logo
Democratic attorneys general sue Trump over ‘illegal' voting order

Democratic attorneys general sue Trump over ‘illegal' voting order

The Guardian04-04-2025
A coalition of 19 Democratic attorneys general filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Thursday, arguing that a recent executive order signed by the president that seeks to overhaul the nation's elections was 'unconstitutional, anti-democratic, and un-American'.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Massachusetts, challenges several provisions of the far-reaching executive order issued last week, including the proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration and new rules requiring all mail ballots be received by election day.
The attorneys general accuse the president of overstepping his authority and allege that the order 'usurps the states' constitutional power and seeks to amend election law by fiat'.
Among the defendants named in the lawsuit are Trump, the attorney general Pam Bondi and the United States Election Assistance Commission, an independent agency charged with helping to improve election administration and ensuring voting accessibility and security.
The state attorneys general say they are asking a judge to declare the provisions 'unconstitutional and void'.
'The president's executive order has no legal justification and far exceeds the scope of his constitutional authority,' the California attorney general Rob Bonta, a Democrat, said during a press conference on Thursday afternoon.
'Let me be clear: Trump is acting like he's above the law. He isn't. He's violating the US constitution. He can't, which is why we're taking action.'
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In the lawsuit, the attorneys general repeatedly cite the elections clause of the constitution, which says that states set the 'times, places and manner' of elections. The clause allows Congress to pass federal voting laws, which House Republicans are racing to do, but 'nowhere does the constitution provide the president, or the executive branch, with any independent power to modify the states' procedures for conducting federal elections', the attorneys general assert in the complaint.
California was joined by the Democratic attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin.
Aaron Ford, the Democratic attorney general of Nevada, said Trump's executive order was not only unconstitutional but 'unnecessary'. He said that all US states had a 'vested interest' in ensuring a fair election process.
'To insinuate otherwise and to seek to impose restrictions based on these insinuations, is political gamesmanship. Frankly, it's illegal political gamesmanship,' Ford said during the press conference with Bonta.
'Blackmailing states with the removal of election security funding unless we comply with the order is a far more damaging and harmful threat than any perceived dangers the president is peddling falsehoods over.'
Trump's elections order, described by White House staff secretary Will Scharf as 'the farthest-reaching executive action taken' in the nation's history, also faces legal challenges brought by the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Governors Association, and Senate and House Democratic leaders, as well as a separate lawsuit filed by two nonprofit organizations, the Campaign Legal Center and the State Democracy Defenders Fund.
These lawsuits were filed in the US district court for the District of Columbia.
Trump, a prolific spreader of election falsehoods who sought to overturn his 2020 defeat on the baseless claim of a stolen election, has said the order is necessary to protect US elections against illegal non-citizen voting. Instances of noncitizens casting ballots in federal elections – a felony crime – are exceedingly rare. Yet Trump and Republicans have continued to amplify the myth.
Trump's order stated that the US had failed 'to enforce basic and necessary election protection', despite reports by elections officials that the recent elections have been among the most secure in US history.
'The president seemingly had no qualms with the result of the last election and happily took office for a second term,' Bonta said. 'That's because our elections are secure.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poll suggests CA Dems prefer Newsom over Harris in 2028
Poll suggests CA Dems prefer Newsom over Harris in 2028

Daily Mail​

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Poll suggests CA Dems prefer Newsom over Harris in 2028

Former Vice President Kamala Harris is losing political altitude in her own backyard. A new poll suggests California Democrats prefer Gavin Newsom over Kamala Harris in a potential 2028 presidential primary. The Politico survey shows the California governor leading Harris with 25% support compared to her 19% among registered Democratic voters and Democratic-leaning independents in California. Moreover, less than a quarter of California Democrats - just 23 percent - are very excited about the prospect of another Harris presidential bid. The survey shows a clear majority - 58 percent - are 'not excited' about Harris 2028. California Democrats are a bit more enthusiastic for Newsom though 51 percent are still 'not excited.' As Democrats remain leaderless following Joe Biden 's exit from the White House , Newsom has emerged as a leading candidate to unite the party against Donald Trump . Meanwhile, Harris has largely remained largely out of the political fray since losing the general election to Trump in 2024. 'There's affection for her, but maybe less confidence that she would be a strong candidate,' said Jack Citrin, a UC Berkeley political science professor who helped author the poll. The survey does show Newsom and Harris would both be leading contenders in the California primary. However, Harris' inability to garner clear support in her own home state is a doomsday scenario for her chances to grab the nomination. '(Newsom is) in the news everyday. If you think someone is running, you're more likely to support them,' Citrin added. Harris also indicated that she's not looking to jump back into the political machine following her landslide loss to Trump. In July, the former vice president said she will not run for California governor ending months of speculation. Harris has also not consistently opposed the Trump administration compared to other Democratic contenders. In contrast, Newsom has spent most of his remaining term as governor publicly resisting Trump's political agenda, including by redrawing California political districts and opposing ICE immigration raids. Additionally, California under Newsom is suing the administration over Trump federalizing the state's National Guard amid anti-Trump protests in LA over the summer. In the past, Harris has struggled at securing the nomination in competitive Democratic primaries. During the 2020 Democratic election primary, she ended her campaign before voting even began in the Iowa caucus.

Prince Andrew told to 'brace himself' as explosive Epstein files to be made public
Prince Andrew told to 'brace himself' as explosive Epstein files to be made public

Daily Mirror

time18 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Prince Andrew told to 'brace himself' as explosive Epstein files to be made public

Disgraced Prince Andrew could find his name splashed across official US records as Congress prepares to release secret documents linked to the billionaire sex offender Prince Andrew has been told to 'brace himself' as explosive American government files on his paedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein are set to be made public within days. ‌ The disgraced Duke of York, already scarred by years of scandal, could find his name splashed across official US records as Congress prepares to release secret documents linked to the billionaire sex offender. On Friday, Congress will start receiving the first batch of papers from the Department of Justice. ‌ They have vowed to publish the files once victims' identities and other sensitive material have been blacked out. A House Oversight Committee spokesperson confirmed to the Mirror: 'The Committee intends to make the records public after thorough review to ensure all victims' identification and child sexual abuse material are redacted. The Committee will also consult with the DOJ to ensure any documents released do not negatively impact ongoing criminal cases and investigations.' ‌ The move piles pressure on Andrew, whose ties to Epstein - including accusations he repeatedly slept with the financier's 'teen sex slave' Virginia Giuffre - have left his royal reputation in tatters. Andrew has always vehemently denied all wrongdoing. A victim of Epstein today said the public release of the files would leave numerous high-profile men nervous, none more so than the Duke of York. 'Andrew should brace himself,' she said. 'When these files are finally made public, countless men, some of whom may have never been named before, will have to answer for their friendship with Jeffrey. Survivors like me have had to live with the shame and trauma while men in power carried on as if nothing happened." The woman, who is now 38 and accepted compensation from the Epstein victim fund, added: 'If your Prince's name is there, then he must answer for it. No amount of royal privilege, no titles, no lawyers should protect him from the truth. He should be ready, because the world will see exactly who was mixed up with Jeffrey and what they chose to ignore.' The files' public publication comes after famed US attorney Gloria Allred recently told The Mirror that Andrew, 65, should appear before US lawmakers to give evidence about his knowledge of Epstein. The lawyer, who represents several of the paedophiles' victims, said: 'All I can say is, now more than ever, he should come forward, and he could volunteer to testify publicly.' Congress is said to be moving fast, with insiders warning the first revelations could come 'in days rather than weeks.' Committee chairman James Comer said the documents would finally shed light on a saga the Trump administration has been accused of covering up. ‌ It comes after the Justice Department declared in July that 'no further disclosures' about Epstein were needed - a decision that outraged victims, campaigners, as well as the President's MAGA base. The US leader had campaigned for the White House on the promise he would make all the government's Epstein documents public. For years, America has been obsessed with so-called 'Epstein files' amid lurid speculation that the financier kept a secret list of powerful friends who enjoyed the company of underage girls. The FBI and DOJ insist no such list exists. ‌ However, earlier this year, former Attorney General Pam Bondi promised to release the files when she claimed, 'It's on my desk.' Donald Trump, who was a close friend of Epstein for over three decades, was often seen at parties in Palm Beach and Manhattan together and is now facing awkward questions of his own. His critics are circling, pointing to tech billionaire Elon Musk's claim that he is named in the files. Days after the Tesla owner made the claims, Trump's administration performed a U-turn, stating there were no files in existence. The move sparked civil war among Trump's MAGA base, with some splitting from him. ‌ Epstein, once a jet-set banker with links to presidents, princes and billionaires, died in his New York jail cell in August 2019. Officially ruled a suicide, his sudden death has fuelled years of conspiracy theories - with many believing he was murdered to stop him talking. Such rumours refuse to die, especially with the US government now forced to hand over files that could drag a string of rich and famous names back into the mud. For Prince Andrew, the threat could not be clearer. His car-crash BBC Newsnight interview, in which he insisted he didn't sweat and denied ever meeting accuser Giuffre, remains one of the most humiliating episodes in royal history. Though he later settled Giuffre's New York civil lawsuit with a reported £12 million payment, he has always denied wrongdoing.

Trump kingmaker pours rare praise on the Democrat who's changed most to fight the president
Trump kingmaker pours rare praise on the Democrat who's changed most to fight the president

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump kingmaker pours rare praise on the Democrat who's changed most to fight the president

President Donald Trump 's longtime political strategist Steve Bannon poured rare praise on the efforts of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is using a cascade of biting X posts to take on President Donald Trump. Newsom's @GovPressOffice account has started trolling MAGA with posts meant to resemble what Trump pushes out on his Truth Social network. Politico reported Wednesday that Newsom and a team of four or five aides manage the account, which has gained more than 250,000 followers and earned more than 225 million impressions since the beginning of August. 'People in the MAGA movement and the America First movement should start paying attention to this, because it's not going to go away,' Bannon told Politico. 'They're only going to get more intense.' Bannon noted that Newsom is 'trying to mimic President Trump.' 'He's no Trump, but if you look at the Democratic Party, he's at least getting up there, and he's trying to imitate a Trumpian vision of fighting, right?' Bannon said. 'He looks like the only person in the Democratic Party who is organizing a fight that they feel they can win.' In recent weeks, @GovPressOffice has posted Trump-like imagery, like the inclusion of Newsom on Mount Rushmore and Newsom being prayed over by the late Hulk Hogan, complete with a halo and angel wings, Tucker Carlson and Kid Rock. 'so nice!' @GovPressOffice commented on the prayerful picture. When a user named Conservative Mike called the image 'very disrespectful and blasphemy' @GovPressOffice chimed back in. Newsom's people highlighted a post from the White House, which had reshared an image from Trump's personal account - an AI image of the president dressed as the Pope. 'oops our bad, sorry. meant to post this,' Newsom's office replied. Newsom's account has also used Trump's traditional all-caps to go on screeds. 'HAS ANYONE NOTICED THAT SINCE I SAID 'I HATE KID ROCK' HE'S NO LONGER 'HOT?' Newsom's account asked Tuesday night. Trump, of course, had sent out a nearly identical message in May about pop star Taylor Swift, who endorsed the president's opponent, former Vice President Kamala Harris, in the 2024 election. On Tuesday, Newsom's team took on Dana Perino, who blasted the California Democrat's antics on Fox News earlier this week. 'DANA 'DING DONG' PERINO (NEVER HEARD OF HER UNTIL TODAY!) IS MELTING DOWN BECAUSE OF ME, GAVIN C. NEWSOM!' the account wrote. 'FOX HATES THAT I AM AMERICA'S MOST FAVORITE GOVERNOR ('RATINGS KING') SAVING AMERICA - WHILE TRUMP CAN'T EVEN CONQUER THE 'BIG' STAIRS ON AIR FORCE ONE ANYMORE!!!' When a user named Conservative Mike called Newsom's post 'very disrespectful and blasphemy' the governor's office then shared a post from the White House, which had highlighted Trump's personal account posting the president as the Pope 'TRUMP HAS 'LOST HIS STEP' AND FOX IS LOSING IT BECAUSE WHEN I TYPE, AMERICA NOW WINS!!!' Newsom's account continued. 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.' Trump often creates nicknames and mocks liberal media figures. The president has also started ending his Truths with 'thank you for your attention to this matter.' Perino had voiced on Fox that if Newsom wanted a bigger job, 'he has to be a little more serious.' It's no secret that the California governor will likely toss his hat into the ring of 2028 Democratic White House contenders. 'If I were his wife, I would say you are making a fool of yourself,' Perino said on The Five on Monday. Newsom told Fox 11 Los Angeles' Elex Michaelson in an interview last week that his social media strategy changed after Trump 'completely misrepresented the facts' about the Los Angeles fires and then federalized the National Guard to send troops to downtown LA to quell anti-ICE protests. 'Yes, I've changed. The facts have changed. We need to change,' Newsom said. 'This guy is an invasive species,' the governor said of Trump. 'He is completely different. I respect the Republican Party, I married into a Republican family, I have deep love and respect for people I disagree with.' 'He is something altogether different, and he is unmoored; there are no constraints,' Newsom added. Democrats are viewing Newsom's social posts as a bright spot as the party tries to find its way back into power.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store