SA's Tshabalala loses AfDB presidency to Mauritanian
His win means the presidency of the bank will again stay between West and North Africa. Southern Africa had fielded two candidates, Tshabalala and Zambian economist Samuel Maimbo. This caused a rift within the regional body Sadc, which publicly endorsed the Zambian, but SA refused to back down.
Tah previously served as director-general for the Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa. He also served as an expert at the Mauritanian Bank for Development and Commerce between 1984 and 1986, then as a financial analyst at the Food Security Commission in 1986.
He also worked as a financial analyst at the Khartoum-based Arab Authority for Agriculture, Investment and Development between 1996 and 1999. Thereafter, he served as investment promotion officer and then technical assistant to the president of the Islamic Development Bank.
He was the adviser to Mauritania's president and prime minister, respectively, in 2006 and 2008. In 2008, he was nominated and appointed as Mauritanian minister of economy and finance.
Tshabalala joined AfDB in 2018 after she was appointed as vice president of finance and CFO. She previously served as a finance manager at Standard Bank Group and as group treasurer at Transnet.
Finance minister Enoch Godongwana previously commended Tshabalala for her contribution and commitment to achieving the AfDB's vital goal of increasing investment in the continent.
TimesLIVE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
34 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
Apartheid, crimes against humanity: How the law remembers the past
Members of the Black Sash and Movement for Colonial Freedom and the Black march to South Africa House in London to deliver a memorandum to South African prime minister JG Strijdom. Photo: ulton-Deutsch Collection/Corbis/Getty Images In May 1945, the world marked the end of World War II. This was a pivotal historical moment that reshaped the world order and profoundly influenced the development of international human rights frameworks. This was a period that acutely exposed the catastrophic consequences of unchecked state power, genocide and war crimes. The 80th anniversary offers a moment to reflect on how societies remember the past and how those memories shape the present and future. For South Africa, a country with its own complex history of injustice, this anniversary provides an opportunity to examine the role of law in shaping collective memory and advancing justice. Law is not just a mechanism for resolving disputes or enforcing rules; it is also a tool for remembering. Legal frameworks, court rulings and public policies often reflect how a society chooses to acknowledge its past. In South Africa, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) stands as a prime example of how the law can be used to confront historical injustices. The TRC sought to document the atrocities of apartheid, offering victims a platform to share their stories while promoting national healing. This year's anniversary is especially monumental as it marks both the end of World War II and the Nuremberg Trials, which were the first military tribunals set up a few months after the end of war. For the first time in history, military and political leaders were prosecuted. Prominent leaders of Nazi Germany were prosecuted for war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against peace. These trials set a long-lasting precedent globally that regardless of rank, political influence or even state authority, individuals can be held personally responsible and account for their role in gross human rights violations. Nuremberg's retributive approach to the violation of human rights laid the foundation for international criminal law as we know it today. It has embedded the concept of justice as a fundamental component of post-conflict recovery. The defining shift in historical legal frameworks — such as the formation of the United Nations, Geneva Conventions and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights — were symbolic of the global reckoning that followed WWII. This shift in the role of law was also a demonstration of law as not just a mechanism to exert control but an instrument of memory. Beyond its adjudicative function, the law serves as a repository of collective moral judgment. The function of the law is not limited to passing judgments, it sets precedents, holding a determining power on what we as post-trauma nations choose to remember and what we are not only willing to forget but allow to happen. But the work of memory is ongoing. In South Africa, the TRC laid a foundation, but many argue that its promises of justice and reparations remain unfulfilled. The law must continue to evolve to address these gaps, ensuring that the past is not forgotten but serves as a guide for building a more equitable future. In 2021, the high court in Johannesburg made a ruling of paramount importance on the history of injustice. The ruling was about the From this perspective, the recent ruling marks a potentially groundbreaking shift in global justice. Not only does it re-open doors to truth-telling and accountability within contexts once thought closed, it also makes possible the idea of extending prosecutions to economic crimes that were direct beneficiaries of systematic racial oppression. Similar to post-war reparations in Germany, where victims of Nazi prosecutions were compensated and acknowledged, South Africa may reckon with the country's renewed calls of redress. Law is similar to history in that it is a narrative and repository of events that happened in the past. The inability or failure of the courts to uphold justice in the face of violations — whether because of procedural injustice, institutional inertia or politicised fear — then risks inaction and legal silence turning into national amnesia. The 80th anniversary of WWII reminds us that the past is never truly behind us. For South Africa, the law must serve as both a mirror and a map — reflecting the injustices of history while charting a path toward a more just and inclusive society. By learning from global and local experiences, South Africa can continue to use the law as a powerful tool for memory, accountability and transformation. Letlhogonolo Mokgoroane is a legal practitioner at the Johannesburg Society of Advocates and part-time in-house counsel at the Centre for Applied Legal Studies, University of the Witwatersrand. Tebelelo Lentsoane is a research and policy consultant and civic education practitioner.
Mail & Guardian
an hour ago
- Mail & Guardian
African values under threat: African Commission must defend them
Organisations such as CitizenGo, Family Watch International, Family Policy Institute and Christian Council International promote opposition to abortion, LGBTI rights, reproductive healthcare and comprehensive sexuality education. A poster featuring an all-white male panel of speakers from Europe, the US and other regions circulated online, promoting a pan-African conference on African Family Values. The line-up was a tell-tale sign of yet another event underwritten by Global North actors with a clear anti-rights agenda. The organisers were The main speakers were from organisations such as CitizenGo, Family Watch International, Family Policy Institute and Christian Council International, as well as churches and parliamentarians. These were also among the supporters and sponsors for the event. These organisations are known for conservative family and societal values advocating for what they call 'traditional family values'. The event organisers, African Christian Professionals Forum, has deep ties with these organisations including some of its board members At its Event participants not only advocate in their countries on these topics but also at regional forums, including the African Union, and at the international level. Civil society has The 2025 Convention on Eliminating Violence against Women and Girls is thought to be their next advocacy target. They will probably argue that this treaty This conference comes at a time of The conference was attended by MPs from Uganda and Malawi and Kenyan lawyers. This is unsurprising since there have long been reports that US groups have The language of 'African values' emerged at the regional level in 2018 when the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR), the continent's highest human rights body, at the instruction of the African Union, In 2022 the ACHPR, this time on its own accord, then But what does it mean to be African? What are African values? The African Charter empowers the ACHPR to undertake studies and research to address such questions. The ACHPR then uses these studies as a basis for principles and rules to guide African governments. In this vein, in 2023 the African Commission In answering this question, there are three key areas the ACHPR should consider. First is a recognition that African families are incredibly diverse. The drafters of the African Charter acknowledged that African society is far too complex to be neatly compartmentalised. It was for this reason that the charter deliberately fails to define the notion of 'peoples', in clear recognition of the diversity of African families, societies and communities. The ACHPR must likewise not confine African identities to cis-gender and heterosexual, nor restrict the concept of the African family to a nuclear model. Second is that the principle of non-discrimination permeates the charter and provides the touchstone of the African concept of human rights. The charter affirms that 'every individual shall respect and consider his fellow beings without discrimination and to maintain relations aimed at promoting, safeguarding and reinforcing mutual respect and tolerance'. The charter's drafters entrenched the idea of non-discrimination because, at the time, African leaders were focused on liberation from colonialism and racism. Indeed, the document broke new ground by prohibiting ethnic discrimination, a prohibition not found in other international agreements at the time. Non-discrimination against LGBTI people is firmly within both the letter and spirit of the African Charter's values. And finally that LGBTI identities are firmly ensconced in African values historically. Same-sex sexualities and gender diversity were With anti-rights actors co-opting African values using neo-colonial tactics, there is greater urgency for the ACHPR to reclaim African values and redefine them in accordance with the African Charter. Drawing on the wisdom of our forebears, the ACHPR must affirm that discrimination has no place in African societies. It should root its approach in both our pre-colonial histories and the present reality of millions of LGBTI Africans who are entitled to the same human rights as anyone else, no matter what opportunistic western anti-rights actors might say. African values must be used to advance inclusion, non-discrimination and equality, not exclusion and discrimination. Khanyo Faris is a senior researcher on civic space at Amnesty International, East and Southern Africa.
Mail & Guardian
a day ago
- Mail & Guardian
South Africa must take the lead in pan-African climate solidarity
For Africa, climate action isn't just about emissions — it is a development imperative. The continent faces a myriad of challenges: a population boom, rising energy demands, persistent poverty and fragile infrastructure. International funding has historically come at a huge cost to Africa, undermining sovereignty and saddling its countries with cycles of debt. Climate action remains heavily dependent on external financing. Africa receives just 2% to 4% of global climate finance with 90% coming from outside sources. The moral imperative lies with wealthier countries to contribute funds to development and climate justice on the continent, given their use of Africa's natural resources and their disproportionate contribution to the climate crisis. Yet, the recent US decision to cut $555 million in funding to the African Development Bank (specifically the African Development Fund or ADF), as well as the earlier USAid cuts, have shifted the geopolitical landscape and the ability of Africa to respond to the climate crisis. The ADF supports programmes and projects that promote economic and social development in least developed African countries as well as providing technical assistance for studies and capacity-building activities. These funding shifts expose deeper vulnerabilities in Africa's dependence on foreign aid and the urgent need to find alternative pathways to ensure African sovereignty in our determination of economic and climate resilience. A space has opened up for South Africa to step up as a collaborative leader in pan-African climate solidarity. The new US government under Donald Trump has made it explicit that it will hinder global cooperation towards addressing climate change. It officially withdrew from the Paris Agreement and the International Partners Group, which has provided funding for just energy transitions in South Africa, Indonesia and Vietnam. For Africa, climate action isn't just about emissions — it is a development imperative. The continent faces a myriad of challenges: a population boom, rising energy demands, persistent poverty and fragile infrastructure. An energy transition on the continent is crucial to provide energy access to 600 million people in Africa who lack access to electricity . Simultaneously, Africa continues to be exploited for natural resources, with the latest pressure felt for minerals needed for the world's digital technology. This drop in funding for the continent worsens an already severe shortfall. The continent needs about $277 billion a year just to meet its climate goals, according to the Climate Policy Initiative and other climate trackers. Current flows reached $52 billion — a fivefold shortfall. Without adequate climate finance, adaptation projects are not seen as a priority and are delayed or abandoned. While other countries reaffirmed their commitments, the loss of US support created uncertainty — especially in institutions like the Green Climate Fund. For Africa, this means even fewer resources and more competition for already limited funds. The third report by the Independent High-Level Expert Group on climate finance in November 2024, indicated that a shortfall in investment in climate action before 2030 puts disproportionate pressure on the future, paving a steeper and potentially more costly path to climate stability. This moment demands a decisive leadership step-up from within the continent. To do this, Africa's leaders must tackle a web of interconnected issues. Most African governments are grappling with unsustainable debt levels, which limits the fiscal space and hinders development priorities and climate action. According to research from the AfDB and the UN Economic Commission for Africa, as much as 70% of the increase in African debt in 2023 was linked to currency depreciation. Domestic resources need to be mobilised to reduce dependence on borrowing in foreign currency. Strengthening the institutional and financial capacity of African public development banks could enhance their lending ability to mobilise local concessional finance for developmental and climate-related projects and crowd in private sector investment. This is particularly important for adaptation projects, which have struggled to attract funding. African leaders need to encourage local investment that redistributes wealth locally. They need to more closely monitor and control international extractive projects that exploit the continent's resources for the profits of a few local elites and foreign-led multi-nationals. We need a political environment that enables solid economic policies that are centred around social benefits, rather than just creating bankable climate investments. Local and foreign investment in fossil fuels should be heavily taxed and redistributed towards public benefits programmes. There is no longer an economic basis to justify continued investments in fossil fuels. Above all, the continent must unify around a strategic climate and development agenda that centres local solutions and resilience. The consequences of climate inaction are already playing out across the continent. As one of the regions most vulnerable to climate change, despite contributing only 4% of global emissions, Africa cannot afford to wait for political tides in the Global North to shift. It is an opportunity — a wake-up call to build greater autonomy, resilience and leadership. If Africa's leaders act boldly and collectively, the continent can mobilise local climate finance to enable sovereignty over climate action, while holding wealthier countries accountable for climate reparations. South Africa, which produces the bulk of the continent's emissions, can assume greater responsibility for the continent's development. South Africa must take a collaborative leadership role that cultivates pan-African solidarity. As the first African nation to preside over the G20, South Africa has an opportunity to advocate for equitable climate finance and debt relief, ensuring that the continent's needs are prioritised in global discussions. Taking this collaborative approach strengthens Africa's collective voice on the global stage and ensures that climate action is inclusive, just and reflective of the continent's diverse needs. Brighton Phiri is a climate activist working with Nu Clima. Kholwani Simelane is the deputy secretary of the Climate Justice Coalition. Tara Nair van Ryneveld is the climate policy coordinator at Southern African Faith Communities' Environment Institute.
