Opinion: Will we stand idly by as a son is torn from his Utah family and deported to one of the world's most inhumane prisons?
That mass expulsion campaign is striking fear in the hearts of millions of immigrants — not just those who come illegally, but also families like the U.D.M.C family, who followed all the rules to enter the U.S. legally.
The U.D.M.C family — a father, mother, two sons and a daughter-in-law — are Latter-day Saints from Venezuela, a failing country where living conditions are dire, marked by political instability and economic collapse; where 70% of the population lacks adequate access to food, healthcare, clean water, electricity and educational opportunity.
Venezuela is also one of the most violent and corrupt countries in the world. When U.D.M.C and his family took to the streets to protest corruption and election fraud in the Maduro government, police detained them and confiscated their ID cards. Soon they began receiving death threats. A lawyer friend advised them to leave the country or face arrest and imprisonment. In 2019, they fled Venezuela hoping to emigrate to the U.S.
The family's path was long and difficult. After living for a few years in neighboring Colombia, they trekked mostly on foot through Guatemala and Honduras to Mexico, reaching Mexico City last year. There, they used U.S. Customs and Border Protection's CBP One mobile app to apply for humanitarian parole and permission to enter the U.S. legally, which was approved.
After crossing the Mexican border legally on August 22, 2024, the family traveled to Utah and settled in Holladay, where they were embraced by their neighborhood and local Latter-day Saint congregation. They located housing, obtained work permits, found employment and applied for asylum. They are now self-supporting and law-abiding taxpayers. The family was granted an asylum hearing date in 2028, entitling them to reside in the U.S. legally until their asylum applications are ruled on.
The makings of a true American success story? It wasn't to be. Someone was left behind. As the family entered the U.S. last August, their 19-year-old son Uriel David, a young man without any criminal history who speaks no English and suffers health problems, was torn from his family, arrested and detained. He has since been swallowed up in a harrowing saga of human tragedy that is stealing national headlines and rapidly becoming a stain on our national character.
Originally detained in San Diego, Uriel David's path has been traced by his family to ICE's El Valle Detention Center in Texas. There, according to the findings of a federal judge in Washington, D.C., in the early morning hours of March 15, 2025, 140 Venezuelans held by the Department of Homeland Security 'were awakened from their cells, taken to a separate room, shackled and informed they were being transferred. To where? That they were not told.'
They were loaded onto planes. 'As the planes waited on the tarmac,' the court found, 'many passengers aboard reportedly began to panic and beg officials for more information, but none was provided.' The planes eventually landed in El Salvador, where the detainees were transferred into CECOT, a brutal Salvadoran mega-prison known for torture, beatings and death.
Based on video from a news report, Uriel David's family identified him among the detainees transferred to CECOT. New cases are being filed every week in federal courts across the U.S. alleging similar deportations of immigrants spirited away to CECOT or other foreign prisons without notice, hearings or any other semblance of the Fifth Amendment due process rights to which every person in the U.S. is entitled, citizen or noncitizen.
In every case so far, courts have found that the Trump administration stripped these detainees of their rights by not allowing them a meaningful opportunity to challenge their removal before being flown to El Salvador. Judges are ordering the government to vindicate the detainees' rights, even if it means returning them to the United States.
In some cases, Trump officials blame administrative error for their actions. In other cases, they stonewall, daring the courts to punish them for contempt of court. In one case, a judge ordered a flight of detainees to turn around midair, an order which was ignored. In three other pending cases, federal judges determined that Trump officials expelled people from the country in violation of standing court orders. In one of these cases, federal appeals court judge Roger Gregory wrote, 'We are confronted again with the efforts of the executive branch to set aside the rule of law in pursuit of its goals.'
Illegal deportations can never in good conscience be brushed off as mere administrative errors or excusable violations of law. They are matters of life and death.
CECOT, where Uriel David is believed to be held, is the largest prison in Latin America. It houses up to 40,000 of the most violent criminals — rival gang members whose internecine wars for decades terrorized all of El Salvador, plunging it into the grip of economic and social chaos and triggering mass emigration.
Prisoners in CECOT are held for life in an 'exception' to the Salvadoran constitution and without any semblance of real due process. Housed 23.5 hours per day in harsh conditions, they are crowded 80 to 100 per cell. Inmates sleep on rows of metal bunks stacked three high without mattresses, pillows or blankets. CECOT has no rehabilitation, recreation or education programs. Visits by lawyers and family members are strictly banned. No telephone calls are allowed. No cell phone service exists within two kilometers of the prison.
The Salvadoran government admits that some inmates are held in CECOT without cause, claiming as an excuse that it is sometimes difficult to determine which inmates are guilty of crimes and which are innocent. In El Salvador, incarceration of innocents is considered the price of law and order. That policy suits the Trump White House fine — it pays El Salvador $6 million a year for the privilege of deporting our immigrants to CECOT.
In Uriel David's case, his family has been unable to learn the reason for his detention and deportation. It is possible that a border guard misinterpreted his tattoos as gang-related? No. His tattoos are innocuous: the word 'familia,' his birthdate, his mother's signature, a crown of thorns, two wings and the lucky number '777.' None of these are gang-related. Uriel David has a constitutional right to prove this to an immigration judge before being expelled from the country.
Shouldn't that matter? Apparently not to Trump officials. A federal judge recently found that 'significant evidence has come to light indicating that many of those currently entombed in CECOT have no connection to [a] gang and thus languish in a foreign prison on flimsy, even frivolous, accusations.'
One thing is certain: no one, including Uriel David, would knowingly agree to be transferred to CECOT.
Yet, CECOT is Uriel's life now and for its duration, absent a public outcry loud enough to secure his release. To begin with, his family, their neighbors, our Salt Lake City community and all Americans are entitled to know exactly what happened to him and why. That is not a demand — it is a necessity in a society that considers itself civilized and loyal to a constitution like ours, which protects citizens and noncitizens alike from being held in custody without due process. A nation that tramples individual rights in pursuit of political gain will not last long as a democratic republic.
I ask all Utahns: Will we stand idly by while Uriel David is torn from his Utah family and deported to one of the world's most inhumane prisons? A few days ago, the Trump White House brought Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran immigrant unlawfully deported to CECOT, back to the U.S. after falsely claiming for months that this was not possible. Obviously, it is possible.
The rallying cry should now be: 'YOU BROUGHT BACK KILMAR ABREGO GARCIA — NOW BRING BACK URIEL DAVID!'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
ICE says illegal migrant threatened to harm himself with butcher knife when stopped by officers in DC
Immigration and Customs Enforcement said on Wednesday that an illegal migrant was detained in Washington, D.C., after he was stopped by agents and subsequently motioned that he would harm himself with a butcher knife. Jimmy Anderson Ayala Mayuri, of Peru, was stopped by federal officers on Wednesday as he was driving his food truck in the nation's capital, according to ICE. "Capital city cleanup continues!" ICE wrote on X. "Illegal Peruvian alien Jimmy Anderson Ayala Mayuri presented a large butcher knife to federal officers and motioned that he'd harm himself with it when we stopped his food truck on National Park Service property in D.C. today," the post continued. ICE said the man briefly barricaded himself in the truck before he was apprehended. He will be detained until a deportation decision is made, according to the agency. This comes after President Donald Trump's recent move to increase the presence of federal law enforcement in Washington in an effort to cut down on crime in the district, although the mayor has said crime had already been on the decline in the city. The federal takeover of D.C. would also include the deployment of the National Guard and the U.S. Justice Department taking control of the city's police department. The arrest on Wednesday also comes amid the Trump administration's mass deportation policies targeting migrants in cities across the country.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - He lost his wife to Trump's immigration crackdown — here's why he still backs Trump
A month after President Trump took office, Brad Bartell's wife, Camila Muñoz, was arrested by ICE. A Peruvian immigrant, she had overstayed a work-study visa years earlier. But after marrying Bartell, she applied for legal status, and her case was under review when they flew to Puerto Rico for their honeymoon. They thought it was safe to travel within U.S. territory while her application was pending. They were wrong. You may have read their story. As they returned, Muñoz was detained under the newly inaugurated Trump's new executive order, which empowered federal agents to arrest and remove anyone lacking documentation, regardless of circumstances. She spent 49 days in a Louisiana detention center while Bartell, back in Wisconsin, scrambled to work with lawyers and prove her ties to the community. 'It was tough,' he told me. 'I was missing a piece … [There was] a lot of extra stress.' And yet, Bartell doesn't regret his vote for Trump and still supports the president. That may seem baffling. Why keep supporting a politician whose policies disrupted your own marriage? But that kind of critique assumes there's only one 'right' reason to vote for someone — and it's usually not the one people like Bartell have in mind. For years, the press has seized on such contradictions in Trump supporters' lives. These voters are often portrayed as punchlines: too loyal, too misled, or too blind to see how their preferred policies come back to bite them. Sometimes, the claim is that their support stems from spite. One recent Hill opinion column argued that 'Trump voters are okay with suffering, as long as other people hurt more.' By 'other people,' the author meant Black Americans — citing white farmers who supposedly don't mind the sting that tariffs put upon them because of the perceived harm to Black farmers. There was no polling, no quotes, no evidence — just conjecture and sweeping generalizations to assume the worst motives. In my conversations with Trump-supporting white farmers, they have acknowledged the pain caused by tariffs but said they understood Trump's reasoning: to hold countries accountable for unfair trade practices. Many also appreciated the subsidies they received to offset the impact. Bartell has heard similar assumptions about Trump supporters. 'If you support Trump, it makes you racist — or a lot of other nasty things,' he said. 'But you can't really understand somebody you don't know personally.' Bartell doesn't see himself as voting against his own interests. 'Of course you aren't going to agree all of the time with the way things are done,' he said. 'But Trump is taking action, which is better than nothing.' He believes the immigration system was broken long before Trump. His wife's detention raised questions for him — but not so much about the man in the White House. The idea that voters should cast their ballots based solely on immediate personal gain is not only simplistic but it is also inconsistently applied. When a billionaire supports a Democrat who wants to raise taxes, he is praised as principled and civic-minded. When a working-class Trump voter backs a policy that might hurt him personally, he is mocked. Why is one seen as virtuous and the other as foolish? And this goes far beyond immigration. Trump's proposed 'One Big Beautiful Bill' includes cuts to Medicaid, threatening coverage for many Americans—including some of his own voters. In rural areas, where hospitals depend on Medicaid, Trump supporters could lose access to care and safety-net programs. These cases are often used as proof that voters don't know what's good for them. But maybe they reflect something else entirely. 'Self-interest' isn't objective or universal. Some voters care more about law and order, cultural preservation, or a sense of national purpose than they do about how government can directly improve their personal situation. Is that really less rational than voting to raise your own taxes for the greater good? That's how Bartell sees it. For him, Trump's immigration crackdown brought short-term pain for himself and his wife — but it didn't invalidate the broader reasons he supports the former president or his immigration policies. Bartell told me that even during the hardest moments, no friends or family challenged his political views. 'They may not have agreed entirely,' he said, 'but there was no challenge in mature conversations.' And he's not alone. Other Trump supporters have stood by him despite being caught in the consequences of his policies. One headline read, 'Detained in immigration raids, MAGA mom still has faith in Trump's mass deportation plan.' Another: 'Husband refuses to take down Trump flags after wife detained by ICE.' These stories rarely get beyond a surface-level analysis, because the details complicate the caricature. Mocking these voters sends a message that only some values matter, and only certain types of sacrifice are valid. Muñoz is home now, and life has returned to something closer to normal. But the experience hasn't shaken Bartell's support for Trump. 'Humans are complex,' he said. 'Everyone's reasons and situations [for supporting a candidate or policy] will be different.' He's right. And if we took that complexity seriously, we might begin to understand each other a little better. Daniel Allott is The Hill's former opinion editor and the author of 'On the Road in Trump's America: A Journey into the Heart of a Divided Country.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
LA County judge denounces ICE arrest outside downtown courthouse
The presiding judge of the LA County Superior Court denounced Immigration and Customs Enforcement after agents arrested a man after his hearing in downtown. "I am deeply disturbed by such actions," Presiding Judge Sergio C. Tapia II said in a statement. "These intimidating and unnecessary displays undermine public trust in the justice system, deter people from seeking justice, and send a dangerous message to immigrant communities that they are not safe to fully and freely participate in the legal process." A video of the arrest showed the name, Stephen Reyes, screaming for help as immigration agents picked him up by his arms and legs before placing him in an unmarked car. Reyes had just attended a preliminary hearing on drug charges after police arrested him last month. The Alternate Public Defender's Office, which represents Reyes, called the arrest a violent abduction that threatened the "integrity of the court system." "It shocks the conscience to see any human violently abducted by a gang of mostly masked unidentified individuals," APD's spokesperson wrote in a statement. "Such aggressive ICE abductions threaten the integrity of the court system and discourage participation." Defense attorneys, such as Lou Shapiro, stated that similar immigration operations encourage people to miss their court dates. "They're afraid just to come to court to show progress on community service, because they realize that could result in a trip to Mexico instead," said Shapiro. "It's sad because people feel that there's no hope. That nothing good can come of this for them, even if they try to do the right thing." The LA County District Attorney's Office said the operations also interfere with their ability to prosecute cases. "Our ultimate goal is to seek justice for victims and hold criminals accountable," the District Attorney's Office wrote in a statement. "Detaining a defendant before the judicial process has concluded interferes with our ability to prosecute cases and is not to the advantage of the pursuit of justice." ICE did not immediately respond to KCAL News for comment.