Benjamin Netanyahu is war hero and so am I
Despite the Israeli prime minister's detractors wanting him jailed as a war criminal following a November 2024 arrest warrant for alleged war crimes in the Gaza conflict issued by the International Criminal Court, Mr Trump insisted: 'He's a war hero.'
Mr Trump, who also claims to have ended seven wars, then extended the accolade to himself, saying: 'He's a war hero, cause we worked together. He's a war hero. I guess I am too.'
He continued: 'Nobody cares. I am too. I sent those planes,' a reference to his order for June airstrikes against three critical enrichment facilities in Iran.
Throughout the interview, Mr Trump complained he had not received sufficient credit for ordering those airstrikes or other recent actions he has taken aimed at easing global conflict.
For his part, Mr Netanyahu has previously called Mr Trump 'the greatest friend Israel has ever had', and in July presented him with a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize.
Mr Trump's most infamous comments about war heroes in the past included denying that the late senator John McCain was a war hero because he had been captured and held as a prisoner of war.
Mr Trump avoided serving in Vietnam with four college deferrals.
In 2018, Mr Trump reportedly snubbed a commemoration for the 100th anniversary of WWI at the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery in Belleau, fearing his hair would become dishevelled in the rain, The Atlantic reported in 2020.
'Why should I go to that cemetery? It's filled with losers,' Mr Trump reportedly told staffers. The then-president also called the more than 1,800 Marines buried there 'suckers' elsewhere during his 2018 trip in France, per The Atlantic.
John Kelly, a former Marine Corps general and the White House chief of staff at the time, attended in Mr Trump's place.
Mr Kelly, whose son was killed in action serving in Afghanistan in 2010, later told CNN that Mr Trump had indeed made the derogatory remarks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The 42
5 hours ago
- The 42
Open letter signed by players calls on GAA to end sponsorship deal with Allianz
AN OPEN LETTER was presented to the GAA yesterday at a protest outside Croke Park, calling on the association to end its sponsorship arrangements with insurance company Allianz. It's reported that over 800 current and former GAA players have signed the letter due to links between Allianz and Israel. Advertisement Letter signed by over 800 GAA former and current players was handed into GAA HQ this afternoon - as part of 'Drop Allianz' Campaign. Allianz's business relationships with Israel are enabling the genocidal and apartheid Israeli regimes across Palestine. — Irish Sport for Palestine (@Sport4Palestine) August 20, 2025 A report published on the website of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights at the UN listed Allianz among companies and corporations that was buying Israeli treasury bonds, which, the report argues, play a 'critical role in funding the ongoing assault on Gaza'. The report was written by UN special rapporteur (independent human rights expert) on Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese. The 42 contacted the GAA for comment but did not receive a response at time of publication. Allianz, in a statement to The 42, said: 'Our long-standing partnership with the GAA is about supporting Irish sport and communities. 'Allianz Ireland is part of a global group, and while the wider group operates internationally across insurance and investment, as a matter of principle we do not comment on individual customers or business matters. 'What we can say is that all Allianz business decisions are guided by strict legal standards and world-leading ESG principles.'
Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Israel's plan for massive new West Bank settlement would make a Palestinian state impossible
The Israeli government has approved a plan for construction of a massive new settlement bloc in the controversial E1 area in the occupied West Bank. In reviving a project first proposed in 1994, which will comprise about 3,500 new dwellings in a line across the West Bank, finance minister Bezalel Smotrich laid bare the intentions of his government. He declared that 'approval of construction plans in E1 buries the idea of a Palestinian state, and continues the many steps we are taking on the ground as part of the de facto sovereignty plan'. E1 ('East 1') refers to 12 sq km of unsettled land east of Jerusalem. It sits inside the boundaries of the third most populous Israeli settlement in the West Bank, Ma'ale Adumim. In 1975, Israel expropriated 30 sq km of land on which seven Palestinian villages had once stood. Here they built Ma'ale Adumim, one of three Israeli settlement blocs that form an 'outer ring' around the Israeli-defined municipal boundaries of Jerusalem. Israeli authorities refer to these blocs as 'facts on the ground'. They were initiated in the West Bank by the Israeli government after the 1967 War to ensure that Israeli population centres were protected from potential attacks. Today, almost 40,000 Israelis live in Ma'ale Adumim – largely secular Israelis and diaspora Jews who have moved to Israel. Far from the makeshift Israeli outposts that are scattered across the rural West Bank, Ma'ale Adumim was designated a city by Israel in 2015. It is considered by the majority of Israeli Jews to be a permanently protected settlement bloc, which will be retained through land swaps in any final agreement with Palestinians. The E1 development plan would involve a significant expansion of the existing settlement. All settlement building in East Jerusalem and the West Bank is deemed illegal under international law, but the E1 plans are particularly controversial. At the heart of the controversy is the viability of a Palestinian state. Israeli construction in E1 would cut the West Bank into two separate parts, rendering it impossible to establish a contiguous Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. In addition, according to an objection lodged by the Israeli pressure group Peace Now, Israeli construction in E1 would negatively affect the economic development of a future Palestinian state. Its objection argues the E1 area is essential for expansion of an urban metropolis necessary for economic growth, and is the only land in East Jerusalem suitable for further development in the Palestinian part of the city. It states that E1 should therefore be left for Palestinian rather than Israeli development. Political threat The plan to develop E1 was first proposed in 1994 by Israel's then-prime minister, Yitzhak Rabin, to make sure Ma'ale Adumim was part of a 'united Jerusalem'. This was subsequently reaffirmed by Shimon Peres during his prime ministership in 1996, as part of proposed territorial swaps in the framework of a permanent peace agreement. In 2005, those plans were frozen after the US administration under George W Bush told Israel that settlement in E1 would 'contravene American policy'. The plan was reignited by Israel's current prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, in 2012, in retaliation for the United Nations' extension of non-member status to Palestine. But it was then put on hold for eight years due to international pressure. In 2020, a week ahead of the third national elections held in Israel in a single year, Netanyahu pledged to revive the E1 project, with the hope of securing votes and to court the ultra-nationalist parties into a potential coalition. In 2022, Netanyahu renewed the E1 construction plans, weeks before then-US president Joe Biden was due to visit Israel. Opposition and support Each time the plans have been proposed, the decision to advance construction has been met with both internal and international condemnation. On June 9 2023, the planning hearing was 'indefinitely' postponed following a call between Netanyahu and Biden's secretary of state, Antony Blinken. In response to the most recent announcement to reinstate the plans, the European Union put out a statement expressing concern. It urged Israel 'to desist from taking this decision forward, noting its far-reaching implications and the need to consider action to protect the viability of the two-state solution'. However, Donald Trump now appears to be breaking with the position of previous US administrations. It was recently reported in the Jerusalem Post that the Trump administration supports the reactivation of the development plans. A spokesperson for the US state department said 'a stable West Bank keeps Israel secure and is in line with this administration's goal to achieve peace in the region'. Israel's latest attempt to initiate construction in E1 shows that, while the plans have consistently been delayed, they have never been abandoned. The question is why did Smotrich, with the apparent approval of Netanyahu, make this announcement now? The answer is most likely that, with the international focus firmly on the continued assault on Gaza, the Israeli government believes it has the breathing space to press ahead with its commitment to building settlements across the West Bank. Alongside the proposed Israeli takeover of Gaza City, the promise by Smotrich that 2025 would be Israel's 'Year of Sovereignty' — and with it the end of a future Palestinian state — appears to be coming ever closer. Leonie Fleischmann is Senior Lecturer in International Politics at City St George's, University of London The Conversation
The Journal
5 hours ago
- The Journal
US court overturns $464m civil fraud penalty against Trump, calling the sum 'excessive'
A US COURT has thrown out a $464 million civil penalty against President Donald Trump imposed by a judge who found he fraudulently inflated his personal worth, calling the sum 'excessive' but upholding the judgment against him. Trump's son, Don Jr, has labelled it a 'massive win'. Judge Arthur Engoron ruled against Trump in February 2024 at the height of his campaign to retake the White House, which coincided with several active criminal prosecutions. Engoron went on to order the mogul-turned-politician to pay $464 million, including interest, while his sons Eric and Don Jr. were told to hand over more than $4 million each. The judge found that Trump and his company had unlawfully inflated his wealth and manipulated the value of properties to obtain favourable bank loans or insurance terms. Alongside the financial hit to Trump, the judge also banned him from running businesses for three years, which the president repeatedly referred to as a 'corporate death penalty.' On Thursday, the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court upheld the verdict, but ruled that the size of the fine was 'excessive' and that it 'violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.' Advertisement 'Massive win!' State Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the initial case, could now appeal to the state's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals. Following the initial verdict, Trump subsequently sought to challenge the civil ruling as well as the scale and terms of the penalty, which has continued to accrue interest while he appeals. He repeatedly condemned the case and the penalty as politically motivated. His son Don Jr. termed the appellate court ruling a 'massive win!!!' 'New York Appeals Court has just THROWN OUT President Trump's $500+ Million civil fraud penalty! It was always a witch hunt, election interference, and a total miscarriage of justice… and even a left leaning NY appeals court agrees! NO MORE LAWFARE!' he wrote on X. During hearings, conducted without a jury under state law, Trump accused then-president Joe Biden of driving the case, calling it 'weaponization against a political opponent who's up a lot in the polls.' As the case was civil, not criminal, there was no threat of imprisonment. - © AFP 2025
