Punjab leader of opposition Partap Singh Bajwa slams AAP govt for bypassing parliamentary conventions
1
2
Chandigarh:
Partap Singh Bajwa
, leader of opposition in the Punjab vidhan sabha, criticised the AAP govt for bypassing established parliamentary conventions by denying the chairmanship of the
public accounts committee
(PAC) to the opposition.
In a letter addressed to the speaker of the Punjab assembly, Bajwa expressed "deep concern and anguish", asserting that the appointment of an opposition member as PAC chair is not a courtesy but a democratic imperative. He stressed that this convention, upheld since the 1960s across party lines, is vital to maintaining legislative oversight, ensuring transparency, and safeguarding the proper use of public funds.
"This move by the AAP govt reflects a deliberate attempt to shield itself from scrutiny and evade accountability. The PAC is not a partisan committee—it is a cornerstone of responsible governance," Bajwa stated.
He further cautioned that the govt's decision raises serious questions about the impartiality of democratic institutions in Punjab and signals a worrying erosion of institutional autonomy. "By denying the opposition its rightful role, the govt is setting a dangerous precedent and undermining public trust in the legislative process," he added.
Bajwa pointed out that during the previous Congress-led regime, the convention of appointing an opposition member as PAC chair was honoured, even while the party held power. He urged the speaker to uphold the dignity of the House and act beyond partisan interests.
Reaffirming his commitment to
democratic principles
, Bajwa vowed to continue defending institutional integrity and ensuring that the voices of the people of Punjab are not silenced through procedural manipulation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
'Doing everything which is against Muslims': Congress leader Rashid Alvi on 11 years of NDA government under PM Modi
Congress leader Rashid Alvi has attacked the Bharatiya Janata Party-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) for targeting Muslims by passing laws while failing to tackle the people's inflation problems. Alvi's remarks came on 9 June, as the NDA government under Prime Minister Narendra Modi completed 11 years in power at the Centre. "I have to say with regret that you brought the law of triple talaq against the Muslims. Brought the law of Waqf against Muslims, You are doing everything in this country which is against Muslims," Congress leader Rashid Alvi told news agency ANI. The Congress leader highlighted the failures of the Modi-led government by criticising demonetisation, repealing Article 370, not listening to farmers, and not keeping inflation in check. "You don't realise that during demonetisation, during the summer, so many people died, that is your minus point, and you think of it as a plus point. You used to claim that with demonitisation, black money would be finished, is it finished though? Also said that terror will end, but did terror finish? Just now, so many people died in Pahalgam," he said. Narendra Modi took oath as Prime Minister for the third time on 9 June 2024, With 293 MPs, the NDA comfortably exceeded the majority mark of 272 in the 543-member Lok Sabha after the 2024 general elections. Put 8 lakh soldiers in J&K Continuing his jibe at BJP over Kashmir, he added, 'You removed (Article) 370 (from Kashmir), put people in jail, and put 8 lakh soldiers there, but in the last 11 years did you give jobs to people, have you reduced inflation? The Petrol-diesel which you have bought for ₹ 35-40 you are giving the same for ₹ 100 to the people of the country. Farmers kept sitting for two years, you were not ready to listen to them.' As Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led NDA government completed 11 years at the Centre, BJP President and Union Minister JP Nadda highlighted the various achievements of the government, including good governance, change in India's "political culture," and several bold decisions made. You are doing everything in this country which is against Muslims. Nadda said during a press conference, "The work done under PM Modi's leadership is written in the golden words because of the unimaginable and unique works. PM Modi has changed the country's politics, political culture. The country was appeased 11 years ago. Earlier, saving a political chair by dividing the society was the norm."
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab: Sukhbir flays AAP for ‘selling govt bonds' for land acquisition
Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) president Sukhbir Singh Badal on Monday condemned the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government for 'selling government bonds to finance the acquisition of 24,000 acres of fertile farm land' adjoining the city. Terming the exercise as needless, he alleged that the government was doing so to fill its own coffers. He said the move was a multi-hundred crore scam. While talking to newsmen here, the SAD president said, 'While the taxpayer will pay exorbitant interest on the ₹1,000 crore being borrowed to fund the land acquisition, the AAP will use the acquisition process to make money. It is promising change of land use in back dates to property dealers and land sharks in exchange for bribes.' Asserting this was the reason why the chief minister had turned a blind eye to the plight of thousands of farmers whose fertile lands would be 'snatched', Sukhbir said, 'The SAD is committed to saving this farm land. We are also committed to exposing this scam and bringing those responsible for these corrupt practices to book once the SAD forms the government in the state.' Asserting that the AAP government was bankrupting the state, the SAD chief said, 'The state's debt has crossed ₹4 lakh crore. Out of this, ₹1 lakh crore has been borrowed by the AAP government in the last three years. At this rate, the debt burden will increase by another ₹50,000 crore by the time the tenure of this government ends.' He said despite such big borrowings, the AAP government had nothing to show by way of development. 'Look around. Do you see any development work? In fact, the condition of roads, lights and sewerage is in its worst ever phase. All development work from bridges, flyovers to extension of the road network has been done during the previous SAD governments.' 'The social benefits have been drastically reduced or completely stopped, be it the aata daal or the Shagun scheme,' he added. CM Bhagwant Mann has already asserted that the government is not resorting to forceful acquisition of land but seeking the consent of farmers for sustainable urban development projects.
Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- Indian Express
A T20 for the Global South: The case for an India-led bloc against terrorism
The terror attack in Pahalgam and the subsequent Indian military response, Operation Sindoor, have once again brought into sharp focus a reality that many in the Global South live with daily: Terrorism is not just an isolated security threat, it is an ongoing war by other means. While India showcased military precision and diplomatic discipline during the crisis, the global response to its actions also exposed gaps in the current international system's ability to credibly and swiftly respond to terror. From these developments emerges a compelling case for a new platform, an India-led initiative: The T20 — Twenty Against Terrorism. The Pahalgam terror attack, audacious in its planning and brutal in its execution, sparked public outrage and political consensus within India. Operation Sindoor, a swift, targeted military campaign in response, reaffirmed India's doctrine of proactive defence. Yet, while the operation achieved its tactical goals, the international diplomatic terrain proved more complex. While allies like the United States, France, and Israel tacitly or overtly supported India, other global institutions such as the United Nations and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) defaulted to calls for 'restraint' and 'dialogue' without assigning responsibility. China, predictably, shielded Pakistan diplomatically. Russia, once a reliable strategic partner, chose calibrated silence. This pattern is familiar and frustrating. The international architecture for counter-terrorism — including the UN, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and the Global Counterterrorism Forum — either lacks teeth, is entangled in geopolitical rivalries, or remains anchored in a Western security paradigm that does not fully reflect the lived realities of terrorism in South Asia, Africa, or the Middle East. The idea of T20 — Twenty Against Terrorism — stems from this chronic mismatch between global terror frameworks and the regional intensity of the threat. It proposes a dedicated alliance of 20 countries, led by India, comprising nations from the Global South who face frequent, asymmetrical, and politically complex terror threats. These include Indonesia, Nigeria, Kenya, Egypt, Mali, Fiji, the Philippines, and others — countries that, like India, often find themselves battling both state-sponsored and ideologically driven terrorist violence without adequate global support. The mandate of T20 would not be to duplicate existing institutions but to supplement them with agility, real-time coordination, and a Global South-first perspective. It would focus on intelligence sharing through a joint task force; capacity building and counter-radicalisation programmes; joint diplomatic statements to name and shame state sponsors of terrorism; a permanent platform to address emerging threats like cyber-terrorism, drone-based warfare, and crypto-financing of extremism. Having dealt with decades of cross-border terror, India has both the experience and the credibility to lead such an initiative. Unlike the West, which often views terrorism through the lens of episodic attacks or homeland security, countries in the Global South confront it as a continuous, multi-generational battle. Moreover, unlike Western coalitions that are often seen as politically selective or militarily interventionist, a T20 rooted in the Global South would command moral legitimacy and operational relevance. The timing also matters. As multilateralism falters under the weight of big-power rivalries, smaller groupings are proving more nimble and effective — be it the Quad, I2U2, or ASEAN-led security platforms. T20 fits this trend and fills a glaring institutional gap: the absence of a platform focused specifically on terror from the perspective of its most frequent victims. Importantly, the T20 would not seek to replace the UN or the FATF but to operate as a conscience-keeper and action-accelerator. It would bring in countries often left on the sidelines of global security debates. It would lend weight to bilateral diplomacy by providing collective legitimacy. And it would foster collaboration beyond the militaristic models of the past, emphasising data, digital tools, community resilience, and development-linked de-radicalisation. The moral case for T20 lies in its inclusivity. Countries like Ethiopia, Kazakhstan, Sri Lanka, and Vietnam may not dominate global headlines, but they, too, have faced acts of terror that scarred their national psyche. A platform where their voices matter — where their intelligence inputs are valued, their pain recognised — would be a radical departure from the hierarchical nature of most global institutions. Strategically, India also benefits. T20 would provide it with leadership stature without the baggage of military entanglement. It affirms its image as a responsible, proactive power and strengthens its positioning as the voice of the Global South. With its experience, digital capacity, and diplomatic network, India is well-placed to host the T20 secretariat, offer training hubs, and shape the global counter-terror narrative from New Delhi. Operation Sindoor was India's immediate answer to a proximate threat. But the deeper lesson is that reactive strikes, however precise, are not enough. What is needed is a shift from episodic response to permanent institutional architecture. T20 answers that call. It is an idea whose time has come, and whose urgency is underscored by every fresh act of terror that rocks cities from Srinagar to Surabaya. India must now take the next step — not just to defend itself, but to offer leadership to all those who, like it, stand on the frontline of an undeclared global war. The writer is a former foreign secretary
