Names Of 65 lakh Voters Excluded In Bihar Draft Roll Posted On District Websites: Election Body
The list of names deleted from Bihar's draft electoral rolls following special intensive revision has been posted on the websites of district magistrates following the Supreme Court's orders, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar said on Sunday.
Hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, the Supreme Court had last week asked the Election Commission (EC) to publish details of 65 lakh deleted names from the voters list with reasons of non-inclusion to enhance transparency in the process.
Addressing a press conference here, Kumar said that within 56 hours of the top court directive, the names of voters that were not included in the draft electoral roll have been posted on district websites.
He also underlined that the election system for parliament and assembly elections in India is a multi-layered, decentralised construct as envisaged by law.
Based on the guidelines issued by the Election Commission, Electoral Registration Officers (EROs), who are SDM-level officers, prepare and finalise the Electoral Rolls (ER) with the help of Booth Level Officers (BLOs).
EROs and BLOs undertake the responsibility for the correctness of Electoral Rolls, it said.
After the publication of the draft electoral rolls, their digital and physical copies are shared with all political parties and put on the EC website for anyone to see.
Following the publication of the draft electoral rolls, a full one-month period is available with the electors and political parties for the filing of claims and objections before the final ER is published, he explained.
The draft electoral roll was published on August 1 in Bihar and it will be available till September 1 for claims and objections under which parties and individuals can seek inclusion of eligible citizens or exclusion of those they believe are ineligible.
The CEC defended the SIR at the press conference on Sunday and said it is a matter of grave concern that some parties were spreading "misinformation" on the exercise.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Impeachment move against CEC Gyanesh Kumar would lack numbers
As the Opposition's high-velocity allegations of 'vote theft' get louder, political sources indicated on August 18 that the INDIA bloc parties are contemplating moving an impeachment motion against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar in the Monsoon Session of Parliament. Also Read: INDIA bloc mulls impeachment motion against CEC Gyanesh Kumar amid Rahul Gandhi's 'Vote Chori' row The move, if put into motion, would mark an isolated but formidable test of India's safeguards around the Chief Election Commission, one of the country's leading constitutional bodies, whose mettle has been tried and tested not just in this country but around the world. Constitutionally, the CEC can only be removed from office through the process of impeachment requiring two-thirds majority of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha or on grounds of proven misbehaviour or incapacity. The CEC cannot be removed from office except on the grounds and in the way Supreme Court judges are removed. The CEC has a tenure of up to six years or up to the age of 65, whichever is earlier. In real terms though, any impeachment would become a numbers game and under the circumstances, there is little doubt that the NDA government will move solidly behind the CEC. Says former CEC TS Krishnamurthy, without getting embroiled in the pros and cons: 'If there is a constitutional provision, let the opposition employ it.' Asked whether it could, potentially, damage the office and the institution of the Election Commission, he declined to offer a view, saying "only time will tell whether it is the correct thing to do.'' The controversy gathered steam after Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi accused the Election Commission of presiding over 'vote theft" in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. He claimed large-scale irregularities in Karnataka's Mahadevapura constituency, citing duplicate entries, fake addresses, bulk voters, invalid photographs and misuse of voter forms. CEC Gyanesh Kumar hit back strongly on August 17, dismissing the accusations as an 'insult" to the Constitution of India. He asked Gandhi either to provide a signed affidavit with evidence or apologise for the remarks. Rahul Gandhi refused, alleging bias and pointing out that no such demand was made when BJP MP Anurag Thakur levelled similar charges. 'The Election Commission asks for an affidavit from me. But when Anurag Thakur says the same thing that I am saying, the poll body does not ask for an affidavit from him," Rahul Gandhi said. As the NDA-INDIA battle of words escalated, Congress MP Syed Naseer Hussain was quoted by the ANI as saying that the party was prepared to use 'all democratic tools," including the option of an impeachment motion. Legally, the two election commissioners can be removed by the President on the recommendation of the CEC. In 2009, CEC N Gopalaswami sent a recommendation to the then President Pratibha Patil to remove election commissioner Navin Chawla due to his partisan behaviour in favour of a particular political party. The President held that such a recommendation is not binding on her and rejected the proposal. Commenting that the system of appointment of election commissioners is defective, former CEC SY Quraishi said the process should be revamped to ensure the neutrality and independence of the Election Commission of India. He told LiveLaw in an interview in 2022 'that the most powerful Commission in the world has the most defective system of appointment.' Also Read: Bihar Voter List Row: People joining SIR enthusiastically, says CEC Gyanesh Kumar, as INDIA bloc cries foul While conceding that he too was a beneficiary of the same system, Quraishi said that wider consultation was needed for such appointments, including parliamentary oversight, stressing the urgent need for a collegium. The Election Commission was a single-member body when it was set up in 1950. This system lasted until 1989 with the CEC as the lone member. After the Election Commission Amendment Act 1989, it became a multi-member body. Since October 1989, it has retained the three-member format it is in today.
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
AAP raises doubts over civic polls credibility, wants multi-member ward plan scrapped
THE Aam Aadmi Party which has already strongly objected to recent decision of the Maharashtra State Election Commission to conduct the upcoming local body elections without the use of the Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT), today raised a serious concerns regarding the transparency, fairness and credibility of the electoral process. At the same time, the AAP demanded that multi-member ward plan should not be implemented in civic elections. 'As held in multiple judgments of the Supreme Court of India, free and fair elections form part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The use of VVPAT is an essential safeguard that enables verification of votes cast through electronic voting machines (EVMs) and ensures public confidence in the electoral process,' Vijay Kumbar, vice-president of AAP, Maharashtra unit, said in a letter to State Chief Election Commissioner Dinesh Waghmare on Monday. In the letter, Kumbhar said, ' Without VVPAT, voters lose the ability to verify their vote, which denies them their fundamental right to ensure that their vote has been correctly recorded. In several election disputes (including Mohit Kumar vs. Kuldeep Singh and related cases), the honourable courts have repeatedly emphasised the necessity of procedural safeguards to maintain electoral integrity. Conducting elections without VVPAT will create grounds for widespread challenges and litigation, delaying the democratic process.' AAP said the Election Commission of India (ECI) has itself mandated VVPAT use in all Parliamentary and Assembly elections. 'Excluding it from local body elections is discriminatory and contrary to established democratic norms. The Supreme Court has, on multiple occasions, emphasized the mandatory nature of transparency-enhancing mechanisms such as VVPAT. 'In Subramanian Swamy vs. Election Commission of India (2013), the Court held that VVPAT is an indispensable requirement of free and fair elections and directed its phased introduction to ensure voter confidence. In subsequent cases, including those in 2019 and 2024, the court reiterated that VVPAT verification is an essential feature for ensuring the credibility of electronic voting. Thus, the Supreme Court's clear intention has been to make VVPAT mandatory in all elections wherever EVMs are used, as it ensures accuracy, transparency, and verifiability. The Mohit Kumar vs. Kuldeep Singh case further illustrates the risk of relying solely on electronic data. An error in tallying nearly altered the democratic mandate. The court's supervised recount (with videography) underscores the absolute need for verifiable records like VVPAT to resolve disputes credibly,' the AAP said. Kumbhar said, 'We request the State Election Commission to reconsider the continuation of multi- member wards in local body elections. The Parliament of India, through the Two-Member Constituencies (Abolition) Act, 1961, abolished two-member constituencies in Parliamentary and State Legislative elections. The Election Commission of India strongly supported this reform, noting that multi-member constituencies created administrative complications, diluted accountability, and often resulted in unequal or distorted representation. The reasons behind the 1961 abolition are directly applicable to local body elections today: Administrative Complexity – Larger constituencies made campaigning and election management difficult. Electoral Inequity – In some cases, reserved category candidates won both seats, excluding others and creating imbalance.' Kumbhar said single-member constituencies ensured clearer accountability and prominence for elected representatives. Voter Convenience – Voting became simpler and more transparent when each voter elected only one representative.'These same issues are now reflected in multi-member wards at the municipal and panchayat levels, where accountability is diluted, campaign costs increase, and voters face confusion. The abolition of two-member constituencies was hailed by both Parliament and the Election Commission as a vital democratic reform. Applying the same principle to local body elections would strengthen grassroots democracy by ensuring clear accountability, equitable representation, and simpler administration.' Stating that conducting elections with VVPAT and under a single-ward system will not cause any delay to the ongoing election process, Kumbhar said, 'VVPAT machines are already available and in routine use for Parliamentary and Assembly elections, and their deployment in local body elections requires no additional procedural hurdles. Similarly, adopting a single-ward system, based on the 1961 precedent, simplifies the election process rather than complicating it, thereby reducing administrative burdens and litigation risks. Hence, these reforms would strengthen electoral transparency and efficiency without affecting election schedules or timelines.'
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Any person missing from electoral draft rolls may file claims along with a copy of Aadhaar card, says Bihar CEO
On a day that the Opposition INDIA bloc again questioned the Election Commission of India (ECI) and its proceedings, the Bihar Chief Electoral Officer on Monday (August 18, 2025) issued an 'important public notice' stating 'the electors whose names are not included in the draft roll and are dissatisfied may file a claim along with a copy of their Aadhaar card'. After SC order 'In light of the interim order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 14.08.2025 in writ petition (s) (Civil) No (5) 640/ 2025 (Association of Democratic Reforms Vs Election Commission of India) it is hereby notified that the list of such electors whose names were included in the electoral roll of the year 2025 (before the draft publication) but are not included in the draft roll published on August 1, 2025 along with reasons (deceased /permanently shifted /absent / repeated entry), has been published on the websites of the Chief Electoral Officer, Bihar and all District Election Officers of the State of Bihar,' CEO Vinod Singh Gunjiyal stated in the notice. The notice further stated that 'all such electors, whose names are not included in the draft roll, may obtain information about their entry and the reasons thereof by using their EPIC number in the published list'. 'The list relating to such electors not included in the draft roll published on 1.08.2025 has also been displayed at all Block Offices, Panchayat Offices, Urban Local Body Offices, and on the polling stations. Through these, such electors can obtain information regarding their entries along with the reasons. Any person dissatisfied may file a claim along with a copy of their Aadhaar card,' it stated. CEC giving excuses: Tejashwi Meanwhile, Leader of Opposition in the State Assembly Tejashwi Yadav alleged that the 'present Chief Election Commissioner of India was giving excuses yesterday (August 17, 2025) not better than the playschool-going children. 'Even the playschool-going children could have given better excuses than the CEC. It seems he was saying in the press meet yesterday what may have come from the PMO,' the Opposition leader claimed. Mr. Yadav further said that now the 'responsibility of protecting credibility of Election Commission does not rest with the officials but of people'. 'He (the CEC) seems to be doing even better performance than Anil Masih who was presiding officer during Chandigarh Mayoral election and caught in a controversy,' charged the Rashtriya Janata Dal leader. However, the State Cooperative Minister and senior BJP leader Prem Kumar said, 'The Election Commission has given one month's time for rectification but the Opposition, without any claim, is spreading false misinformation.' 'The people of Bihar know the truth and has negated the politics of misinformation by the Opposition parties', he said, while further demanding 'strict action against those spreading misinformation among people and the vote looters'. Similarly, Minister of Industries and Tourism Nitish Mishra echoed the same saying: 'Some political parties are misleading voters in the name of electoral roll'. 'SIR (Special Intensive Revision) is a normal process and if there are some errors in the electoral roll, people have rights to register their claims,' Mr. Mishra added.
