logo
Australia's time has come to be a green energy intensive export superpower

Australia's time has come to be a green energy intensive export superpower

The Guardiana day ago
One really big idea is to take the steps necessary to see Australia become a renewable energy superpower by exporting green energy intensive products such as green iron, green aluminium, green transport fuels and green fertilisers. Australia is blessed with some of the best solar and wind resources with world-best availability factors, and comparatively little of this is needed domestically.
These significant resources can be used to make energy intensive exports. The key point to understand is that in the fossil fuel world it is low cost to transport, for example, our iron ore, coking coal, gas and thermal coal to north-east Asia where they are used to make iron and steel. In the net zero world, however, it is extremely expensive to export the renewable energy, and the hydrogen to replace coking coal, which are needed to make green iron. So green iron should be made where the renewable resources are and where the hydrogen is made – in Australia. The change in transport costs flips the economics so that it is logical that more value adding occurs in Australia.
The benefits for Australia and the world are enormous. Significant investment is required, many skilled workers are needed, and our productivity will be boosted as the technology and learning-by-doing sees continuing improvement in making these products.
The world benefits as well because if we realise our green energy intensive export potential Australia can produce products that will reduce world emissions by up to 10%. Countries that do not have the renewable resources to decarbonise themselves will rely on Australia playing its role, just as we have by being the world's largest exporter of coal and gas combined.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
The only downside is that we do not know how quickly countries will meet their international commitments and decarbonise. The faster they do, the larger the opportunity for Australia.
Australia as an energy intensive green export superpower is extremely practical. Indeed, its time has come. Continually talking about the superpower opportunity without projects emerging encourages scepticism and sees other countries gain an advantage over us that they should not have. Other countries are starting projects and gaining the learning-by-doing lessons we should be benefiting from.
What is needed is for the government to support early projects with 15-30% innovation capital grants, and to provide initial support to make up for the lack of a world carbon price. If you believe in the climate science that fossil fuel use damages our environment, it is ridiculous that products that do not damage the environment are competing with those that do without the latter paying for the damage they cause.
While not a necessary component of this big idea, this could all be paid for, with considerable money left over, if Australia introduced a carbon price. This would see Australia decarbonise in an easier and much less costly way than we are now.
There are minimal political risks apart from where the government obtains the small amount of money to fund this. The funding is small as only the first few projects will qualify for the innovation grants, and Australia's green energy intensive exports, once we have made a start, can respond to overseas carbon pricing, as will soon apply in Europe with the introduction of its Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, and as is emerging in other countries directly or via increasing green product mandates which have the same effect.
Whereas decarbonising Australia involves some politically difficult decisions, what is not to like about Australia value adding more in Australia, with new jobs outside our cities, and a continuing boost to productivity and prosperity?
The only downside is talking about it but not taking the steps to bring it about.
Rod Sims is the chair of the Superpower Institute. He is an expert advisor to the Treasury's competition taskforce and to the UK's Competition and Markets Authority on digital issues. From 2011 to 2022 he was chair of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Major trucking company goes bust after almost 60 years of operating across Australia
Major trucking company goes bust after almost 60 years of operating across Australia

Daily Mail​

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Major trucking company goes bust after almost 60 years of operating across Australia

A trucking company that has been operating for 57 years has become the latest in the country to collapse. DJK Transport entered voluntary liquidation on Friday, after a restructuring practitioner was appointed in July. The company is registered in Austral, Western Sydney under the name of sole shareholder and director, David Kean. DJK delivered freight cargo across New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and South Australia. It delivered cargo for mining companies, as well as supermarkets and department stores. DJK ran interstate routes with trailers, flat top and tautliner trucks.

Australia's biggest bank reveals why rate cuts WON'T make life easier
Australia's biggest bank reveals why rate cuts WON'T make life easier

Daily Mail​

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Australia's biggest bank reveals why rate cuts WON'T make life easier

The chief executive of Australia's biggest bank is predicting life will still be tough even with more interest rate cuts. Commonwealth Bank boss Matt Comyn made the call a day after the Reserve Bank of Australia cut interest rates again for the third time in six months - taking the cash rate back to 3.6 per cent for the first time since May 2023. ' Inflation is back within the target band, and what we expect to be a modest rate-cutting cycle is underway,' he said. 'Consumer confidence has improved, but households remain stretched.' Mr Comyn unveiled a $10.3billion cash profit for 2024-25 a day after the RBA cut rates again and signalled more relief for borrowers. Reserve Bank Governor Michele Bullock suggested more rate cuts were likely in 2025 and possibly 2026 based on inflation remaining 'sustainably' within its target range. 'The forecasts imply that the cash rate might need to be a bit lower than it is today to keep inflation low and stable and to keep employment growing,' she told reporters in Sydney. Updated Reserve Bank forecasts, released on Tuesday, had underlying inflation remaining at 2.6 per cent into 2026, or the midpoint of its two to three per cent target.

China's fight against price wars is an uphill battle
China's fight against price wars is an uphill battle

Reuters

time8 minutes ago

  • Reuters

China's fight against price wars is an uphill battle

HONG KONG, August 13 (Reuters) - Overcapacity has made its way into China's domestic market, with price wars leading to collapsing profitability and accelerating deflation. The government has responded by launching a so-called 'anti-involution' program to combat deflationary price wars. It's had some early wins, but this could be a lengthy battle. The Chinese internet slang for 'involution' originally referred to competitive pressures faced by young Chinese in education and the workplace. Since early 2024, however, the word has come to describe supposedly excessive, unsustainable competition among Chinese firms, where more resources are being invested without increasing higher returns. The Chinese government began to highlight the economic dangers of involution as early as June 2024, opens new tab in the face of declining corporate margins and profitability across diverse sectors such as electric vehicles, solar panels, lithium batteries, steel, cement and food delivery. Critiques of "excessive" competition grew much louder in the first half of 2025 as several price wars escalated. In particular, EV leader BYD( opens new tab started sharply cutting prices, and food delivery giant Meituan ( opens new tab and new ecommerce platform opens new tab began offering discounts and subsidies. Increased competition in China also appears to be amplifying deflationary pressures. While China's Producer Price Index (PPI) has been in negative territory for much of the last three years, hopes of escaping this morass were ignited in mid-2024 as domestic demand appeared to be recovering. However, that optimism was doused this year as price wars intensified, with PPI falling by 3.6% year-on-year in the most recent report. China's government, recognising that industrial overcapacity is a potential danger to the domestic economy, launched a multi-pronged anti-involution campaign in July. The program seeks to channel investment funds to advanced manufacturing, control production in highly competitive industries like steel, oversee pricing and subsidies in EVs and food delivery, and continue phasing out obsolete industrial capacity. It's early days, but some nascent impacts are visible. Carmakers' average price discount declined in July, and Meituan, and Alibaba ( opens new tab recently agreed to end aggressive discounting in food delivery and promote "fair competition". Industry consolidation has accelerated as well. Polysilicon manufacturers are discussing the creation of a $7 billion fund to acquire and shut down almost one-third of their production capacity and restructure part of the loss-making sector. Additionally, the country's largest coal miner, China Shenhua Energy ( opens new tab , stated its intention to acquire various assets from the subsidiaries of its controlling shareholder to improve operational efficiency. China's anti-involution program faces myriad hurdles, however. For one, most of the targets of the anti-involution program are in the private sector, which means they will be making voluntary pledges to maintain pricing discipline and thus could revert to aggressive tactics in the face of market pressure. Importantly, Beijing's previous supply-side structural reforms from 2015-17 reduced excess capacity among state-owned firms, over which Beijing, by definition, had much more control. Moreover, many of China's local governments are highly indebted and may prioritise short-term revenue generation over long-term reform, potentially offering subsidies to firms to attract investment even in industries targeted by the anti-involution campaign. Innovation in emerging technologies could also be a casualty if deterring overlapping investments hinders experimentation with different approaches. And tighter oversight on pricing and capacity could dampen private capital's investment enthusiasm overall. Finally, one of the biggest risks to the implementation of the program is the possibility of job losses as industries consolidate and become more inefficient. While China's youth unemployment rate has declined recently, it remains high and could increase over the next few months as over 12 million new university graduates join the workforce. And the private sector – the target of the anti-involution program – generates the vast majority of China's incremental employment. China's anti-involution efforts have had some success, but this will likely not be a short fight. First, to truly absorb excess capacity in various industries, Beijing will almost certainly have to stimulate domestic consumption more aggressively than it has in the past. Sentiment among Chinese consumers remains quite low, implying that the monetary and fiscal stimuli undertaken by China's government over the past year have had only a limited impact. The government could also consider more innovative, hitherto untested policies. For example, it could mandate superior product quality to weed out players who compete purely on cost to encourage industry consolidation. However, defining 'low quality' and enforcing standards would be challenging, and this strategy may be less effective in services industries. Another way to reduce the incentives for extreme competition would be encouraging collaboration between firms through technology sharing and mutual equity holdings. And the increased availability of patient long-term capital could obviate the need for companies to ramp up production and revenues rapidly. The anti-involution program marks a new phase of China's pursuit of high-quality development. Enforcing pricing discipline and market stability in furiously competitive industries will be no easy task. That means an updated playbook may be needed. (The views expressed here are those of Manishi Raychaudhuri, the founder and CEO of Emmer Capital Partners Ltd, and the former Head of Asia-Pacific Equity Research at BNP Paribas Securities). Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),, opens new tab your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI,, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn,, opens new tab and X., opens new tab

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store