Providers Named After Failing To Meet HDC Recommendations
The Health and Disability Commissioner (HDC) has taken the unusual step of naming two providers who have not complied with recommendations made in decisions issued by the HDC.
HDC promotes and protects the rights of people using health and disability services, as set out in the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights (the Code).
Two consumers (Mr A and Mrs B) complained to HDC about services they had received from Nicholas Stoneman and the New Zealand Disability Trust (NZDAT). Mr Stoneman was chairman of the NZDAT at the time.
Mr A and Mrs B' complaints raised concerns about poor organizational processes, a lack of policies and procedures, Mr Stoneman and the NZDAT's exploitation and treatment of vulnerable consumers, and their poor engagement with the complaints process.
HDC undertook an investigation. In October 2024, Mr Stoneman and NZDAT were found to have breached the Code and not provided Mr A and Mrs B with an appropriate standard of service.
In her decision, HDC Deputy Commissioner, Rose Wall, recommended Mr Stoneman provide both complainants with a written apology and comply with a number of other recommendations. Despite repeated follow up from HDC, Mr Stoneman and NZDAT have not complied with any of the recommendations.
"In failing to meet any of my recommendations, Mr Stoneman and NZDAT have failed to comply with their legal obligations under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994. They have demonstrated a lack of commitment towards improving their practice.
"In the circumstances, I consider Mr Stoneman and NZDAT pose a risk to other vulnerable consumers. I have therefore decided to re-issue the decision and name them."
Ms Wall said anyone who had received substandard treatment from a practitioner should contact HDC if they wished to submit a complaint.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
7 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Social worker suspended over dodgy Covid vaccine exemption
A Dunedin-based social worker who issued a shonky Covid-19 vaccine exemption has been suspended for a year. Dr Jacquelyn Elkington's case came before the Social Workers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal yesterday — but she did not. Elderly pay price for Covid 'complacency' The woman, who is listed on the University of Otago's website as a senior lecturer hauora Māori, failed to show up for the hearing and was promptly found guilty of professional misconduct after tribunal chairman Winston McCarthy found her behaviour was likely to bring discredit to the profession. It was the first time a social worker has been taken to task over a Covid-19 issue and co-counsel for the professional conduct committee (PCC) Becca Boles said the only appropriate penalty was deregistration. But the tribunal opted to suspend Dr Elkington for 12 months, censuring her and ordering her to pay costs of more than $13,000. In November 2021, during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, the government introduced legislation narrowing the grounds for a vaccine exemption. Only a suitably qualified health practitioner could make the assessment and it had to be verified by the country's director-general of health. A month later, Dr Elkington — who was working in Auckland at the time — issued such an exemption for a "vulnerable" client. "She's not a medical practitioner, she's a social worker," PCC co-counsel Elena Mok said. "Her conduct took her outside the scope of her practice." A day later, the man used the exemption in a bid to gain entry to a recreational facility. A staff member subsequently raised suspicions and referred the matter to the health and disability commissioner (HDC). Ms Mok said Dr Elkington's conduct "snowballed" from that point, Dr Elkington thwarting the resulting investigations against her by repeatedly failing to provide information. In June 2022, the woman made an online application to renew her practising certificate with the Social Workers Registration Board. Dr Elkington falsely indicated she was not subject to any inquiry and when she was pulled up on her lie, she claimed she thought the HDC inquiry had closed. But a couple of months later she resubmitted the online application, again declaring she was free of any scrutiny. Dr Elkington's behaviour was "at least misleading, if not outright false", Ms Mok said. The social worker went on to claim she felt "harassed and threatened" by the probe into her conduct, and that it was "borderline bullying". Many requests for information — about client notes or records on how many vaccine exemptions she had issued — throughout 2024, after the file was passed on to the PCC, were met with silence. At other points, Dr Elkington said she could not provide the documentation as she did not have the consent of her clients. She occasionally claimed to have already submitted the requested information and also made references to the Bill of Rights Act and various international treaties. On one occasion Dr Elkington referred to the River of Lies documentary — which bills itself as revealing the truth behind the "New Zealand scamdemic" — produced by the controversial Billy Te Kahika. Her lack of engagement in the process showed a disrespect for the process and an ongoing lack of remorse and insight, reinforced by her non-attendance at yesterday's hearing, the PCC argued. "The vaccine exemption appears to have been issued because of Dr Elkington's personal beliefs about the safety of the vaccine and her views on the Covid pandemic," Ms Mok said. "Dr Elkington's attempt to justify her approach is an example of her effectively allowing these personal beliefs to influence her social work practice unduly." The University of Otago refused to answer questions about the woman's employment at the institution. In 2022, Dr Elkington ran for the Whakatāne mayoralty and posted online at the time her various theories, which included that the Covid-19 vaccination caused monkeypox. She came sixth out of seven candidates. Dr Elkington did not respond to requests for comment. The tribunal ordered that if the social worker returned to practice she must undertake monthly supervision for a year.
RNZ News
28-07-2025
- RNZ News
Dead teen's family told they had to organise getting his body back to hometown
An urgent transfer meant the young man's family did not have a chance to say goodbye to him before his death. Photo: 123RF The family of a teenager who died from complications after an operation never got the chance to say goodbye. They were further distressed by being told they needed to organise his body's repatriation to his hometown. A complaint about the 19-year-old's care was referred to Health and Disability Commissioner by the coroner. The young man - who died in 2015 - had undergone an operation in January that year related to his type 2 neurofibromatosis - a genetic condition that causes benign tumours to develop on nerves, particularly those in the skull and spine. There were complications due to a post-operative infection and meningitis, which was treated successfully at a secondary hospital. The man - who was referred to in the commissioner's report as Mr B - continued to suffer from fluid building up around the brain and required regular release of cerebrospinal fluid through lumbar puncture. He was admitted to hospital with ongoing headaches and vomiting in April. A decision was made to hold off on further lumbar punctures due to concerns it could cause a hernia and to transfer him to another hospital via an air retrieval team. The transfer was delayed due due to staffing issues and a lack of an available air ambulance. Deputy commissioner Dr Vanessa Caldwell said at the time Mr B was neurologically stable and his transfer was scheduled for the next day. However, while waiting he collapsed and his heart stopped. He was then urgently transferred to another hospital, but his condition deteriorated and at the second hospital he was declared brain dead. Mr B's family told the commissioner they did not understand why he was not transferred by road when the air retrieval team was not available, and they did not understand why he was transferred to another hospital when his prognosis was poor. The transfer meant they did not have a chance to say goodbye to him before his death. The family also said they were asked if they would donate his organs only minutes after being told he was brain dead, which left them little time to consider their options. They were also told by a social worker it was up to them to organise transport of his body back to where they lived, even though he qualified for travel assistance. Health NZ apologised for the distress caused by the discussion related to organ donation and the miscommunication regarding transporting Mr B's body. Dr Caldwell said the care provided to the man was at an appropriate standard and decisions, such as the air transfer, were made appropriately based on the information available to the team at the time. Incorrect and minimal information was provided to the family once the man died and this had been particularly distressing for them, she said. She also had concerns about the communication between the air retrieval team and the teams treating Mr B. Health New Zealand breached the patient's right to information under the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights, the commissioner said. A number of changes had been made since the young man's death, including the establishment of Health NZ, Dr Caldwell said. "I am also mindful that providing recommendations at this stage for errors that happened some time ago is likely to have limited practical benefit." She recommended Health NZ Southern and Health NZ Waitaha Canterbury provided a formal written apology for the breaches identified in the report within three weeks. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
28-07-2025
- NZ Herald
Health commissioner finds pattern of demeaning care at Whakatāne rest home
The woman's daughter complained to the commissioner following several complaints to Golden Pond. Her complaints included that Golden Pond staff would speak to her mother disrespectfully and delay or refuse to take her to the toilet. Her complaint included that staff didn't accommodate her mother's hearing and speech problems, ignored her requests for help, failed to recognise she had a urinary tract infection and were slow to react when she had a fall. Aged Care Commissioner Carolyn Cooper said in the report she found Golden Pond failed to provide services in a manner that treated the woman with respect, a breach of the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights. Cooper, however, acknowledged the home and hospital had changed many of its practices since the investigation. The report detailed Golden Pond's apology letter, which said it was sorry for the way the woman was treated and the lack of communication and accountability. The woman was in her 70s and received hospital-level care since her admission in May 2019. She had a history of depression and limited vision and had been diagnosed with progressive supranuclear palsy, a complex, chronic neurological condition that affects speech, swallowing, eye movements and mobility. Cameras were installed for security purposes and for the woman's daughter to check if her mother had any falls. The woman's daughter became concerned about the care her mother was receiving based on events captured in 23 videos that were supplied to the commission as evidence. She was frequently asking to use the toilet and staff became frustrated. They failed to recognise she had a urinary tract infection. On the morning of her fall, she was left on the ground for 40 minutes before being found. Golden Pond acknowledged there needed to be accountability for the failings in its care, but emphasised in its response to the commission that five years had passed and none of the staff members involved worked at Golden Pond anymore. Cooper's report said three of the videos were particularly concerning, including one where a carer was arguing with the woman while she was on the toilet. 'In my view, this incident demonstrates an appalling disregard for [the woman's] dignity.' In another video, the woman pleaded with staff to use the toilet but was told she should have gone earlier and that her incontinence pad would be sufficient. 'In my opinion, these repeated instances of demeaning conduct by several staff members, particularly in circumstances involving [the woman's] toileting when she was entirely reliant on staff for her cares, amount to a failure to provide services in a manner that respected [her] dignity.' Cooper's report concluded there was evidence of a 'concerning pattern of demeaning and disrespectful treatment' involving six staff members, including two nurses. 'While there is individual accountability for these actions, in my view, the continued widespread and repeated actions by staff at Golden Pond reflect a culture of disrespect and disregard for the dignity of those under Golden Pond's care, for which, ultimately, I hold Golden Pond responsible.' Cooper said Golden Pond had been aware of the woman's daughter's concerns since at least January 2020, and some action was taken. 'However, I consider that the continued inappropriate conduct of staff, over a period of months, indicates a failure by Golden Pond to manage, improve and monitor the situation adequately.' She noted Golden Pond acknowledged in its response that it was too slow to pick up on the stress staff were under and put in strategies to deal with the woman's behaviour. A 2025 Golden Pond audit was complimentary of the service, and Cooper said in the report she commended Golden Pond on the 'significant improvements' it had made since the complaint. However, she still made the recommendation that Golden Pond provide evidence of its most recent staff training and education on elder abuse, respectful communication and conduct, and managing stress and challenging resident behaviours. It had to provide evidence of that training to the commissioner within six months. Kelly Makiha is a senior journalist who has reported for the Rotorua Daily Post for more than 25 years, covering mainly police, court, human interest and social issues.
