logo
Threats against public officials persist in year after Trump assassination attempt

Threats against public officials persist in year after Trump assassination attempt

The Hill13-07-2025
Threats against public officials have persisted in the year since the first assassination attempt of President Trump, as experts in political violence warn the upward trend shows no sign of fizzling out.
The failed attack — one of two attempts on Trump's life as he sought a second term in the White House — yielded sharp condemnations of violence and ample calls to turn down the heat on political rhetoric.
But since then, high-profile attacks have continued to mount, from the assassination of a Democratic lawmaker in Minnesota to Monday's shootout at a U.S. Border Patrol facility in Texas.
'We continue to see a normalizing of political violence, a very casual acceptance that some elected officials may be legitimate targets for violence — based on conspiracies, based on disinformation — and unfortunately and tragically, we've seen that that has real world consequences,' said Jon Lewis, a research fellow at the Program on Extremism at the George Washington University.
'When there is so much rhetoric…it's only a matter of time before someone with a grievance and a gun finds that justification,' he said.
In 2024, there were 180 federal arrests for threatening a public official — the highest number in the last 12 years, said Seamus Hughes, a researcher at University of Nebraska Omaha's National Counterterrorism Innovation, Technology, and Education Center (NCITE).
Hughes said toward the end of the Biden administration, several incidents that would typically go to a local district attorney or be met with a warning from the FBI resulted in federal arrests. It's clear, he said, that law enforcement and prosecutors want to 'put their finger on the scale' on such threats, taking cases that they wouldn't have five years ago.
Despite those efforts, it's particularly challenging to disrupt lone actor plots, Lewis said, 'even if you are doing everything else perfectly.'
'They're taking it seriously, without a doubt, but how much can they do?' Lewis said.
Threats against the judiciary have also rocketed, especially as adverse rulings to Trump's far-reaching agenda have put targets on the backs of individual judges.
U.S. District Judge Esther Salas, whose son was killed in 2020 by a misogynistic lawyer who had once appeared before her, spurring her advocacy for better protections for judges, said at a legal forum last month that she's tracked 408 threats against judges this year.
'We're going to break records, people, and not in a good way,' the judge said.
High-profile attacks have put a spotlight on the warming threat climate in the U.S., but local officials have also faced rising threats and harassment, often without the greater protection of heavy security or a national profile.
'I'm more concerned about the city council member who gets a threat and doesn't have that apparatus behind them,' Hughes said. 'They don't know who to call…they don't know if they need to move their family out in the middle of the night to a hotel, they don't know what to do when they're doxxed, and maybe they don't raise their hand next time to run for office, because it's not worth the hassle and trouble and threats.
'That has a chilling effect on democracy,' he said.
More than 200 reported threat and harassment incidents against local officials have occurred this year, according to Princeton University's Bridging Divides Initiative (BDI). Those incidents were largely driven by community-specific disputes and national issues like immigration policy and LGBTQ rights.
Last year, roughly 600 incidents were recorded around the country — about a 14% increase from 2023 and an even larger jump from 2022, said Shannon Hiller, BDI's executive director.
Hiller said a third of surveyed local officials fear experiencing hostility in the future, and two-thirds say they're less likely to engage in activities 'essential for a healthy democracy,' such as running for re-election or participating in public events.
Additionally, three-quarters of those surveyed said they believe the hostility is connected somehow to their policy positions, leaving many more wary of taking on complex or controversial issues in their work, she said.
'This 'all-at-once' dynamic is part of what we hear local officials describing as this… 'fire hose' or 'the worst it's ever been,'' Hiller said.
Threats against public officials were already on the rise when the attempt on Trump's life occurred.
The U.S. Capitol Police said in February that threats against members of Congress more than doubled from 2017 to 2024. Last year, USCP's threat assessment team investigated more than 9,400 'concerning statements and direct threats' against lawmakers, their families and staff.
In its annual assessment of threats, published in October, the Department of Homeland Security named politically motivated violence among its top concerns for 2025.
The report noted that online users in forums frequented by some domestic violent extremists were increasingly calling for violence linked to the 2024 election and 'socially divisive topics,' including immigration, abortion rights and LGBTQ issues. It predicted that extremists would continue to rely on those issues to 'justify violence and promote their causes' into 2025.
The motive for Trump's first attempted assassin in Butler, Pa., has still not been revealed a year later. But his second alleged would-be-assassin's federal criminal case in Florida is ongoing and could yield new answers soon.
The defendant, Ryan Routh, faces five counts including attempted assassination of a major presidential candidate over allegations he pushed the muzzle of a rifle through the perimeter of Trump's West Palm Beach golf course while the former president was a hole away, prompting a Secret Service agent to fire.
'Dear world, this was an assassination attempt on Donald Trump but I am so sorry I failed you,' he allegedly wrote in a letter detailing his plans months before the attempted attack. 'I tried my best and gave it all the gumption I could muster.'
He's set to go to trial on Sept. 8, but this week, asked a federal judge to let him terminate his public defender and represent himself.
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who also oversaw Trump's criminal case in Florida before it was dismissed, said she'll hold arguments on the matter later this month.
The experts agreed that, without intervention, it's unlikely threats against public officials will taper off. However, it shouldn't be seen as destiny.
'We don't have to accept this climate of hostility as inevitable or a new normal that we just have to live with now,' Hiller said. 'Whether it's the assassination attempts on the current president when he was campaigning, or the assassination in Minnesota, these can be inflection points where we decide to say this is unacceptable.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump, Murdoch agree to pause WSJ case deposition until after dismissal ruling
Trump, Murdoch agree to pause WSJ case deposition until after dismissal ruling

Axios

time2 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump, Murdoch agree to pause WSJ case deposition until after dismissal ruling

President Trump and Rupert Murdoch reached a deal Monday to postpone the media mogul's deposition in a libel lawsuit related to the Wall Street Journal publishing a report on an Epstein birthday book, per court filings. Why it matters: Trump's lawyers had raised concerns about Murdoch's age and health when they asked a federal court in Florida last week to expedite the 94-year-old's deposition, but the deal postpones this until after the outlet's upcoming motion to dismiss the case. Now, neither Murdoch nor the 79-year-old Trump are likely to be deposed for months, per Politico's Josh Gerstein, who first reported on Monday's filing in Miami. Zoom in: "Until Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is adjudicated, the Parties agree not to engage in discovery," according to the filing. If the WSJ's motion to dismiss Trump's lawsuit is denied, Murdoch would appear in person for a deposition within 30 days of such a ruling. Murdoch must provide a sworn declaration about his current health condition within three days of a court order approving the agreement and the Australian-born mogul has agreed to provide regular updates on his health, per the filing. Driving the news: Trump is suing Murdoch, the WSJ, its owner Dow Jones, its parent company News Corp. and others over the Journal report last month about a " bawdy" birthday letter" that the outlet said bore the president's name.

Hebron Republicans, Democrats endorse their slate of candidates
Hebron Republicans, Democrats endorse their slate of candidates

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hebron Republicans, Democrats endorse their slate of candidates

HEBRON — Hebron Democrats and Republicans have endorsed their chosen candidates to run for municipal offices this fall. The town has a town manager style of government, overseen by a five-member Board of Selectmen. Three of the seats on that board are up for re-election. Democrat Tiffany Thiele has been endorsed to run again, and Jan Lawrence was also nominated by the Democratic Town Committee to run for the seat that is currently held by Democrat Claudia Riley. The Republicans nominated Rob McLaughlin to serve on the board. There are currently three Republicans on the Board: Keith Petit, who is the current chair, Daniel Larson, the current vice chair, and Sean Fitzgerald, who was just appointed in June to succeed Peter Kaspar, who had to resign mid-term due to a relocation out of town. Fitzgerald's term, as is Petit's, runs to November of 2027. McLaughlin is running for Larson's seat. Larson was first elected to the Board of Selectmen in 2009, and served a stint as Board Chair, but has been involved in different town roles for decades. 'I've been serving the town and putting my life on the line since 1980,' said Larson, an electrician who has been in the Hebron Fire Company and is a former fire chief. He's also been a fire maintainer, emergency medical technician, burning official, deputy fire marshal and fish and game warden, to name a few roles. He said he's seen a lot of change, arriving in town when the population was approximately 3,500 people and 'there were more cows than people' and watching the town grow to almost 10,000 residents. 'There comes a point in time when you have to bow out gracefully,' Larson said. 'It's time I take care of myself and my family a little bit. It was a hard decision. I've met a lot of fantastic people. It's just time.' However, he will never stop working to make the town better, even if unofficially, saying that one of his goals is to improve cell service in town. 'Service is markedly worse, with more dead zones and more dropped calls,' Larson said, noting he planned to gain aid from state legislators for this problem. 'There are less land lines to fall back on as everyone switched to cell phones. The cell phone companies need to be making upgrades that benefit everyone. If people can't make emergency calls, that's a problem.' Thiele, a public relations manager and former journalist, was first elected as Selectman in 2021. Democratic Town Committee Chair Chris Lawrence said there was a mix of returning Democrats and new faces among the candidates this year. 'It's a good slate,' she said. For the Town Clerk, incumbent Francesca Villani was cross-endorsed by both the Democratic and the Republican caucuses and will return for another term. For the Board of Finance, Democrats endorsed Ryan Herrick and Adam Ockman, while Republicans selected Brian O'Reilly and Michael Beaulieu. For the Board of Assessment Appeals, Maura Curran Baker was nominated by the Republican caucus. For the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Republican Party selected Chad Livernois, Christopher Cyr and Brenda Nicolo; Democrats picked David Sousa. Cyr currently sits on the commission. For Planning and Zoning Commission alternate, Democrats nominated Davis Howell, an incumbent. For the Zoning Board of Appeals, Adam Thiele is the Democratic candidate, while Jason Guidone, Martin Halloran and Brian Tyler are the Republican nominees. Catherine McSweeney, a Democrat, and June Danaher, a Republican, are the candidates for Zoning Board of Appeals alternate; Danaher is an incumbent. For the local Board of Education seats overseeing Hebron and Gilead Hill Elementary Schools, the Republican candidates are Toni Livernois and Alyson Nadeau-Schmeizl; Nadeau-Schmeizl is the incumbent. The Democrats endorsed Elizabeth Fitzgerald, Nicole Matthews and Heather Petit. Matthews and Petit are current incumbents and Petit is now the board chair. For the regional Board of Education, which oversees RHAM Middle/High School, Hebron residents who were endorsed included Republicans Amy D'Amaddio, who previously served on the Board, including a stint as chair; Rudy Dellafiore Jr. and Jessica Hall. Hebron Democrats Michele May, Brandie O'Reilly and Keith Petit were also nominated for seats on the regional school board. Lawrence, the Democratic Town Committee chair, did note some of the candidates were endorsed as place-holders and may not be on the ballot in November. The Democratic party will host a fundraiser on September 13, staff an informational booth at the town's Harvest Moon Festival in October, and is planning an candidate forum ahead of the elections. The Republican Town Committee meets on the fourth Monday of every month.

Texas dispute highlights nation's long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?
Texas dispute highlights nation's long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?

Boston Globe

time32 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Texas dispute highlights nation's long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?

Who is responsible for gerrymandering? In many states, like Texas, the state legislature is responsible for drawing congressional districts, subject to the approval or veto of the governor. District maps must be redrawn every 10 years, after each census, to balance the population in districts. But in some states, nothing prevents legislatures from conducting redistricting more often. In an effort to limit gerrymandering, some states have entrusted redistricting to special commissions composed of citizens or bipartisan panels of politicians. Democratic officials in some states with commissions are now talking of trying to sidestep them to counter Republican redistricting in Texas. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up How does a gerrymander work? Advertisement If a political party controls both the legislature and governor's office — or has such a large legislative majority that it can override vetoes — it can effectively draw districts to its advantage. One common method of gerrymandering is for a majority party to draw maps that pack voters who support the opposing party into a few districts, thus allowing the majority party to win a greater number of surrounding districts. Another common method is for the majority party to dilute the power of an opposing party's voters by spreading them among multiple districts. Why is it called gerrymandering? The term dates to 1812, when Massachusetts Gov. Elbridge Gerry signed a bill redrawing state Senate districts to benefit the Democratic-Republican Party. Some thought an oddly shaped district looked like a salamander. A newspaper illustration dubbed it 'The Gerry-mander' — a term that later came to describe any district drawn for political advantage. Gerry lost re-election as governor in 1812 but won election that same year as vice president with President James Madison. Advertisement Is political gerrymandering illegal? Not under the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court, in a 2019 case originating from North Carolina, ruled that federal courts have no authority to decide whether partisan gerrymandering goes too far. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote: 'The Constitution supplies no objective measure for assessing whether a districting map treats a political party fairly.' The Supreme Court noted that partisan gerrymandering claims could continue to be decided in state courts under their own constitutions and laws. But some state courts, including North Carolina's highest court, have ruled that they also have no authority to decide partisan gerrymandering claims. Are there any limits on redistricting? Yes. Though it's difficult to challenge legislative districts on political grounds, the Supreme Court has upheld challenges on racial grounds. In a 2023 case from Alabama, the high court said the congressional districts drawn by the state's Republican-led Legislature likely violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the voting strength of Black residents. The court let a similar claim proceed in Louisiana. Both states subsequently redrew their districts. What does data show about gerrymandering? Statisticians and political scientists have developed a variety of ways to try to quantify the partisan advantage that may be attributable to gerrymandering. Republicans, who control redistricting in more states than Democrats, used the 2010 census data to create a strong gerrymander. An Associated Press analysis of that decade's redistricting found that Republicans enjoyed a greater political advantage in more states than either party had in the past 50 years. Advertisement But Democrats responded to match Republican gerrymandering after the 2020 census. The adoption of redistricting commissions also limited gerrymandering in some states. An AP analysis of the 2022 elections — the first under new maps — found that Republicans won just one more U.S. House seat than would have been expected based on the average share of the vote they received nationwide. That was one of the most politically balanced outcomes in years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store