Bahrain Seals $17 Billion Investment Deal in US
Bahrain's Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa has unveiled a $17 billion investment plan in the United States following a high-level meeting with President Donald Trump at the White House. The announcement signals deepening economic and strategic ties between Manama and Washington, with deals cutting across aviation, energy, and defence sectors.
A key feature of the plan includes a contract worth approximately $7 billion under which Gulf Air, Bahrain's flag carrier, will purchase 12 Boeing aircraft. The agreement also includes an option for six additional planes and 40 aircraft engines from General Electric. The deal was presented as a tangible outcome of bilateral discussions, reinforcing Bahrain's commitment to US industry and technology.
ADVERTISEMENT
Crown Prince Salman described the deals as 'real' and economically sound, addressing scepticism often associated with foreign investment pledges. The statement, made from the Oval Office, was aimed at highlighting the financial credibility of the agreements. 'These aren't fake deals,' he remarked, drawing a sharp contrast with previously publicised but unfulfilled investment promises by other nations.
The Bahraini leader's Washington visit followed a similar pattern to President Trump's earlier engagement with Saudi Arabia, during which over $600 billion in US investment commitments were secured. Trump had also finalised a $142 billion arms agreement with Riyadh. Bahrain's announcement is now being viewed as a strategic move to bolster its position as a reliable economic and security partner of the United States.
The investment plan is expected to deliver significant economic dividends to both countries. For the US, the immediate impact would be in job creation, especially across Boeing's manufacturing facilities and GE's industrial operations. For Bahrain, the plan strengthens access to cutting-edge aviation technology and helps modernise its national infrastructure in both civil and defence aviation.
The timing of the announcement also reflects the evolving regional security dynamics in the Gulf. Iran's influence and the broader geopolitical situation were key discussion points during the White House meeting. Bahrain, which hosts the US Navy's Fifth Fleet, has remained a close military ally to Washington. The investment commitment not only serves economic purposes but also underscores Bahrain's alignment with US strategic objectives in the Middle East.
Observers note that the choice of sectors—aviation, defence technology, and energy—signals Bahrain's intent to link its national growth trajectory with American innovation and industrial capability. Gulf Air's fleet expansion through Boeing jets and GE engines is viewed as a cornerstone of this agenda. Beyond the aviation component, additional investment is expected in energy-related projects and advanced technology, although specific agreements in these areas are yet to be publicly detailed.
ADVERTISEMENT
The financial scope of the investment echoes previous patterns of engagement between Gulf monarchies and US administrations. Bahrain's capital injection arrives amid growing competition among Gulf states seeking to secure American technological partnerships and defence cooperation, while positioning themselves as key regional intermediaries.
For President Trump, who had prioritised foreign investment in US manufacturing and defence during his tenure, the $17 billion figure plays into the broader narrative of restoring domestic industrial capacity through global alliances. It also fits into the administration's push for balancing trade relationships and encouraging allies to contribute more significantly to US economic interests.
Strategic analysts have pointed out that the Gulf kingdom's outreach comes at a time when regional alliances are undergoing shifts. Bahrain has been at the forefront of some of the Arab world's diplomatic realignments, including its role in the Abraham Accords. The alignment with US economic and security goals could further consolidate its position as a trusted partner in American foreign policy planning for the Gulf.
Crown Prince Salman's visit marked the continuation of a trend where Middle Eastern states use bilateral state visits to announce substantial investment projects. These announcements serve dual purposes: generating domestic political capital for US leaders while allowing foreign partners to project influence and economic modernisation.
Washington policymakers have signalled approval of the deals, suggesting that the partnership with Bahrain could deepen further in sectors such as infrastructure development, cyber-security, and military training. While the specifics of such cooperation are yet to materialise in binding agreements, the tone from both capitals points toward an expanding strategic partnership.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
3 hours ago
- Al Etihad
US trade advisor says Trump tariff rates unlikely to change
3 Aug 2025 20:22 WASHINGTON (AFP) New US tariff rates are "pretty much set" with little immediate room for negotiation, Donald Trump's trade advisor said in remarks aired who has wielded tariffs as a tool of American economic might, has set tariff rates for dozens of economies, including the European Union, at between 10 and 41 percent, come August 7, his new hard deadline for the a pre-taped interview broadcast Sunday on CBS's "Face the Nation," US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said "the coming days" are not likely to see changes in the tariff rates."A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country," Greer said."These tariff rates are pretty much set."Undoubtedly, some trade ministers "want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States," he "we're seeing truly the contours of the president's tariff plan right now with these rates."Last Thursday, the former real estate developer announced hiked tariff rates on dozens of US trade will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. Meanwhile, White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said that while talks are expected to continue over the next week with some US trade partners, he concurred with Greer's tariffs assessment in that the bulk of the rates "are more or less locked in."
Khaleej Times
5 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Opec+ makes another large oil output hike in market share push
Opec+ agreed on Sunday to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day for September, the latest in a series of accelerated output hikes to regain market share, as concerns mount over potential supply disruptions linked to Russia. The move marks a full and early reversal of Opec+'s largest tranche of output cuts plus a separate increase in output for the UAE amounting to about 2.5 million bpd, or about 2.4 per cent of world demand. Eight Opec+ members held a brief virtual meeting, amid increasing US pressure on India to halt Russian oil purchases — part of Washington's efforts to bring Moscow to the negotiating table for a peace deal with Ukraine. President Donald Trump said he wants this by August 8. In a statement following the meeting, Opec+ cited a healthy economy and low stocks as reasons behind its decision. Oil prices have remained elevated even as Opec+ has raised output, with Brent crude closing near $70 a barrel on Friday, up from a 2025 low of near $58 in April, supported in part by rising seasonal demand. 'Given fairly strong oil prices at around $70, it does give Opec+ some confidence about market fundamentals,' said Amrita Sen, co-founder of Energy Aspects, adding that the market structure was also indicating tight stocks. The eight countries are scheduled to meet again on September 7, when they may consider reinstating another layer of output cuts totalling around 1.65 million bpd, two Opec+ sources said following Sunday's meeting. Those cuts are currently in place until the end of next year. Opec+ in full includes 10 non-Opec oil producing countries, most notably Russia and Kazakhstan. The group, which pumps about half of the world's oil, had been curtailing production for several years to support oil prices. It reversed course this year in a bid to regain market share, spurred in part by calls from Trump for Opec to ramp up production. The eight began raising output in April with a modest hike of 138,000 bpd, followed by larger-than-planned hikes of 411,000 bpd in May, June and July, 548,000 bpd in August and now 547,000 bpd for September. 'So far the market has been able to absorb very well those additional barrels also due to stockpiliing activity in China,' said Giovanni Staunovo of UBS. 'All eyes will now shift on the Trump decision on Russia this Friday.' As well as the voluntary cut of about 1.65 million bpd from the eight members, Opec+ still has a 2-million-bpd cut across all members, which also expires at the end of 2026. 'Opec+ has passed the first test,' said Jorge Leon of Rystad Energy and a former Opec official, as it has fully reversed its largest cut without crashing prices. 'But the next task will be even harder: deciding if and when to unwind the remaining 1.66 million barrels, all while navigating geopolitical tension and preserving cohesion.'
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
With Gaza in the global spotlight, expect Israel to turn the heat on Hezbollah
Israel finds itself in need of diverting global attention away from its atrocities in Gaza. Enter Hezbollah. The Israeli government appears to see renewed war with the Lebanese group as a chance to further its interests, pretexting the latter's refusal to surrender its weapons to the Lebanese state as it previously pledged. The timing is driven by several factors. The administration of US President Donald Trump has grown weary of waiting for Beirut to fulfil its promise of exclusive state control over arms, and it might be ready to endorse any Israeli decision, regardless of its severity. Another factor is Iran's unwillingness to enter a direct war with Israel on Hezbollah's behalf. Indeed, Tehran is both preoccupied with the fallout from the recent US and Israeli strikes and worried about another wave of attacks in the near future. Still, it refuses to abandon its strategy of using armed regional proxies as bargaining chips in potential negotiations with Washington. Tensions between the US and Iran are thus escalating – manifested through American sanctions, Iranian threats and Israeli war preparations. Iran's proxies in Lebanon and Yemen are on high alert, and the wider Iranian 'Axis of Resistance' is watching events closely, from Iraq to Gaza. Israel has zero tolerance regarding Hezbollah's arsenal. It has convinced the Trump administration that if the Lebanese government fails to implement its disarmament pledge, Israel has no choice but to press ahead with its war on the group. Meanwhile, the international conference on the two-state solution – co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France at the UN – might have angered Iran. The Islamic Republic's ideology rejects the two-state solution, with its doctrine calling for Israel's destruction. Moreover, the conference's show of global support for the Palestinian Authority as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people was also a collective cry against Hamas, a key player in Iran's axis. Just as Israel is indifferent to the civilian toll in Gaza, Iran appears unbothered by Palestinian suffering, particularly as long as Hamas remains faithful to the axis. Mr Trump was recently forced to acknowledge the human-made famine in Gaza, having previously denied this reality. While he didn't initially act against Israel, which is enacting a policy of starvation in the enclave, he spoke about it after parts of his Maga political base pressed him to intervene to end the humanitarian catastrophe. This was accompanied by a different kind of global political pressure as Mr Trump was challenged by European and non-European allies who participated in the two-state solution conference and endorsed its final communique charting a path towards a Palestinian state alongside Israel. There are concerns over possible vindictive responses from Mr Trump, particularly if he feels isolated on the international stage. There is unease over his administration sanctioning the PA's leadership, which the latter says is a form of punishment for seeking the establishment of a Palestinian state. It shouldn't surprise anyone if Israel seeks to crush everything that emerged from the UN conference. It views the PA as an obstacle to its ambitions of annexing the West Bank. It opposes the near-unanimous international view that Hamas should be dismantled, only because its policy is to fracture Palestinian unity and undermine the PA. The dilemma facing the US President over the current Israeli government's extremist policies is his growing global isolation on the Palestine issue. He may still choose to ignore increasing international momentum in favour of a Palestinian state, but it could come at a cost. Indeed, it was no small development for Saudi Arabia to insist to the international community that it won't normalise relations with Israel unless a Palestinian state is established. Riyadh's support for Palestinian statehood gained greater significance when it co-chaired the conference with France. The event brought surprising developments, including the UK's readiness to recognise the state of Palestine at next month's UN General Assembly unless Israel changes course from its current approach in Gaza. Yet a Palestinian state cannot come into being without American backing and Israeli compliance. The UN Security Council has already enshrined the two-state solution in resolutions 1397 and 1515, both supported by Washington. But the roadmap they laid out for Palestinian statehood by 2005 was never implemented and the Trump administration walked back American commitments to those resolutions. The events in New York could push Mr Trump further into the arms of Israeli extremism and its rejection of the two-state solution. Or he might find himself cornered and unable to punish the broad coalition of states that have challenged him. If so, his policy could shift under pressure. This would require a deft diplomatic effort to present Mr Trump with ways to align with the emerging consensus without feeling provoked. Countries have bilateral interests and won't risk undermining relations with Washington solely for the sake of the two-state solution. Having been increasingly scrutinised by the international community, Israel appears intent on shifting global focus away from Gaza. This is precisely because it intends to continue its policies there. And as long as European states fail to impose tangible punitive measures on Israel, and as long as Mr Trump supports its project of 'voluntary displacement', Israel will continue with its agenda. Israel's posture towards Lebanon and Iran, however, is another matter. There is little international sympathy for Iran's insistence that Hezbollah retain its arms in defiance of Lebanese sovereignty. Nor is there sympathy for Tehran's reckless endangerment of the Lebanese people's safety, security and agency. There is, likewise, little global sympathy for the Islamic Republic's stubborn adherence to its triad of strategic doctrines – nuclear capability, ballistic missiles and proxy warfare – without modifications. Thus, should it once again face US or Israeli military strikes, it is unlikely to find many sympathisers. Tehran is now trapped by American sanctions and the threat of more air strikes. Hezbollah, too, will find no one rushing to its rescue if it falls prey to Israel's attempts to shift global attention away from Gaza. Both entities will have only themselves to blame.
