India ‘a bit recalcitrant' in trade talks, says US treasury secretary amid Trump tariff tensions
India and the US are reportedly engaged in trade negotiations ahead of the August 27 deadline for imposition of the remaining half of the import duties Trump has threatened.
Bessent has said large trade agreements are still awaited, including with Switzerland and India, reported news agency Reuters, which added that Bessent singled India out, saying the country had been "a bit recalcitrant" in the ongoing talks.
He also reportedly told Fox Business Network's "Kudlow" that trade negotiations could be wrapped up by the Trump administration by the end of October.
"That's aspirational, but I think we are in a good position," he was quoted as saying by Reuters.
"I think we can be, we will have agreed on substantial terms with all the substantial countries," Bessant added.
Half of Trump's 50 per cent tariffs threatened on Indian goods have come into force on August 7, and the remaining are set to take effect on August 27.
Ahead of that deadline, India is reportedly reviewing the tariff impact in consultation with exporters and other stakeholders, while also exploring alternative trade partnerships.
The Union finance ministry informed Parliament on Tuesday that over half of the total export value of India's merchandise to the US will see an impact due to the reciprocal tariffs.
'It is estimated that around 55% of the total value of India's merchandise exports to the US is subject to this reciprocal tariff,' Union minister of state for finance Pankaj Chaudhary said in a written response to Lok Sabha MP Abhishek Banerjee.
However, India maintains that the relationship it shares with the US is broad, with trade just being one part of it.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump referred to India as Russia's 'largest or second-largest oil buyer', saying his tariff move has dealt a huge blow to the Russian economy.
"...They have tremendous potential in Russia to do well. They're not doing well. Their economy is not doing well right now because it's been very well disturbed by this," Trump said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
IAF Fighter pilots who struck targets inside Pakistan awarded — Full list of Gallantry awardees
Independence Day 2025: Twenty-six officers and airmen of the Indian Air Force (IAF) have been conferred with the Vayu Sena Medal (Gallantry), recognising their exceptional courage in high-stakes missions — including precision strikes on targets inside Pakistan — and their pivotal role in operating the S-400 and other advanced air defence systems that successfully thwarted all planned Pakistani attacks on Indian soil. The decorated fighter pilots include: Gp Capt Anuraj Singh Minhas Gp Capt Kunal Vishwas Shimpi Wg Cdr Devendra Babasaheb Autade Wg Cdr Abhay Singh Bhadoria Wg Cdr Amandeep Singh Dihot Sqn Ldr Kaustubh Nalawade Sqn Ldr Mihir Vivek Chaudhari Sqn Ldr Malapati NV Naveen Kumar These names represent the frontline of India's aerial operations, combining precision flying skills with split-second decision-making under combat conditions. Alongside the fighter squadrons, IAF personnel operating the S-400 air defence system and other ground-based interceptors were instrumental in neutralising potential aerial threats from Pakistan. Their efforts ensured that no planned enemy strikes succeeded, safeguarding both civilian and military assets. In parallel, sixteen personnel from the Border Security Force (BSF) have also been honoured with gallantry medals for Operation Sindoor — a retaliatory action conducted from 7–10 May, targeting terrorist and military installations in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). The operation followed the 22 April Pahalgam terror attack, which claimed 26 lives, mostly tourists. Among the BSF awardees are a Deputy Commandant, two Assistant Commandants, and an Inspector, all recognised for their 'conspicuous bravery' and 'unmatched valour' while serving on the India–Pakistan border. In a statement, the BSF hailed the medals as 'a testament to the Nation's faith and trust reposed in India's First Line of Defence.'
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
The Houthis and the U.N.'s Ship of Fools
Leave it to the United Nations to make a bad problem worse. Using donor funds from governments and companies, the U.N. bought a Very Large Crude Carrier, an oil tanker called the Yemen, for $55 million in 2023. The goal was noble. Off Yemen's Houthi-controlled Red Sea coast was a Floating Storage and Offloading vessel called the Safer, which was rusted and at risk of sinking. Inaction spelled potential environmental disaster, involving the release into the ocean of four times as much oil as the Exxon Valdez spill and up to $20 billion in cleanup costs. And so the U.N. sent the VLCC Yemen to empty the FSO Safer. Not everything went according to plan. Following the transfer of oil, the Yemen was supposed to be operated by Yemen's state oil company under the advisory oversight of the U.N. Development Program. In practice, the vessel serves as a floating fuel station for the Houthis. On paper, the U.N. transferred ownership to Yemen's internationally recognized government—but control is what matters, and the Houthis have it. As if seizing the transferred oil wasn't enough, the Houthis are now using the Yemen to help Russia evade sanctions. According to a recent Lloyd's List investigation, the Yemen was involved in transferring more than a million barrels of Russian oil from early 2024 to June 2025. The Valente tanker conducted ship-to-ship transfers with the Yemen in March and April last year. Another vessel, the Savitri, made a delivery in October 2024. The first offloading from the Yemen occurred on this June 10, to a Panama-flagged tanker that then sailed to Ras Isa, the Houthi-controlled port where shore storage has since been damaged by U.S. and Israeli airstrikes. The Yemen has become the Houthis' primary offshore storage hub and a key element of their war economy. All this is being underwritten by the international community. While the Houthis attack commercial vessels and threaten global shipping, the U.N. is bankrolling their offshore oil logistics by paying $450,000 a month for the Yemen's operations. A vessel designed to prevent one catastrophe is facilitating another—moving Russian oil in defiance of sanctions, sustaining the Houthis' illicit fuel economy, and prolonging a regional war. This isn't the U.N.'s first blunder to benefit the Houthis. Since the group seized Yemen's capital in 2014, the U.N. has kept its headquarters in Houthi-held Sana'a rather than relocating to Aden, the internationally recognized government's interim capital. That choice has allowed the Houthis to detain U.N. personnel, storm U.N. offices and exploit aid shipments. Nearly half of all detained U.N. employees worldwide are held by the Houthis. The 2018 Stockholm Agreement made matters worse. Brokered to avert humanitarian disaster from a military offensive to retake Hodeidah port, the agreement cemented Houthi control of this strategically significant economic hub on Yemen's west coast. The U.N. kept its agreement and funded the port's reconstruction, while the Houthis have refused to abide by their commitments. Houthi control over this region has enabled the group to attack more than 100 commercial vessels since November 2023. If the U.S. is serious about restoring deterrence in the Red Sea and enforcing sanctions on Russia, it must cut off Houthi oil flows. While U.S. options are limited by concerns over potential environmental disaster, the Trump administration is already moving in the right direction by terminating a Biden-era authorization earlier this year that allowed oil transactions through Houthi-controlled areas. The White House should go a step further by designating the Yemen as property in which the Houthis have an interest, exposing any vessels or intermediaries that interact with the ship to secondary sanctions. The tragedy of purchasing the Yemen isn't that the U.N. tried to avert an oil spill. It's that the operation was naively conceived, poorly executed and left open to predictable exploitation. Whether it involves Hamas, Hezbollah or the Houthis, good intentions are no substitute for good strategy when confronting Iran's terrorist proxies. Mr. Meizlish is a senior research analyst and Ms. Toomey a research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
India.com
26 minutes ago
- India.com
Former US ambassador makes massive statement, explains why Donald Trump imposed 50 percent tariff on India, lack of response led to...
Donald Trump- File image New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has imposed a steep 50 percent tariff on India over its purchases of Russian oil. The new rate will come into effect in 21 days, so on 27 August, according to the executive order. A response from India's foreign ministry said Delhi had already made clear its stance on imports from Russia, and reiterated that the tariff is 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable'. To recall, in May, the Modi government outrightly rejected Trump's so-called role in the ceasefire with Pakistan. Former Indian ambassador and renowned author Vikas Swarup revealed that Trump's displeasure is also linked to India joining the BRICS organisation and refusing to bow to US pressure during trade negotiations. While talking to news agency ANI, the former Indian ambassador said that India–US relations are strategic, whereas US–Pakistan relations are merely a money game. The ambassador also praised India's firm stance. He also warned that Trump's tariffs would lead to a rise in inflation within the United States itself. What Vikas Swarup say: In an interview with ANI, Vikas Swarup, who is a former High Commissioner to Canada, said steps being taken by the US President Donald Trump will eventually lead to ratcheting up inflation in America. 'US called India a 'Tariff King'. But now the 'Tariff King' in the world is the United States because our average tariff is about 15.98%. The US tariff today is 18.4%. So, it is now the 'Tariff King' of the world. But the fact is, tariffs are bringing in money. They will bring in about a 100 billion dollars a year for the US. But the issue is that eventually who will pay for these tariffs? By American consumers. So, what's going to happen is this is going to ratchet up inflation in America, it's going to ratchet up prices in America. I think that's when the chickens will come home to roost,' he said. 'If you cave in to a bully then the bully will increase his demands. Then there will be even more demands. So, I think we have done the right thing. India is too large, too proud a country to become a camp follower of any other country. Our strategic autonomy has been the bedrock of our foreign policy right from the 1950s. I don't think that any Govt in Delhi can compromise on that,' says former diplomat Vikas Swarup on the tariff rift between India and the US,' he added. President Trump announced 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods plus an unspecified penalty in July, even as there were hopes of an interim India-US trade deal that would have otherwise helped avoid elevated tariffs. A few days later, he imposed another 25 per cent tariff, taking the total to 50 per cent, over India's imports of Russian oil. On Opposition questioning India's Foreign Policy and diplomacy, Vikas Swarup said India should not cave in to any pressure as India's strategic autonomy is non-negotiable'. Here, I would not blame our diplomats at all. I think what has happened is Pakistan, through some intermediaries, has gotten the ear of the US President and that is why, two visits by Asim Munir to Washington, the so-called 'deal' with America on so-called 'oil reserves' of Pakistan. More importantly, I think Pakistan is now trying to position itself as the 'Crypto King' of South Asia and there, through World Liberty Financial in which Trump's family has stakes, Steve Witkoff's family has a stake, through that I think Pakistan has managed to project an image of itself as a reliable partner…All these things have led to Trump having a softer approach towards Pakistan,' he said.
