logo
In Kyiv, we don't believe in the fantasy of Trump's ‘peace deal'. Our reality is more dead civilians

In Kyiv, we don't believe in the fantasy of Trump's ‘peace deal'. Our reality is more dead civilians

The Guardian25-04-2025

War teaches you to believe only in what happens, rather than what is merely said or promised. A day after the 'peace talks' in London, which the US secretary of state Marco Rubio didn't even turn up for, Ukrainians were not anxiously waiting for the results of a possible deal, which looked unfeasible anyway. Instead, they were counting their dead.
According to Ukraine's air force, in the early hours of Thursday morning Russia launched 11 Iskander ballistic missiles, 37 KH-101 cruise missiles, six Iskander-K cruise missiles, 12 Kalibr cruise missiles, 4 KH-59/KH-69 missiles and 145 drones. For Kyiv and Kharkiv residents that night, this was not just a case of reading numbers on a news feed, but hearing and feeling explosions rock their cities. It turned out to be the deadliest night for the Ukrainian capital this year.
'Not necessary and very bad timing,' Donald Trump later wrote on social media. But, Ukrainians might ask, when would be a better time to kill 12 civilians and injure at least 90?
Most people were asleep in the western suburbs of Kyiv that were hit. Most of the homes in a five-story apartment block were damaged. A ballistic missile – allegedly North Korean – destroyed an older two-story house. Most of the casualties lived there.
At the time of writing – late afternoon on Thursday – rescue workers and firefighters had been working on the pile of rubble for 15 hours. A group of teenagers came to watch. Some arrived early in the morning because their friend and schoolmate, Danya Khudya, 17, lived in that house with his parents. Earlier, Danya's sister was sent to the hospital, but the boy was missing under the rubble. So, the kids started to search, helping the rescue workers and the police. 'Is he alive?' they kept asking.
By the end of the day, more than 50 young people were there silently gazing into the rubble behind the tape. They stood, hardly moving, just hugging each other. They were waiting for a miracle. It didn't happen. Around 5pm, Danya's body was found. The relatives were asked to identify the body. His parents, Vika and Oleh, had died, too.
In front of the house, I saw a man, his face covered with shrapnel injuries , standing in his slippers. He was offered help – someone asked if he needed proper shoes. But he refused and didn't understand why he was being treated as a victim. He said that he had everything at home. Should he be grateful?
I have written before about how Kyivites have turned their anger into action. They are still doing that now, but there is also something else in the air – a sense of confusion and bewilderment. Is this the new normal?
I think this is because residents of the capital had become used to Ukraine's air defences protecting the city. The first Patriots – the US army's central air defence system – arrived in Kyiv a year after the invasion in February 2022. The system proved capable of intercepting and destroying the Kinzhal, a Russian hypersonic ballistic missile. Vladimir Putin had boasted that the missiles were 'invincible'. Since then, hundreds of them have been repelled in the air above Ukraine's cities and towns.
But there are fewer than 10 air defence systems in Ukraine – this is simply not enough for what is, after all, the second-largest country in Europe after Russia. Recently, Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, made a request to the US to buy – not to be given – 10 additional Patriot systems. Trump treated it as a joke, as an example of Ukrainian warmongering.
This matters because the missiles for the Patriots are the most important part of US military aid (beyond intelligence) that European partners can't deliver themselves. Even if allies try to buy them for Ukraine, it is up to the US to permit outsourcing them. On top of that, Washington can remotely restrict use of the system, as it retains control over the technology and components, which rely on US software updates and radar configurations.
This is the real leverage that the US has against Ukraine – the cudgel it could use to force Kyiv into accepting peace on Russian terms. Those terms include freezing the frontline, Ukraine conceding up to 20% of its sovereign land and relying on Moscow's goodwill that it would not attack again. In comparison, Russia might receive not just recognition by the US of illegally annexed Ukrainian territories, but also the lifting of US sanctions.
Ukrainians don't have the luxury of indulging in the fantasies and distortions of Truth Social, or X, or Russian state TV. They have no choice but to believe in the rockets flying over their heads, the news of dead neighbours – in short, in reality. The events of this week are about as vivid a demonstration you can get that the war is still happening, that it is real, and that Moscow has no real desire to end it.
Nataliya Gumenyuk is a Ukrainian journalist and CEO of the Public Interest Journalism Lab

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer doubles down on Israeli ministers' sanctions despite being slammed by US
Keir Starmer doubles down on Israeli ministers' sanctions despite being slammed by US

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Keir Starmer doubles down on Israeli ministers' sanctions despite being slammed by US

SIR Keir Starmer yesterday doubled down on sanctioning Israeli ministers, despite being savagely rapped by the US. Donald Trump 's administration hit out at Britain after the PM broke with tradition and imposed a travel ban and asset freeze on two far-right members of Israel's government, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich. 4 4 4 In a scathing attack on the move, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the sanctions 'do not advance American efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home and end the war'. Mr Rubio warned Britain 'not to forget who the real enemy is'. The US ambassador to the UK said he 'fully supported' Mr Rubio's slap down and warned the PM against 'impeding constructive dialogue'. Ben-Gvir, who is pushing to annex the West Bank and wants to permanently expel Palestinians from Gaza, said: 'The American administration is a moral compass in the face of the confusion of some Western countries that choose to appease terrorist organizations like Hamas. 'Israel is not afraid — we will continue to fight terrorism. 'History will judge the Chamberlains of our time.' At PMQs Sir Keir defended the sanctions as a bid to 'uphold human rights and defend the prospect of a two-state solution'. The PM said: "Acting alongside our allies, we have sanctioned individuals responsible for inciting appalling settler violence and expansion. "We will continue to support all efforts to secure a ceasefire, the release of all hostages despicably held by Hamas and the humanitarian aid that needs to surge in. Greta Thunberg's Gaza 'Freedom Flotilla' boarded & seized by Israeli forces 4

Don't forget who real enemy is, U.S. warns Lammy over sanctions of two Israeli ministers over ‘egregious abuses' of human rights in Gaza
Don't forget who real enemy is, U.S. warns Lammy over sanctions of two Israeli ministers over ‘egregious abuses' of human rights in Gaza

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Don't forget who real enemy is, U.S. warns Lammy over sanctions of two Israeli ministers over ‘egregious abuses' of human rights in Gaza

The White House has criticised Britain's decision to sanction two Israeli ministers over 'egregious abuses' of human rights in Gaza. US secretary of state Marco Rubio said the travel ban and asset freeze imposed on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich should be reversed. He urged the UK 'not to forget who the real enemy is' and said the sanctions hindered the US's ceasefire efforts. In a major break with the US, the UK this week joined Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway in imposing sanctions on the two Israeli ministers. Mr Smotrich, the finance minister, and Mr Ben-Gvir, the security minister, both belong to Right-wing parties that help to prop up Benjamin Netanyahu 's coalition government. They have both been criticised for their hardline stance. Mr Smotrich has campaigned against allowing aid into Gaza, and supported the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which are considered illegal under international law. Meanwhile, Mr Ben-Gvir has called for Gaza's people to be resettled out of the territory. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the ministers had been 'inciting violence against Palestinian people for months and months and months, they have been encouraging egregious abuses of human rights'. But Mr Rubio tweeted: 'These sanctions do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home and end the war. 'We reject any notion of equivalence – Hamas is a terrorist organisation that committed unspeakable atrocities, continues to hold innocent civilians hostage, and prevents the people of Gaza from living in peace. We remind our partners not to forget who the real enemy is.' Mr Ben-Gvir thanked Mr Rubio for his comments, writing: 'The American administration is a moral compass in the face of the confusion of some Western countries that choose to appease terrorist organizations like Hamas. 'History will judge the Chamberlains of our time.' Yesterday, Sir Keir Starmer said: 'Acting alongside our allies, we have sanctioned individuals responsible for inciting appalling settler violence and expansion. We've done that to uphold human rights and defend the prospect of a two-state solution.' Downing Street said the two men had been sanctioned in their 'personal capacities'.

Judge says Trump administration cannot deport or detain Mahmoud Khalil
Judge says Trump administration cannot deport or detain Mahmoud Khalil

BBC News

time2 hours ago

  • BBC News

Judge says Trump administration cannot deport or detain Mahmoud Khalil

A federal judge said on Wednesday that the Trump administration cannot deport or continue to detain Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University activist who was arrested by immigration officers in March. But Judge Michael Farbiarz put a pause on his injunction until the morning of 13 June to give the federal government time to appeal. Khalil will be detained at least until that point. In his written decision, Judge Farbiarz said there was no compelling interest to keep Khalil in custody or to deport the 30-year-old, who is a lawful permanent he was arrested at his home in New Jersey, Mr Khalil has been held at a detention centre in Louisiana. He was taken into custody as part of President Donald Trump's wider crackdown on international students who protested the Israel-Gaza Khalil has become one of the most high-profile cases in that crackdown, with videos of his arrest whipping around social media and the birth of his child in April, while he was being held, making of State Marco Rubio had determined his presence and activities in the country compromised US foreign policy interests and he should be removed, but the judge on Wednesday questioned using the determination to hold or deport Mr also wrote that Mr Khalil's "career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled --- and this adds up to irreparable harm" and that he expects Mr Khalil to win in the case against federal government is expected to appeal against the injunction.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store