Britain caves in to Trump demands on iPhone security
Tulsi Gabbard, Donald Trump's director of national intelligence, said the UK had agreed to withdraw an order to Apple that it made earlier this year.
It comes after Mr Trump and JD Vance, the vice-president, demanded that the Government drop its plans.
The order required Apple to break the end-to-end encryption it uses to secure iPhone backups that include a person's photos and messages, potentially allowing security services access to the content of suspects' iPhones.
Privacy campaigners had said the creation of a backdoor would have jeopardised millions of people's security.
'Over the past few months, I've been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside @POTUS and @VP, to ensure Americans' private data remains private and our Constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected,' Ms Gabbard said on X.
'As a result, the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties.'
The Home Office and Apple were contacted for comment.
The Government order was the first known demand to break encryption under surveillance laws that have been dubbed a 'snooper's charter'.
Ministers have never confirmed the existence of a so-called technical capability notice, but government lawyers appeared in a secret court hearing in March after Apple challenged the order.
Mr Trump had criticised the Government over the matter, saying it was like 'something that you hear about with China'.
Apple removed the 'advanced data protection' system for British users in February but was still subject to the Home Office order, which applies worldwide, and had appealed to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal.
In a blow to the Government, the panel ruled that the case would not have blanket secrecy after a legal challenge from media organisations including The Telegraph.
A government spokesman said: 'We have long had joint security and intelligence arrangements with the US to tackle the most serious threats such as terrorism and child sexual abuse, including the role played by fast-moving technology in enabling those threats.
'Those arrangements have long contained safeguards to protect privacy and sovereignty: for example the Data Access Agreement includes critical safeguards to prevent the UK and US from targeting the data of each other's citizens.'We will continue to build on those arrangements and we will also continue to maintain a strong security framework to ensure that we can continue to pursue terrorists and serious criminals operating in the UK. We will always take all actions necessary at the domestic level to keep UK citizens safe.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gerry Adams donates to ‘good causes' after BBC pays 100,000 euro damages
Gerry Adams has said he has made donations to 'good causes' after the BBC paid the former Sinn Fein president 100,000 euro (£84,000) in defamation damages. The broadcaster lost a defamation case earlier this year after Mr Adams took them to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme and an accompanying online story. They contained an allegation that Mr Adams sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson. Mr Adams denied any involvement. In May, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euro (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. Johnsons Solicitors, which represented Mr Adams in his action, confirmed that the BBC has discharged the order of the court in relation to the compensation to their client. Mr Adams said he intended to donate any damages awarded to good causes. The law firm said donations have been made to 'Unicef for the children of Gaza', local GAA organisations, a support group for republican prisoners and their families called An Cumman Cabhrach, to the Irish language sector, to the 'homeless and Belfast based-youth, mental health and suicide prevention projects' and others. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Fein leader's legal costs, potentially in the order of millions. However, it is understood the final amount of costs have yet to be determined.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A new tax on homes? Map shows areas most affected by Rachel Reeves' '£500,000 levy'
The Treasury is reportedly considering a major tax overhaul which could see the introduction of new local and national property taxes. The Treasury is reportedly considering plans to raise money from a new national property tax on the sale of homes worth more than £500,000. Officials have been asked to look into how this "proportional" new tax would work in practice, with sources telling the Guardian that it would replace stamp duty on owner-occupied homes. No final decision has been made, but it is thought this national tax could also help build a model for local levies to replace council tax in the medium term. One estate agent has told Yahoo News that while stamp duty is "unfit for purpose", concerns remain that the tax will be "punishingly high" and the cost of some properties could "skyrocket". Chancellor Rachel Reeves is reportedly considering a number of tax reforms ahead of the autumn budget as the Treasury attempts to raise £40bn to plug its funding gap. A new property tax would allow Labour to stick to its manifesto commitment not to raise income tax, employee national insurance, or VAT, and, as some argue, would be fairer and help address regional inequalities. Here's what we know so far about the reported proposals. What is stamp duty? Buyers currently pay stamp duty if they purchase a property worth more than £125,000 in England or Northern Ireland. First-time buyers are entitled to some relief from the tax, paying 0% on the first £300,000 of the value of their new home, and 5% on the portion between £300,001 and £500,000, as of April 2025. Stamp duty is only paid by the person buying a property, not selling it. It is an unpopular tax among many, with Tax Policy Associates arguing it "reduces transactions, distorts the housing market and often stops people moving when they want to". "Stamp duty makes it harder to borrow from a bank (because the stamp duty is 'lost value')," the think tank adds. "All of this means it reduces labour mobility, results in inefficient use of land, and plausibly holds back economic growth. What is a national property tax? If ministers do go ahead with these plans, the new levy would be paid by owner-occupiers on houses worth more than £500,000 when they sell their home. The amount due would be determined by the value of the property and a rate set by the government, according to officials. They say the Treasury is partly basing its plans on a report by centre-right think tank Onward published in August last year. It suggests that an annual rate of 0.54%, with a 0.278% supplement on property valued over £1m would "raise the same amount as stamp duty". "The new tax would be payable on owner-occupied property only after a sale" and payment would rise annually by inflation, suggests the report's author, former government adviser Dr Tim Leunig. The map below shows the average house prices for May 2025 across the UK, according to the Office for National Statistics. The overwhelming majority of properties impacted are likely to be in London and the South East. What is the local property tax? Ministers are also understood to be considering another recommendation in the report to replace council tax with a local property tax, which Dr Leunig says would be more in line with property values. He says this would be levied on house values up to £500,000 with a minimum annual payment of £800 and would be payable by the owner, rather than the resident. The Treasury has remained tight-lipped on these plans so far, with a spokesperson saying: "As set out in the plan for change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus." Treasury minister Torsten Bell was guarded when asked about the proposals, telling Sky News: 'I'm a newish MP but I'm not an idiot. You know that tax decisions are made by the chancellor. "I'm not going to start speculating on individual taxes because then you'll ask me another three questions about other taxes." Before becoming an MP, Bell was CEO of the Resolution Foundation think-tank, which advocated for scrapping council tax. The map below shows the regional proportions of homes in England for sale over £500,000, according to Rightmove. What homes will a new 'property tax' affect? Based on current proposals, the tax would be paid by owner-occupiers on homes worth more than £500,000. However, this new tax would not replace the higher rate of stamp duty paid by people buying second homes, including buy-to-lets. Onward's proposal has "no tax until £500,000, and only small amounts for properties a little above that", which will be welcome news for those looking to buy a home under the threshold. On the proposed changes to council tax, assuming stamp duty is also replaced, Onward's report says that those living in the lowest council tax band of A stand to benefit the most. This is because the new system would see "those whose houses are worth more than average" paying more, when under the current system, "those with the most valuable houses pay less". What have experts said? Stamp duty has been a "huge barrier to movement, from first-time buyers to downsizers", says Rightmove's property expert Colleen Babcock. "If changes are brought in that make home-moving genuinely more affordable for people then we would welcome them, but without firm details it remains to be seen if a different type of taxation would leave property owners better or worse off in the long run." With no confirmation of the plans, Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown says those in the process of buying or selling a home shouldn't "change their plans". "The risk is that even if this doesn't happen, it could tempt people into knee-jerk reactions that could leave them worse off," she tells Yahoo News. "Anyone planning to sell a valuable property might be worried that their tax bill could rise if they sell after the budget, so it could persuade them to rush to the market. "Meanwhile, anyone planning to buy might be worried about the rumours of an annual tax, so hold back. "The imbalance of supply and demand could mean the market dries up and property values fall. Those who plough on with a sale at a lower price could end up taking a significant price cut to escape a tax that never happens." What impact could the policy have? Simon Gerrard, chairman of Martyn Gerrard Estate Agents, says the existing stamp duty system is "unfit for purpose and has had a chilling effect on the housing market". He welcomes the government's attempts to fix the "broken system" and says that the tax being paid by the seller, rather than the buyer, "won't be the same tax on aspiration that stamp duty currently is". 'However, it's clear that the government is motivated by a desire to raise revenues and I'm concerned that this new tax is going to be punishingly high," he adds. "If that's the case, you're going to see a ceiling at the £500,000 threshold for that band of the market, as people avoid falling under the regime, and then a significant jump in values with nothing in between. "Prices above £500,000 will skyrocket as sellers account for the losses caused by the tax, that used to be paid by the buyer." In particular, Gerrard is worried that the reforms will disproportionately affect families in London, where, according to Rightmove, the average price of a property is now £666,983. "If prices surge higher because of this new regime, how will anyone in the capital start a family? "If Labour wants to support working people, as it claims, then it must raise the threshold to pay this tax for London and the Southeast. Otherwise, these new measures will only further penalise those who are already having to pay the most." Read more Kirstie Allsopp accuses Rachel Reeves of 'punishing' homebuyers as Chancellor 'mulls new property tax' (The London Standard) Which taxes could rise in the budget to fill £40bn black hole? What we know (Yahoo News) Property tax across Europe: Which countries collect the most, and what's their share of total tax? (Euronews)
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Roasters Shun Coffee From Brazil After 50% Tariffs Kick In
(Bloomberg) -- American coffee buyers are shunning fresh deals with top grower Brazil after President Donald Trump's 50% tariff took effect this month. Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds Companies are avoiding new contracts and looking for wiggle room in existing ones to avoid having to pay the higher levies, according to a dozen brokers, roasters and exporters contacted by Bloomberg. Some US buyers are asking for extended shipping timelines in the hopes that tariffs may be eased later, according to Brazil's exporter group Cecafé. Deals between the US and Brazil have 'totally stalled,' said coffee broker Thiago Cazarini. 'No one's really buying anything.' About a third of America's unroasted coffee typically comes from Brazil, a country Trump has been immersed in a trade conflict with, in part due to what he calls the 'politically motivated persecution' of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. A political ally of Trump's, Bolsonaro faces trial for an attempted coup against the government of President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who defeated Bolsonaro in a 2022 election. Trump first announced 10% tariffs on Brazil and other countries in April, before imposing 50% levies on the South American agricultural power that kicked in on Aug. 6. One roaster, Florida-based Zaza Coffee, gets about a quarter of its beans from Brazil and currently has 14 to 16 weeks left of those supplies. After the beans are used up, the company is looking to replace them with coffee from Central America, Peru and Mexico, said JP Juarez, Zaza's director of coffee innovation. 'We have a certain window within this 14 weeks that maybe something can change in the case of the tariffs,' Juarez said. But 'in the scenario of keeping the tariffs at those levels, probably we are not going to ask for Brazilian coffee.' Many roasters are reluctant to change longstanding blends on what could turn out to be a short-term policy. The country's dominant share makes its beans nearly irreplaceable, with few alternative origins able to match its volumes, according to Christian Wolthers, chief executive officer of Florida-based importer Wolthers Douqué. Roasters may also not want to alter the profile of the blends customers are accustomed to. Brazil is the world's top exporter of arabica, which is considered smoother than robusta and is the only bean used by coffeehouse chain Starbucks Corp. 'Roasters have blends that they like to keep as consistent as they can in any given cost environment,' Rabobank analyst Jim Watson said. Even so, coffee trade between the US and Brazil may continue to slow, in line with a trend seen so far this year. The Cuban-style coffee brand Café Aroma is among the roasters 'working to import coffees where the applicable tariff has more predictability,' vice president Bernadette Gerrity said. It's also buying more coffee futures to help protect against higher costs. Colombia, Vietnam and Honduras are the next biggest sources of coffee for the US in terms of quantity, according to the Department of Agriculture. Vietnam primarily produces robusta, a cheaper variety that most Americans only know from instant coffee. US imports of those beans could climb to 'historical highs' as tariffs on the nation are only 20%, according to Laleska Moda, market intelligence analyst at Hedgepoint Global Markets. The US could also boost imports from Indonesia and Uganda, which have substantially lower tariffs than Brazil, she said. Limited offers for Honduran coffee are already priced 30 to 40 cents per pound above the futures market, while Colombian exporters haven't been offering prices at all in case the market surges later, said Tomas Araujo, a senior trader at StoneX. A shift away from Brazilian beans in the US would likely divert more of those supplies to Europe, offering relief for buyers there that are seeking traceable beans to comply with the bloc's upcoming deforestation rules, according to Dave Behrends, head of trading at Sucafina SA. More beans would also go to the growing coffee market in China, leaving US roasters facing a pricier market. While New York-based Gregorys Coffee is lucky to have had its last shipment from Brazil arrive on Aug. 2 before the higher tariffs kicked in — leaving it supplied until mid-November — it will eventually need to import another batch it already contracted at the higher rate, said CEO Gregory Zamfotis. The company, as well as other smaller roasters, are bracing for the impact. 'Absorbing a 10% tariff is nearly impossible for a small business to do entirely on its own,' said Daria Whalen, the director of coffee at San Francisco-based Ritual Coffee Roasters. 'Some of that has to be passed to customers — and 50% feels staggering and insurmountable.' --With assistance from Anuradha Raghu. Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Yosemite Employee Fired After Flying Trans Pride Flag ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
