logo
NZ receives 1500 refugees each year but Hawke's Bay doesn't settle any. Why?

NZ receives 1500 refugees each year but Hawke's Bay doesn't settle any. Why?

NZ Herald3 days ago
The closest settlement locations are Palmerston North and Masterton, and the newest locations to welcome refugee families include Blenheim, Timaru, Ashburton, Levin and Masterton.
'Quota refugees are settled in locations throughout New Zealand based on community links and access to services to help support their settlement and employment opportunities,' an Immigration NZ spokeswoman said.
'We work with refugees to ensure that their allocated settlement region is one that meets their needs and has the capacity to support them.
'New Zealand has a long and proud history of helping people whose lives are at risk and are forced to flee their country.'
Multicultural Association Hawke's Bay president Rizwaana Latiff said multiple Afghan and Iraqi refugees now live in the region, particularly around Napier, and refugees were free to move here once they had been settled in other locations like Palmerston North.
She said while it would be great to see refugees sent to Hawke's Bay directly to live, the reality was support, funding and volunteers had to be in place first.
'At the moment, I would love us to be a resettlement spot, but we can't just say we want to when we don't have the resources to be able to welcome them.'
She said refugees need assistance with housing, language learning, finding jobs, transport, navigating where and how to access services, and on top of that they 'have an added layer in that they have been traumatised'.
'If I had a magic wand, that is what I would love to do, welcome them,' she said.
'These refugees have lived for years in shacks.
'To even have a one-bedroom house would be ideal for them if they had power and running water and food.
'But we also need to look at the flipside of the reality of what is happening in Hawke's Bay.'
She said Hawke's Bay has a big housing shortage and things like jobs all needed to be taken into account.
She said one thing people can do to help prepare the region to potentially become a settlement location in future was volunteer, and support the migrant population.
She said there was a shortage of volunteers in Hawke's Bay for things like teaching English or helping migrants learn to drive.
'A lot of people don't realise the value that migrants bring, not just economically but culturally as well,' Latiff, who is running for Hastings District Council, said.
'It brings the world to us. It helps our children grow up with open minds.'
New Zealand's quota of 1500 people will be reviewed again in 2028.
If you would like to volunteer email president@mcahb.org.nz.
Gary Hamilton-Irvine is a Hawke's Bay-based reporter who covers a range of news topics including business, councils, breaking news and cyclone recovery. He formerly worked at News Corp Australia.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Trump's funding cuts threaten US science and global innovation
How Trump's funding cuts threaten US science and global innovation

NZ Herald

timean hour ago

  • NZ Herald

How Trump's funding cuts threaten US science and global innovation

Khvorova built her career by thinking boldly, but if slowdowns and cuts to federal science funding continue, she'll be forced to winnow her ambitions. 'What is happening right now is absolutely suicidal,' said Khvorova, speaking softly in Russian-accented English. 'I will stop making drugs. I will reduce my lab from 30 people to five. I will stop training scientists.' With stunning speed, the Trump Administration has over the past six months cut research dollars, terminated grants and hit the brakes on federal funding, destabilising an 80-year-old partnership between the government and universities that has made the United States a scientific superpower. The policy twists may sound arcane, but to researchers, everything is at stake. Day-to-day, Khvorova's lab is bright and buzzing. Scientists are trying to develop cures for Huntington's disease or halt the muscle loss that comes with ageing. Longer term? 'I have no clue,' Khvorova said. The Trump Administration portrays its changes as a targeted correction. Officials say grants are being terminated because they touch on topics with which the Administration disagrees, such as increasing diversity in science. Funding to specific universities has been frozen because they haven't protected Jewish students, according to the Administration. Fundamental research, Trump officials vow, will thrive. 'The money that goes to basic and blue-sky science must be used for that purpose, not to feed the red tape that so often goes along with funded research,' Michael Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science Technology and Policy, said in a speech at the National Academy of Sciences in May. From left, Gregory Smith, Nathan Gioacchini and Philip Soglo synthesise strands of RNA at U-Mass Chan Medical School. Photo / Kate Wool, The Washington Post In contrast, a recent report from the American Association for the Advancement of Science found that President Donald Trump's budget request for 2026 – including a 40% cut to the National Institutes of Health – would slice the nation's basic research portfolio by about a third. A new report from the Congressional Budget Office found that a 10% cut to the NIH budget would result in two fewer drugs invented per year, a gradual decline that would go into full effect in 30 years. The Trump Administration's science agenda is getting pushback in courts, in Congress and at the state level, but the impacts are being felt in research institutions across the country. As of August 1, the Chan Medical School had a US$37 million ($62m)shortfall in funding because of long delays at the National Institutes of Health. Khvorova is no stranger to doing science under challenging conditions. She trained at Moscow State University in the waning days of the Soviet Union, when there was sometimes no hot water, no reagents for experiments, no salaries. Even that has not prepared her for the abrupt policy swings that threaten the unique American research system. 'We are working on developing cures, which are not politically oriented,' Khvorova said. 'Democrats age, and Republicans age.' Disruptions will ripple over decades, since no one can predict what science breakthroughs in the lab will turn into world-changing innovations. Khvorova's work built off years of federally funded research into soil-dwelling microscopic roundworms that revealed short strands of RNA perform like symphony conductors, controlling the activity of genes and turning their volume down. Worcester, a gritty former mill city in Central Massachusetts, is home to two Nobel laureates and an RNA Therapeutics Institute that has spawned 12 start-ups. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, a company based on the phenomenon originally discovered in roundworms in labs at Chan Medical School and the Carnegie Institution of Washington, has discovered six drugs now approved for diseases that include rare genetic conditions and high cholesterol. The company's market capitalisation has soared to more than US$50 billion, and it has 2200 employees. Basic research 'is almost like the starter when you bake sourdough bread. You can't make the bread without it,' said John Maraganore, who led Alnylam for nearly two decades before he stepped down in 2021. 'Girls just wanna have (NIH) funding' In the labyrinthine, slightly cluttered labs at Chan Medical School, scientists tend to high-end instruments with geeky names like 'Dr Oligo', using them to synthesise strands of RNA aimed at treating fatal forms of dementia or diseases that cause muscles to waste away. Under sterile hoods, they grow millions of mouse liver cells for experiments. In a small room called the 'wormhole', decorated with colourful worms hanging from the door jamb like icicles, Victor Ambros, a Nobel Prize-winning worm biologist, zooms in on mutant roundworms wriggling across a yellowish agar gel. Unlike Harvard University, which has had billions of dollars in funding choked off by the Trump Administration, Chan hasn't been targeted. But it is not untouched. Like hundreds of other institutions across America, it has been thrown off stride day-to-day and week-to-week by the Trump Administration's unprecedented efforts to downsize and reshape the agencies that support science. Uncertainty looms over nearly every experiment and conversation. Slogans, not scientific sketches, are scrawled on the frosted glass wall of one office: 'We want scientific data, not alternative facts!' 'Girls just wanna have (NIH) funding' 'Science Not Silence!' More than a dozen NIH grants, out of several hundred, have been terminated, though they are tangled up in lawsuits challenging the Trump Administration's actions. About 200 employees have been laid off or furloughed, about 3% of the medical school's 6500 employees. A hiring freeze has been in place since March. Graduate school offers to nearly 90 young biomedical scientists were rescinded, though 13 spots were salvaged for next year's class. 'We have this feeling of extreme uncertainty, in a context where, previously, we could depend upon a robust system, a merit-based system that was predictable for the right reasons – the best science will get funded,' said Ambros, who shared the Nobel in medicine last year. Jesse Lehman, a graduate student who focuses on understanding the speed and dynamics of immune defences against pathogens, became hooked on science when he first felt the rush of discovering things no one else knew. There are no guarantees in this career – the contest for federal funding is exceptionally competitive. But what has fuelled the system is its reliability. The federal Government funds the best research, year after year, and scientists chase grants without worrying that the funder may lose interest in neuroscience or immunology and decide instead to buy a sports team. But now, federal funding may be there one moment and gone the next. 'I have this fear that the career that I've worked 10 years on developing just may not be viable,' Lehman said. The 20-year path to success Research institutions nationwide experience layoffs and uncertainty due to the funding reductions. Photo / Kate Wool, The Washington Post In textbooks, science is a steady march of progress. In the lab, it's an iterative process – filled with detours and dead ends that sometimes turn out to be surprises that push the field forward. In 2006, Chan biologist Craig Mello shared the Nobel Prize with Stanford University biologist Andrew Fire for the discovery of a phenomenon called RNA interference: short double strands of RNA could silence genes. It is a profound biological mechanism shared not just by tiny worms, but by humans. Other scientists built on the work, capturing the interest of venture capitalists and pharma companies. Many human diseases are caused by errant genes. What if, instead of treating patients' symptoms, doctors could give their patients drugs that just shut off the problematic ones? More than a billion dollars flowed into start-ups, but biology turned out to be a bit more complicated. Investor ebullience evaporated. Alnylam, an RNAi company, began trading below the amount of cash it had on hand, meaning investors thought its stock was less valuable than the money it had in the bank. Years of science – including a lot of chemistry – eventually turned a profound biological mechanism into a new class of safe effective drugs. 'Sickness doesn't have political boundaries,' said Phillip Zamore, a co-founder of Alnylam and a professor of biomedical sciences. 'Everyone deserves a better treatment for their disease, and I just want to make that possible. And I can't do that if my lab, my university, my colleagues' ability to do science is destroyed.' In the past few years, several biotech companies have spun out of Chan, including Comanche Biopharma, which is focused on a treatment for pre-eclampsia – a complication of pregnancy – and Atalanta Therapeutics, which is searching for cures for neurodegenerative diseases. Khvorova, a co-founder of both companies, came to the US with very little money in the mid-1990s, intending to check a box on her CV and stay a year or two. Instead, she became a 'typical example of the American Dream', as she puts it. She's an inventor named on nearly 250 patents. She just scooped up one of the most prestigious prizes in biomedical research, with a US$2.7m award. She should be on top of the world. But as she walked to her lab on a recent Tuesday, she gestured sadly at a collection of empty champagne bottles sitting high up above the cabinets in the lounge outside. Each bottle, she noted, is a trained graduate student – a reminder that most of next year's class was turned away.

'Really difficult': NZ woman, son, detained by US immigration
'Really difficult': NZ woman, son, detained by US immigration

1News

time15 hours ago

  • 1News

'Really difficult': NZ woman, son, detained by US immigration

A New Zealand woman and her six-year-old son have been detained by US immigration officials after she tried to return to America from a trip to Canada. Sarah Shaw had taken her two older children to Vancouver so they could catch a direct flight back to New Zealand on July 24 to visit family, and she then planned to travel back to her home in Washington state with her younger son. Shaw's lawyer Minda Thorward told local media that she had a temporary immigration document that allowed her travel and re-enter the US but there was an 'administrative error' with it. Her friend Victoria Bescancon told 1News that she was stopped at the border by immigration agents and told there was a problem with her documents, so she and her son would be detained immediately. 'Sarah slept on the floor with her son in a room. They had an emergency blanket,' said Besancon. ADVERTISEMENT Shaw and her son were then transferred to a facility in South Texas – one of only two that can house families together. 'Sarah is trying really hard to stay positive and trying really hard to adjust to the situation, but watching your child be detained in an immigration facility being the only two people who speak English in that facility and being treated every single day like a criminal has been devastating to her,' said Bescancon. Shaw and her son are now sharing their room with four other families, she said. 'She's not even able to have a conversation with anybody or just relate. And it's been really difficult for her.' Besancon has setup a fundraising page for Shaw to help with legal costs, with nearly US$40,000 already raised. 'She's not able to independently make phone calls to anybody she would like, but it has meant the world to her to know that she's not alone in this situation, that there are people who care and there are people who are taking this situation very seriously for her and her son.' Shaw's legal team have told them the allegations from immigration officials are incorrect and they are now fighting for a court date. ADVERTISEMENT Along with legal costs, Shaw is also covering rent and car payments. Her two older children were due back in the US next month, Bescancon said. Seattle media site KING5 said Shaw immigrated to the United States three and a half years ago with her then-husband as her sponsor. They subsequently divorced and while this can jeopardise a green card application, Shaw was able to reapply independently under guidelines for survivors of domestic abuse, KING5 said. Shaw has been working at a juvenile care facility run by Washington state. NZ's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said consular officials were aware of reports that a New Zealander and her son have been detained and are seeking further information. 1News has approached United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement for comment.

Clearing out the confusion over NCEA changes
Clearing out the confusion over NCEA changes

Newsroom

timea day ago

  • Newsroom

Clearing out the confusion over NCEA changes

It is billed as the most significant overhaul of NCEA in more than two decades, but there are questions being raised in the education industry about whether it is a bold step forward or a risky roll of the dice. The Government's sweeping changes to the national qualification aim to lift standards, streamline the way students are assessed, and restore confidence. RNZ's education reporter John Gerritsen tells The Detail the bold move comes with both hope and hesitation. 'There is a sort of sense that maybe this new system is trying to apply a way of working that might suit the kids in the leafy suburbs and not so much the kids in the poorer areas,' he says. The changes should be in place by 2030. If you never understood NCEA, or you are unsure of what the changes involve, this is the podcast to listen to as Gerritsen takes us through what's going on. NCEA Level 1, which typically takes place in Year 11, will be abolished, with students being required to take English and mathematics and to sit a new 'Foundational Skills Award' test that documents achievement in literacy and numeracy. Two new qualifications will replace NCEA Level 2 and Level 3, for Year 12 and 13 students, respectively. They will now qualify with the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE), respectively. Students will be required to take five subjects, and will have to pass at least four, to attain each certificate in Years 12 and 13. A to E pass-fail grades will replace the 'excellent, merit, achieved, and not achieved' rankings. Supporters of the changes say this is exactly what NCEA needs. Employers have long voiced concerns that school leavers do not always have the basic skills needed for the workforce. With literacy and numeracy now the focus, that gap could start to close. And by reducing assessment overload, that means less pressure on students and more time for actual learning. Some parents also claim it should be easier for them to understand what their child is learning – and why. 'On one level, you'd have to say, a qualification system that has been in place since 2002, so over 20 years, and still confuses people probably needs to be revised pretty heavily,' says John Gerritsen. 'Some of the way the language, the way this has been described – it's been a bit obtuse, and people have struggled to understand it over the years.' But for every person applauding the changes, another is sounding the alarm. Some principals and parents worry that standalone literacy and numeracy tests risk leaving behind students with learning differences or who are from non-English-speaking backgrounds. 'There is a whole swathe of young people who struggle with exams,' Gerritson tells The Detail. 'Some of them may have dyslexia, others may just simply have anxiety about doing exams. 'There are also issues around increasing shifts to computer-based exams for students who don't have much to do with computers, so this is definitely going to become an issue.' And then there is the equity question. Will all schools – urban, rural, well-resourced, or underfunded – be ready to deliver under this new scheme? Or will the gaps further widen? 'When talking to principals from poorer communities, they're really worried that a system that has helped their communities achieve success is going to be got rid of and replaced with something with big question marks around it,' John says. 'There are worries that young people from poorer backgrounds are going to be disadvantaged by this, and they will be less likely to leave school with some sort of qualification.' The consultation process closes in less than five weeks. And when it comes to the future of every New Zealand student, there is no room for error. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store