
Ian Murray: SNP must lift nuclear ban after Sizewell C deal
READ MORE
This follows French energy giant EDF announcing earlier this month that it would take a 12.5% stake—lower than its previously stated 16.2%.
The total investment, which combines equity funding and debt financing, exceeds the target construction cost. Ministers say this should provide a buffer in the event of cost overruns.
The National Wealth Fund—the Government's investment vehicle—is providing the bulk of the debt finance through a loan of up to £36.6bn.
From autumn, an average of £1 will be added to each household's energy bill per month for the duration of the construction phase.
Once operational in the 2030s, Sizewell C is expected to deliver savings of up to £2 billion a year across the UK's future low-carbon electricity system.
The Government said the plant would generate enough electricity to power the equivalent of six million homes and create around 10,000 jobs.
While energy is largely reserved to the [[UK Government]], the Scottish Government effectively has a veto on new nuclear power developments through planning regulations.
Commenting on the announcement, Mr Murray said: 'The UK Government's deal with EDF to build Sizewell C shows again how Scotland is losing out.
'This deal will bring jobs and investment to the local economy, as well as helping us meet our clear power ambitions.
'The UK Government is driving forward nuclear power in other parts of the UK, but in Scotland the Scottish Government continues to block new nuclear sites.
'That means Scotland is being left behind, missing out on jobs and growth, as well as affordable energy. I urge the Scottish Government again to put Scotland's interests first and drop their ideological objections.'
However, the SNP warned that Scottish energy bill payers would bear the cost if the project overruns again.
They said the statement had been 'snuck out just hours before the Parliament goes into a six-week summer recess'.
READ MORE:
The SNP's energy spokesperson, Graham Leadbitter said: 'Nuclear is extortionate, takes decades to build and the toxic waste is a risk to local communities.
"Scotland's future is in renewables, carbon capture and links to Europe—not more money for white elephants.
'Just months ago, the Labour Government rubbished the £38bn figure for Sizewell C, yet today Ed Miliband snuck out a statement confirming they've lost control of this project before spades are even in the ground.
'To make matters worse, Scots will be left to foot the bill with a levy on energy bills. You simply could not make it up—yet Anas Sarwar and Scottish Labour back this extortionate and wasteful plan that energy-rich Scotland will pay for through the nose.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
State pension gender gap narrows - but difference in size of private pots is still huge
The state pension gender gap has shrunk to 1 per cent, less than a decade after a major overhaul aimed at gradually equalising payments. Women received £208.15 per week on average on reaching 66 and men got £209.95 in the year to November 2024, new Government figures reveal. But this stands in stark contrast with private pension pots, where there is a 48 per cent gender divide in the run-up to retirement, according to recent official data. The state pension is the bedrock of most people's retirement income and is currently worth £230.25 a week if you qualify for the full amount, or nearly £12,000 a year. But although couples can get by on two full state pensions, financial experts warn individuals face a struggle on only one and recommend building a private fund too to achieve a decent standard of living. Former Pensions Minister Steve Webb, who was the architect of the new state pension introduced in 2016, says one of its goals was to gradually eliminate the gender gap in state pensions. Webb, who is now a partner at LCP and This is Money's pensions columnist, says: 'The new system had to be phased in gradually, not least to protect the rights people had already built up under the old system. 'But those transitional protections are gradually working their way out of the system, with the result that the gap between men and women is reducing with every passing year.' Webb, who obtained the state pension data under a Freedom of Information request, notes the average state pensions paid to men and women who retired under the pre-2016 state pension system differ greatly. Men get an average of £217.30 compared with £186.44 for women - and the latter includes many widows who were on much lower state pensions when younger, he points out. But Webb says he is delighted that the battle against the state pension gender gap is nearly won for those retiring today. 'When there is so much negative news about gaps between men and women when it comes to pensions, these figures show that things can be changed provided that there is the political will to do so. 'There are however, far too many women who have already retired who are living on reduced pensions and I will continue to campaign for them to be treated fairly, including by rooting out all of the errors which have led to so many being underpaid for so long.' Private pension gender gap Separate private pension gap data was published by the Government last month which was based on the median pension wealth (the middle figure in the range) of people aged 55-59 in 2020-2022. The gap overall was 48 per cent, but it was 39 per cent for people with only defined benefit pensions, also known as final salary pensions. These are guaranteed until you die but almost phased out unless you work in the public sector. However, the gap is a massive 75 per cent among people only saving into defined contribution schemes, which are prevalent in the private sector and depend on building and investing a pension fund for old age. For those with both types of pension the gender gap is 52 per cent, but younger generations who work for private companies are likely to have just defined contribution funds. Rachel Vahey, head of public policy at AJ Bell, says the 48 per cent figure is 'truly appalling' and 'quite frankly unacceptable'. She blamed it on women earning less, and then working fewer hours after they have children, despite saving around the same percentage of salary as men into a pension under auto enrolment. 'The wheels come off women's retirement saving when they start a family,' Vahey says. 'The gap is much smaller at younger ages, at 22 per cent for those aged between 25 and 29, but rises dramatically for older women. 'Those women who work in the public sector fare better. The gender pensions gap for those that only hold defined benefit pensions – now mostly only available to public sector workers – is much lower. 'This throws into stark relief the chasm between private sector workers and their public sector counterparts.' Vahey suggests changing pension risk warnings to be more appropriate for a female audience, and reducing the auto enrolment earnings trigger of £10,000 because some women have several part-time jobs that all fall below it. 'Change must also come from the labour market, such as through pay, affordable childcare and more shared parental leave,' she adds. Hannah English, head of DC corporate consulting at Hymans Robertson, says the gaps in gender private pensions remain 'stubbornly high', and she called on the Government to make auto enrolment changes like lowering the earnings limit and reviewing the auto enrolment entry age of 22 as soon as possible. 'Reducing the age limit would not only support all savers to save more into pensions and retirement, it could also help reduce the gender pensions gap further. 'It would allow female employees the chance to save more over a larger proportion of their working career. 'In effect, this would avoid the dramatic fall often as a result of taking time out for child care or other caring responsibilities, which often fall to women later in life. All of which sees their pay and savings levels drag behind male peers.'


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Europe's bond market losing Dutch pension fund buyers as retirement payouts shift
LONDON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - As if Europe's cash-hungry finance ministers didn't have enough to worry about. An overhaul of the Dutch pension system is depriving the euro zone's $10 trillion government bond market of a key buyer of its long-term debt, just as state funding needs surge. The Dutch private pension sector, the bloc's largest which oversees more than 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) of assets, will move to a defined contribution system - as opposed to defined benefit - from next year. For governments looking to issue debt to fund their spending needs, it's a big change. Long-term debt has many advantages for governments because they are able to plan out their interest liabilities for longer. But under the new Dutch system, pension funds will have less need to buy bonds - and longer-dated bonds in particular - as they will no longer promise specific long-term benefits and will be able to take on more risk overall. Dutch pension funds are already stepping back from buying longer-dated bonds, according to a senior trader at BofA, just as Germany prepares to triple its borrowing. It's unclear how quickly funds will unwind their bond holdings and their hedges against risk, and how they will invest in future, adding to the uncertainty. "You're in a paradigm shift where you've had the largest-duration buyer in Europe disappear," said BofA's EMEA head of linear rates trading Kal El-Wahab. "They haven't been buying all year." "In a world where there's already a supply-demand imbalance going on, as sovereigns need to raise more cash than they ever have, losing one of the largest buyers of duration in Europe is very, very material." Longer-dated government bonds have been under pressure globally this year, prompting Japan and Britain to shorten the maturities of their issuance, as other key buyers have stepped back there too. But in the euro zone, pension fund reform "comes when Germany has to do more than it has ever done on the issuance front," said Barclays' head of euro rates strategy Rohan Khanna. The additional premium that benchmark borrower Germany pays for 30-year debt over shorter maturities has already risen this year. Traders say anticipation of the reform has been one driver. So far, the long end of the German yield curve has steepened roughly in line with other regions , , but the trend may have further to run. "The market's consensus is still for steepeners," said Credit Agricole CIB's head of European government bond trading Bruno Benchimol. BofA's El-Wahab expects the German 10/30-year yield curve, currently at around 50 basis points, could steepen another 20-25 basis points and lead other markets from here. Declining demand from Dutch pension funds is "something (governments) have to take into account when coming up with (funding) plans," said ABN AMRO rates strategist Jaap Teerhuis, who previously headed the Dutch Treasury's dealing room. Dutch banks estimate pension funds will eventually sell around 100 billion euros of government bond holdings. But their holdings aren't as long-dated and many of the long-dated bonds they bought have rolled down the curve over the years, BofA's El-Wahab noted. "It's not clear they're going to be selling long-dated bonds in order to do this transition ... The very seismic shift is just the absence of them on a forward-looking basis." The biggest source of uncertainty is how quickly funds will reduce those holdings and what role bonds will play in funds' post-transition portfolios, ABN's Teerhuis said. A plan from ABP, the country's largest pension fund, which manages 520 billion euros in assets, points to a gradual shift. It suggests ABP will shed around 25 billion euros of government bonds by 2030, but its exposure will remain unchanged in 2027 compared with 2023. Analysts said they expect even greater curve steepening in the swaps market. Pension funds have hedged their interest-rate risk by putting on long-dated swap trades to receive fixed-rate payments, but will now raise cash to close those trades, most likely by selling bonds. The next hurdle for markets is January 2026, when three of the five biggest funds plan to start switching to the new system, according to Barclays. But analysts aren't ruling out delays, which could stoke volatility at year-end. One of the three, PMT, has said it will assess in December and once again in January whether it's ready to transition. "We will know about the final 'go, no-go' very perilously close to the transition date," Khanna said.


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Readers' Letters: Bridge the attainment gap with pipe bands in schools
A reader supports calls for the formation of pipe bands in schools to boost academic performance Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Professor Roderick Paisley (Scotsman, 5 August) is correct in noting the remarkable benefits offered to schools and their communities by forming pipe bands – and, of course, by sourcing serious cash for their continuing development. There are big lessons to be learned from the successes of Preston Lodge High School in East Lothian over the last decade or so, whether in terms of musical or academic performance. What has been achieved through imaginative public/private partnership deserves to be known across Scotland and beyond, as Preston Lodge proves itself to be a school well worthy of the accolade 'comprehensive' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Through the building up of discipline, ability, community and huge good fun the young people of Preston Lodge's bands have proved themselves willing learners to their teachers, giving so much to their fine school while enhancing so very clearly their own life prospects. Research found teenagers at Preston Lodge High who learned a traditional Scottish instrument outperformed their classmates in exams (Pictures: Jeff) If the SNP government is remotely serious about closing Scotland's dismal attainment gap in the short to medium term, it should pack its education boffins onto the Waverley to Prestonpans train and take a ride. This would prove to be a short journey of considerable discovery. Rev Dr Robin Hill, Longniddry, East Lothian Learn lesson On 1 August, five days before the 80th anniversary of America dropping the first nuclear bomb on Hiroshima (marked yesterday), in response to an ill-advised tweet by Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chair of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, President Trump ordered two ballistic nuclear submarines closer to Russia. A few days earlier the commander of the US Army in Europe, General Christopher Donoghue, boasted that he could 'take down' the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad in a shock and awe operation. Then Lindsey Graham, the Republican senator for South Carolina urged Trump to 'kick Putin's ass'. Not to be outdone Zelensky said 'if we don't stand firm Putin will advance further than Ukraine'. The hotline between Moscow and Washington is no longer in use, the Doomsday Clock is 89 seconds to midnight, and the Hiroshima bomb which killed hundreds of thousands is a pin-prick compared with the monstrous nuclear arsenals of Russia and America. We are in danger of sleepwalking into Armageddon. William Loneskie, Lauder, Scottish Borders Holocaust denial Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The egregious situation unfolding in Gaza is endangering global knowledge and understanding of the Holocaust. As a long-time, proactive supporter of the rights of Palestinians to self-determination and as grandmother to two Jewish boys, I fear that Holocaust denial is likely to gather hideous momentum due to the actions of the Israeli government. The asymmetric barrage of death inflicted on Gaza – alongside our present climate of 'fake news' and binary stances invoked by social media – is on course to re-shape our understanding of history in all its diabolic manifestations. Susie Macleod, Ceres, Fife Flawed tax Replacements for the much-derided council tax seem to have been touted forever. A spokesman from the Jimmy Reid Foundation, put it well: 'We've had consultations, commissions and countless commitments, but little has changed.' (Scotsman, 6 August) Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And meanwhile, cash-strapped councils continue to struggle to provide much needed services, not least libraries and education. Taxation based on outdated property bands is clumsy and unfair. The trouble is that no system seems foolproof. My own view is that a tax system based on land valuation is the least flawed option. Land is something we all share, however infinitesimally and releases our taxes from a base in either property or income. We can only hope that after decades of consultations, commissions and countless commitments, everything will have changed, for the better. Ian Petrie, Edinburgh Forbes' exit The valedictory praise heaped on Kate Forbes could not have been greater had politicians and journalists been writing obituaries. Certainly, Ms Forbes is a good communicator and made encouraging noises about Scotland needing to nurture private business, which generates the wealth that the financially incontinent SNP regime spends at will. However, two queries need to be addressed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad First, what did Ms Forbes actually achieve in government, beyond making soothing comments about intent? There is nothing visible to the naked eye. Second, her words that are sensible in comparison with pretty much anything any other SNP politician says were vitiated by her clear attachment to the falsehoods that underpin what passes for SNP policy. As an example, when, a couple of years ago, Ian Blackford revived the SNP lie that HM Treasury would continue to fund pensions in an independent Scotland, Ms Forbes said that she would not presume to disagree with him. Further, she may or may not have agreed with the SNP leadership's espousal of scientifically illiterate 'gender' theory, but we shall probably never know. She managed to absent herself from public discussion of that. Perhaps that is evidence of her political astuteness, but ordinary voters can scarcely find it a credible stance for an allegedly principled politician. Jill Stephenson, Edinburgh New deputy With Kate Forbes out of the picture, John Swinney will need to have someone else for the position of deputy leader ahead of the upcoming Holyrood election. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This person needs to have a solid track record of success. Enter Jenny Gilruth, the Education Secretary? She has decreased the attainment gap between rich and poor pupils, Nicola Sturgeon's dream. In true SNP style, this was only by a rather meagre 0.1 per cent but in SNP circles this qualifies as a huge success. Don't forget all talk of Kate Forbes being leadership material was originally only based upon her short-notice speech when she replaced Derek McKay after his enforced resignation. This sums the SNP up in one word: lightweight. Gerald Edwards, Glasgow Darien II Council chiefs in Edinburgh and Glasgow have no chance of meeting net zero targets by 2030 (Scotsman, 6 August), just as the SNP at Holyrood will fail to meet the 2045 goals. It appears not a single MSP is aware that the cost to decarbonise Scottish homes increased from the Green Party estimate of £31 billion to £130bn once Humza Yousaf dispensed with the services of Patrick Harvie as a minister. That debt is about a cost of over £50,000 for every Scottish household! Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In addition, the total cost of meeting Scottish net zero goals will be around £1 trillion, which indicates Holyrood plans to inflict a Darien Scheme Mk2 on every Scottish taxpayer. Ian Moir, Castle Douglas, Dumfries & Galloway Bin day blunder On Sunday night, the UK was under an amber alert due to Storm Floris, with authorities urging the public to avoid unnecessary travel as train services were expected to be disrupted. Yet, come Monday morning – bin collection day – households were faced with a dilemma. With strong winds forecast for the afternoon, many were unsure whether to put their bins out or risk them becoming airborne hazard. Paper waste, collected only once a month, meant most households didn't want to miss the opportunity. Unfortunately, as predicted, the stormy winds arrived and paper bins began tipping over, sending cardboard and paper flying across streets and gardens. While such incidents aren't frequent, they're not unheard of either – especially in a country with decades-old waste collection practices and unpredictable weather. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad What's truly surprising is the lack of any clear guidance or contingency plans from the responsible authorities. In an age where weather alerts are timely and accurate, surely it's time for our waste collection services to adapt and communicate better with the public during adverse conditions. Imran M Khan, Cambuslang, South Lanarkshire Sign here In the 2024 general election, I stood as an independent candidate in the new constituency of Dunfermline and Dollar. I secured 323 votes. In good faith, I campaigned for a better Britain. In the event, Labour was gifted a parliamentary majority of 165, a totally demoralised and fragmented opposition, a lame and tame Speaker and considerable public goodwill. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Despite such favourable political circumstances, Labour has squandered a unique opportunity. They promised so much, but have delivered little. Britain is considerably worse off at every level. Labour now stands accused of a massive electoral fraud. They must be brought to book. I owe it to 323 voters in Fife therefor to fully support the Parliamentary Petition to demand a general election now. Inevitably Starmer will remind his MP's that there are good reasons for them to protect him. He will lean on the gullible Speaker and he will brush off any petition of modest numbers. However if the petition reaches one million signatures, even Starmer, with little or no integrity, will have to acknowledge the inevitable. I urge every Scot to sign the petition, without hesitation. Graham Hadley, Dunfermline, Fife Write to The Scotsman