany — but still chose to ditch it for the UK. Coach-load of asylum seekers SPRINT into 4-star London migrant hotel after protests erupt outside We told yesterday how Hanifyar filmed himself on TikTok giving a guide to men on how to kill their wives if they attempt to leave them. He also posted from his London hotel room but the account was banned after we notified TikTok. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp led calls for his deportation. 6 The TikTok asylum seeker smirking on dinghy to the UK 6 The illegal migrant shared social posts wearing a balaclava

Vile TikTok migrant sticking fingers up at Britain is a symbol of our pathetic borders… we are being taken for a ride
Vile TikTok migrant sticking fingers up at Britain is a symbol of our pathetic borders… we are being taken for a ride

The Sun

time2 days ago

  • The Sun

Vile TikTok migrant sticking fingers up at Britain is a symbol of our pathetic borders… we are being taken for a ride

BRITISH taxpayers who work all hours to make ends meet have every reason to feel angered by a TikTok video posted last week by Parwiz Hanifyar. He is the Afghan migrant who gloated about his journey to Britain and his stay at a four-star hotel. 3 They have even more reason to be disgusted by a video clip which has subsequently emerged of him appearing to advise men who want to kill their estranged wives to drink heavily first, in the belief that it will lessen their sentence. But in one sense he has done us all a favour. He has destroyed once and for all the pretence that all migrants who come to our shores to seek asylum are 'desperate' and fleeing for their lives. That is what we are told continuously by refugee charities and advocacy groups: That they are deeply traumatised people who have fallen victim to people-traffickers because they cannot see any other option to save their lives — and we should all be generous to them as a result. I don't know much about Hanifyar's situation, other than the reports I have read suggesting that he has spent the past few years living in not-very-war-torn France and Germany. I can't say he looks all that traumatised to me. Were he genuinely fleeing from danger, you would expect him to be deeply grateful for the help he received from Border Agency officials who scooped him and his fellow migrants from their boat mid English Channel and sped them to Britain. You would think he would want to show his appreciation to the people of Britain. Instead, the tone of his now-defunct TikTok channel is one of gloating — and taking the mickey out of people whose taxes are funding his new life. 'Tell your friends to come,' he said to his 70,000 followers. He then went on, appearing to advertise the services of people-smugglers: 'Why are you so stingy? Being stingy is not good for God. You see, I risked my life! Why don't you come? My wish was to come to this hotel and live. I came here just for this.' Migrant housed in UK asylum hotel promoted how to kill 'cheating wives' with a razor blade Showing us all around his room at the Crowne Plaza at Heathrow, with its freshly pressed sheets and puffed-up pillows, he then says: 'This is dedicated to those haters who were happy thinking we either drowned or ended up dead.' Since his video was removed from TikTok, a darker side to Hanifyar has emerged. Taken for a ride In an earlier clip which seems to have been made in Germany in recent weeks, he put himself in the hypothetical situation of wanting to murder his wife. 'Before I kill her I drink a bottle of alcohol,' he says. 'When the police comes, they say, he was drunk.' I disassociate myself from anyone who wishes harm to Hanifyar or any other migrant, but police must now investigate what he posted, just as they — rightfully — do people who have called for attacks on migrants. A functioning asylum system would dismiss out of hand any claim by someone who has advocated violence. The reaction to Hanifyar's videos needs to go further than that. This, finally, needs to be the moment of realisation that Britain and its high-principled asylum system is being taken for a ride. 3 Listen to the refugee charities and you would think that no economic migrant ever tried to cheat the asylum system by posing as someone fleeing from danger, either by faking their nationality or by falsely claiming to be Christian, or gay. You would think that no migrant ever came here to commit a crime or involve themselves in terrorism. Sadly, we know that there are many migrants who have done just these things. Worse, our asylum system, which cravenly defers to the human rights establishment, so often refuses to deport them. The tragedy is that our failure to weed out the criminals, liars and chancers makes it much harder to help those who are genuinely fleeing for their lives. Like everything else in a democratic society, the asylum system ultimately depends on public consent, and cases of migrants fooling the system are utterly poisonous to public opinion on asylum. No one should be taken in by the swift action of TikTok, encouraged by the Prime Minister, to remove Hanifyar's video. In some ways, I wish it had stayed up so as to symbolise our pathetic borders policy. Even if this individual ends up being removed from Britain — and I am not holding my breath for that — there will be many others of his kind who will be waved through. Even if this individual ends up being removed from Britain — and I am not holding my breath for that — there will be many others of his kind who will be waved through We are not going to have a sensible borders policy until we can wrest it back from the human rights lawyers and become serious about what are supposed to be the rules — not least that if you want to claim asylum, you must do so in the first safe country you reach. We should be deeply suspicious of the motives of any asylum-seeker who has come here from France, unless they can claim a need to flee from Emmanuel Macron's government. boatloads of mostly young men who are sticking their fingers up at Britain.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store