
2025 Renault 4 E-Tech review: Quick drive
Is the Renault 4 – either the 1961-1992 original or this modern electric recreation – a hatchback or an SUV? It's not immediately obvious, is it?
The original Renault 4 is reckoned to be the first truly popular hatchback. Not only did it rack up more than eight million sales, but it's also the fourth best selling car of all time, and the best-selling Renault ever.
Nonetheless, some claim that, thanks to its long-travel suspension, boxy body and its proven ability to tackle rough terrain the Renault 4 was the original, uncrowned SUV.
For its modern-day reinvention, the all-electric Renault 4 E-Tech is somewhere in the same ballpark.
The chunky styling, copious amounts of bash-proof black plastic trim, and the upright stance seem to indicate that it's an SUV (it's the same height as the Renault Captur, but has more ground clearance), but the proportions and general character make it more of a hatchback.
It has the same relationship to the Renault 5 E-Tech as the Captur has to the Clio: same bits underneath, but taller and roomier within.
There's no confirmation yet whether the Renault 4 E-Tech electric will come to Australia, but should you be banging down the door of your local dealer, insisting you get a chance to buy one? Read on to find out.
In European terms, the Renault 4 E-Tech will start comfortably under the €30,000 mark — that's the equivalent of A$52,000 or less.
With the Megane E-Tech hatchback currently starting at a price of $54,990 before on-road costs, that would be in the right ballpark for a Renault 4 here.
Nothing is confirmed yet, but Renault Australia is known to be keen to bring both the R4 and R5 here at some point. It's likely that's at least a year away though, as Renault is already scrambling to fulfil orders in Europe for the R5.
If the R4 does make a return to these shores, it will be something of a homecoming, as the original Renault 4 was built in Renault Australia's factory in Heidelberg, Victoria from 1962 to 1966.
The Renault 4 E-Tech's interior is very much that of the Renault 5, but slightly larger and taller.
It uses the same digital instrument cluster (7.0-inch for base models, 10.0-inch for higher-spec versions) and the same 10.0-inch infotainment touchscreen, running the impressive Google-based software.
Thankfully that screen is backed up by some proper physical buttons for the climate control functions, which makes life much easier but you can have too much of a good thing – the profusion of column stalks to the right of the steering wheel to control drive modes, wipers and audio – takes a bit of getting used to.
However, the R4 is much roomier than the R5. In the front, there's not much to choose between the two save for a touch more headroom, but in the back there's a great deal more usable space.
Tall adults will struggle to even fit in the back of the R5, let alone get comfortable, but they will fit in the back of the R4, although you'd still struggle to call it properly spacious. It's more adequately practical.
Boot space is quite impressive, however, and at 420 litres up to the luggage cover, there's slightly more space on offer than you'd find in most direct competitors.
Better still, the load sill is very low – a nod to both practicality and to the low sill of the original Renault 4 – and it means that not only will loading up be less of a strain on your back, the boot also makes a nice place to sit, perhaps for a picnic.
There's a bonus 55-litre space under the floor, which is designed for charging cable storage, and the lid for that is divided in two, which in theory makes it easier to get into if you've got a boot full of luggage or shopping.
The lining of that underfloor storage also lifts out so it can be cleaned or used as a handy container. There's a pair of stretchy elastic straps (complete with French tricolours) at each side of the boot, for holding taller items in place, and the usual hooks and tie-downs.
There is an entry-level Renault 4 E-Tech with a small 40kWh battery and a 90kW electric motor, giving it a theoretical range of up to 308km, but that's a car we've yet to test. Our drive in Portugal included only the 'Comfort Range' model, with the 52kWh battery, a 110kW electric motor (driving the front wheels, of course) and a potential range of up to 409km.
That official number turns out to be fairly realistic. Over a full day's driving, taking in highway, city streets and winding country roads, we managed to average slightly better efficiency than Renault's claim (we scored 14.9kWh/100km overall, compared to the official 15.1kWh/100km WLTP figure) which suggests that, in mixed driving at least, that 400km is achievable.
As with any electric car, long journeys on fast highways will deplete the charge a bit faster, and at the 120km/h permissible on some Portuguese roads, the useable range falls to more like 220-250km. Overall then, we reckon that around 360km is a safe, real-world bet between charges.
There's also a handy vehicle-to-load function, which allows you to plug other electric devices into the R4, using an adaptor.
Performance from the 110kW motor is perfectly fine. The Renault 4 is notably light for an EV, tipping the scales at a reasonable 1462kg, so that motor, and its 245Nm of torque, is plenty. The 8.3-second 0-100km/h time doesn't look all that impressive on paper, but on the road the R4 feels brisk enough for most purposes.
There's a detente at the bottom of the accelerator pedal's travel, which when pushed through gives you access to a quick burst of maximum performance for overtaking, which is welcome.
Just remember that switching into Eco mode in the 'Multi Sense' driving modes reduces the power coming from the motor and so restricts your speed on faster roads. There's also little point in activating Sport mode.
There is one-pedal braking for low-speed driving around town, something you can't yet have on theR5, but to be honest the R4's brake pedal feels so firm and responsive (not something you can sayabout all EVs…) that just using your own foot is the better option.
Unsurprisingly, there's a close relationship to the R5 under the skin (the two cars are built on the same 'AmpR Small' platform) and that means sophistication that you might not expect from a car like this. And it means that the R4 E-Tech feels quite good to drive.
Quite good is a little way south of the genuinely fun and brilliant way a Renault 5 E-Tech drives, but that's the price of a longer wheelbase, a longer rear overhang, a taller body, a little more weight, and softer suspension and steering settings.
Incidentally, if you're wondering how the taller and heavier R4 manages roughly the same electric range as the R5, it's essentially down to the tyres – the R4 uses dedicated EV-specific, energy-saving tyres, whereas the R5 uses sportier rubber for a more engaging drive.
Which is pretty much how it plays out on the road. The R4 shares the R5's fast, light steering and its firm, yet well-damped suspension, but there's not quite as much communication with the driver.
That said, it's quite happy being punted along a twisty country road, but the overall character and personality means that it seems happier when being driven gently, while you take in the view.
The stiff springs mean that big, transverse ridges send a hefty 'whump' up into the cabin, but the rest of the time the ride is quite well judged.
The steering is quick enough that you have to recalibrate your own inputs a little at first, but you soon get used to it, just rolling your wrists a little to point the R4 through most corners.
Visibility is only OK, though, which isn't great in town. The roof is quite low set, which means taller drivers must duck a bit to see all around them.
Still, that makes for a good excuse to pick the option of the 'Plein Sud' full-length canvas sunroof, really…
Given that the Renault 4 E-Tech isn't confirmed for Australia, local specifications are unavailable. In Europe it gets the following as a base.
2025 Renault 4 E-Tech equipment highlights:
The Renault 4 E-Tech has not yet been assessed by ANCAP or Euro NCAP, so we do not know precisely how safe it might be. The Renault 5 E-Tech has been tested by Euro NCAP, and came away with a four-star score, notably a low score for Renault which was the first company to ever get a full five-star score from the safety organisation.
The Renault 5 was marked down for poor speed assistance, and occupant status monitoring. It remains to be seen whether Renault can improve those items before the R4 is tested.
Standard safety equipment includes:
Assuming you're on a good 16c-per-kWh electricity rate at home, you could fully charge the R4 E-Tech for as little as $8.32. Try seeing how far you get on $8.32 worth of petrol…
Renault Australia's standard warranty is an impressive one – five years, with unlimited mileage for most models. There's also an eight-year/160,000km warranty for the battery, and five years' roadside assistance.
The only question mark is over servicing plans. Theoretically an electric car should be cheaper to service, but so far there's no specific service plan for Renault's only EV in Australia, the Megane E-Tech.
The Renault 4 E-Tech is less immediately loveable than the Renault 5 E-Tech. Then again, that is true of most cars, but the R4 is more of a slow-burn kind of car.
You start to spot more and more delightful design details the more time you spend with it, and even if the R4 isn't quite as sparkling to drive as the R5, it's still way ahead of many rivals in terms of how rewarding it is behind the wheel.
It may not ever hit the giddy heights of eight million sales, but this is another electric Renault that is well-deserving of your attention.MORE: Everything Renault
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
Is the Renault 4 – either the 1961-1992 original or this modern electric recreation – a hatchback or an SUV? It's not immediately obvious, is it?
The original Renault 4 is reckoned to be the first truly popular hatchback. Not only did it rack up more than eight million sales, but it's also the fourth best selling car of all time, and the best-selling Renault ever.
Nonetheless, some claim that, thanks to its long-travel suspension, boxy body and its proven ability to tackle rough terrain the Renault 4 was the original, uncrowned SUV.
For its modern-day reinvention, the all-electric Renault 4 E-Tech is somewhere in the same ballpark.
The chunky styling, copious amounts of bash-proof black plastic trim, and the upright stance seem to indicate that it's an SUV (it's the same height as the Renault Captur, but has more ground clearance), but the proportions and general character make it more of a hatchback.
It has the same relationship to the Renault 5 E-Tech as the Captur has to the Clio: same bits underneath, but taller and roomier within.
There's no confirmation yet whether the Renault 4 E-Tech electric will come to Australia, but should you be banging down the door of your local dealer, insisting you get a chance to buy one? Read on to find out.
In European terms, the Renault 4 E-Tech will start comfortably under the €30,000 mark — that's the equivalent of A$52,000 or less.
With the Megane E-Tech hatchback currently starting at a price of $54,990 before on-road costs, that would be in the right ballpark for a Renault 4 here.
Nothing is confirmed yet, but Renault Australia is known to be keen to bring both the R4 and R5 here at some point. It's likely that's at least a year away though, as Renault is already scrambling to fulfil orders in Europe for the R5.
If the R4 does make a return to these shores, it will be something of a homecoming, as the original Renault 4 was built in Renault Australia's factory in Heidelberg, Victoria from 1962 to 1966.
The Renault 4 E-Tech's interior is very much that of the Renault 5, but slightly larger and taller.
It uses the same digital instrument cluster (7.0-inch for base models, 10.0-inch for higher-spec versions) and the same 10.0-inch infotainment touchscreen, running the impressive Google-based software.
Thankfully that screen is backed up by some proper physical buttons for the climate control functions, which makes life much easier but you can have too much of a good thing – the profusion of column stalks to the right of the steering wheel to control drive modes, wipers and audio – takes a bit of getting used to.
However, the R4 is much roomier than the R5. In the front, there's not much to choose between the two save for a touch more headroom, but in the back there's a great deal more usable space.
Tall adults will struggle to even fit in the back of the R5, let alone get comfortable, but they will fit in the back of the R4, although you'd still struggle to call it properly spacious. It's more adequately practical.
Boot space is quite impressive, however, and at 420 litres up to the luggage cover, there's slightly more space on offer than you'd find in most direct competitors.
Better still, the load sill is very low – a nod to both practicality and to the low sill of the original Renault 4 – and it means that not only will loading up be less of a strain on your back, the boot also makes a nice place to sit, perhaps for a picnic.
There's a bonus 55-litre space under the floor, which is designed for charging cable storage, and the lid for that is divided in two, which in theory makes it easier to get into if you've got a boot full of luggage or shopping.
The lining of that underfloor storage also lifts out so it can be cleaned or used as a handy container. There's a pair of stretchy elastic straps (complete with French tricolours) at each side of the boot, for holding taller items in place, and the usual hooks and tie-downs.
There is an entry-level Renault 4 E-Tech with a small 40kWh battery and a 90kW electric motor, giving it a theoretical range of up to 308km, but that's a car we've yet to test. Our drive in Portugal included only the 'Comfort Range' model, with the 52kWh battery, a 110kW electric motor (driving the front wheels, of course) and a potential range of up to 409km.
That official number turns out to be fairly realistic. Over a full day's driving, taking in highway, city streets and winding country roads, we managed to average slightly better efficiency than Renault's claim (we scored 14.9kWh/100km overall, compared to the official 15.1kWh/100km WLTP figure) which suggests that, in mixed driving at least, that 400km is achievable.
As with any electric car, long journeys on fast highways will deplete the charge a bit faster, and at the 120km/h permissible on some Portuguese roads, the useable range falls to more like 220-250km. Overall then, we reckon that around 360km is a safe, real-world bet between charges.
There's also a handy vehicle-to-load function, which allows you to plug other electric devices into the R4, using an adaptor.
Performance from the 110kW motor is perfectly fine. The Renault 4 is notably light for an EV, tipping the scales at a reasonable 1462kg, so that motor, and its 245Nm of torque, is plenty. The 8.3-second 0-100km/h time doesn't look all that impressive on paper, but on the road the R4 feels brisk enough for most purposes.
There's a detente at the bottom of the accelerator pedal's travel, which when pushed through gives you access to a quick burst of maximum performance for overtaking, which is welcome.
Just remember that switching into Eco mode in the 'Multi Sense' driving modes reduces the power coming from the motor and so restricts your speed on faster roads. There's also little point in activating Sport mode.
There is one-pedal braking for low-speed driving around town, something you can't yet have on theR5, but to be honest the R4's brake pedal feels so firm and responsive (not something you can sayabout all EVs…) that just using your own foot is the better option.
Unsurprisingly, there's a close relationship to the R5 under the skin (the two cars are built on the same 'AmpR Small' platform) and that means sophistication that you might not expect from a car like this. And it means that the R4 E-Tech feels quite good to drive.
Quite good is a little way south of the genuinely fun and brilliant way a Renault 5 E-Tech drives, but that's the price of a longer wheelbase, a longer rear overhang, a taller body, a little more weight, and softer suspension and steering settings.
Incidentally, if you're wondering how the taller and heavier R4 manages roughly the same electric range as the R5, it's essentially down to the tyres – the R4 uses dedicated EV-specific, energy-saving tyres, whereas the R5 uses sportier rubber for a more engaging drive.
Which is pretty much how it plays out on the road. The R4 shares the R5's fast, light steering and its firm, yet well-damped suspension, but there's not quite as much communication with the driver.
That said, it's quite happy being punted along a twisty country road, but the overall character and personality means that it seems happier when being driven gently, while you take in the view.
The stiff springs mean that big, transverse ridges send a hefty 'whump' up into the cabin, but the rest of the time the ride is quite well judged.
The steering is quick enough that you have to recalibrate your own inputs a little at first, but you soon get used to it, just rolling your wrists a little to point the R4 through most corners.
Visibility is only OK, though, which isn't great in town. The roof is quite low set, which means taller drivers must duck a bit to see all around them.
Still, that makes for a good excuse to pick the option of the 'Plein Sud' full-length canvas sunroof, really…
Given that the Renault 4 E-Tech isn't confirmed for Australia, local specifications are unavailable. In Europe it gets the following as a base.
2025 Renault 4 E-Tech equipment highlights:
The Renault 4 E-Tech has not yet been assessed by ANCAP or Euro NCAP, so we do not know precisely how safe it might be. The Renault 5 E-Tech has been tested by Euro NCAP, and came away with a four-star score, notably a low score for Renault which was the first company to ever get a full five-star score from the safety organisation.
The Renault 5 was marked down for poor speed assistance, and occupant status monitoring. It remains to be seen whether Renault can improve those items before the R4 is tested.
Standard safety equipment includes:
Assuming you're on a good 16c-per-kWh electricity rate at home, you could fully charge the R4 E-Tech for as little as $8.32. Try seeing how far you get on $8.32 worth of petrol…
Renault Australia's standard warranty is an impressive one – five years, with unlimited mileage for most models. There's also an eight-year/160,000km warranty for the battery, and five years' roadside assistance.
The only question mark is over servicing plans. Theoretically an electric car should be cheaper to service, but so far there's no specific service plan for Renault's only EV in Australia, the Megane E-Tech.
The Renault 4 E-Tech is less immediately loveable than the Renault 5 E-Tech. Then again, that is true of most cars, but the R4 is more of a slow-burn kind of car.
You start to spot more and more delightful design details the more time you spend with it, and even if the R4 isn't quite as sparkling to drive as the R5, it's still way ahead of many rivals in terms of how rewarding it is behind the wheel.
It may not ever hit the giddy heights of eight million sales, but this is another electric Renault that is well-deserving of your attention.MORE: Everything Renault
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
Is the Renault 4 – either the 1961-1992 original or this modern electric recreation – a hatchback or an SUV? It's not immediately obvious, is it?
The original Renault 4 is reckoned to be the first truly popular hatchback. Not only did it rack up more than eight million sales, but it's also the fourth best selling car of all time, and the best-selling Renault ever.
Nonetheless, some claim that, thanks to its long-travel suspension, boxy body and its proven ability to tackle rough terrain the Renault 4 was the original, uncrowned SUV.
For its modern-day reinvention, the all-electric Renault 4 E-Tech is somewhere in the same ballpark.
The chunky styling, copious amounts of bash-proof black plastic trim, and the upright stance seem to indicate that it's an SUV (it's the same height as the Renault Captur, but has more ground clearance), but the proportions and general character make it more of a hatchback.
It has the same relationship to the Renault 5 E-Tech as the Captur has to the Clio: same bits underneath, but taller and roomier within.
There's no confirmation yet whether the Renault 4 E-Tech electric will come to Australia, but should you be banging down the door of your local dealer, insisting you get a chance to buy one? Read on to find out.
In European terms, the Renault 4 E-Tech will start comfortably under the €30,000 mark — that's the equivalent of A$52,000 or less.
With the Megane E-Tech hatchback currently starting at a price of $54,990 before on-road costs, that would be in the right ballpark for a Renault 4 here.
Nothing is confirmed yet, but Renault Australia is known to be keen to bring both the R4 and R5 here at some point. It's likely that's at least a year away though, as Renault is already scrambling to fulfil orders in Europe for the R5.
If the R4 does make a return to these shores, it will be something of a homecoming, as the original Renault 4 was built in Renault Australia's factory in Heidelberg, Victoria from 1962 to 1966.
The Renault 4 E-Tech's interior is very much that of the Renault 5, but slightly larger and taller.
It uses the same digital instrument cluster (7.0-inch for base models, 10.0-inch for higher-spec versions) and the same 10.0-inch infotainment touchscreen, running the impressive Google-based software.
Thankfully that screen is backed up by some proper physical buttons for the climate control functions, which makes life much easier but you can have too much of a good thing – the profusion of column stalks to the right of the steering wheel to control drive modes, wipers and audio – takes a bit of getting used to.
However, the R4 is much roomier than the R5. In the front, there's not much to choose between the two save for a touch more headroom, but in the back there's a great deal more usable space.
Tall adults will struggle to even fit in the back of the R5, let alone get comfortable, but they will fit in the back of the R4, although you'd still struggle to call it properly spacious. It's more adequately practical.
Boot space is quite impressive, however, and at 420 litres up to the luggage cover, there's slightly more space on offer than you'd find in most direct competitors.
Better still, the load sill is very low – a nod to both practicality and to the low sill of the original Renault 4 – and it means that not only will loading up be less of a strain on your back, the boot also makes a nice place to sit, perhaps for a picnic.
There's a bonus 55-litre space under the floor, which is designed for charging cable storage, and the lid for that is divided in two, which in theory makes it easier to get into if you've got a boot full of luggage or shopping.
The lining of that underfloor storage also lifts out so it can be cleaned or used as a handy container. There's a pair of stretchy elastic straps (complete with French tricolours) at each side of the boot, for holding taller items in place, and the usual hooks and tie-downs.
There is an entry-level Renault 4 E-Tech with a small 40kWh battery and a 90kW electric motor, giving it a theoretical range of up to 308km, but that's a car we've yet to test. Our drive in Portugal included only the 'Comfort Range' model, with the 52kWh battery, a 110kW electric motor (driving the front wheels, of course) and a potential range of up to 409km.
That official number turns out to be fairly realistic. Over a full day's driving, taking in highway, city streets and winding country roads, we managed to average slightly better efficiency than Renault's claim (we scored 14.9kWh/100km overall, compared to the official 15.1kWh/100km WLTP figure) which suggests that, in mixed driving at least, that 400km is achievable.
As with any electric car, long journeys on fast highways will deplete the charge a bit faster, and at the 120km/h permissible on some Portuguese roads, the useable range falls to more like 220-250km. Overall then, we reckon that around 360km is a safe, real-world bet between charges.
There's also a handy vehicle-to-load function, which allows you to plug other electric devices into the R4, using an adaptor.
Performance from the 110kW motor is perfectly fine. The Renault 4 is notably light for an EV, tipping the scales at a reasonable 1462kg, so that motor, and its 245Nm of torque, is plenty. The 8.3-second 0-100km/h time doesn't look all that impressive on paper, but on the road the R4 feels brisk enough for most purposes.
There's a detente at the bottom of the accelerator pedal's travel, which when pushed through gives you access to a quick burst of maximum performance for overtaking, which is welcome.
Just remember that switching into Eco mode in the 'Multi Sense' driving modes reduces the power coming from the motor and so restricts your speed on faster roads. There's also little point in activating Sport mode.
There is one-pedal braking for low-speed driving around town, something you can't yet have on theR5, but to be honest the R4's brake pedal feels so firm and responsive (not something you can sayabout all EVs…) that just using your own foot is the better option.
Unsurprisingly, there's a close relationship to the R5 under the skin (the two cars are built on the same 'AmpR Small' platform) and that means sophistication that you might not expect from a car like this. And it means that the R4 E-Tech feels quite good to drive.
Quite good is a little way south of the genuinely fun and brilliant way a Renault 5 E-Tech drives, but that's the price of a longer wheelbase, a longer rear overhang, a taller body, a little more weight, and softer suspension and steering settings.
Incidentally, if you're wondering how the taller and heavier R4 manages roughly the same electric range as the R5, it's essentially down to the tyres – the R4 uses dedicated EV-specific, energy-saving tyres, whereas the R5 uses sportier rubber for a more engaging drive.
Which is pretty much how it plays out on the road. The R4 shares the R5's fast, light steering and its firm, yet well-damped suspension, but there's not quite as much communication with the driver.
That said, it's quite happy being punted along a twisty country road, but the overall character and personality means that it seems happier when being driven gently, while you take in the view.
The stiff springs mean that big, transverse ridges send a hefty 'whump' up into the cabin, but the rest of the time the ride is quite well judged.
The steering is quick enough that you have to recalibrate your own inputs a little at first, but you soon get used to it, just rolling your wrists a little to point the R4 through most corners.
Visibility is only OK, though, which isn't great in town. The roof is quite low set, which means taller drivers must duck a bit to see all around them.
Still, that makes for a good excuse to pick the option of the 'Plein Sud' full-length canvas sunroof, really…
Given that the Renault 4 E-Tech isn't confirmed for Australia, local specifications are unavailable. In Europe it gets the following as a base.
2025 Renault 4 E-Tech equipment highlights:
The Renault 4 E-Tech has not yet been assessed by ANCAP or Euro NCAP, so we do not know precisely how safe it might be. The Renault 5 E-Tech has been tested by Euro NCAP, and came away with a four-star score, notably a low score for Renault which was the first company to ever get a full five-star score from the safety organisation.
The Renault 5 was marked down for poor speed assistance, and occupant status monitoring. It remains to be seen whether Renault can improve those items before the R4 is tested.
Standard safety equipment includes:
Assuming you're on a good 16c-per-kWh electricity rate at home, you could fully charge the R4 E-Tech for as little as $8.32. Try seeing how far you get on $8.32 worth of petrol…
Renault Australia's standard warranty is an impressive one – five years, with unlimited mileage for most models. There's also an eight-year/160,000km warranty for the battery, and five years' roadside assistance.
The only question mark is over servicing plans. Theoretically an electric car should be cheaper to service, but so far there's no specific service plan for Renault's only EV in Australia, the Megane E-Tech.
The Renault 4 E-Tech is less immediately loveable than the Renault 5 E-Tech. Then again, that is true of most cars, but the R4 is more of a slow-burn kind of car.
You start to spot more and more delightful design details the more time you spend with it, and even if the R4 isn't quite as sparkling to drive as the R5, it's still way ahead of many rivals in terms of how rewarding it is behind the wheel.
It may not ever hit the giddy heights of eight million sales, but this is another electric Renault that is well-deserving of your attention.MORE: Everything Renault
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
Is the Renault 4 – either the 1961-1992 original or this modern electric recreation – a hatchback or an SUV? It's not immediately obvious, is it?
The original Renault 4 is reckoned to be the first truly popular hatchback. Not only did it rack up more than eight million sales, but it's also the fourth best selling car of all time, and the best-selling Renault ever.
Nonetheless, some claim that, thanks to its long-travel suspension, boxy body and its proven ability to tackle rough terrain the Renault 4 was the original, uncrowned SUV.
For its modern-day reinvention, the all-electric Renault 4 E-Tech is somewhere in the same ballpark.
The chunky styling, copious amounts of bash-proof black plastic trim, and the upright stance seem to indicate that it's an SUV (it's the same height as the Renault Captur, but has more ground clearance), but the proportions and general character make it more of a hatchback.
It has the same relationship to the Renault 5 E-Tech as the Captur has to the Clio: same bits underneath, but taller and roomier within.
There's no confirmation yet whether the Renault 4 E-Tech electric will come to Australia, but should you be banging down the door of your local dealer, insisting you get a chance to buy one? Read on to find out.
In European terms, the Renault 4 E-Tech will start comfortably under the €30,000 mark — that's the equivalent of A$52,000 or less.
With the Megane E-Tech hatchback currently starting at a price of $54,990 before on-road costs, that would be in the right ballpark for a Renault 4 here.
Nothing is confirmed yet, but Renault Australia is known to be keen to bring both the R4 and R5 here at some point. It's likely that's at least a year away though, as Renault is already scrambling to fulfil orders in Europe for the R5.
If the R4 does make a return to these shores, it will be something of a homecoming, as the original Renault 4 was built in Renault Australia's factory in Heidelberg, Victoria from 1962 to 1966.
The Renault 4 E-Tech's interior is very much that of the Renault 5, but slightly larger and taller.
It uses the same digital instrument cluster (7.0-inch for base models, 10.0-inch for higher-spec versions) and the same 10.0-inch infotainment touchscreen, running the impressive Google-based software.
Thankfully that screen is backed up by some proper physical buttons for the climate control functions, which makes life much easier but you can have too much of a good thing – the profusion of column stalks to the right of the steering wheel to control drive modes, wipers and audio – takes a bit of getting used to.
However, the R4 is much roomier than the R5. In the front, there's not much to choose between the two save for a touch more headroom, but in the back there's a great deal more usable space.
Tall adults will struggle to even fit in the back of the R5, let alone get comfortable, but they will fit in the back of the R4, although you'd still struggle to call it properly spacious. It's more adequately practical.
Boot space is quite impressive, however, and at 420 litres up to the luggage cover, there's slightly more space on offer than you'd find in most direct competitors.
Better still, the load sill is very low – a nod to both practicality and to the low sill of the original Renault 4 – and it means that not only will loading up be less of a strain on your back, the boot also makes a nice place to sit, perhaps for a picnic.
There's a bonus 55-litre space under the floor, which is designed for charging cable storage, and the lid for that is divided in two, which in theory makes it easier to get into if you've got a boot full of luggage or shopping.
The lining of that underfloor storage also lifts out so it can be cleaned or used as a handy container. There's a pair of stretchy elastic straps (complete with French tricolours) at each side of the boot, for holding taller items in place, and the usual hooks and tie-downs.
There is an entry-level Renault 4 E-Tech with a small 40kWh battery and a 90kW electric motor, giving it a theoretical range of up to 308km, but that's a car we've yet to test. Our drive in Portugal included only the 'Comfort Range' model, with the 52kWh battery, a 110kW electric motor (driving the front wheels, of course) and a potential range of up to 409km.
That official number turns out to be fairly realistic. Over a full day's driving, taking in highway, city streets and winding country roads, we managed to average slightly better efficiency than Renault's claim (we scored 14.9kWh/100km overall, compared to the official 15.1kWh/100km WLTP figure) which suggests that, in mixed driving at least, that 400km is achievable.
As with any electric car, long journeys on fast highways will deplete the charge a bit faster, and at the 120km/h permissible on some Portuguese roads, the useable range falls to more like 220-250km. Overall then, we reckon that around 360km is a safe, real-world bet between charges.
There's also a handy vehicle-to-load function, which allows you to plug other electric devices into the R4, using an adaptor.
Performance from the 110kW motor is perfectly fine. The Renault 4 is notably light for an EV, tipping the scales at a reasonable 1462kg, so that motor, and its 245Nm of torque, is plenty. The 8.3-second 0-100km/h time doesn't look all that impressive on paper, but on the road the R4 feels brisk enough for most purposes.
There's a detente at the bottom of the accelerator pedal's travel, which when pushed through gives you access to a quick burst of maximum performance for overtaking, which is welcome.
Just remember that switching into Eco mode in the 'Multi Sense' driving modes reduces the power coming from the motor and so restricts your speed on faster roads. There's also little point in activating Sport mode.
There is one-pedal braking for low-speed driving around town, something you can't yet have on theR5, but to be honest the R4's brake pedal feels so firm and responsive (not something you can sayabout all EVs…) that just using your own foot is the better option.
Unsurprisingly, there's a close relationship to the R5 under the skin (the two cars are built on the same 'AmpR Small' platform) and that means sophistication that you might not expect from a car like this. And it means that the R4 E-Tech feels quite good to drive.
Quite good is a little way south of the genuinely fun and brilliant way a Renault 5 E-Tech drives, but that's the price of a longer wheelbase, a longer rear overhang, a taller body, a little more weight, and softer suspension and steering settings.
Incidentally, if you're wondering how the taller and heavier R4 manages roughly the same electric range as the R5, it's essentially down to the tyres – the R4 uses dedicated EV-specific, energy-saving tyres, whereas the R5 uses sportier rubber for a more engaging drive.
Which is pretty much how it plays out on the road. The R4 shares the R5's fast, light steering and its firm, yet well-damped suspension, but there's not quite as much communication with the driver.
That said, it's quite happy being punted along a twisty country road, but the overall character and personality means that it seems happier when being driven gently, while you take in the view.
The stiff springs mean that big, transverse ridges send a hefty 'whump' up into the cabin, but the rest of the time the ride is quite well judged.
The steering is quick enough that you have to recalibrate your own inputs a little at first, but you soon get used to it, just rolling your wrists a little to point the R4 through most corners.
Visibility is only OK, though, which isn't great in town. The roof is quite low set, which means taller drivers must duck a bit to see all around them.
Still, that makes for a good excuse to pick the option of the 'Plein Sud' full-length canvas sunroof, really…
Given that the Renault 4 E-Tech isn't confirmed for Australia, local specifications are unavailable. In Europe it gets the following as a base.
2025 Renault 4 E-Tech equipment highlights:
The Renault 4 E-Tech has not yet been assessed by ANCAP or Euro NCAP, so we do not know precisely how safe it might be. The Renault 5 E-Tech has been tested by Euro NCAP, and came away with a four-star score, notably a low score for Renault which was the first company to ever get a full five-star score from the safety organisation.
The Renault 5 was marked down for poor speed assistance, and occupant status monitoring. It remains to be seen whether Renault can improve those items before the R4 is tested.
Standard safety equipment includes:
Assuming you're on a good 16c-per-kWh electricity rate at home, you could fully charge the R4 E-Tech for as little as $8.32. Try seeing how far you get on $8.32 worth of petrol…
Renault Australia's standard warranty is an impressive one – five years, with unlimited mileage for most models. There's also an eight-year/160,000km warranty for the battery, and five years' roadside assistance.
The only question mark is over servicing plans. Theoretically an electric car should be cheaper to service, but so far there's no specific service plan for Renault's only EV in Australia, the Megane E-Tech.
The Renault 4 E-Tech is less immediately loveable than the Renault 5 E-Tech. Then again, that is true of most cars, but the R4 is more of a slow-burn kind of car.
You start to spot more and more delightful design details the more time you spend with it, and even if the R4 isn't quite as sparkling to drive as the R5, it's still way ahead of many rivals in terms of how rewarding it is behind the wheel.
It may not ever hit the giddy heights of eight million sales, but this is another electric Renault that is well-deserving of your attention.MORE: Everything Renault
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Advertiser
7 hours ago
- The Advertiser
2025 Mitsubishi ASX ES Street review
Mitsubishi ASX Pros Mitsubishi ASX Cons The end is nigh for the long-lived Mitsubishi ASX. Note: This article is based on our most recent review of the Mitsubishi ASX, as there have been no major changes since it was have updated key details such as pricing and specifications with the most up to date information available. Read the latest price and specs article here for all the details. A new Mitsubishi ASX, in the form of a restyled Renault Captur, is finally coming to Australia this year. Government approval documents show the new-generation ASX will be offered in LS, Aspire and Exceed trim levels, although pricing hasn't been confirmed. The current-generation model was launched back in 2010, back when Julia Gillard was our prime minister, and it has had four facelifts since then – the most recent being in 2019. Yes, this is one old car, easily the oldest in its segment. And since its 2010 launch, versions with turbo-diesel power, all-wheel drive, and even Peugeot and Citroen badging have come and gone. Though it no longer tops the sales charts in its segment, it remains an extremely popular option. I last drove an ASX four years ago, and it hasn't changed since then except for the usual reshuffling of the model lineup. A lot has changed in the small SUV segment since then, however. The MG ZS has become Australia's best-selling small SUV, and the GWM Haval Jolion, Chery Tiggo 4 Pro, and Chery Omoda 5 have come along to give local buyers additional modern but affordable Chinese offerings. Most of these Chinese SUVs offer similarly tempting prices to the ASX, but much longer lists of standard safety equipment. Mitsubishi introduced a Street package for the ASX ES last year, and we've put this to the test here. Given it costs $2500 more than the ES for cosmetic upgrades – detailed further below – and no extra performance, it isn't our pick of the range. Best to stick with the standard ES, which would have earned a better value for money score, or get the LS which costs the same as an ASX with the ES Street package but packs more safety and convenience features. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX stacks up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. For something this old, the interior actually has held up pretty well. The doors feel a little light and tinny, which while making it easier for kids to enter the car doesn't set the best first impression. Then you sit down and see an instrument cluster and an overall dashboard layout that haven't changed since 2010, and things are off to a wobbly start. Speaking of wobbles, that centre console bin lid is exceptionally wobbly, while the climate control knobs look like they once held custard tarts and the headliner looks like mouse fur. It initially all seems a bit cheap and old – the latter of which makes sense, given this is a 14-year-old car. Look a bit closer, however, and the ASX (mostly) holds up to scrutiny. Those tacky fan speed and temperature knobs are still infinitely preferable to touchscreen-based climate controls. Gloss black trim is used sparingly, and only in places you're unlikely to touch. And those analogue instruments are still attractive, even if the chrome cylinders they sit in are a bit 2000s now. Oh, sure, the screen in between the analogue gauges is rubbish. There's no digital speedometer, while the trip computer is ridiculously unintuitive and is controlled via a single button. Even a tamagotchi has more buttons, and don't get us started on how the fuel economy readout flips back and forth between modes whenever you restart the car. The infotainment system is also rudimentary, with particularly dated graphics. But there's (wired) Apple CarPlay and Android Auto so you'll probably never look at the rest of it, while the screen size is still acceptable in 2024 – if you're asking for more than eight inches, you're being greedy. The reversing camera resolution is adequate, too. The touchscreen's placement within the centre stack – instead of jutting out of the dashboard like a tombstone – betrays the ASX's age, but it's still easy to see on the run. Also betraying the ASX's age is the lack of a wireless phone charger or even a spot big enough to keep your phone. There's a tray at the base of the centre console, but it won't fit many of today's large smartphones. You can put it in the centre console bin, while there's also a decently sized glove compartment. The gated shifter and manual handbrake are another couple of signs you're in an old car, though the former is at least different from the one the ASX launched with back in 2010. Progress… The cloth upholstery is attractive with its tessellating cubes pattern, and the front seats are comfortable though I couldn't get an ideal seating position – I always felt like I was perched too high. Material quality in the ASX is pretty good overall. Where many rivals don't bother, Mitsubishi put squishy leatherette trim on the sides of the centre console to make it easier on your knees. The tops of the front doors are finished in soft-touch plastic and while the piece of soft-touch trim across the front of the dashboard looks a bit stuck-on, the graining matches the hard plastic found on the dash top. Step into the back and you'll find plenty of legroom. At 180cm tall, I could comfortably sit behind my seating position. Headroom isn't quite as impressive, and I only had a little bit of clearance. Taller passengers won't be happy, with the roof appearing lower in the back than up front. The rear-seat occupant may grumble. Their seat is ever so slightly higher, while there's a little bit of a driveline hump to eat into their legroom. Really, everyone back here will have something to grumble about as there are no air vents, nor are there any USB outlets. You get a fold-down armrest with cupholders, a map pocket on one seatback, bottle holders in the doors, and that's it. If you have small children, you'll find ISOFIX child seat anchor points on the two outboard seats, and top-tether points for all three seats. Open the tailgate and you'll find a competitive 393 litres of luggage space, expanding to 1193 litres if you drop the 60:40 split/fold rear seats. Under the boot floor is a space-saver spare. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. Two naturally aspirated petrol engines are available in the ASX depending on variant; the Street features the less powerful option. We would typically see the ASX hover around 9L/100km on the daily commute. Many rivals have moved to smaller, turbocharged engines, and indeed the related Eclipse Cross packs a turbo 1.5-litre. Its claimed combined cycle fuel economy in front-wheel drive guise, however, is virtually the same at 7.3L/100km. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. We've driven newer Korean SUVs with speed limit assist systems that won't shut up, as well as Chinese SUVs with intrusive lane-keep assist and driver attention monitoring systems. You may therefore find the Mitsubishi ASX, being as old as it is, a refreshingly simple alternative to those tech-laden rivals. There's autonomous emergency braking but no blind-spot monitoring or rear cross-traffic alert – at least not on the ES. There is a lane-departure warning system that alerts you if you cross a lane marking, but doesn't actually nudge you back into place. You therefore don't feel the steering wheel squirming like with many cars with lane-keep assist systems. And yet despite this, the steering is the most awkward part of the ASX driving experience. There mightn't be a nanny intervening to pull you back into your lane, but the steering feels like it's unsettled anyway. The ASX's steering feels like you're working knots out of it, with an oddly inconsistent weighting. It doesn't feel fluid at all and can still feel heavy at low speeds – for example, when you're negotiating a carpark. The engine is rather gruff. The ticks you'll often hear from an idling engine are more like loud snaps in the ASX, which seems to run rough. Prod the accelerator and you're welcomed with a drone, with the CVT making it sound like you're stuck in one very tall first gear. That CVT does make the most out of the ASX's outputs though, giving the Mitsubishi a relatively zippy feel off the line. The 2.0-litre can nevertheless still feel a little bit laboured at times, however, including when you're driving on steeper grades. Tyre roar is also present even on smoother surfaced roads at double-digit speeds, and becomes more pronounced on coarser-chip roads and at highway speeds. There's a bit of wind noise around the mirrors, too. Ride comfort is decent, with the ASX managing some of Brisbane's poorer roads without much fuss. As for handling, don't go expecting this to be as engaging as, say, a Suzuki Vitara. You feel the high centre of gravity and while it won't fall over in a corner, it won't spark much joy either. The ASX and Eclipse Cross are the last vehicles still standing in Australia on the GS platform, co-developed by Mitsubishi and what was then DaimlerChrysler. Other vehicles to use this platform included the Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Avenger and Caliber, and first-generation Jeep Compass. That's hardly a who's who of talent, but then again Mitsubishi did use this platform for the Lancer Evolution. Swings and roundabouts… The lack of features like adaptive cruise control and lane-keep assist is a bit retrograde, but the greatest omission of all is a digital speedometer. Seriously, Mitsubishi, would it have been so hard to fit one? The ES – sans the ES Street package – strikes us as the best value of the ASX lineup. 2025 Mitsubishi ASX GS equipment highlights: ES adds: ASX ES Street adds: ASX LS adds (over ES): ASX MR adds (over ES): ASX GSR adds (over LS): ASX Exceed adds: To see how the Mitsubishi ASX stacks up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. When the Mitsubishi ASX was tested by ANCAP in 2014 it received a rating of five stars, though this has now lapsed meaning the car is now unrated. This rating from 2014 was based on a frontal offset score of 14.13 out of 16 and a side impact score of 16 out of 16. Whiplash and pedestrian protection were rated Good and Acceptable, respectively. Standard safety equipment includes: ES adds: LS adds: To see how the Mitsubishi ASX stacks up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. Mitsubishi offers 10 years of capped-price servicing, as well as a lengthy 10-year, 200,000km warranty. However, to take advantage of that you'll need to service your ASX at a Mitsubishi dealership. If you don't continue servicing your ASX through Mitsubishi, the warranty drops to five years and 100,000km. Scheduled servicing is required every 12 months or 15,000km – whichever comes first. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. We often hear enthusiasts say, "Oh, if only you could still buy a new [BLANK]! If they had kept building it, I'd buy one now." We think many enthusiasts who say this are referring to cars like the E39 5 Series or any V8 Commodore sedan, and not the Mitsubishi ASX, a car that wasn't exactly a class-leader in 2010 and has well and truly fallen off the pace since. The Mitsubishi ASX is so very old, and it has scarcely changed during its very long tenure on the market. It makes more sense to buy a near-new one because you won't be missing out on anything. Nothing has changed. It does say something about the arguable lack of advancement in this segment, though, that the Mitsubishi ASX doesn't feel like a complete relic. The styling has held up surprisingly well – what car usually looks better four facelifts later? – and the interior layout and material quality remain quite agreeable, while the warranty is long and the price is cheap. Rivals have packed in more safety equipment, but it hasn't always been ideally calibrated. And many of its Japanese and Korean rivals wear a much higher price tag than the ASX. While Chinese cars are rising up the sales charts, we know there are plenty of buyers out there who don't want to take the chance. Ultimately, though, cars like the Chery Tiggo 4 Pro and GWM Haval Jolion are the most direct competition for the ASX on size and price. So you'll need to decide whether you'll take the chance, or stick with the proven but dated ASX. If you're keen on an ASX, our advice is to stick to an ES and don't add any accessories like this ES Street package. Interested in buying a Mitsubishi ASX? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers hereMORE: Everything Mitsubishi ASX Content originally sourced from: ASX Pros Mitsubishi ASX Cons The end is nigh for the long-lived Mitsubishi ASX. Note: This article is based on our most recent review of the Mitsubishi ASX, as there have been no major changes since it was have updated key details such as pricing and specifications with the most up to date information available. Read the latest price and specs article here for all the details. A new Mitsubishi ASX, in the form of a restyled Renault Captur, is finally coming to Australia this year. Government approval documents show the new-generation ASX will be offered in LS, Aspire and Exceed trim levels, although pricing hasn't been confirmed. The current-generation model was launched back in 2010, back when Julia Gillard was our prime minister, and it has had four facelifts since then – the most recent being in 2019. Yes, this is one old car, easily the oldest in its segment. And since its 2010 launch, versions with turbo-diesel power, all-wheel drive, and even Peugeot and Citroen badging have come and gone. Though it no longer tops the sales charts in its segment, it remains an extremely popular option. I last drove an ASX four years ago, and it hasn't changed since then except for the usual reshuffling of the model lineup. A lot has changed in the small SUV segment since then, however. The MG ZS has become Australia's best-selling small SUV, and the GWM Haval Jolion, Chery Tiggo 4 Pro, and Chery Omoda 5 have come along to give local buyers additional modern but affordable Chinese offerings. Most of these Chinese SUVs offer similarly tempting prices to the ASX, but much longer lists of standard safety equipment. Mitsubishi introduced a Street package for the ASX ES last year, and we've put this to the test here. Given it costs $2500 more than the ES for cosmetic upgrades – detailed further below – and no extra performance, it isn't our pick of the range. Best to stick with the standard ES, which would have earned a better value for money score, or get the LS which costs the same as an ASX with the ES Street package but packs more safety and convenience features. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX stacks up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. For something this old, the interior actually has held up pretty well. The doors feel a little light and tinny, which while making it easier for kids to enter the car doesn't set the best first impression. Then you sit down and see an instrument cluster and an overall dashboard layout that haven't changed since 2010, and things are off to a wobbly start. Speaking of wobbles, that centre console bin lid is exceptionally wobbly, while the climate control knobs look like they once held custard tarts and the headliner looks like mouse fur. It initially all seems a bit cheap and old – the latter of which makes sense, given this is a 14-year-old car. Look a bit closer, however, and the ASX (mostly) holds up to scrutiny. Those tacky fan speed and temperature knobs are still infinitely preferable to touchscreen-based climate controls. Gloss black trim is used sparingly, and only in places you're unlikely to touch. And those analogue instruments are still attractive, even if the chrome cylinders they sit in are a bit 2000s now. Oh, sure, the screen in between the analogue gauges is rubbish. There's no digital speedometer, while the trip computer is ridiculously unintuitive and is controlled via a single button. Even a tamagotchi has more buttons, and don't get us started on how the fuel economy readout flips back and forth between modes whenever you restart the car. The infotainment system is also rudimentary, with particularly dated graphics. But there's (wired) Apple CarPlay and Android Auto so you'll probably never look at the rest of it, while the screen size is still acceptable in 2024 – if you're asking for more than eight inches, you're being greedy. The reversing camera resolution is adequate, too. The touchscreen's placement within the centre stack – instead of jutting out of the dashboard like a tombstone – betrays the ASX's age, but it's still easy to see on the run. Also betraying the ASX's age is the lack of a wireless phone charger or even a spot big enough to keep your phone. There's a tray at the base of the centre console, but it won't fit many of today's large smartphones. You can put it in the centre console bin, while there's also a decently sized glove compartment. The gated shifter and manual handbrake are another couple of signs you're in an old car, though the former is at least different from the one the ASX launched with back in 2010. Progress… The cloth upholstery is attractive with its tessellating cubes pattern, and the front seats are comfortable though I couldn't get an ideal seating position – I always felt like I was perched too high. Material quality in the ASX is pretty good overall. Where many rivals don't bother, Mitsubishi put squishy leatherette trim on the sides of the centre console to make it easier on your knees. The tops of the front doors are finished in soft-touch plastic and while the piece of soft-touch trim across the front of the dashboard looks a bit stuck-on, the graining matches the hard plastic found on the dash top. Step into the back and you'll find plenty of legroom. At 180cm tall, I could comfortably sit behind my seating position. Headroom isn't quite as impressive, and I only had a little bit of clearance. Taller passengers won't be happy, with the roof appearing lower in the back than up front. The rear-seat occupant may grumble. Their seat is ever so slightly higher, while there's a little bit of a driveline hump to eat into their legroom. Really, everyone back here will have something to grumble about as there are no air vents, nor are there any USB outlets. You get a fold-down armrest with cupholders, a map pocket on one seatback, bottle holders in the doors, and that's it. If you have small children, you'll find ISOFIX child seat anchor points on the two outboard seats, and top-tether points for all three seats. Open the tailgate and you'll find a competitive 393 litres of luggage space, expanding to 1193 litres if you drop the 60:40 split/fold rear seats. Under the boot floor is a space-saver spare. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. Two naturally aspirated petrol engines are available in the ASX depending on variant; the Street features the less powerful option. We would typically see the ASX hover around 9L/100km on the daily commute. Many rivals have moved to smaller, turbocharged engines, and indeed the related Eclipse Cross packs a turbo 1.5-litre. Its claimed combined cycle fuel economy in front-wheel drive guise, however, is virtually the same at 7.3L/100km. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. We've driven newer Korean SUVs with speed limit assist systems that won't shut up, as well as Chinese SUVs with intrusive lane-keep assist and driver attention monitoring systems. You may therefore find the Mitsubishi ASX, being as old as it is, a refreshingly simple alternative to those tech-laden rivals. There's autonomous emergency braking but no blind-spot monitoring or rear cross-traffic alert – at least not on the ES. There is a lane-departure warning system that alerts you if you cross a lane marking, but doesn't actually nudge you back into place. You therefore don't feel the steering wheel squirming like with many cars with lane-keep assist systems. And yet despite this, the steering is the most awkward part of the ASX driving experience. There mightn't be a nanny intervening to pull you back into your lane, but the steering feels like it's unsettled anyway. The ASX's steering feels like you're working knots out of it, with an oddly inconsistent weighting. It doesn't feel fluid at all and can still feel heavy at low speeds – for example, when you're negotiating a carpark. The engine is rather gruff. The ticks you'll often hear from an idling engine are more like loud snaps in the ASX, which seems to run rough. Prod the accelerator and you're welcomed with a drone, with the CVT making it sound like you're stuck in one very tall first gear. That CVT does make the most out of the ASX's outputs though, giving the Mitsubishi a relatively zippy feel off the line. The 2.0-litre can nevertheless still feel a little bit laboured at times, however, including when you're driving on steeper grades. Tyre roar is also present even on smoother surfaced roads at double-digit speeds, and becomes more pronounced on coarser-chip roads and at highway speeds. There's a bit of wind noise around the mirrors, too. Ride comfort is decent, with the ASX managing some of Brisbane's poorer roads without much fuss. As for handling, don't go expecting this to be as engaging as, say, a Suzuki Vitara. You feel the high centre of gravity and while it won't fall over in a corner, it won't spark much joy either. The ASX and Eclipse Cross are the last vehicles still standing in Australia on the GS platform, co-developed by Mitsubishi and what was then DaimlerChrysler. Other vehicles to use this platform included the Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Avenger and Caliber, and first-generation Jeep Compass. That's hardly a who's who of talent, but then again Mitsubishi did use this platform for the Lancer Evolution. Swings and roundabouts… The lack of features like adaptive cruise control and lane-keep assist is a bit retrograde, but the greatest omission of all is a digital speedometer. Seriously, Mitsubishi, would it have been so hard to fit one? The ES – sans the ES Street package – strikes us as the best value of the ASX lineup. 2025 Mitsubishi ASX GS equipment highlights: ES adds: ASX ES Street adds: ASX LS adds (over ES): ASX MR adds (over ES): ASX GSR adds (over LS): ASX Exceed adds: To see how the Mitsubishi ASX stacks up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. When the Mitsubishi ASX was tested by ANCAP in 2014 it received a rating of five stars, though this has now lapsed meaning the car is now unrated. This rating from 2014 was based on a frontal offset score of 14.13 out of 16 and a side impact score of 16 out of 16. Whiplash and pedestrian protection were rated Good and Acceptable, respectively. Standard safety equipment includes: ES adds: LS adds: To see how the Mitsubishi ASX stacks up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. Mitsubishi offers 10 years of capped-price servicing, as well as a lengthy 10-year, 200,000km warranty. However, to take advantage of that you'll need to service your ASX at a Mitsubishi dealership. If you don't continue servicing your ASX through Mitsubishi, the warranty drops to five years and 100,000km. Scheduled servicing is required every 12 months or 15,000km – whichever comes first. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. We often hear enthusiasts say, "Oh, if only you could still buy a new [BLANK]! If they had kept building it, I'd buy one now." We think many enthusiasts who say this are referring to cars like the E39 5 Series or any V8 Commodore sedan, and not the Mitsubishi ASX, a car that wasn't exactly a class-leader in 2010 and has well and truly fallen off the pace since. The Mitsubishi ASX is so very old, and it has scarcely changed during its very long tenure on the market. It makes more sense to buy a near-new one because you won't be missing out on anything. Nothing has changed. It does say something about the arguable lack of advancement in this segment, though, that the Mitsubishi ASX doesn't feel like a complete relic. The styling has held up surprisingly well – what car usually looks better four facelifts later? – and the interior layout and material quality remain quite agreeable, while the warranty is long and the price is cheap. Rivals have packed in more safety equipment, but it hasn't always been ideally calibrated. And many of its Japanese and Korean rivals wear a much higher price tag than the ASX. While Chinese cars are rising up the sales charts, we know there are plenty of buyers out there who don't want to take the chance. Ultimately, though, cars like the Chery Tiggo 4 Pro and GWM Haval Jolion are the most direct competition for the ASX on size and price. So you'll need to decide whether you'll take the chance, or stick with the proven but dated ASX. If you're keen on an ASX, our advice is to stick to an ES and don't add any accessories like this ES Street package. Interested in buying a Mitsubishi ASX? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers hereMORE: Everything Mitsubishi ASX Content originally sourced from: ASX Pros Mitsubishi ASX Cons The end is nigh for the long-lived Mitsubishi ASX. Note: This article is based on our most recent review of the Mitsubishi ASX, as there have been no major changes since it was have updated key details such as pricing and specifications with the most up to date information available. Read the latest price and specs article here for all the details. A new Mitsubishi ASX, in the form of a restyled Renault Captur, is finally coming to Australia this year. Government approval documents show the new-generation ASX will be offered in LS, Aspire and Exceed trim levels, although pricing hasn't been confirmed. The current-generation model was launched back in 2010, back when Julia Gillard was our prime minister, and it has had four facelifts since then – the most recent being in 2019. Yes, this is one old car, easily the oldest in its segment. And since its 2010 launch, versions with turbo-diesel power, all-wheel drive, and even Peugeot and Citroen badging have come and gone. Though it no longer tops the sales charts in its segment, it remains an extremely popular option. I last drove an ASX four years ago, and it hasn't changed since then except for the usual reshuffling of the model lineup. A lot has changed in the small SUV segment since then, however. The MG ZS has become Australia's best-selling small SUV, and the GWM Haval Jolion, Chery Tiggo 4 Pro, and Chery Omoda 5 have come along to give local buyers additional modern but affordable Chinese offerings. Most of these Chinese SUVs offer similarly tempting prices to the ASX, but much longer lists of standard safety equipment. Mitsubishi introduced a Street package for the ASX ES last year, and we've put this to the test here. Given it costs $2500 more than the ES for cosmetic upgrades – detailed further below – and no extra performance, it isn't our pick of the range. Best to stick with the standard ES, which would have earned a better value for money score, or get the LS which costs the same as an ASX with the ES Street package but packs more safety and convenience features. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX stacks up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. For something this old, the interior actually has held up pretty well. The doors feel a little light and tinny, which while making it easier for kids to enter the car doesn't set the best first impression. Then you sit down and see an instrument cluster and an overall dashboard layout that haven't changed since 2010, and things are off to a wobbly start. Speaking of wobbles, that centre console bin lid is exceptionally wobbly, while the climate control knobs look like they once held custard tarts and the headliner looks like mouse fur. It initially all seems a bit cheap and old – the latter of which makes sense, given this is a 14-year-old car. Look a bit closer, however, and the ASX (mostly) holds up to scrutiny. Those tacky fan speed and temperature knobs are still infinitely preferable to touchscreen-based climate controls. Gloss black trim is used sparingly, and only in places you're unlikely to touch. And those analogue instruments are still attractive, even if the chrome cylinders they sit in are a bit 2000s now. Oh, sure, the screen in between the analogue gauges is rubbish. There's no digital speedometer, while the trip computer is ridiculously unintuitive and is controlled via a single button. Even a tamagotchi has more buttons, and don't get us started on how the fuel economy readout flips back and forth between modes whenever you restart the car. The infotainment system is also rudimentary, with particularly dated graphics. But there's (wired) Apple CarPlay and Android Auto so you'll probably never look at the rest of it, while the screen size is still acceptable in 2024 – if you're asking for more than eight inches, you're being greedy. The reversing camera resolution is adequate, too. The touchscreen's placement within the centre stack – instead of jutting out of the dashboard like a tombstone – betrays the ASX's age, but it's still easy to see on the run. Also betraying the ASX's age is the lack of a wireless phone charger or even a spot big enough to keep your phone. There's a tray at the base of the centre console, but it won't fit many of today's large smartphones. You can put it in the centre console bin, while there's also a decently sized glove compartment. The gated shifter and manual handbrake are another couple of signs you're in an old car, though the former is at least different from the one the ASX launched with back in 2010. Progress… The cloth upholstery is attractive with its tessellating cubes pattern, and the front seats are comfortable though I couldn't get an ideal seating position – I always felt like I was perched too high. Material quality in the ASX is pretty good overall. Where many rivals don't bother, Mitsubishi put squishy leatherette trim on the sides of the centre console to make it easier on your knees. The tops of the front doors are finished in soft-touch plastic and while the piece of soft-touch trim across the front of the dashboard looks a bit stuck-on, the graining matches the hard plastic found on the dash top. Step into the back and you'll find plenty of legroom. At 180cm tall, I could comfortably sit behind my seating position. Headroom isn't quite as impressive, and I only had a little bit of clearance. Taller passengers won't be happy, with the roof appearing lower in the back than up front. The rear-seat occupant may grumble. Their seat is ever so slightly higher, while there's a little bit of a driveline hump to eat into their legroom. Really, everyone back here will have something to grumble about as there are no air vents, nor are there any USB outlets. You get a fold-down armrest with cupholders, a map pocket on one seatback, bottle holders in the doors, and that's it. If you have small children, you'll find ISOFIX child seat anchor points on the two outboard seats, and top-tether points for all three seats. Open the tailgate and you'll find a competitive 393 litres of luggage space, expanding to 1193 litres if you drop the 60:40 split/fold rear seats. Under the boot floor is a space-saver spare. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. Two naturally aspirated petrol engines are available in the ASX depending on variant; the Street features the less powerful option. We would typically see the ASX hover around 9L/100km on the daily commute. Many rivals have moved to smaller, turbocharged engines, and indeed the related Eclipse Cross packs a turbo 1.5-litre. Its claimed combined cycle fuel economy in front-wheel drive guise, however, is virtually the same at 7.3L/100km. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. We've driven newer Korean SUVs with speed limit assist systems that won't shut up, as well as Chinese SUVs with intrusive lane-keep assist and driver attention monitoring systems. You may therefore find the Mitsubishi ASX, being as old as it is, a refreshingly simple alternative to those tech-laden rivals. There's autonomous emergency braking but no blind-spot monitoring or rear cross-traffic alert – at least not on the ES. There is a lane-departure warning system that alerts you if you cross a lane marking, but doesn't actually nudge you back into place. You therefore don't feel the steering wheel squirming like with many cars with lane-keep assist systems. And yet despite this, the steering is the most awkward part of the ASX driving experience. There mightn't be a nanny intervening to pull you back into your lane, but the steering feels like it's unsettled anyway. The ASX's steering feels like you're working knots out of it, with an oddly inconsistent weighting. It doesn't feel fluid at all and can still feel heavy at low speeds – for example, when you're negotiating a carpark. The engine is rather gruff. The ticks you'll often hear from an idling engine are more like loud snaps in the ASX, which seems to run rough. Prod the accelerator and you're welcomed with a drone, with the CVT making it sound like you're stuck in one very tall first gear. That CVT does make the most out of the ASX's outputs though, giving the Mitsubishi a relatively zippy feel off the line. The 2.0-litre can nevertheless still feel a little bit laboured at times, however, including when you're driving on steeper grades. Tyre roar is also present even on smoother surfaced roads at double-digit speeds, and becomes more pronounced on coarser-chip roads and at highway speeds. There's a bit of wind noise around the mirrors, too. Ride comfort is decent, with the ASX managing some of Brisbane's poorer roads without much fuss. As for handling, don't go expecting this to be as engaging as, say, a Suzuki Vitara. You feel the high centre of gravity and while it won't fall over in a corner, it won't spark much joy either. The ASX and Eclipse Cross are the last vehicles still standing in Australia on the GS platform, co-developed by Mitsubishi and what was then DaimlerChrysler. Other vehicles to use this platform included the Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Avenger and Caliber, and first-generation Jeep Compass. That's hardly a who's who of talent, but then again Mitsubishi did use this platform for the Lancer Evolution. Swings and roundabouts… The lack of features like adaptive cruise control and lane-keep assist is a bit retrograde, but the greatest omission of all is a digital speedometer. Seriously, Mitsubishi, would it have been so hard to fit one? The ES – sans the ES Street package – strikes us as the best value of the ASX lineup. 2025 Mitsubishi ASX GS equipment highlights: ES adds: ASX ES Street adds: ASX LS adds (over ES): ASX MR adds (over ES): ASX GSR adds (over LS): ASX Exceed adds: To see how the Mitsubishi ASX stacks up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. When the Mitsubishi ASX was tested by ANCAP in 2014 it received a rating of five stars, though this has now lapsed meaning the car is now unrated. This rating from 2014 was based on a frontal offset score of 14.13 out of 16 and a side impact score of 16 out of 16. Whiplash and pedestrian protection were rated Good and Acceptable, respectively. Standard safety equipment includes: ES adds: LS adds: To see how the Mitsubishi ASX stacks up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. Mitsubishi offers 10 years of capped-price servicing, as well as a lengthy 10-year, 200,000km warranty. However, to take advantage of that you'll need to service your ASX at a Mitsubishi dealership. If you don't continue servicing your ASX through Mitsubishi, the warranty drops to five years and 100,000km. Scheduled servicing is required every 12 months or 15,000km – whichever comes first. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. We often hear enthusiasts say, "Oh, if only you could still buy a new [BLANK]! If they had kept building it, I'd buy one now." We think many enthusiasts who say this are referring to cars like the E39 5 Series or any V8 Commodore sedan, and not the Mitsubishi ASX, a car that wasn't exactly a class-leader in 2010 and has well and truly fallen off the pace since. The Mitsubishi ASX is so very old, and it has scarcely changed during its very long tenure on the market. It makes more sense to buy a near-new one because you won't be missing out on anything. Nothing has changed. It does say something about the arguable lack of advancement in this segment, though, that the Mitsubishi ASX doesn't feel like a complete relic. The styling has held up surprisingly well – what car usually looks better four facelifts later? – and the interior layout and material quality remain quite agreeable, while the warranty is long and the price is cheap. Rivals have packed in more safety equipment, but it hasn't always been ideally calibrated. And many of its Japanese and Korean rivals wear a much higher price tag than the ASX. While Chinese cars are rising up the sales charts, we know there are plenty of buyers out there who don't want to take the chance. Ultimately, though, cars like the Chery Tiggo 4 Pro and GWM Haval Jolion are the most direct competition for the ASX on size and price. So you'll need to decide whether you'll take the chance, or stick with the proven but dated ASX. If you're keen on an ASX, our advice is to stick to an ES and don't add any accessories like this ES Street package. Interested in buying a Mitsubishi ASX? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers hereMORE: Everything Mitsubishi ASX Content originally sourced from: ASX Pros Mitsubishi ASX Cons The end is nigh for the long-lived Mitsubishi ASX. Note: This article is based on our most recent review of the Mitsubishi ASX, as there have been no major changes since it was have updated key details such as pricing and specifications with the most up to date information available. Read the latest price and specs article here for all the details. A new Mitsubishi ASX, in the form of a restyled Renault Captur, is finally coming to Australia this year. Government approval documents show the new-generation ASX will be offered in LS, Aspire and Exceed trim levels, although pricing hasn't been confirmed. The current-generation model was launched back in 2010, back when Julia Gillard was our prime minister, and it has had four facelifts since then – the most recent being in 2019. Yes, this is one old car, easily the oldest in its segment. And since its 2010 launch, versions with turbo-diesel power, all-wheel drive, and even Peugeot and Citroen badging have come and gone. Though it no longer tops the sales charts in its segment, it remains an extremely popular option. I last drove an ASX four years ago, and it hasn't changed since then except for the usual reshuffling of the model lineup. A lot has changed in the small SUV segment since then, however. The MG ZS has become Australia's best-selling small SUV, and the GWM Haval Jolion, Chery Tiggo 4 Pro, and Chery Omoda 5 have come along to give local buyers additional modern but affordable Chinese offerings. Most of these Chinese SUVs offer similarly tempting prices to the ASX, but much longer lists of standard safety equipment. Mitsubishi introduced a Street package for the ASX ES last year, and we've put this to the test here. Given it costs $2500 more than the ES for cosmetic upgrades – detailed further below – and no extra performance, it isn't our pick of the range. Best to stick with the standard ES, which would have earned a better value for money score, or get the LS which costs the same as an ASX with the ES Street package but packs more safety and convenience features. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX stacks up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. For something this old, the interior actually has held up pretty well. The doors feel a little light and tinny, which while making it easier for kids to enter the car doesn't set the best first impression. Then you sit down and see an instrument cluster and an overall dashboard layout that haven't changed since 2010, and things are off to a wobbly start. Speaking of wobbles, that centre console bin lid is exceptionally wobbly, while the climate control knobs look like they once held custard tarts and the headliner looks like mouse fur. It initially all seems a bit cheap and old – the latter of which makes sense, given this is a 14-year-old car. Look a bit closer, however, and the ASX (mostly) holds up to scrutiny. Those tacky fan speed and temperature knobs are still infinitely preferable to touchscreen-based climate controls. Gloss black trim is used sparingly, and only in places you're unlikely to touch. And those analogue instruments are still attractive, even if the chrome cylinders they sit in are a bit 2000s now. Oh, sure, the screen in between the analogue gauges is rubbish. There's no digital speedometer, while the trip computer is ridiculously unintuitive and is controlled via a single button. Even a tamagotchi has more buttons, and don't get us started on how the fuel economy readout flips back and forth between modes whenever you restart the car. The infotainment system is also rudimentary, with particularly dated graphics. But there's (wired) Apple CarPlay and Android Auto so you'll probably never look at the rest of it, while the screen size is still acceptable in 2024 – if you're asking for more than eight inches, you're being greedy. The reversing camera resolution is adequate, too. The touchscreen's placement within the centre stack – instead of jutting out of the dashboard like a tombstone – betrays the ASX's age, but it's still easy to see on the run. Also betraying the ASX's age is the lack of a wireless phone charger or even a spot big enough to keep your phone. There's a tray at the base of the centre console, but it won't fit many of today's large smartphones. You can put it in the centre console bin, while there's also a decently sized glove compartment. The gated shifter and manual handbrake are another couple of signs you're in an old car, though the former is at least different from the one the ASX launched with back in 2010. Progress… The cloth upholstery is attractive with its tessellating cubes pattern, and the front seats are comfortable though I couldn't get an ideal seating position – I always felt like I was perched too high. Material quality in the ASX is pretty good overall. Where many rivals don't bother, Mitsubishi put squishy leatherette trim on the sides of the centre console to make it easier on your knees. The tops of the front doors are finished in soft-touch plastic and while the piece of soft-touch trim across the front of the dashboard looks a bit stuck-on, the graining matches the hard plastic found on the dash top. Step into the back and you'll find plenty of legroom. At 180cm tall, I could comfortably sit behind my seating position. Headroom isn't quite as impressive, and I only had a little bit of clearance. Taller passengers won't be happy, with the roof appearing lower in the back than up front. The rear-seat occupant may grumble. Their seat is ever so slightly higher, while there's a little bit of a driveline hump to eat into their legroom. Really, everyone back here will have something to grumble about as there are no air vents, nor are there any USB outlets. You get a fold-down armrest with cupholders, a map pocket on one seatback, bottle holders in the doors, and that's it. If you have small children, you'll find ISOFIX child seat anchor points on the two outboard seats, and top-tether points for all three seats. Open the tailgate and you'll find a competitive 393 litres of luggage space, expanding to 1193 litres if you drop the 60:40 split/fold rear seats. Under the boot floor is a space-saver spare. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. Two naturally aspirated petrol engines are available in the ASX depending on variant; the Street features the less powerful option. We would typically see the ASX hover around 9L/100km on the daily commute. Many rivals have moved to smaller, turbocharged engines, and indeed the related Eclipse Cross packs a turbo 1.5-litre. Its claimed combined cycle fuel economy in front-wheel drive guise, however, is virtually the same at 7.3L/100km. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. We've driven newer Korean SUVs with speed limit assist systems that won't shut up, as well as Chinese SUVs with intrusive lane-keep assist and driver attention monitoring systems. You may therefore find the Mitsubishi ASX, being as old as it is, a refreshingly simple alternative to those tech-laden rivals. There's autonomous emergency braking but no blind-spot monitoring or rear cross-traffic alert – at least not on the ES. There is a lane-departure warning system that alerts you if you cross a lane marking, but doesn't actually nudge you back into place. You therefore don't feel the steering wheel squirming like with many cars with lane-keep assist systems. And yet despite this, the steering is the most awkward part of the ASX driving experience. There mightn't be a nanny intervening to pull you back into your lane, but the steering feels like it's unsettled anyway. The ASX's steering feels like you're working knots out of it, with an oddly inconsistent weighting. It doesn't feel fluid at all and can still feel heavy at low speeds – for example, when you're negotiating a carpark. The engine is rather gruff. The ticks you'll often hear from an idling engine are more like loud snaps in the ASX, which seems to run rough. Prod the accelerator and you're welcomed with a drone, with the CVT making it sound like you're stuck in one very tall first gear. That CVT does make the most out of the ASX's outputs though, giving the Mitsubishi a relatively zippy feel off the line. The 2.0-litre can nevertheless still feel a little bit laboured at times, however, including when you're driving on steeper grades. Tyre roar is also present even on smoother surfaced roads at double-digit speeds, and becomes more pronounced on coarser-chip roads and at highway speeds. There's a bit of wind noise around the mirrors, too. Ride comfort is decent, with the ASX managing some of Brisbane's poorer roads without much fuss. As for handling, don't go expecting this to be as engaging as, say, a Suzuki Vitara. You feel the high centre of gravity and while it won't fall over in a corner, it won't spark much joy either. The ASX and Eclipse Cross are the last vehicles still standing in Australia on the GS platform, co-developed by Mitsubishi and what was then DaimlerChrysler. Other vehicles to use this platform included the Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Avenger and Caliber, and first-generation Jeep Compass. That's hardly a who's who of talent, but then again Mitsubishi did use this platform for the Lancer Evolution. Swings and roundabouts… The lack of features like adaptive cruise control and lane-keep assist is a bit retrograde, but the greatest omission of all is a digital speedometer. Seriously, Mitsubishi, would it have been so hard to fit one? The ES – sans the ES Street package – strikes us as the best value of the ASX lineup. 2025 Mitsubishi ASX GS equipment highlights: ES adds: ASX ES Street adds: ASX LS adds (over ES): ASX MR adds (over ES): ASX GSR adds (over LS): ASX Exceed adds: To see how the Mitsubishi ASX stacks up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. When the Mitsubishi ASX was tested by ANCAP in 2014 it received a rating of five stars, though this has now lapsed meaning the car is now unrated. This rating from 2014 was based on a frontal offset score of 14.13 out of 16 and a side impact score of 16 out of 16. Whiplash and pedestrian protection were rated Good and Acceptable, respectively. Standard safety equipment includes: ES adds: LS adds: To see how the Mitsubishi ASX stacks up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. Mitsubishi offers 10 years of capped-price servicing, as well as a lengthy 10-year, 200,000km warranty. However, to take advantage of that you'll need to service your ASX at a Mitsubishi dealership. If you don't continue servicing your ASX through Mitsubishi, the warranty drops to five years and 100,000km. Scheduled servicing is required every 12 months or 15,000km – whichever comes first. To see how the Mitsubishi ASX lines up against the competition, check out our comparison tool. We often hear enthusiasts say, "Oh, if only you could still buy a new [BLANK]! If they had kept building it, I'd buy one now." We think many enthusiasts who say this are referring to cars like the E39 5 Series or any V8 Commodore sedan, and not the Mitsubishi ASX, a car that wasn't exactly a class-leader in 2010 and has well and truly fallen off the pace since. The Mitsubishi ASX is so very old, and it has scarcely changed during its very long tenure on the market. It makes more sense to buy a near-new one because you won't be missing out on anything. Nothing has changed. It does say something about the arguable lack of advancement in this segment, though, that the Mitsubishi ASX doesn't feel like a complete relic. The styling has held up surprisingly well – what car usually looks better four facelifts later? – and the interior layout and material quality remain quite agreeable, while the warranty is long and the price is cheap. Rivals have packed in more safety equipment, but it hasn't always been ideally calibrated. And many of its Japanese and Korean rivals wear a much higher price tag than the ASX. While Chinese cars are rising up the sales charts, we know there are plenty of buyers out there who don't want to take the chance. Ultimately, though, cars like the Chery Tiggo 4 Pro and GWM Haval Jolion are the most direct competition for the ASX on size and price. So you'll need to decide whether you'll take the chance, or stick with the proven but dated ASX. If you're keen on an ASX, our advice is to stick to an ES and don't add any accessories like this ES Street package. Interested in buying a Mitsubishi ASX? Get in touch with one of CarExpert's trusted dealers hereMORE: Everything Mitsubishi ASX Content originally sourced from:


The Advertiser
21 hours ago
- The Advertiser
2025 Renault Trafic price and specs
Renault has updated its mid-size Trafic commercial van, and the headline acts are additional safety gear and lightly tweaked styling. Prices are up by $490 range-wide, which means the French delivery van now starts at $49,490 before on-roads for the base Trafic SWB Pro manual and extends to $63,490 before on-roads for the full-fat Trafic LWB Crew Lifestyle. Tweaks include new Renault logos and a bulkhead with a glazed window, as well as a middle-seat work station and document holder with hidden laptop storage. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. New safety gear includes a driver attention monitor, autonomous emergency braking (AEB), a 'QR rescue code', an Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) shortcut button, and automatic bi-LED reflector-style headlights. Renault says the ADAS shortcut button provides "direct access to an on/off switch for ADAS features". It also unlocks a "perso" mode, which allows drivers to set up personal favourites to activate or deactivate certain features "at the press of a button". Similarly, the QR rescue code is a digitised barcode on the windscreen that allows first responders "quick access to the vehicle's structural and technical information in the event of a crash". Other changes include making a factory-fitted steel bulkhead standard, which features a glazed window to reduce road noise. This was previously an option on Trafic Pro van models. Weights and capacities vary by body type and are detailed below. There are two body lengths for the 2025 Trafic, with Crew variants sharing the same wheelbase and dimensions as LWB models. Crew variants offer six-seat passenger capacity, while the vans are fitted with a three-seat front bench. The 2025 Renault Trafic is currently unrated by ANCAP, though it was awarded a 'Gold' 69 per cent collision avoidance score in 2024. Standard safety equipment includes: Premium models add blind spot monitoring, tyre pressure monitoring, front and side parking sensors, and adaptive cruise control, while the Crew Lifestyle adds traffic sign recognition. Renault offers a handful of Trafic grades in Australia. 2025 Renault Trafic Pro equipment highlights: Trafic Premium adds: Trafic Crew Pro adds (over Pro): Trafic Crew Lifestyle adds: There are several options available across the Trafic range. Trafic Pro options include: Trafic Premium options include: Trafic Lifestyle options include: Renault currently offers five exterior paint finishes for the Trafic, with metallic paints commanding an $800 premium. Cumulus Blue is currently unavailable. 2025 Renault Trafic colours: MORE: Everything Renault Trafic Content originally sourced from: Renault has updated its mid-size Trafic commercial van, and the headline acts are additional safety gear and lightly tweaked styling. Prices are up by $490 range-wide, which means the French delivery van now starts at $49,490 before on-roads for the base Trafic SWB Pro manual and extends to $63,490 before on-roads for the full-fat Trafic LWB Crew Lifestyle. Tweaks include new Renault logos and a bulkhead with a glazed window, as well as a middle-seat work station and document holder with hidden laptop storage. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. New safety gear includes a driver attention monitor, autonomous emergency braking (AEB), a 'QR rescue code', an Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) shortcut button, and automatic bi-LED reflector-style headlights. Renault says the ADAS shortcut button provides "direct access to an on/off switch for ADAS features". It also unlocks a "perso" mode, which allows drivers to set up personal favourites to activate or deactivate certain features "at the press of a button". Similarly, the QR rescue code is a digitised barcode on the windscreen that allows first responders "quick access to the vehicle's structural and technical information in the event of a crash". Other changes include making a factory-fitted steel bulkhead standard, which features a glazed window to reduce road noise. This was previously an option on Trafic Pro van models. Weights and capacities vary by body type and are detailed below. There are two body lengths for the 2025 Trafic, with Crew variants sharing the same wheelbase and dimensions as LWB models. Crew variants offer six-seat passenger capacity, while the vans are fitted with a three-seat front bench. The 2025 Renault Trafic is currently unrated by ANCAP, though it was awarded a 'Gold' 69 per cent collision avoidance score in 2024. Standard safety equipment includes: Premium models add blind spot monitoring, tyre pressure monitoring, front and side parking sensors, and adaptive cruise control, while the Crew Lifestyle adds traffic sign recognition. Renault offers a handful of Trafic grades in Australia. 2025 Renault Trafic Pro equipment highlights: Trafic Premium adds: Trafic Crew Pro adds (over Pro): Trafic Crew Lifestyle adds: There are several options available across the Trafic range. Trafic Pro options include: Trafic Premium options include: Trafic Lifestyle options include: Renault currently offers five exterior paint finishes for the Trafic, with metallic paints commanding an $800 premium. Cumulus Blue is currently unavailable. 2025 Renault Trafic colours: MORE: Everything Renault Trafic Content originally sourced from: Renault has updated its mid-size Trafic commercial van, and the headline acts are additional safety gear and lightly tweaked styling. Prices are up by $490 range-wide, which means the French delivery van now starts at $49,490 before on-roads for the base Trafic SWB Pro manual and extends to $63,490 before on-roads for the full-fat Trafic LWB Crew Lifestyle. Tweaks include new Renault logos and a bulkhead with a glazed window, as well as a middle-seat work station and document holder with hidden laptop storage. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. New safety gear includes a driver attention monitor, autonomous emergency braking (AEB), a 'QR rescue code', an Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) shortcut button, and automatic bi-LED reflector-style headlights. Renault says the ADAS shortcut button provides "direct access to an on/off switch for ADAS features". It also unlocks a "perso" mode, which allows drivers to set up personal favourites to activate or deactivate certain features "at the press of a button". Similarly, the QR rescue code is a digitised barcode on the windscreen that allows first responders "quick access to the vehicle's structural and technical information in the event of a crash". Other changes include making a factory-fitted steel bulkhead standard, which features a glazed window to reduce road noise. This was previously an option on Trafic Pro van models. Weights and capacities vary by body type and are detailed below. There are two body lengths for the 2025 Trafic, with Crew variants sharing the same wheelbase and dimensions as LWB models. Crew variants offer six-seat passenger capacity, while the vans are fitted with a three-seat front bench. The 2025 Renault Trafic is currently unrated by ANCAP, though it was awarded a 'Gold' 69 per cent collision avoidance score in 2024. Standard safety equipment includes: Premium models add blind spot monitoring, tyre pressure monitoring, front and side parking sensors, and adaptive cruise control, while the Crew Lifestyle adds traffic sign recognition. Renault offers a handful of Trafic grades in Australia. 2025 Renault Trafic Pro equipment highlights: Trafic Premium adds: Trafic Crew Pro adds (over Pro): Trafic Crew Lifestyle adds: There are several options available across the Trafic range. Trafic Pro options include: Trafic Premium options include: Trafic Lifestyle options include: Renault currently offers five exterior paint finishes for the Trafic, with metallic paints commanding an $800 premium. Cumulus Blue is currently unavailable. 2025 Renault Trafic colours: MORE: Everything Renault Trafic Content originally sourced from: Renault has updated its mid-size Trafic commercial van, and the headline acts are additional safety gear and lightly tweaked styling. Prices are up by $490 range-wide, which means the French delivery van now starts at $49,490 before on-roads for the base Trafic SWB Pro manual and extends to $63,490 before on-roads for the full-fat Trafic LWB Crew Lifestyle. Tweaks include new Renault logos and a bulkhead with a glazed window, as well as a middle-seat work station and document holder with hidden laptop storage. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. New safety gear includes a driver attention monitor, autonomous emergency braking (AEB), a 'QR rescue code', an Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) shortcut button, and automatic bi-LED reflector-style headlights. Renault says the ADAS shortcut button provides "direct access to an on/off switch for ADAS features". It also unlocks a "perso" mode, which allows drivers to set up personal favourites to activate or deactivate certain features "at the press of a button". Similarly, the QR rescue code is a digitised barcode on the windscreen that allows first responders "quick access to the vehicle's structural and technical information in the event of a crash". Other changes include making a factory-fitted steel bulkhead standard, which features a glazed window to reduce road noise. This was previously an option on Trafic Pro van models. Weights and capacities vary by body type and are detailed below. There are two body lengths for the 2025 Trafic, with Crew variants sharing the same wheelbase and dimensions as LWB models. Crew variants offer six-seat passenger capacity, while the vans are fitted with a three-seat front bench. The 2025 Renault Trafic is currently unrated by ANCAP, though it was awarded a 'Gold' 69 per cent collision avoidance score in 2024. Standard safety equipment includes: Premium models add blind spot monitoring, tyre pressure monitoring, front and side parking sensors, and adaptive cruise control, while the Crew Lifestyle adds traffic sign recognition. Renault offers a handful of Trafic grades in Australia. 2025 Renault Trafic Pro equipment highlights: Trafic Premium adds: Trafic Crew Pro adds (over Pro): Trafic Crew Lifestyle adds: There are several options available across the Trafic range. Trafic Pro options include: Trafic Premium options include: Trafic Lifestyle options include: Renault currently offers five exterior paint finishes for the Trafic, with metallic paints commanding an $800 premium. Cumulus Blue is currently unavailable. 2025 Renault Trafic colours: MORE: Everything Renault Trafic Content originally sourced from:


7NEWS
a day ago
- 7NEWS
2025 Renault Trafic price and specs
Renault has updated its mid-size Trafic commercial van, and the headline acts are additional safety gear and lightly tweaked styling. Prices are up by $490 range-wide, which means the French delivery van now starts at $49,490 before on-roads for the base Trafic SWB Pro manual and extends to $63,490 before on-roads for the full-fat Trafic LWB Crew Lifestyle. Tweaks include new Renault logos and a bulkhead with a glazed window, as well as a middle-seat work station and document holder with hidden laptop storage. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. New safety gear includes a driver attention monitor, autonomous emergency braking (AEB), a 'QR rescue code', an Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) shortcut button, and automatic bi-LED reflector-style headlights. Renault says the ADAS shortcut button provides 'direct access to an on/off switch for ADAS features'. It also unlocks a 'perso' mode, which allows drivers to set up personal favourites to activate or deactivate certain features 'at the press of a button'. Similarly, the QR rescue code is a digitised barcode on the windscreen that allows first responders 'quick access to the vehicle's structural and technical information in the event of a crash'. Other changes include making a factory-fitted steel bulkhead standard, which features a glazed window to reduce road noise. This was previously an option on Trafic Pro van models. Pricing Drivetrains and Efficiency Weights and capacities vary by body type and are detailed below. Dimensions There are two body lengths for the 2025 Trafic, with Crew variants sharing the same wheelbase and dimensions as LWB models. Crew variants offer six-seat passenger capacity, while the vans are fitted with a three-seat front bench. Servicing and Warranty Safety The 2025 Renault Trafic is currently unrated by ANCAP, though it was awarded a 'Gold' 69 per cent collision avoidance score in 2024. Standard safety equipment includes: 6 airbags Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) (NEW) Lane departure warning Cruise control Driver attention monitor (NEW) Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) shortcut button (NEW) QR rescue code (NEW) Rear parking sensors Reversing camera Premium models add blind spot monitoring, tyre pressure monitoring, front and side parking sensors, and adaptive cruise control, while the Crew Lifestyle adds traffic sign recognition. Standard Equipment Renault offers a handful of Trafic grades in Australia. 2025 Renault Trafic Pro equipment highlights: 16-inch steel wheels Full-size steel spare wheel Updated Renault badging (NEW) Automatic LED headlights Heated side mirrors 8.0-inch touchscreen infotainment display 4.2-inch display in instrument cluster DAB+ digital radio Wireless Apple CarPlay, Android Auto 2-speaker sound system Cloth upholstery Leather-look steering wheel 8-way manual-adjustable driver's seat Fixed passenger seat bench Bulkhead with glazed window (NEW) Passenger work station bench (NEW) Keyless entry Trafic Premium adds: Front LED fog lights Rain-sensing wipers 7-inch display in instrument cluster (NEW) Wireless phone charger Trafic Crew Pro adds (over Pro): Automatic high-beam 3 rear seats Trafic Crew Lifestyle adds: 17-inch alloy wheels Satellite navigation 4-speaker sound system Heated driver's seat Under-seat storage (rear seats) Options There are several options available across the Trafic range. Trafic Pro options include: Unglazed window on right-hand sliding door ($800) Glazed windows on rear barn doors ($400) 17-inch alloy wheels ($1000) Trade Pack ($2000) Peace Of Mind Pack ($1200) Comfort Pack – van ($1200) Comfort Pack – Crew ($1000) Trafic Premium options include: Glazed tailgate window ($0) No right sliding door ($0) Left and right sliding doors – with glazed windows (N/A with Trade Pack) ($400) 17-inch alloy wheels (N/A with Business Pack) ($1000) Trade Pack ($2000) Business Pack ($2200) Trafic Lifestyle options include: Tailgate with glazed window ($0) Colours Renault currently offers five exterior paint finishes for the Trafic, with metallic paints commanding an $800 premium. Cumulus Blue is currently unavailable. 2025 Renault Trafic colours: Glacier White Urban Grey Highland Grey Metallic ($800) Comet Grey Metallic ($800) Jet Black Metallic ($800)