logo
Pro-Russian hackers claim to have targeted several UK websites

Pro-Russian hackers claim to have targeted several UK websites

The Guardian07-05-2025
A pro-Russian hacking group has claimed to have successfully targeted a range of UK websites, including local councils and the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, during a three-day campaign.
In a series of social media posts, the group calling itself NoName057(16) suggested it had made a number of websites temporarily inaccessible, although it is understood the attacks were not wholly successful.
The hackers sought to flood a range of websites with internet traffic in what is known as a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack. The group wrote on X: 'Britain is invested in the escalation of the [Ukraine] conflict, and we are disconnecting its resources.'
Its success was limited, however, with councils in Blackburn and Darwen and Exeter among those reporting that their website was unaffected despite the hacking group's claims of success.
A number of other allegedly targeted organisations, including the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, Harwich International Port, the National Highways and Cardiff city council were unavailable for comment.
Where websites did temporarily become inaccessible due to the sudden surge of traffic, they were back operating within hours, officials said.
A spokesperson at Arun district council said: 'We can confirm that we did experience problems with our website [on Tuesday morning] starting around 7.15am, our website was fully operational by 11.30am. We are aware of the claims made on X and continue to investigate.'
The attack is a rerun of an attempt made last October to disrupt the websites of half a dozen councils. It did not put at risk the data of users or residents but disabled the websites for a short period as they were swamped by traffic.
The National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) said at the time that the agency had 'provided guidance' to affected local authorities. 'Whilst DDoS attacks are relatively low in sophistication and impact, they can cause disruption by preventing legitimate users from accessing online services,' it said.
Since its launch in 2022, NoName057(16) has used such attacks to disrupt the running of a range of Ukrainian, European and American government agencies and media outlets. In January 2023, it targeted the websites of Czech presidential candidates in a first attempt to attack political figures.
Research published last summer by the cybersecurity company Bridewell found that 63% of businesses in the government sector had experienced a ransomware attack over the past 12 months. The National Audit Office warned in January that the 'cyber threat to UK government is severe and advancing quickly'.
The NCSC was forced to issue new guidance this week after a spate of cyber-attacks on retailers that appear to have been made possible through criminals impersonating IT help desks. They include attacks on Marks & Spencer, Co-op and Harrods.
The criminals had targeted IT help desks to change passwords and reset authentication processes as they sought to gain access to systems.
Of the attacks on retailers, the NCSC said it was 'not yet in a position to say if they are linked, if this is a concerted campaign by a single actor or whether there is no link between them at all'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I told Jeremy Corbyn starting a new party was a bad idea, says Diane Abbott
I told Jeremy Corbyn starting a new party was a bad idea, says Diane Abbott

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

I told Jeremy Corbyn starting a new party was a bad idea, says Diane Abbott

Diane Abbott advised Jeremy Corbyn against setting up a new political party, she said, over concerns it would struggle to get a foothold in Britain because of the voting system. Ms Abbott, who served as Mr Corbyn's shadow home secretary when he was Labour leader, said she had spoken to him before its launch, and said it was not a good idea. Speaking at an event at the Edinburgh Book Festival, the current longest-serving female MP said: 'There were people around Jeremy encouraging him to set up a new party, and I told him not to. 'It's very difficult under first-past-the-post system for a new party to absolutely win. If it wasn't first-past-the-post, then you can see how a new party could come through, but I understand why he did it.' Ms Abbott said she thought the party, formed by her long-time friend Mr Corbyn alongside independent MP Zarah Sultana, would outperform people's expectations. It was launched last month, but is still without a formal name. She said she believed it would take advantage of a broader discontent with politics in Britain. She paid tribute to Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana but said: 'At this point in time, it's difficult to see how a brand new party wins. 'However, I think Jeremy's party is going to do a lot better than people think because a lot of people who are not necessarily terribly left-wing people, are a tiny bit disappointed about the way we've gone in the past year.' The MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington indicated her disappointment with the Labour government. She had the whip withdrawn for the second time in two years in July, after she expressed a lack of regret about comments to the Observer in 2023 that suggested that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism. However, she implied she would not join Mr Corbyn's party. Ms Abbott said: 'It's a tricky state of play. I wouldn't have thought that you'd have a Labour government and they'd be cutting winter fuel allowance for the elderly and benefits for the disabled.' She was also critical of the Government's proscription of Palestine Action and labelled the decision 'a complete disgrace'. 'What they are seeking to do is proscribe protest as such,' she said. 'I mean, we all saw the pictures of the people in Trafalgar Square – 500 people? Half of them over 60. Come on, these are terrorists? I think this is an attempt to bear down on (protest).' She added her more than 40 years in Labour meant it was too late to leave it. She was elected to Parliament in 1987, and was the only black female MP in the Commons for a decade until Labour's landslide under Tony Blair. In response to a question about whether she thought she would ever be accepted 'at the heart' of the Labour Party, she replied: 'I think I am at the heart of the Labour Party, it's other people who aren't.' Ms Abbott, whose book A Woman Like Me was the subject of the interview in the Scottish capital by campaigner Talat Yaqoob, also told the audience of her anger at not being called by Commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle in the aftermath of racist comments by Conservative Party donor Frank Hester in 2024. She said she had stood during a Prime Minister's Question session more than 40 times to be called to speak, after Sir Keir Starmer, Rishi Sunak and Sir Ed Davey had all spoken about the incident. Mr Hester was reported to have said Ms Abbott made him want to 'hate all black women' and that she 'should be shot'. The remarks brought widespread condemnation, including from Sir Keir, but she told the event her office was used to receiving racist abuse. 'I've been an MP for 38 years, and custom practice in the chamber is if you're being talked about, you get called. It's just a courtesy. I was so shocked that I wasn't called. 'But I heard later from someone who had reason to know, that what happened was that Rishi didn't want me called, because (Hester) was a Tory donor and it would look bad for them, and I'm afraid Keir Starmer didn't want me called because he wanted to milk the issue (for) political advantage, without mentioning me.' She said Sir Keir had approached her after the questions session and asked what he could do to help. 'I said, 'Yes, you can restore the whip'. And as if he hadn't heard, he said, 'Is there anything I can do for you?' It was like he was deaf. And I said, 'Yes, you can restore the whip', and he realised I wasn't going to play that game and he went off.'

Jury discharged in trial of former Nine O'Clock Service priest Christopher Brain
Jury discharged in trial of former Nine O'Clock Service priest Christopher Brain

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Jury discharged in trial of former Nine O'Clock Service priest Christopher Brain

A jury has been discharged in the trial of a former priest who was the leader of the Nine O'Clock Service evangelical movement. Christopher Brain, 68, from Wilmslow, Cheshire, was charged with one count of rape and 36 counts of indecent assault between 1981 and 1995 against 13 women. He pleaded not guilty to all charges. He was the leader of the Nine O'Clock Service (NOS), part of the Church of England, in Sheffield between 1986 and 1995. The 11-strong jury, sitting at Inner London Crown Court, was discharged by Judge Freya Newbery on Thursday after failing to reach a verdict on five counts, having started deliberations on August 12. The judge told the jurors: 'I am going to discharge you now on those counts. For you it all comes to an end now. 'I am really grateful for such a lot of time that you have given.' Ms Newbury gave the jurors the option of exemption from jury service if summoned within the next 10 years. A further hearing to determine whether prosecutors believe there are grounds for a retrial for the charges was set for September 4. On Wednesday, jurors at Inner London Crown Court found him guilty of 17 counts of indecent assault against nine women. However, he was acquitted of another 15 charges of indecent assault against two women. The jury is still deliberating the rape charge and four further counts of indecent assault. The seven-week trial heard how Brain, 68, was praised by the Archbishop of Canterbury after his 'club culture' inspired services at St Thomas' Church in Crookes, Sheffield, and later Ponds Forge leisure centre, drew hundreds of young congregants. He was fast-tracked for Holy Orders as the movement took off, but it collapsed in controversy in 1995 after women alleged their charismatic leader had been sexually assaulting them, in some cases claiming he was helping to heal their sexual repression.

Anti-Putin activist, 26, 'took his own life' after asylum bid was rejected as he 'feared being sent back to Russia'
Anti-Putin activist, 26, 'took his own life' after asylum bid was rejected as he 'feared being sent back to Russia'

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Anti-Putin activist, 26, 'took his own life' after asylum bid was rejected as he 'feared being sent back to Russia'

An anti-Putin activist has been found dead in London after his asylum bid was rejected. After more than a year's wait for an appeal hearing, Alexander Frolov, 26, was found dead in Acton, west London, on July 28. His friends believe that he took his own life because of the mental pressure of being sent back to Russia. Originally arriving in the UK under a temporary visa as an agricultural worker in 2021, Alexander submitted his asylum application in December 2022. When Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, his friend Galina Shakirova said he was unable to return home as he 'refused to take part in killing people'. According to The i Paper, his asylum application was rejected in April 2024. Alexander had appealed the decision and was waiting for his hearing to be rescheduled when he died. Metropolitan Police are not believed to be investigating any suspicious circumstances into his death and an inquest will be held next week. He was described by the Russian Democratic Society as a 'dedicated opponent of Putin's regime'. They added he was a 'volunteer who gave his time to help others, and a constant presence at anti-war protests'. 'Alexander believed in the possibility of a free and democratic Russia and hoped to one day return to it,' the group said. His friend Galina, who met Alexander when they worked together as stewards at anti-war rally, called him 'kind, generous, quietly dependable'. She said: 'Imagine being an opposition activist who knows that returning home almost certainly means prison. You've spoken out publicly. You've worked with organisations labelled in Russia as 'undesirable' or 'extremist'. 'Then you ask for protection – hoping for safety, for a chance to survive. And instead, you're refused.' The Home Office said: 'It is our long-standing policy not to comment on individual cases.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store