
NSW political staffers could be arrested after failing to appear at Dural caravan inquiry
The staffers – three from the office of the premier, Chris Minns, and two who work for the police minister, Yasmin Catley – were summoned to appear before the inquiry on Friday.
But they did not show up. The staffers claimed – in a letter to the upper house committee chair, independent MP Rod Roberts – that they had the 'reasonable excuse or just cause' required by law to not appear.
The staff members argued they were 'proxies' because Minns and Catley could not, as members of the lower house, be compelled to appear as witnesses.
The inquiry – launched with the support of the Coalition, the Greens and crossbench MLCs – is examining the handling of information about the caravan plot amid concerns about whether parliament was 'misled' before controversial laws aimed at curbing antisemitism were rushed through parliament.
In January, after it was announced that the caravan had been found in Dural laden with explosives, Minns said it had the potential to be a 'mass casualty event'. But in March, the Australian federal police revealed they believed it was a 'con job' by organised crime figures seeking to divert police resources and influence prosecutions.
Minns has said he was briefed early on that the caravan plot 'could be something other than terrorism as it's classically defined and that no line of inquiry was being ruled out by NSW police'.
The premier and the police minister refused to appear at the inquiry before the committee sought the appearance of their staffers.
Friday's extraordinary decision to seek the arrest warrants could lead to the staffers being apprehended and brought before the committee to give evidence. But several steps have to be completed first.
Roberts, the chair, will meet with the president of the Legislative Council, Nationals MP Ben Franklin, on Friday afternoon to submit the committee's case.
Under the Parliamentary Evidence Act, if the president is satisfied that the five staffers failed to appear without just cause or reasonable excuse, the matter would be referred to a judge of the supreme court.
If the judge agrees, then warrants would be issued and the staffers arrested and brought before the committee to give evidence.
'This decision follows numerous attempts by the committee over several weeks to secure the attendance of these staff by invitation and ultimately by summons,' Roberts said in a statement.
The staffers summoned to appear included Minns' chief of staff, James Cullen, and two of his deputy chiefs of staff, Edward Ovadia and Sarah Michael.
The police minister's chief of staff, Ross Neilson, was also summoned, along with Catley's deputy chief of staff, Tilly South.
The staffers' letter to Roberts, released by the committee, stated: 'Our attendance before the select committee to give evidence would be at odds with the principles of ministerial accountability and comity between the houses of parliament.'
Sign up to Afternoon Update
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
They pointed to an outstanding inquiry on parliamentary privilege and ethics, stating they suspected in light 'of recent events' it would consider whether compelling ministerial staff to give evidence infringed parliamentary privilege or 'offends principles' of Australia's Westminster system of government.
'In these circumstances, and particularly while the standing committee's inquiries are ongoing, we consider that there is a reasonable excuse or just cause for us to not attend the hearing, and we propose not to do so,' they wrote on Thursday.
'Given your [Roberts'] comments on breakfast radio yesterday as to the motivation for issuing the summonses, which make it clear we are 'proxies' because our respective ministers cannot be compelled as witnesses to the select committee, we also consider that they have not been properly issued.'
The letter noted Ovadia had informed the committee he was on leave during the relevant period.
Minns told reporters on Thursday that his staff would not appear. On Friday morning, Roberts conducted a roll call twice to empty chairs set out for the staffers before closing the hearing.
Earlier in the week, the premier told 2GB radio he believed the inquiry was based on a 'giant conspiracy' led by his political opponents.
Minns said summoning staffers to appear was a 'bid for some kind of relevance' by opponents.
Asked if his staffers were prepared to be arrested, Minns said: 'Well, I hope it doesn't get to that. I mean, I think that would be a giant overreach. It's never happened before.'
The NSW Liberal leader, Mark Speakman, was asked by reporters on Friday if the move was drastic.
'It is drastic and it's easily avoidable if they do the right thing, obey the law and appear,' he said. Minns and Catley were contacted for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Frenemy: why Australia can't live without China
Australia holds a unique position in global geopolitics - on the other side of the world but still very much a 'Western' country. To that end, Roland Oliphant speaks with former Australian Defence Minister Christopher Pyne about the delicate balancing act his country faces in dealing with an increasingly sharp-elbowed China; and whether President Trump will stand by the AUKUS nuclear submarine pact with Australia. Also in this episode, Roland looks at developments in Gaza. Nearly 200 journalists have been killed while reporting in the strip, but for the first time, Israel has publicly stated that the death of one on Sunday - Al Jazeera's Anas al-Sharif - was an assassination by its own forces... The Telegraph's Jerusalem correspondent Henry Bodkin discusses why the strike happened now and what it means for journalists either already in Gaza and those still trying to enter. battlelines@ @venetiarainey


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Tense moment ABC's Sarah Ferguson shuts down Israeli ambassador to Australia with cutting remark
has clashed with the Israeli Ambassador to Australia in a tense interview after Anthony Albanese declared Australia would recognise Palestine at the United Nations. Amir Maimon appeared on the public broadcaster's flagship 7.30 program during which he was grilled over the suffering of civilians in Gaza, refuting figures quoted by Ferguson, but being unable to provide his own. 'Do you accept that 100 children in Gaza have died of starvation in recent months? Do you accept those statistics?' Ferguson asked. Mr Maimon sidestepped answering the question. 'I'm following the statistics of the Israeli authorities. The statistics of COGAT,' he said. The Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) is an Israeli authority tasked with overseeing policy in the West Bank and logistical activities in the Gaza Strip. 'I'm aware there are other views, like in any other issue, but I'm following the statistics of COGAT and I just share with you some of the statistics.' Ferguson then interrupted him. 'Ambassador, you mentioned COGAT,' Ferguson pressed. 'Excuse me, how many children do they say have died from starvation in recent months?' The ambassador then replied: 'I don't have the figures'. 'Well you can't push back on these figures if you don't have any of you own.' The figures Ferguson quoted were from the Gaza Health Ministry. 'Well, I have no figures, but I can push back on the fact Israeli hostages that did not receive humanitarian aid since October 7th, nor a visit from any of the organizations that are responsible to assist those who are in need.' Israeli authorities have repeatedly denied Palestinians in Gaza are starving or that they have stemmed the flow of aid into the region. There have also been claims that Hamas had been looting the aid that did get through. Ferguson also pointed out that: 'Israeli defense officials speaking to the New York Times said clearly that the Israeli military had not found evidence that Hamas had looted aid from the convoys.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced Australia will join allies such as France, the UK and Canada and recognise Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly meeting in September. 'Australia will recognise the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own,' the prime minister told reporters in Canberra on Monday. 'A two-state solution is humanity's best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza.' The prime minister said Palestinian recognition was part of international efforts to resolve the conflict in the Middle East. Any recognition would need to guarantee that the designated terror group Hamas, which de facto governs Gaza, played no role in its future government, the prime minister said. The prime minister said the international community had to act. 'This is about much more than drawing a line on a map. This is about delivering a lifeline to the people of Gaza,' he said. 'The toll of the status quo is growing by the day, and it can be measured in innocent lives. 'The world cannot wait for success to be guaranteed.' But Palestinian recognition could be used as a 'veneer' that allows Israel to 'continue brutalising Palestinians with no consequences', Australia Palestine Advocacy Network's president Nasser Mashni warned. 'What I want today is for Palestinians not to be slaughtered, what I want as an Australian is our government not to be complicit in that slaughter ... for Palestinians like myself to have the opportunity to enact our inalienable right to return,' he told reporters in Melbourne. 'What happens after that will be upon the Palestinian people. 'It's not my job, or Anthony Albanese's to determine how Palestinians might seek their self-determination.' The Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council has condemned the government's decision. 'Recognition by Western countries telegraphs to Hamas that its rejection of multiple ceasefire proposals over the past 12 months were the correct decision,' the council said in a statement. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and coalition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash have also taken issue with recognition. They warned it 'risks delivering Hamas one of its strategic objectives' and puts Australia at odds with the US, which is 'our most important ally and the most consequential player in the conflict in Gaza'. Foreign Minister Penny Wong confirmed she spoke with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio about Australia's intention to recognise Palestine before the decision was formally announced.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australia's time has come to be a green energy intensive export superpower
One really big idea is to take the steps necessary to see Australia become a renewable energy superpower by exporting green energy intensive products such as green iron, green aluminium, green transport fuels and green fertilisers. Australia is blessed with some of the best solar and wind resources with world-best availability factors, and comparatively little of this is needed domestically. These significant resources can be used to make energy intensive exports. The key point to understand is that in the fossil fuel world it is low cost to transport, for example, our iron ore, coking coal, gas and thermal coal to north-east Asia where they are used to make iron and steel. In the net zero world, however, it is extremely expensive to export the renewable energy, and the hydrogen to replace coking coal, which are needed to make green iron. So green iron should be made where the renewable resources are and where the hydrogen is made – in Australia. The change in transport costs flips the economics so that it is logical that more value adding occurs in Australia. The benefits for Australia and the world are enormous. Significant investment is required, many skilled workers are needed, and our productivity will be boosted as the technology and learning-by-doing sees continuing improvement in making these products. The world benefits as well because if we realise our green energy intensive export potential Australia can produce products that will reduce world emissions by up to 10%. Countries that do not have the renewable resources to decarbonise themselves will rely on Australia playing its role, just as we have by being the world's largest exporter of coal and gas combined. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The only downside is that we do not know how quickly countries will meet their international commitments and decarbonise. The faster they do, the larger the opportunity for Australia. Australia as an energy intensive green export superpower is extremely practical. Indeed, its time has come. Continually talking about the superpower opportunity without projects emerging encourages scepticism and sees other countries gain an advantage over us that they should not have. Other countries are starting projects and gaining the learning-by-doing lessons we should be benefiting from. What is needed is for the government to support early projects with 15-30% innovation capital grants, and to provide initial support to make up for the lack of a world carbon price. If you believe in the climate science that fossil fuel use damages our environment, it is ridiculous that products that do not damage the environment are competing with those that do without the latter paying for the damage they cause. While not a necessary component of this big idea, this could all be paid for, with considerable money left over, if Australia introduced a carbon price. This would see Australia decarbonise in an easier and much less costly way than we are now. There are minimal political risks apart from where the government obtains the small amount of money to fund this. The funding is small as only the first few projects will qualify for the innovation grants, and Australia's green energy intensive exports, once we have made a start, can respond to overseas carbon pricing, as will soon apply in Europe with the introduction of its Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, and as is emerging in other countries directly or via increasing green product mandates which have the same effect. Whereas decarbonising Australia involves some politically difficult decisions, what is not to like about Australia value adding more in Australia, with new jobs outside our cities, and a continuing boost to productivity and prosperity? The only downside is talking about it but not taking the steps to bring it about. Rod Sims is the chair of the Superpower Institute. He is an expert advisor to the Treasury's competition taskforce and to the UK's Competition and Markets Authority on digital issues. From 2011 to 2022 he was chair of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission