Malayalam film directors Khalid Rahman, Ashraf Hamza arrested for possession of hybrid ganja
The arrested individuals have been identified as Khalid Rahman and Ashraf Hamza, both known for their contributions to the Malayalam film industry, along with their friend, Shalif Mohammed.
The arrest occurred after a thorough investigation led by the Excise authorities, which culminated in the discovery of 1.6 grams of hybrid ganja in the possession of the suspects.
While the operation itself was swift, it has sparked significant attention due to the high-profile status of the individuals involved.
Khalid Rahman, known for his critically acclaimed film 'Manjummel Boys' and Ashraf Hamza, who gained recognition with his debut film 'Thamaasha', were both taken into custody under the provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.
According to sources within the Excise Department, the three individuals were found with the drugs during the operation, and the authorities did not uncover any further illicit substances during their investigation.
The filmmakers and their associate were granted station bail shortly after the detention.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
5 days ago
- Khaleej Times
Shwetha Menon appointed as AMMA president after Mohanlal steps down
After months of controversy, actor Shwetha Menon has been elected as the first-ever female president of the Association of Malayalam Movie Artistes (AMMA). Menon opened up about her recent appointment, stating that she has planned to bring changes to necessary matters. "I haven't planned anything..I do have an is a very big don't expect miracles, but we will be doing something for a change," she said. The much-awaited election results for the AMMA presidential position came nearly a year after her predecessor, the superstar Mohanlal, resigned in August 2024. He resigned as the head of the 17-member executive committee over growing allegations of sexual abuse within the Malayalam film industry. The allegations surfaced in the Justice K Hema Committee's report on the working conditions of women in the Malayalam film industry. At that time, all other executive members also resigned from their positions. The controversy stemmed from several complaints and allegations from many female actors in the wake of the Hema Committee report. The government also formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the hardships faced by women in the industry. A redacted version of the Justice Hema Committee report was also made public, shedding light on harassment faced by women in the Malayalam film industry. The 235-page report noted that the industry is controlled by 10 to 15 male producers, directors, and actors who have been dominating and exerting control. Earlier in January this year, Malayalam actor Unni Mukundan stepped down as the AMMA treasurer, citing increasing work commitments that had affected his "mental health".
The National
13-08-2025
- The National
Western attempts to curb criticism of Israel will come at a cost
Demonstrations over the same issue were held in London and Kuala Lumpur last weekend. In one, the authorities kept order in good cheer. In the other, heavy-handed policing led to hundreds of arrests, amid much commentary about a fearful chilling of free speech. In the past, some might have expected the second to have been the demo in Kuala Lumpur, or in Jakarta or Bangkok, where there have also been pro-Palestinian rallies. But it was in London that 522 people were arrested for protesting against the British government's decision to ban a group called Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act 2000. What has Palestine Action done? Activists broke into a Royal Air Force base in June and sprayed two planes with red paint, but the group's co-founder Huda Ammori has quoted the UK's Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre's assessment that 'Palestine Action does not advocate for violence against persons'. British Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, however, insists that it 'is not a non-violent organisation', and has defended the proscription, which makes membership of, or support for, Palestine Action a criminal offence, with a sentence of up to 14 years in prison. This puts the group and its supporters in the same legal bracket as Al Qaeda or ISIS – which has been condemned by the former Labour cabinet minister Peter Hain as 'intellectually bankrupt, politically unprincipled and morally wrong'. Both the suffragettes who fought for the right of women to vote in Britain, and the anti-apartheid protests that Mr Hain led as a young man, would have been labelled as terrorist under this order, he told the House of Lords earlier this month. 'Frankly I am deeply ashamed,' he said. Mr Hain is not alone in this view. Many believe that this is yet another case of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government bending over backwards to please supporters of the Israeli administration of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by restricting entirely legitimate criticism of what a host of distinguished scholars and organisations have called Israel's 'genocidal' campaign in Gaza. He may not have had this issue in mind, but US Vice President JD Vance was at least partly right when he warned against Europe going down a 'very dark path' on free speech during his recent stay with UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy. 'The entire collective West got a little too comfortable with censoring rather than engaging with a diverse range of opinions,' he said. What is the proscription of Palestine Action, if not exactly that? The very obviously respectable people who have been arrested for supporting the group makes the decision appear even more draconian. No wonder Mr Hain declared that the ban would 'end in tears for the government', and if a legal challenge succeeded, it 'would be a mercy to all concerned, including the government'. European-style free speech has not been the norm in most South-East Asian countries. Nevertheless, when regional readers put forth legislation that further limits freedom of expression, they can and do defend it stoutly. In 2016, then-Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak introduced two laws on terrorism and security that critics said curtailed civil liberties. His response? 'I make no apology for placing the safety and security of all Malaysians as my foremost priority,' he said. 'The best way to protect civil liberties is to ensure national security.' Likewise, Singapore's PAP government had no qualms earlier this year about passing The Maintenance of Racial Harmony Act, which allows the Home Minister to issue restraining orders against individuals or entities 'for conduct that causes feelings of enmity, hatred, ill will or hostility between different races in Singapore'. Anyone breaking an order faces up to two years in prison. Britain's Labour government, on the other hand, is currently defending what is seen by most people as indefensible. Look at who has been arrested over the proscription of Palestine Action – they include a retired magistrate, a war hero colonel, and Jonathon Porritt, a baronet and former environmental adviser to King Charles III. These are hardly dangerous revolutionaries. Pointing out that about half of those arrested over the weekend were aged 60 and above, including almost 100 in their seventies and 15 in their eighties, the editor of Prospect magazine, Alan Rusbridger, published an article headlined: 'Dubbing tame pensioners as 'terrorists' makes a farce out of the Terrorism Act – and freedom of speech.' 'It's a funny old world when Margaret Thatcher had a greater sense of individual liberty than Keir Starmer,' wrote Rusbridger, who is also a former editor of The Guardian. It's a funny old world when there is greater free speech in South-East Asia than in Europe and the US, where politicians never stop crowing about their love of liberty But Britain is far from alone. In the US and Germany, the authorities have attempted to deport pro-Palestinian activists. Social media posts are being scanned, and the possibility of being detained or put on the first plane home is no joke. A Qatari friend was recently due to attend an old associate's wedding in America, but told me he thought he'd better not risk it. His comments on X don't support terrorism, but he does repost reports critical of Israel. He was probably right not to go. So on an issue that is one of the most crucial of the day, the UK, Europe and the US have been denying the right to free speech, whereas in South-East Asian countries – so often criticised on human rights issues – citizens can have their say. And people can see why. This is very dangerous in terms of isolating Israel even further; it risks fuelling anti-Semitism, and the allegations that the so-called Israeli lobby influences western governments and western media – with honourable exceptions – is now widespread. There was a time when to state that view was to expect an accusation of anti-Semitism to follow pretty soon, and in the past, I have pushed back against anything that smacked of age-old conspiracy theories. But when an eminent Malaysian businessman and one of the country's top diplomats talked to me about the Israeli lobby's dominance over the West in the past week, I couldn't demure. They would have been incredulous if I had tried to argue to the contrary. Just take the issue of Palestine Action. To echo Rusbridger, it's a funny old world when there is greater free speech in South-East Asia than in Europe and the US, where politicians never stop crowing about their love of liberty. But liberty for whom? Not for Palestinians or their supporters, it would appear. A reckoning will come – indeed, it is already coming – and contrary to their efforts, it may hurt the state and the people that these politicians have been covering up for the most.
Khaleej Times
11-08-2025
- Khaleej Times
UAE authority seizes over 17.6 million of illegal goods in first half of 2025
The Federal Tax Authority (FTA) seized more than 17.6 million non-compliant excise goods — including tobacco products, soft drinks, energy drinks, and sweetened beverages — during record nationwide inspections in the first half of 2025. The 85,500 field visits carried out between January and June marked a 110.7 per cent jump from the same period last year, bringing in Dh357.22 million in taxes and fines — up 86.29 per cent from Dh191.75 million in 2024. The campaigns were conducted in cooperation with local authorities. Among the seizures were 11.52 million packs of tobacco without Digital Tax Stamps and not registered in the FTA's electronic system, more than double last year's 5.52 million packs. Introduced in 2019, the stamp system allows each pack to be tracked from production or import through to sale, ensuring excise tax is paid and curbing smuggling and counterfeiting. Inspectors also confiscated 6.1 million bottles and cans of non-compliant beverages — more than 3.5 times the 1.74 million seized in the first half of 2024. Under UAE excise tax law, carbonated drinks, energy drinks, and sweetened beverages are taxed to reduce consumption of unhealthy products. From 2026, sugar-sweetened beverages will be taxed according to sugar content, replacing the current flat rate. Sara AlHabshi, Executive Director of Tax Compliance at the FTA, said the authority's use of advanced digital monitoring tools has strengthened market oversight and improved enforcement efficiency. 'These technologies are critical in identifying and removing smuggled goods that fail to meet UAE tax requirements,' she said, adding that inspections will continue nationwide to protect consumers and ensure businesses comply with tax laws.
